Election porn cup still runneth over
Yesterday we got two Obama mailers on the same day:
We're voting for the guy, but that seems sort of wasteful even if we were still on the fence and they might have made a difference.
Yesterday we got two Obama mailers on the same day:
We're voting for the guy, but that seems sort of wasteful even if we were still on the fence and they might have made a difference.
Comments (13)
Too bad Obama's turning a blind-eye to the union and environmental lobbyists.
Posted by Chris McMullen | May 14, 2008 1:12 PM
thank God I am a registered libertarian I don't get any of the crap you dems or pubs get :)
Posted by Anthony | May 14, 2008 3:14 PM
Still looking for answers about what qualifies Obama to be El' Presidente.....
Posted by Ed | May 14, 2008 7:41 PM
Hope and Change :P
Posted by Joey Link | May 14, 2008 9:04 PM
There has to be someone better than the two and half Democrats that running the PREZ!
Posted by R T Howard | May 14, 2008 9:11 PM
I find it curious that Obama would send flyer's out on the oil industry's bleeding Americans. I find it even odder that he calls this old Washington. If you want to know who Obama is supported by just go to the sites that have to disclose who contributes to his campaign. I think you will find several activists that work for him that have taken a leave of absence from the oil lobbyist firms they were working for. also check out his voting record on oil!!! A man of change or just a new way of bull. It's not what you say it is how you say it. So funny that the Senators that endorse him (Kennedy and Kerry) are old Washington.
A vote for Obama is a vote for Rev. Wright, William Ayers, and Louis Farrahkan. I know were smarter then he thinks we are. Aren't we?
Posted by Political Junkie 56 | May 14, 2008 9:55 PM
" Hope and Change " the only answer that starry eyed Obamaites can respond with....
Posted by Ed | May 14, 2008 10:13 PM
We'll see who's laughing in November. Hint: It won't be you.
Posted by Jack Bog | May 14, 2008 10:15 PM
The only reason I am voting for him is he is the best of the crap lot we are being offered by the establishment in Washington.
I dont really like the "windfall profits" tax idea, but I guess we take what we can get.
If they want to force a tax like that, I would rather see them make all companies pay it. Especially health insurance companies. Far more of my money goes into an HMO rathole than I pay for gasoline each month.
Posted by Jon | May 14, 2008 10:23 PM
I really don't like the idea of the government deciding how much income a private corporation can make. I also don't like the idea of the government assisting them in their quest for profits. There are so many other ways they could get more money from the oil companies than a 'windfall profits' tax. They ought to start with reforming their policies.
Posted by Joey Link | May 15, 2008 9:40 AM
Yeah those evil oil companies making a whopping $0.10/gallon profit. What a rip-off.
Of the course, the feds get $0.18/gallon and Oregon gets $0.43/gallon!
Whom is ripping whom off, I wonder?
Posted by Chris McMullen | May 15, 2008 11:29 AM
I'm dumping all the paper ads I've been getting in the forest the day after the primary election.
Want to join in on the fun?
Posted by Jon | May 15, 2008 11:17 PM
I'm thinking of building something out of them -- not sure what yet.
Posted by Jack Bog | May 15, 2008 11:55 PM