Jail Blazer Hall of Famer
If Darius Miles walks into a bar that you're in, check to make sure you've got a loaded gun, a clear path to the door, or preferably both. The details of this latest episode are still sketchy, but I see he's already hired old Steve Houze to defend him. And so he must be guilty of something.
It would be easy for the Blazers to tell this guy that he's got to leave town. They're going to need lots of fan sympathy again this year -- especially among the rubes who dropped thousands thinking they were going to see Greg Oden. Another seven months of police blotter entries on Darius aren't going to help. And his influence on the young players of which the roster is full is bad news all around.
Comments (13)
surely there are better people out there for the Blazers to hire. Why oh why don't they hold people responsible for their behavior and get rid of the criminal thugs? And I am not just talking basketball-but ALL sports.
Posted by kathe w. | October 24, 2007 7:45 AM
I dunno. target="_blank">He seemed cool when I saw him. But then maybe he thought there would be strippers at City. Maybe.
Anytime you Houze-up, it's for a reason.
Posted by Richard Thruster | October 24, 2007 8:25 AM
I dunno. He seemed cool when I saw him. But then maybe he thought there would be strippers at City. Maybe.
Anytime you Houze-up, it's for a reason.
Posted by Richard Thruster | October 24, 2007 8:47 AM
tsk, tsk, Jack. Hiring a criminal defense lawyer isn't evidence (let alone proof) of guilt. Remember the presumption of innocence? (You may be out of practice with the concept of "presumption on innocence" -- thinking about the IRS as much as you do.)
If someone falsely accused you of a crime, who would you hire, a labor lawyer?
Posted by Laura Graser | October 24, 2007 10:57 AM
re: that previous comment. I ran into Darius at the Safari (strip) club just two weeks after the previous commenter. He whipped out his Amex black card and outfitted his entourage with $2,200 in one dollar bills. They were throwing them by the handful. Teh man himself sat back in the corner, having his shoulders rubbed and talking to one of the girls there - reportedly exchange for a wrapped stack of ones. All the rest of us chose to step back and let the girls make their "tuition" money. The basketball, it pays well.
Posted by This time I'll be anonymous | October 24, 2007 10:59 AM
I think there still hoping his knee forces him to retire which means they get some of his cap space back.
Note this isn't about them trying to save money, they are stuck paying him no matter what, but if he retires the freed up cap space can be usefull for signing other players, or more likley making a trade. Having some cap space to sweeten the pot could be usefull for another of Prithard's patented draft day trades.
Posted by Eric K | October 24, 2007 11:02 AM
If someone falsely accused you of a crime, who would you hire, a labor lawyer?
But he hasn't been accused of anything yet, and already he's, as one commenter brilliantly put it, "Houzing up." Of course, he's innocent in the eyes of the law. But fortunately for everyone, I'm not the law.
Posted by Jack Bog | October 24, 2007 11:56 AM
So why is it that people can comment on unsubstantiated rumors about Darius Miles, but I can't do the same regarding coke-using chefs?
Posted by CH | October 24, 2007 4:24 PM
Relieved to see Bernie has not "Houzed up!"
Posted by pdxjim | October 24, 2007 5:11 PM
Darius has absolutely no influence on the current Blazers roster of outstanding athletes and characters. James Jones for example, double degrees in real estae and finance. You really think he gives a rat's behind about Darius? Or any of the other guys? Please.
Posted by Alexander | October 24, 2007 5:44 PM
One of the first things Oden said after his surgery was that he was getting lots of advice from Darius. When Darius is on the bench in street clothes, guys like Aldridge are yukking it up with him all through the game.
Who's James Jones? And what team will he be on in March?
Posted by Jack Bog | October 24, 2007 11:09 PM
So why is it that people can comment on unsubstantiated rumors about Darius Miles, but I can't do the same regarding coke-using chefs?
Because (a) truth is a defense to defamation, and (b) this is my site.
Posted by Jack Bog | October 24, 2007 11:21 PM
And so he must be guilty of something.
So if that isn't the truth, it's defamation?
Regarding it being your site, that's fair. But next time, I'd rather you simply not post the comment. If it doesn't pass your stringent test of legality, trash it rather than editing it for content.
Posted by CH | October 25, 2007 6:18 AM