Big hush money paid by the PDC
Here's an utterly outrageous story. Two executive types who recently resigned from the deeply troubled Portland Development Commission were actually paid to leave. Urban development director Erin Flynn, passed over for the CEO job, was paid a cool $63,000 on her way out the door (headed for a way-overpriced bobblehead gig at Portland State), and the human resources director, Sandy Reina, who reportedly left her job to care for her parents, picked up a cool $85,000 severance.
In exchange for these ridiculous payments, the two promised to "not disparage or make derogatory comments" about the agency. Especially to prosecutors?
My God, what has gone so terribly wrong in Portland? People, it is time for some amendments to the city charter. This kind of garbage has got to stop. "Urban renewal," as currently abused in this town, has got to go.
Comments (37)
These types of severance payments occur at other governmental agencies around Portland as well. They should be illegal. They use taxpayer money to prevent taxypayers from finding out what's really going on. It's disgusting.
Posted by Ickabod | September 20, 2011 10:06 PM
Amen. Maybe the state constitution ought to be amended.
Posted by Jack Bog | September 20, 2011 10:09 PM
Why do you all act 'surprised' anymore?!
This is ridiculous.
I ask people this: 'Are you pi$$ed off about the way the government wastes your money?'
WELCOME TO THE TEA PARTY!!!
Posted by Bye bye Portland | September 20, 2011 10:47 PM
Severances like this in PDC and elsewhere in our local government, coupled with PDC sponsored Barbur Lightrail, PDC SoWhat, PDC Milwaukie Lightrail, PDC's own failed Creative Center-now their own office, the list goes on, there will certainly be a vote on urban renewal. Either citywide or statewide. Keep it coming PDC. And I hope we get some whistle-blowers.
Posted by lw | September 20, 2011 10:50 PM
Bye bye is right on. The Tea Party is just regular folks who are mad as hell and aren't going to take it any more!
Posted by Abe | September 20, 2011 10:53 PM
Jack, it would be interesting to get public disclosure on these PDC employee's contracts. I'll bet they didn't have severances packages, at least this high. Let's see the contracts. Record's request, please.
Posted by lw | September 20, 2011 10:53 PM
Hi Jack:
I'm not sure, but I think the PDC Eric Flynn you referred to was actually Erin Flynn, a lady and not a guy. Also not sure about the inside politics at PDC, but Erin was and is a very sharp cookie.
VTY,
The Old Curmudgeon
Posted by Michael Whitmore | September 20, 2011 11:21 PM
Yes, I meant Erin; that was a typo. I know her gender -- I said on her way out the door. She sure landed on her feet with a $160,000 PSU gig and a $63,000 payoff to keep her mouth shut. There are a lot of smart cookies who don't do that well on the public dime, especially immediately upon rolling into town. Five years ago she was in Boston.
And what has the PDC actually achieved in the last four years for all the money it paid Ms. Flynn? That agency ought to be scaled back, or even disbanded.
Posted by Jack Bog | September 20, 2011 11:57 PM
From the exit interview: "Urban renewal? Oh, I thought he said bourbon renewal."
Posted by Mojo | September 21, 2011 1:25 AM
WTF? Severance in the private sector is given when your employer lays you off, not when you choose to leave. And if one of the had another job lined up, then severance is pure BS. And paying people for silence???? In the private sector, as part of severance you sign paper work agreeing not to sue over your severance. During one lay-off I am aware of an employee refused to sign and so his package was boosted until he signed. I think it should be illegal to sign any other terms.
Posted by LucsAdvo | September 21, 2011 5:03 AM
So this is what you get when you just take $200M to $300M out of the property tax base. Be a real shame to waste that money on something like schools wouldn't it?
They have plenty of money - Vote NO on every/any bond ever.
Posted by Steve | September 21, 2011 6:39 AM
Too bad the state has a worthless, spineless Attorney General who appears to be totally incapable of prosecuting any public official for wrongdoing.
Time to vote the blowhard out at the next election.
Posted by Dave A. | September 21, 2011 6:50 AM
Jack, I would vote disbanding.
Posted by pdxjim | September 21, 2011 7:31 AM
I think this may be a new level of outrageous behavior by the PDC.
Liars, Crooks and Thieves! Always have been always will be, until that organ-ization is gone!
However all the so called "urban renewal" organs around the state and the country are exactly the same, as they learn to to this B/S from the same source, The International Downtown Association.
