Endorsement time, cont'd: the state measures
We've blogged about our choices for elective offices, Multnomah County ballot measures, and Portland and Tri-Met ballot measures. That leaves the always entertaining Oregon statewide ballot measures, and here is where we're coming out on those:
70: Expanded veterans' loans. Cue "God Bless America." You dare not say no to the vets. Yes.
71: Legislature meets every year. They've got a lot of nerve. The most recent regularly scheduled "special" session was an enormous waste of time, pretty much proving that we don't need this. No.
72: Expands state borrowing. In case you haven't noticed, government debt at all levels is completely out of control, and will be a bigger drag on the quality of our children's lives than anyone is honestly talking about. Ted Wheeler is right -- the state needs to borrow less money, less often, not more. No.
73: Mandatory sentences for sex crimes and DUI. The sentences we now have are strict enough, and we're already spending enough money on our corrupt-looking corrections system, which the average person doesn't even want to know about. No.
74: More rational medical pot rules. The current laws regarding marijuana are insane. It's illegal, but only sorta illegal, and if you're sick, you can get a card to let you buy it, but you can still lose your job over it, and you have to buy it from some sleazy drug dealer on the corner, and if you grow your own, it's still a federal crime, not to mention some home invader who's going to hold a gun to your head, yada yada yada. We ought to treat pot like booze, and until then, all of this is pure foolishness. No endorsement.
75: Multnomah County casino. Who are these guys? And how many handshakes removed are they from the Mafia? Come to think of it, you could ask the same questions of the Indian casinos, who of course are screaming bloody murder against this measure. In the end, the state lottery people (another shady group) would like to put the tribes out of business, but in the meantime, the last thing Oregon needs is bringing in Harrah's or their ilk to compete for the gamblin' fools' money. No.
76: Lottery revenue dedicated to environmental causes. As we noted recently, the lottery money is better spent on the birds and the bees than on Milwaukie light rail, the UC Nike football program, and assorted other garbage that the state legislature might find worthy. Yes, the legislature will be handcuffed, but given their level of judgment, that's not an entirely bad thing. It's too bad we tax only stupidity and addictive personality for this purpose, but Oregon sold its soul on that issue a long time ago. Yes.
With that, I think we're ready to vote. Honey, get out the No. 2 lead pencil! And bring your ballot so that I can fill it out for you. Bring Grandma's, too -- it's in by her death certificate.
Comments (5)
Maybe you could sprinkle some of Grandma's ashes in her Vote by Mail envelope? Just a thought.
Posted by Abe | October 19, 2010 11:12 PM
Love the "Yes on 75" banner being shown right next to your "No" endorsement.
Google AdSense is awesome for irony.
Posted by MachineShedFred | October 20, 2010 6:13 AM
Love the no on 75 vote.
Advertising by proponents of 75 (who knows who they are) all over the metro area suggest 75 is primarily about funding schools and creating jobs. Their ads by far win the disingenuous award prize in my view. A tough title to hold in this election.
Or am I mistaken and that is a cocktail server in the ad to the right?
Posted by Gibby | October 20, 2010 8:35 AM
Environmentalists are extremely well funded. They don't need more money from the lottery. How much has each salmon, each spotted owl or marbled murrelet cost us? Has anybody, especially the folks at US Fish & Wildlife and the EPA, given a thought to the cost? Or maybe this is like Iraq and Afghaniston, and we have to spend whatever it takes to "win."
Posted by Don | October 20, 2010 10:39 AM
Measure 74 is a ill-conceived, vaguely worded law that will make medical marijuana much more expensive for card holders while exempting dispensary owners and employees from any prosecution..
Make no mistake. The growers and dispensary owners stand to make some serious "bank".
There may well be a need for a way to get it in the hands of those who need it most, but this law won't help them and will line the pockets of a lot of other people.
Posted by Tom Parker | October 21, 2010 4:25 PM