War -- what is it good for?
| Posted at 6:05 PM | Permalink |
|
About
This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on June 18, 2007 6:05 PM.
The previous post in this blog was Limiting his potential.
The next post in this blog is Son of a wimp.
Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.
Comments (3)
Seems like it was pretty good for gettin' rid of Hitler.
Posted by butch | June 19, 2007 9:36 AM
Gee whiz folks, Iraq/Afganistan it's the best and hottest war we currently have. Until a better one comes along why not just get behind this one and maybe try to win? A novel idea for Democrats. Maybe in 2008, if the Dems win, they can start their one them selves and then set the U.S. up to loose their war.
Posted by R.J. | June 19, 2007 7:27 PM
The author of the article displays a distinct anti-American bias. How can he be sure the children were killed in the firefight by the Americans?
Were the radicals armed simply with bad body odor and harsh language? Or were they using, or attempting to use lethal force against our, or Iraqi government forces. It makes a difference.
Innocents are always caught in the crossfire in armed conflict. It is the nature of war.
Repeating the enemy's propaganda is contrary to the interests of our country.
Posted by HMLA267 | June 20, 2007 12:49 PM