Would Hillary or Obama keep paying for "Star Wars"?
Either they would, or they don't have the guts to say they wouldn't.
| Posted at 4:16 PM | Permalink |
|
About
This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on August 12, 2007 4:16 PM.
The previous post in this blog was The things we do for law.
The next post in this blog is Here am I floating in my tin can.
Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.
Comments (4)
Obama has called for ratification of the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty, but I can't tell you whether that means a ban on Star Wars. He's also called for close cooperation with Russia to control their stockpile, and that isn't going to be possible without ditching Star Wars.
Posted by puddlejumper | August 12, 2007 6:01 PM
I both agree with puddlejumper and hope he's right. I'm leaning pretty strongly towards Obama and him advocating keeping Star Wars would be... disconcerting to say the least.
Posted by Kevin | August 12, 2007 7:04 PM
In 2004, it would have been dangerous to give Bush ammo like "he doesn't care enough to protect us from Iran's nuclear bombs." Not sure if that holds any longer, and tend to agree that people will respond positively to promises to talk, cooperate, and seek justice.
Posted by puddlejumper | August 12, 2007 7:50 PM
I'd reply with something like "Bush's missile defense plan is going to work like his New Orleans relief plan, his Iraq war plan, his economic plan, his health care plan, his Social security plan..."
Posted by Jack Bog | August 12, 2007 11:15 PM