This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on
December 22, 2012 1:28 PM.
The previous post in this blog was
Good in the 'hood.
The next post in this blog is
Info/Clackistani wins comment contest.
Many more can be found on the
main index page or by looking through
the archives.
Comments (3)
Per the article: However, he [Vancouver Mayor Tim Leavitt] said non-disclosure agreements prevented him from sharing the company's name or any other specifics about the proposal. ..... Other city and economic development officials said they could not talk about any part of discussions with the unnamed company, citing a non-disclosure agreement.
Doesn't this guy realize that getting into bed with Nike usually tends to shorten one's political carrer?
Posted by John Rettig | December 22, 2012 2:47 PM
Frankly I'm surprised Nike doesn't bolt across the river to unincorporated Clark County. Lots of room to expand and grow, much lower taxes...and it could probably sell off the (not in) Beaverton campus for a huge sum of money, likely to a consortium of government agencies, and build an even better campus north of the river.
Then when Adidas decides to be closer to its customers on the east coast...leaving another big office building in Portland vacant...
Posted by Erik H. | December 24, 2012 11:54 AM
I always thought Nike had Boise on the top of the list.
Posted by David E Gilmore | December 26, 2012 6:57 AM