About

This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on October 12, 2007 7:10 AM. The previous post in this blog was It wasn't just Georgia. The next post in this blog is Speak now or forever hold your dog. Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.

E-mail, Feeds, 'n' Stuff

Friday, October 12, 2007

Portland tax levy appears back on the rise

The other day, as part of our examination of the City of Portland's financial health, we noted that the city's tax levy apparently declined slightly last year (2006-2007) below what it was the year before (2005-2006). Now that the current year's tax roll (2007-2008) has been published by the county, we thought we'd try to see in which direction the city's levy is moving this year, and by how much.

It looks as though it's going up. Adding up six "categories of City of Portland" tax levy in the county's new figures, we come up with a grand total of property taxes this coming year of $378,265,819.40, which would be about a 4.2 percent increase over the $363,073,000 shown in the city's recent bond offering document as the tax levy for last year.

Over the past seven years (including last year's down year), the city's tax levy had grown at a compound rate of about 5.01 percent a year. And so this coming year's increase, while notable, is still less on a percentage basis than it's been over the medium-term past. Keep in mind that over the last seven years, the city's long-term debt has risen at the compound rate of 6.66 percent per year, and so property tax growth still lags well behind growth in long-term liabilities.

If I've got my math right (and since the city and mainstream media are studiously avoiding me, I can only hope), the city's long-term debt of $4.4 billion is roughly 11.7 times the coming year's property tax levy. In other words, you could take every single penny of the city's property tax levy this year, and take that same amount annually for more than another decade, and it wouldn't pay off even the principal on the city's existing long-term liabilities, much less principal and interest. That money's all been spent.

For the record, the six categories of Portland property taxes that we added up to get to our $378.3 million total were labeled as follows by the county: City of Portland; City of Portland Children's Local Opt.; City of Portland Parks Local Opt. and (related) Bonds; and Urban Renewal - Portland and (related) Bonds (the last category being zero). If the city levy includes something else, I hope savvy readers will let me know.

Although our property tax bill typically breaks out separate lines called "City of Portland - Bonds" and "Portland Police/Fire Pension," the county spreadsheet does not do so. I assume that those two are somehow subsumed into one or more of the six categories I have found. Please let me hear about it if I've got it screwed up.

Comments (3)

Jack - I think you have got it mostly right.

One thing to consider is that part of the City's debt are revenue bonds, paid through water & sewer charges, and that's the revenue stream that bondholder's are counting on to make those bond payments. Ultimately, though, if that revenue stream was deficient - the general fund would be on the hook.

Also, there are other significant revenue sources to the city's general fund aside from property taxes. These would be the "business license fee", known in the real world as a business income tax of $68 Million; "utility license fees", known in the real world as franchise fees or sales taxes of $63 Million; and the city's share of state taxes on liquor & cigarettes of $11 Million. There are other revenues to the general fund of about $24 Million.

Of course all of that stuff is supposed to be paying for cops, firefighters, parks etc., but instead a pretty big chunk is going to debt payments - way too much. And I think you are dead right in highlighting this alarming situation. Thanks for your work.

Also, there are other significant revenue sources to the city's general fund aside from property taxes. These would be the "business license fee", known in the real world as a business income tax of $68 Million; "utility license fees", known in the real world as franchise fees or sales taxes of $63 Million; and the city's share of state taxes on liquor & cigarettes of $11 Million. There are other revenues to the general fund of about $24 Million.

Agreed, but who pays those, ultimately? Portland residents. They all get passed on to the little guys. Which is why debt per capita is, to me, the only rational way to measure how bad the situation is.

No argument there - debt per capita is the clearest way to quantify the dire situation we are in.




Clicky Web Analytics