Little tiny Rainier has "lost" $700,000 it was supposed to pay to the now bankrupt USGypsum company under a very shady urban urban renewal program set up there in 2001.
Posted by portland native | September 21, 2011 7:50 AM
Disband by ballot measure... just sayin'
Posted by LucsAdvo | September 21, 2011 8:07 AM
Happens in the burb's too. Beaverton Mayor Denny Doyle made the decision last month to "lay off" the Economic Development Director Gary Brentano and transfer his responsibilities to Community Development Director Don Mazziotti. Brentano according to the Portland Trib is 60 years old and gets 6 months of pay. Sounds like a nice PERS send off to me.
And, oh by the way, the City is asking to form an urban renewal agency on the November ballot. Do you hear a street car approaching?!
Posted by Jerry | September 21, 2011 8:33 AM
Given the AGs apparent preference to only pursue cases of note if they're out of state and turn a blind eye if they're in, one has wonder if either he's decided he doesn't want to get his hands dirty or he's been 'advised' not to.
Posted by Mr. Grumpy | September 21, 2011 8:43 AM
TriMet and Metro are no different.
The PDC UR scams have infected the whole region like a parasite.
Clackamas County has been following their model and Beaverton is attempting to.
The Clackamas Town Center UR district (since 1980) has grown into the typical PDC cash cow.
It's scheduled to terminate in June 2013. It only has a $5 million debt yet a $20 million reserve and $12 million yearly income.
Clackamas Fire gets a total of 75K from the entire district to provide fire and rescue service.
Another expired district has a $9 million annual budget.
So while county services have been cut and under funded their UR agency has been rolling in millions without any scrutiny at all.
In Beavetron their UR scheme has produced the most dishonest ballot title I have ever seen.
It is telling voters their plan is free. That ALL of the money will come from the "public & private investments and projects"
See here---
http://tinyurl.com/bvtSCAM
Yet their own UR plan docs show 3 out of every 4 dollars of the funding increment will be the normal routine increases that will happen with NO UR at all.
They also assume only a 3% normal increase in value for 30 years. Meaning they are claiming nothing will get built in the entire 1000 acres over the 30 years of the plan if no UR is used.
And they assume a 4% increase with UR. Wow!
In reality there will be things built and a 4% increase without UR.
But they want to try and bail out the Round with more TODs on the old Westgate theater site the city bought with help from Metro. That and the city is paying millions for the central plant that loses money.
Angry people need to join and expand the Clackistan rebellion.
The best thing that can happen in the short term, November, is a crushing defeat of the Beaverton plan, victory for the Clackamas citizen initiative measure and crushing defeat of the politicians sham competing measure.
Then re-group and go after the racket everywhere and every way it operates and with added defeats of politicians at the 2012 ballot box.
Posted by Ben | September 21, 2011 8:50 AM
But we know, after the audit, that they do not respect the Charter and violate it at will. We do not appear to have anyone willing to represent the people and bring action against them for this. There is no way to get them out short of voting for someone like Gary Johnson, former governor of NM, who just said no and shut corruption down. Rather than raising living costs for ordinary people, Gary Johnson lowered them. We need to find candidates who can do this.
Posted by JadeQueen | September 21, 2011 9:33 AM
LucsAdvo, I have no problem with private companies having the option to pay their departing employees to keep silent about any questionable actions they may have seen during their time with a company, but this should not be happening in the public sector. Governments need to be open and transparent so that citizens can hold elected officials accountable, if necessary. Severance agreements that contain "do not disparage" clauses prevent people who might be willing to expose wrongdoing after they've left an agency from doing so. The fact that the money to make severance agreements comes from taxpayers makes this practice even more repugnant.
Posted by Ickabod | September 21, 2011 9:46 AM
So a long time ago you made your money off of crime and resource exploitation. Then you sent your kids to medical, law and business schools.
Then you placed your kids in key government and business positions. Once there, you created a series of scams to siphon off public assets, one of which is named Urban Renewal.
But like all scams, they don't last forever because eventually the frog gets boiled.
So as the rats start leaving the ship, you cut off their tongues- no need to scare the unboiled into jumping out of the scam.
Posted by Ralph Woods | September 21, 2011 9:48 AM
...My God, what has gone so terribly wrong in Portland?...
Portland may become the poster child for how a city goes down while in the process, a few benefit greatly!
We do have what in my opinion is perhaps a last opportunity and believe me the insiders will do everything they can to stay in control - that is three open seats, Mayor and two council seats, three votes needed to at least try and straighten out a myriad of problems that have Jack asking what has gone so terribly wrong?
