SoloPower job hype takes 10% cut
It used to be 500 jobs, any day now. Now it's 450 jobs within three years. But only 90 to start. Sure, guys. We believe you. You would never pad the numbers to fleece the taxpayers. That's not how corporations operate.
Comments (16)
I never expect corporations to do anything other than lie, cheat, steal and chase the bottom line. That's their function. Profit seeking above all else.
I expect my government to make good decisions based on the needs of the people. When the government behaves as a corporation, or in cahoots, we got the problems you see now.
Incidentally that's why I don't buy the 'we need a business man in the whitehouse' adverts.
Posted by Jo | September 28, 2012 5:12 AM
But it really wouldn't matter if this company employed 500, or 5... if only government wasn't so eager to share tax money with them, would it?
Posted by ltjd | September 28, 2012 6:20 AM
I'm less concerned with the actions of these companies than I am with the government employees that condone it.
Posted by David E Gilmore | September 28, 2012 6:37 AM
David - Nailed it.
Posted by Jo | September 28, 2012 6:39 AM
Just curious i went to Sam Adams fb page to see if he was gloating, sure enough he was:
Solopower Ribbon Cutting! 60-450 new $51k paying jobs for North/NE #Pdx making cutting-edge thin-film photovoltaics http://www.solopower.com/
That sure is a broad range of jobs, maybe 60, maybe 450!
Posted by Toad | September 28, 2012 7:18 AM
Jo, you must be so happy with a non-businessman who sends our money to Green projects. Green = greenbacks. Only.
Posted by Sam L. | September 28, 2012 8:09 AM
"I never expect corporations to do anything other than lie, cheat, steal"
Apparently you're not familiar with local govt.
BTW - There are a couple of honest people that work for disgusting corporations. They even have the decency to spend their paychecks on their families and paying taxes.
Posted by Steve | September 28, 2012 8:14 AM
It's like the millions of climate refugees we're supposed to be seeing any day now... we urgently need to be building housing for them and we need to funnel tax dollars to certain builders to do it.
Posted by Mr. Grumpy | September 28, 2012 8:30 AM
Sam L - Never mistake my distaste for the Romney candidacy as support for Obama. I find one only slightly more palatable than the other. I'll vote for neither.
Steve - Oh the martyrdom. My comments were directed toward the failure of government to regulate corporate excess. Corporations function exactly as intended. So don't feel so guilty about selling out.
Posted by Jo | September 28, 2012 8:37 AM
Lets see, the City funds are only a "backup" to the state loan, but the City is secured by the plant's equipment. Thats certainly clear.
Just to check up on Scam Adams latest, I think I'll do a UCC search at the Secretary of State's office to see if the City really is protected with a financing statement.
Of course, if the company goes bust, what that equipment is worth is problematical.
Posted by Nonny Mouse | September 28, 2012 8:49 AM
Scammy got some 'splaining to do.
I did a UCC search at the Secretary of State's online website, using "SoloPower" as the search term.
According to the web site, there are no financing statements filed which mention "SoloPower". None,. Zero. Da nada.
Whatever the City's arrangement with SoloPower and the state, and whatever "security" or lien the City thinks it may have in / on SoloPower's equipment, the Secretary of State's Office apparently has no record of it.
See for yourself:
http://www.sos.state.or.us/search-results.html?q=SoloPower
Maybe the City has some other form of "security" instrument with respect to SoloPower's equipment for its "backup" "guarantee" of the loan, but there doesn't appear to be any record of the usual, normal, customary type of security interest filing , a UCC 1, with the statewide office which records such things.
Not having a UCC 1 filing setting out the security interest, the City might have some serious difficulty recovering on the equipment if this outfit goes belly up.
Scammy has some 'splaining to do.
And the local media outlets n PDX, print and broadcast, need to learn to do their homework in following the dollars and confirming the tall tales too often told by local politicians when touting their economic development "successes".
Posted by Nonny Mouse | September 28, 2012 9:09 AM
"Corporations function exactly as intended."
What would you suggest as an alternative? State-controlled enterprises like Randy Leonard and Goldschmidt have setup? Maybe more bank bailouts that put $0 in the average guys pocket? Govt has a high concentration of bought/paid for workers.
I'm not against better regulations and more enforcement of laws against corporate scofflaws, but when I see Obama inviting Immelt of GE and Warren Buffet (his company NetJets is trying to get out of about $600M of taxes), I have to ask - Qui custodet ipsos custodes?
Posted by Steve | September 28, 2012 10:05 AM
Bog bloggers quoting Juvenal.
Gotta' love it.
Posted by Nonny Mouse | September 28, 2012 10:40 AM
"Bog bloggers quoting Juvenal."
Dirty job, but someone's gotta do it.
Posted by Steve | September 28, 2012 10:47 AM
Lately, the fourth estate seems to have had some skin in the game.
Posted by David E Gilmore | September 28, 2012 3:02 PM
Lotsa FOXtalk here, Lars-like, saying: myopic foresight and antisocial peeve.
And there should be no question about business survival, (financial backing), for various electric-power infrastructures replacing crude oil (going ... going ...), investing in solar panels and wind generators. However, political survival may be a different question: Obama Blocks Chinese Purchase of US Wind Farms, By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS, September 28, 2012 China has the money (backing) but is not politically allowed to fund 'green' electric power generation. So that leaves, umm, uh, 'Big Oil' big-money men from Texas who are really sincere about establishing the non-petroleum energy basis, for the transition of the USA Economy to phase out of dependence on oil energy, I suppose.Fox Puts Its Solyndra Blinders On Again, SHAUNA THEEL, Media Matters .org, September 28, 2012
Posted by Tenskwatawa | September 28, 2012 9:21 PM