This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on
March 20, 2012 8:07 PM.
The previous post in this blog was
Fetch the slop bucket, Mama.
The next post in this blog is
Willy Week endorses Hales.
Many more can be found on the
main index page or by looking through
the archives.
Comments (15)
Useful Idiot...
Village Idiot...
Rube...
It's easy to get confused on when to use what term for whom...
Posted by Harry | March 20, 2012 8:39 PM
Krugman and Pierce are the useful idiots.
Posted by Molly | March 20, 2012 10:18 PM
Would you care to explain that remark, Molly? (I'm guessing not.)
Posted by semi-cynic | March 20, 2012 10:57 PM
I'll explain that remark:
It is swallowed 1% propaganda spoonfed from the likes of K street, Fox and Rush.
Posted by from Where I Sit | March 20, 2012 11:45 PM
Krugman won't be happy so long as the national debt is less than $30 trillion -- idiot is a good word to attach to any fool who follows his economic prescriptions.
Posted by Newleaf | March 21, 2012 12:42 AM
Wyden is not useful.
Back when he started is plunge to where he is today, he had a plan.The Grey Panthers, start up this help the senior group, form a base. It was just a matter of not to screw up too much along the way and keep "help" coming for the people that would voted for him. His base was what got him started then he moved on the groups that support him and to hold tight his Democrat buddies on the left.
Worked great, is working great, no one will ever beat him here in this state in a election. Idiot NO. Oregon got what it voted for, and will keep getting what it votes for. Just like the City & county losers that are in office today.
Posted by v perley | March 21, 2012 3:49 AM
I apologize for the brevity of my drive-by comment. It is helpful to understand where the term 'useful idiot' comes from. Here's an explanation from Wikipedia:
"In political jargon, useful idiot is a pejorative term used to describe people perceived as propagandists for a cause whose goals they do not understand, who are used cynically by the leaders of the cause.
The term was originally used to describe Soviet sympathizers in Western countries. The implication is that although the people in question naïvely thought of themselves as an ally of the Soviet Union, they were actually held in contempt and were being cynically used.
The use of the term in political discourse has since been extended to other propagandists, especially those who are seen to unwittingly support a malignant cause which they naively believe to be a force for good."
I believe the likes of Krugman and Pierce(the propagandists) better fit this description than Wyden (who more aptly can be described as a leader of the cause).
Posted by Molly | March 21, 2012 7:24 AM
v perley: Oregon got what it voted for....
And what it wanted...
And what it deserved...
More Wyden.
More of the same.
Oregon will only get more so.
Posted by Harry | March 21, 2012 9:25 AM
Harry, yep, I think that is what I said.
Being around along time, one sees what they do now as well as what they did many years ago... Wyden is a clever fellow planning his career or he was just lucky, I know not which.
Posted by v | March 21, 2012 10:10 AM
Pierce: "zombie-eyed, granny-starving, trickle-down Randian snake-oil salesman"
Thank goodness for the new bipartisanship. Who knows what Pierce might have said.
Posted by ConcordBridge | March 21, 2012 12:54 PM
idiot is a good word to attach to any fool who follows his economic prescriptions
Actually, "rich" would be what you would call anyone who acted on Krugman's economic predictions.
Posted by Allan L. | March 21, 2012 12:56 PM
zombie-eyed, granny-starving, trickle-down Randian snake-oil salesman
This is definitely offensive on Pierce's part. Rand's eyes are more or less life-like.
Posted by Allan L. | March 21, 2012 12:58 PM
Pierce or Krugman might not be useful idiots. Fellow travelers maybe?
Posted by David E Gilmore | March 21, 2012 2:00 PM
The problem is, Medicare (as we know it), Medicaid (as we know it)and Social Security (as we know it) are all actuarialy doomed.
"The rich" don't have enough money to take to make it work. (such a taking would also mean that they are no longer "as we know it.")Plus, if "the rich" were suddenly to liquify their holdings, who would buy them?
So, you need to ask yourself the same question that General Custer's aide did, "What now?"
Posted by John D | March 21, 2012 7:19 PM
No doubt he is an idiot. But how can you say he is "our" useful idiot. He doesn't even live in Oregon, much less represent us.
Posted by Dave | March 22, 2012 12:19 PM