We cannot let the insiders control this election this time. We know who the insider candidates are, don't we?
Posted by clinamen | September 21, 2011 10:14 AM
Ickabod - If they are asked by authorities and they keep their mouths shut, it's perjury. If they know something but were not involved and fail to speak up, you could construe that as accessory after the fact. Hush money really is an enticement for criminal offenses in my book.
Posted by LucsAdvo | September 21, 2011 11:03 AM
Hush hush, am afraid there has been far too much hush hush around pdx!
How much has "hush hush" cost us when added up throughout the years?
Posted by clinamen | September 21, 2011 12:13 PM
"the two promised to "not disparage or make derogatory comments" about the agency."
Even if the truth is disparaging?
How rich.
Posted by Ben | September 21, 2011 12:18 PM
Yes Ben,
Rich - richly costing us to keep the truth from us?
Posted by clinamen | September 21, 2011 12:31 PM
God this is pathetic.
I'm starting to think the guillotine is the only answer to this mess.
Posted by AL M | September 21, 2011 3:55 PM
As a former PDC employee, I can only tell you that this is the tip of the iceberg. Ms. Reina was in way over her head, had poor skills and was promoted to the highest level of her incompetence. Because so many HR folks left before her (a veritable revolving door), she was about the only poor schmuck remaining to be promoted to do management's bidding.
Paying off employees to buy their silence as they depart is the norm at PDC.
It was the worst career experience of my life, and the work environment was so abusive. There was so much misappropriation of funds, and earned 'trust' of the public or its resources. Money was spent inappropriately for years, with lots of blatant cronyism. For all of the successful projects over the years as well as how PDC has put its stamp on the city, significant money was spent wastefully. Glad to be gone.
Posted by Joe Schmo | September 21, 2011 5:38 PM
Oops. That was supposed to be: "And PDC had NO earned trust of the public or its resources."
Posted by Joe Schmo | September 21, 2011 5:45 PM
Fraud, waste and abuse...
But they mean so well....
Posted by tankfixer | September 21, 2011 5:48 PM
Re: "We know who the insider candidates are, don't we?"
clinamen,
"'Name me someone that's not a parasite and I'll go out and say a prayer for him'"
Posted by Gardiner Menefree | September 21, 2011 5:56 PM
A successful parasite does not kill its host.
Posted by Max | September 21, 2011 6:03 PM
I'm getting to the point in regards to "hush money", where I'd contribute to a "tell all whistle-blower money" fund. It would be better than contributing to the candidates that we get and the continuation of the norm.
Posted by lw | September 21, 2011 10:15 PM
I wonder if the Bike Nazis care about these shennanigans?
Or maybe anything that annoys Bojack is good fun for them ("the enemy of my enemy is my friend")?
Clearly, light rail tracks are a known hazard to the biking community. And the BILLIONS spend on light rail and condo subsidies would go a long way towards building climate controlled bike paths surrounded by anti-car barriers all over Multnomah County.
Posted by Mister Tee | September 22, 2011 5:46 AM
My uncaffeinated brain wonders whether Detroit had a development council and what role it played in the destruction of that fine city.
Posted by LucsAdvo | September 22, 2011 6:16 AM
Gardiner Menefree,
No names at this point, but perhaps a prayer from many for those who may be considering to enter.
We simply need good people who are not politicians, but would give a few years of good service for our community.
Daunting it is, to step into an arena that has been way off course, the question is whether it is too late and humpty dumpty cannot be put back together again?
I believe this city is at crossroads, some may think I am too optimistic, and that it is too late, but what are those of us who have witnessed the downward spiral to do?
Other than throw up our hands and get out of Dodge.
Posted by clinamen | September 22, 2011 9:37 AM
Severence packages at PDC are pretty normal for high level employees who are forced to leave. PDC executives don't have the slightest clue on how to manage people. That means they don't know how to document poor performance so they have justification when they fire someone. They set staff up to be fall guys/gals. They put people in way over their heads and then blame the employee when they struggle without having any support whatsoever. They write a big check to get someone out of their hair rather than learning how to effectively manage. All in all, they as an entity demonstrate complete ineptitude. But, there are some individuals at PDC that are brilliant and some of the hardest working people I know. Most of them leave and don't get the benefit of a severence package.
Posted by PDXPessimist | September 22, 2011 5:05 PM