It's all about Jamie
Here's a vomit-inducing interview by a local journalist of the worst scoundrel banker in the United States. What about Occupy Wall Street, Jamie? "I read a tremendous amount...." That says it all.
| Posted at 9:57 AM | Permalink |
|
About
This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on November 4, 2011 9:57 AM.
The previous post in this blog was Why Mike Reese? Why now?.
The next post in this blog is Two more years for Moyer's Hole.
Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.
Comments (14)
But indiscriminate blame of everybody is not the right thing for anybody.
That's right. We blame you.
Posted by reader | November 4, 2011 10:07 AM
We gotta close our accounts at this guy's shop ASAP. I opened an account at WAMU when I moved to town 17 yrs ago, and have been too lazy to make a switch. Bad on us.
Posted by jimbo | November 4, 2011 10:22 AM
So who are the stooges still flocking to bank at Chase to merit opening 33-35 new branches in Oregon, mostly in the Portland market?
Posted by SKA | November 4, 2011 10:24 AM
reader you took the words out of my mouth.
"The greatest trick the Devil ever pulled was convincing the world he didn't exist."
Posted by EB | November 4, 2011 10:24 AM
Wow, that's a stunning ego. "I think most people would agree with me if they thought about it a moment."
Posted by Kirsten A | November 4, 2011 10:35 AM
Q: if you threw Jamie Dimon out a 50-story window, what sound would he make when he splashed as he hit the ground?
A: "DOUCHE!"
Posted by Texas Triffid Ranch | November 4, 2011 10:49 AM
It's all about Cold Hard Cash.
Posted by dman | November 4, 2011 11:00 AM
How does junk debt in the hands of an FDIC covered institution magically transform into a valuable asset when sold to the Federal Reserve? Is the asset still junk?
Should the Federal Reserve have instead used helicopters to distribute 1.6+ trillion dollars in a slightly more equitable fashion?
Should the Federal Reserve's junk debt asset purchases be recognized as having zero value on their balance sheet?
Posted by pdxnag | November 4, 2011 11:33 AM
I wonder if the pre-interview restraint-of-subject rules were written down ahead of time? or was that even necessary?
Posted by JadeQueen | November 4, 2011 2:52 PM
Hey does anyone here remember where they put that guillotine after the French Party ?
Posted by billb | November 4, 2011 3:10 PM
JadeQueen, I don't think it was even busy. This is a classic case of where the interviewer has his tongue so far up the interviewee's *** that the latter now has calluses on the backs of his eyeballs.
Posted by Texas Triffid Ranch | November 4, 2011 4:09 PM
you guys are blind and close minded. He's the CEO of a corporation and a responsibilty to shareholders What's wrong with that? Will defazio have the guts to meet him 1:1? i doubt it. Never forget that it is the responsibilty of the US Congress and Senate to make the laws and they are doing a terrible job. Chase on the other hand is doing a great job managing it's way profitably even with the incompetance in Washington, DC.
I'm keeping my bank accounts at Chase. They offer excellent services. 'nuff said.
Posted by mcinor | November 4, 2011 9:16 PM
Agreed Mcinor. It is unrealistic to expect business entities to do anything but seek profit. The blame is on the politicians for not protecting the population from the excesses.
Posted by JO | November 4, 2011 9:21 PM
Chase on the other hand is doing a great job managing it's way profitably even with the incompetance in Washington, DC.
Jamie loves people like you. Keep giving him your money.
Posted by Jack Bog | November 4, 2011 9:55 PM