Why deny the obvious, child?
You know somebody needs to go to jail when a politician shows you a "district" map that looks like this one:
That's Portland's proposed new "urban renewal" district. There have got be 50 scams in that picture. Think the local media will find even two of them? Not before it's too late. It seems that under the Sam-Rand Twins, the whole city's for sale. [Via WW.]
Comments (30)
does like most people not notice that most of downtown is already a urban renewal area that keeps 'renewing' every time its about to expire?
its shocking that so many people let this go unchecked.
Posted by anthony | October 12, 2010 10:24 PM
I never have been a fan of that guy Gerry Mandering....
Posted by Peggy | October 12, 2010 10:35 PM
Looks as if those blighted structures such as Macy's/The Nines, Nordstrom's and Fox Tower are inside this urban renewal zone.
Yes, the most expensive real estate in Oregon desperately needs urban renewal.
Posted by Gil Johnson | October 12, 2010 11:14 PM
Gerry Mandering for Guv.:
"I say,, now Guvnor" what wud yu like w/ yur crumpets, tea or bisquits?????
Absurd....yes,
but c'mon now guv...., who der yu like?
My guess...., go with the money honey.
Although absurd, it's possible, if not probable.
VTY,
"The Curmudgeon"
Posted by Mike | October 13, 2010 12:36 AM
"Holey" map making, Batman. Call the commissioners. It's going to be hard to stop the Weasel Troop. Do we have the right tools in the Bat Cave. (Total apologies to Batman).
Posted by LucsAdvo | October 13, 2010 5:57 AM
Peggy, I agree but I do like Pat Pending and Al Dente. Good guys, they are! (OK, deep breath.)
Maybe we ask the USAF to use PDX as a bombing run, then renew the entire city!
Posted by Lawrence | October 13, 2010 6:41 AM
Gerry Mandering is my current congressional representative. Why would he want to run for guv?
Posted by David E Gilmore | October 13, 2010 6:42 AM
Why deny the obvious, child?
Hell, deny the obvious child!
Posted by Starbuck | October 13, 2010 6:43 AM
A City Council of children would do better for our community.
Posted by clinamen | October 13, 2010 7:34 AM
And as an extra, here's a grand reminder that when dealing with a Paulson, hang onto your wallet with both hands. Hell, staple the thing to your butt, for that matter:
http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2010/10/10/101753/inaction-by-treasurys-paulson.html
Posted by Texas Triffid Ranch | October 13, 2010 7:45 AM
So acre by acre CoP diverts future money from Mult county's share of property taxes to themselves.
News reporters don't care, it's been this way for eons and if they didn't get it then, why should they now?
Posted by Steve | October 13, 2010 7:45 AM
Looks to me like someone is wanting more $$ to spruce up their themepark, or maybe it's just the showroom?
Posted by jc | October 13, 2010 7:54 AM
Too bad Ted Wheeler is not in their way.
Think Cogan will step up to say No to this scheme,
or will he lay in line with the rest?
Posted by clinamen | October 13, 2010 8:07 AM
Ooops!
Cogen,
Think Cogen will step up to say No to this scheme, . . . ?
Posted by clinamen | October 13, 2010 8:10 AM
Gee, look for major investigative reporting by the "O", wait.. their offices are locating in... never mind...
Posted by PDXileinOmaha | October 13, 2010 8:17 AM
Would love to know the process by which some properties were included in the map and others were hopscotched over. I'm sure it's correlated to the number of visits to Sam's office by the usual developer and parking magnate suspects.
Posted by Eric | October 13, 2010 9:19 AM
This can be stopped.
We're about ready to file a petition to require voter approval in Clackamas County. Tomorrow likely.
Folks in Lake Oswego, Milwaukie, Oregon City and Portland who are interested in filing their own, please start thinking about who, or if you, will step up to be a chief petitioner. It only takes 1 chief petitioner, can be 2 or 3, and the drafting of the petition language is already complete.
Once we roll out our effort, it will be easy to help coordinate a simultaneous effort in multiple municipalities.
Posted by Petition | October 13, 2010 10:10 AM
Petition, how can we track down more info on your petition effort?
This just disgusts me. All the tax revenue resulting from growth in most of the central city would be kept from schools and county services.
This is just no longer excusable(as if it ever was.)
