This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on August 3, 2008 11:32 PM.
The previous post in this blog was Logical transition.
The next post in this blog is More on the anthrax doc.
Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.
Comparisons between peak oil and the transition off whale oil are interesting (and discussed at length in Peter Terzekian's book "A Thousand Barrels a Second") but, ultimately, they provide a false comfort, like that saying that "The Stone Age didn't end for lack of stones."
Because there were good alternatives available in abundance, the decline in whale slaughter had little impact except on whaling communities. As the whales got harder to find, the amount of energy required to land them went up --- the energy return on energy invested went down, in other words. The result is that the price had to keep climbing. If there's a replacement handy, then it comes in.
But there doesn't seem to be a replacement for oil -- nothing provides its stability, energy density, ease of storage, use, and distribution, and versatility. Coal to liquids means global suicide and a fried planet.
What do you think, Cheetah? Do you think that we're entitled to use all the fossil energy we want without consequences because we want it to be so? If wishes were horses ...
Comments (8)
Any truth to the rumor the Repulican platform is going to call for the resumption of whaling as the key to both their energy and job stimulus plans?
McCain/Ahab 2008
Posted by ejs | August 4, 2008 6:14 AM
That just wouldn't work. There's no one that we could invade to assure a continued supply of whale oil.
Posted by john rettig | August 4, 2008 6:35 AM
I was thinking maybe Japan. They must be hoarding a strategic whale oil reserve.
Posted by ejs | August 4, 2008 6:40 AM
Comparisons between peak oil and the transition off whale oil are interesting (and discussed at length in Peter Terzekian's book "A Thousand Barrels a Second") but, ultimately, they provide a false comfort, like that saying that "The Stone Age didn't end for lack of stones."
Because there were good alternatives available in abundance, the decline in whale slaughter had little impact except on whaling communities. As the whales got harder to find, the amount of energy required to land them went up --- the energy return on energy invested went down, in other words. The result is that the price had to keep climbing. If there's a replacement handy, then it comes in.
But there doesn't seem to be a replacement for oil -- nothing provides its stability, energy density, ease of storage, use, and distribution, and versatility. Coal to liquids means global suicide and a fried planet.
Posted by George Seldes | August 4, 2008 7:24 AM
Nice video meditation on our predicament
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dkMfohB2Gtw
Posted by George Seldes | August 4, 2008 7:38 AM
Coal to liquids means global suicide and a fried planet.
Well, I guess we can stop all research on coal gasification/liquefaction based on that pronouncement.
What, pray, do you suggest, George...
...higher tire pressures?
Lay off the bananas.
Posted by cheetahcheeta | August 4, 2008 11:28 AM
Excellent video link George!
Posted by dman | August 4, 2008 11:57 AM
What do you think, Cheetah? Do you think that we're entitled to use all the fossil energy we want without consequences because we want it to be so? If wishes were horses ...
Posted by George Seldes | August 4, 2008 8:01 PM