Bad sneakers
Adidas has gotten itself into hot water with these. The controversy is so obvious that we wonder whether they did it on purpose.
Adidas has gotten itself into hot water with these. The controversy is so obvious that we wonder whether they did it on purpose.
Comments (22)
The idea sounded good to the designers after a couple of Pina Coladas.
Posted by Cary | June 18, 2012 5:18 PM
So wait a minute. If I make a reference to "the old ball and chain," then I'm a racist?
Posted by PDXLifer | June 18, 2012 5:53 PM
I’ll bet these actually were aimed to be marketed to the youth African American community. Actually is cool in that community to have an electronic monitoring ankle bracelet; as if you have one you are bad.
Posted by John Benton | June 18, 2012 6:02 PM
Appropriately, tomorrow is Juneteenth (June 19th).
Juneteenth, celebrated on June 19, is the name given to emancipation day by African-Americans in Texas. On that day in 1865 Union Major-General Gordon Granger read General Orders, No.3 to the people of Galveston. It stated
"The people of Texas are informed that, in accordance with a proclamation from the Executive of the United States, all slaves are free. This involves an absolute equality of personal rights and rights of property between former masters and slaves, and the connection heretofore existing between them becomes that between employer and hired labor. The freedmen are advised to remain quietly at their present homes and work for wages. They are informed that they will not be allowed to collect at military posts and that they will not be supported in idleness either there or elsewhere."
Juneteenth is celebrated in 41 states, including Oregon.
Posted by John | June 18, 2012 6:11 PM
I'm sure that without national hoopla over the sneakers kids will buy them up and think they are cool.
Posted by Darrin | June 18, 2012 6:17 PM
Its only racist if you associate shackles with African Americans. Every day inmates at your local jail wear them no matter his or her race. Roman slave, Greek slaves, Egyptian slaves etc. The true racists are those that look at the shoes and their first thought is African Americans as slaves. Stupid fashion and stupid use of the race card.
Posted by John | June 18, 2012 7:14 PM
Dont know if this hurts or helps why the shoes look like this but this is from the Jeremy Scott line of high-concept art shoes for the Adidas Originals and based on my pet monster
http://observer.com/2012/06/jeremy-scott-my-pet-monster-06182012/
Posted by Toad | June 18, 2012 8:01 PM
Big flip. They're perfect: Shackled to "Fashion" & peer pressure.
Keep your eyes on the balls people. Don't fall for distractions like that.
Posted by Mojo | June 18, 2012 8:45 PM
Also available is a hoodie with a bullseye printed on the back. Wear them together for the ultimate look.
Posted by Andy | June 18, 2012 8:55 PM
Women have been wearing slave sandals for years. I don't know which ethnic group this offends (Italians?), but the design message is a bit strange. So is the sneaker.
Posted by Nolo | June 18, 2012 9:18 PM
Are they available in pink for the girls?
Posted by Andy | June 18, 2012 9:23 PM
As a wacky news expert - and this falls into that despite the social ramifications or whatever - I not only dealt with this story for the morning commute, but I can also give you at least one other example from the category.
The category? Bonehead, offensive moves in corporate fashion marketing that get a lot of attention.
Another example? Remember when Abercrombie and Fitch marketed bikinis with padded tops to 8-year-old girls? Their spokesperson compared them to the Wonder Bra and they were sold to girls 8 to 14 years old.
Sometimes I hate the wacky news.
Posted by Bill McDonald | June 18, 2012 9:47 PM
Interesting theory, Jack. But I don't buy it.
In MY opinion, Adidas is selling "Prison Chic".
Having never been to prison myself, I'm told prisoners in transit to court hearings, or outside the walls, are routinely shackled in leg irons to prevent escape.
I do know the beltless, saggy pants with showing boxers so popular in the "hood" stemmed from the ban on belts within prison...and it seems young urban blacks seem to associate with that "prison chic" look.
"Look at me...I'm fresh outta prison, dude. Don't mess with me."
And the BEST thing for Adidas would be an effort to ban these shoes. THEN they can probably double the price.
Posted by ltjd | June 18, 2012 9:49 PM
Those are not shackles. They are cho-pat straps that around your leg just under the knee to stabilize your patella.
Posted by Dan Meek | June 19, 2012 12:04 AM
Adidas must be going insane but with a large sum of money to spend.
Posted by Dan Meek | June 19, 2012 12:06 AM
Andy, you asked for it, I found it, and it wasn't that hard. There are a lot of places that sell "slave" or "gladiator" sandals to girls and women, but I thought that a place called "Little Fox Fashions" sounded particularly apt. And yes, they come in pink. With sparkles.
http://www.littlefoxfashions.com/catalog.php?page=4&category=49
Posted by Nolo | June 19, 2012 1:42 AM
I wonder if they chafe if you wear them without socks.
I wonder if the chains get caught on things.
Posted by Michelle | June 19, 2012 6:40 AM
The real slaves are the workers making the shoes.
Posted by reader | June 19, 2012 8:39 AM
Emancipation Day joke?
http://www.ketknbc.com/news/lawmakers-introduce-legislation-to-designate-juneteenth-as-a-national-day-of-observance
Posted by Jon | June 19, 2012 8:47 AM
Why not a shackle around the neck with chains hooked to the belt loops on the pants?
This design would make a fashion statement and be practical at the same time.
Posted by Andy | June 19, 2012 9:13 AM
I think the idea was to attach your belt-less pants to the straps to prevent them from hindering your fleeing skills...
Posted by Tim | June 19, 2012 11:27 AM
Whatever helps to keep sneaker on the feet and off the wires overhead is fine by me.
Posted by PDXLifer | June 19, 2012 11:37 AM