Posted by Snards | October 13, 2010 10:32 AM
I have been told by several reliable sources that years ago, when PDC modified the boundaries of the urban renewal district that includes MLK, one commissioner literally walked the new proposed boundaries with a bunch of his buddies to ensure that his friends were in and his enemies were out. Look at the boundaries now. They zig-zag all over the place.
Posted by Elizabeth | October 13, 2010 10:33 AM
Clinamen, apparently Cogen isn't that happy about it. We'll see if he stays that way:
http://blogs.wweek.com/news/2010/10/12/county-chairman-voices-concern-over-mayors-urban-renewal-proposal/comment-page-1/#comment-299044
Posted by Snards | October 13, 2010 10:46 AM
It would be interesting to compile a map with all of the property owners identified in the red zone.
It does look like the grey area is probably government buildings and Portland State.
Posted by Umpire | October 13, 2010 11:46 AM
Here are the obvious things I see they're trying to shoehorn in:
1) all parts of "mid-town" which aren't currently in one of the three(!) existing UR areas
2) PSU campus
3) part of the waterfront for an expensive amphitheater
4) the Mult Co Courthouse
5) Whatever is west of Couch Park
6) The last remaining sections of NW between 17th and 19th which are still "affordable" (we're being relative here) for housing and businesses
7) A bunch of industrial land and parking lots on the north end
Surprisingly, it does not include PGE park. But does include the Oregonian.
Posted by Snards | October 13, 2010 12:15 PM
Oh, I guess you're right Umpire. I guess most of PSU isn't included. And that's the one area where I would support a spruce up.
Posted by Snards | October 13, 2010 12:17 PM
Too bad the local federal prosecutors are too dumb or too lazy or too on the take to be bothered with this kind of brazen criminal behavior.
Posted by LucsAdvo | October 13, 2010 12:35 PM
If I remember correctly, the state Legislature reined in the worst of Portland's abuses with a recent new law that requires Portland to give back to PPS and MultCo some of the money it steals from them at 10 years instead of making them wait the full 20 or 25 years. They need to go one-step farther and require URAs to expire when they are supposed to expire and prevent renewals, which Portland loves to do (I think the ClackCo petition being circulated would specifically require this in their county). It also needs to firm up a definition for what constitutes "blight". Maybe by the number of residents living in poverty or depressed commercial activity or something. By any reasonable definition of blight, URA money should be spent in Cully or outer Southeast Portland. The idea that the Pearl, Downtown, and SoWa are "blighted" is ridiculous. Although . . . considering all the unsold condos down there and the coming immigration jail . . . sorry, detention facility . . . maybe the term actually does apply to SoWa . . .
Posted by Eric | October 13, 2010 1:12 PM
Even if a municipality has a particular Urban Renewal project or plan they wanted to fund and complete "Tax Increment Financing" should not be used.
TIF bonds costs more that general obligation bonds and paying off the TIF debt relies nearly entirely upon blatant misappropriation from higher priority government services.
Yet it became widely acceptable to spend millions of school dollars on development and rail transit projects.
Now we are witnessing an addiction to Urban Renewal that has reached the point of mandatory public intervention.
Posted by Petition | October 13, 2010 5:49 PM
clinamen - we already have a kiddie council
Petition - how do we contact you...
Posted by LucsAdvo | October 13, 2010 6:15 PM
LucsAdvo: .we already have a kiddie council. .
Or more like a kitty council, still under the
Katz agenda.
Posted by clinamen | October 13, 2010 8:54 PM
The Katz agenda for Council has to go!
I'm sure Mayor Creepy would not want to deal with a council of pussies.
Posted by Major Dewché | October 13, 2010 9:07 PM
Contact info when Clackams County petition is filed. Perhaps tomorrow.
But there has been talk about duplicating the effort in Portland.
A Chief Petitioner has stepped up.
There can be 3.
Are there two more who could step up.
Prominent, and/or really smart, good speakers?
Maybe with employed by or retired from any of the taxing jurisdictions relying on property taxes which Urban Renewal diverts?
Same in Milwaukie, LO & Oregon City?
Imagine that? Same petition filed all at the same time.
After filing it takes about 3-4 weeks to get a ballot title so the signature gathering effort would not begin until after the election.
Nothing else would be going on so all of the volunteers, money and attention wold be available.
The number of signatures needed is only around 8000 for our Clackmas County Petition. Oregon City, Milwaukie and LO could ride our gathering signatures side by side.
Think about how this would play out.
Posted by Petition | October 13, 2010 10:25 PM