Must be nice
You're not the only one getting a kicker from the State of Oregon:
The state has about 60 department heads who will get raises of 21 percent to 24 percent over the next two years, Kulongoski announced Monday. Nearly 4,800 state managers will see their salaries rise 11 percent to 16 percent.Plus, don't forget, a generous pension and oh, the fringe benefits!
Comments (15)
Well, at least it's "for the children".
Not mine, of course - but for those of the vast, underpaid bureaucracy of state government.
Poor babies.
I wonder how much scientific research Teddy did on the subject of whether this increase will actually increase the retention rate among these irreplaceable dept. heads and managers. Which professional consulting firm looked at this move with a view to its likely effectiveness? What evaluation was done to determine the value of the alleged purpose relative to spending these monies elsewhere? Was this a priority over schools? I'll bet Teddy just couldn't restrain himself and shot from the hip on this one.
Nice to see that not all stereotypes are false - maybe just backward - spend and tax; it's the Democrat way.
Posted by rr | September 25, 2007 11:57 AM
Considering the scopes of responsibility and size of budgets administered (as reported in this morning's Big Zero) then the new salaries don't seem unreasonable. Even with the benefit package.
Of course the big increases look bad in comparison with other public employee raises and of course they'll be compared with "average Oregonians". And of course there will be lots of debate about whether or not they're really needed to attract top people. But realistically, a $150K annual income just isn't that big a deal anymore - just ask a tax preparer.
The problem is the continuing growth of public-funded programs - examples of which are regularly discussed on this site. Social engineering and a Nanny State don't come cheap.
Posted by RonaldM | September 25, 2007 12:04 PM
Boy, Ted sure thinks the gravy train is a-rolling. Amazing how short-sighted these guys are. We staff and give evryone raises and then, boom, we are in a financial crisis to support deserving state workers, have no money for schools/police and need to raise taxes. The hits just keep coming.
Posted by Steve | September 25, 2007 12:27 PM
Sounds like he is bumping up some pensions for people about to retire.
And attracting top people? One would think that the benefits and PERS would be enough for that.
Posted by Jon | September 25, 2007 1:09 PM
Is it odd that the State's tax revenues increased about 20%, and the pay raises match and the recent States budget spending increased 20%? Magic.
It my axiom that whatever tax/fee increases we have "for the children", for "public safety", that is all seems to go to pay raises.
Posted by Jerry | September 25, 2007 1:22 PM
These people (Ted, I mean) are their own worst enemy.
Posted by Allan L. | September 25, 2007 3:34 PM
We will see the "wisdom" of these pay raises next year when the RECESSION hits Oregon.
Posted by Dave A. | September 25, 2007 5:51 PM
The worst part about this is not the inflated salaries, but the concomitantly inflated PERS retirement benefits, that will continue for the life once these folks retire. The money would have been better spent on training replacements - preferably relatively new hires who are on the new "tier three" retirement plan, which is much more like a defined contribution plan. What a waste.
Posted by Frank | September 25, 2007 6:21 PM
WHAT generous pension?!? Got news for you folks -- the old PERS I and II are no more, people hiring into the state now get dumped into PERS III, basically just your basic, stripped-down defined contribution plan. No defined benefit at all. When the economy tanks for good, thanks to Chimpy and peak oil, a PERS III pension will be worth very little.
Posted by George Seldes | September 25, 2007 10:51 PM
basically just your basic, stripped-down defined contribution plan.
Welcome to reality.
Posted by Jack Bog | September 26, 2007 8:45 AM
BTW, I'm sure most of the agency heads are under the old system.
Posted by Jack Bog | September 26, 2007 8:47 AM
I believe the Tier III plan includes both a defined benefit component(1.5% of ending salary per year of service) and defined contribution component (guaranteed minimum annual return on contributions), with contributions to both accounts paid by the government employer.
Posted by Molly | September 26, 2007 9:10 AM
Molly, I think you meant paid by the tax payers of the state.
Posted by Richard/s | September 26, 2007 9:38 AM
Richard, you are correct. My point was to disagree with George, who stated the pension component was gone. Tier III still includes a generous defined benefit (pension) component, unlike most private sector retirement plans. Contributions to Tier III are not made by the employee through payroll deduction, but are paid by the government employer (funded by taxes, fees, etc) above and beyond salary, unlike most private employment arrangements.
Posted by Molly | September 27, 2007 5:38 AM
I work for the Department of Human Services/Mental Health and Addiction Services, and let me tell you, I'm no fat cat state employee. After 4 yrs, I make about $26,000/yr. My PERS check (I am Tier II) will be MAYBE $1000, after taxes and health insurance. I don't sit behind a desk taking a break the minute it is your turn in line - I deal with behavioral emergencies that have put me in the ER twice this year, along with the other times I have been bit, had coffee thrown on me, been spit on, etc. Don't judge all state workers by what you see at the DMV.
Posted by jake | October 10, 2007 12:07 PM