You got that right
"When we need $35m for the tram, the City can find it. But When we need another residential de-tox bed, where is the money for that?"More here.
"When we need $35m for the tram, the City can find it. But When we need another residential de-tox bed, where is the money for that?"More here.
Comments (1)
Posted by: John Capradoe at August 26, 2006 12:34 AMLet's not forget that the City not only does not fund any Drug beds, but DEFUNDS the County Programs through TIF to pay for the TRAM, UR infrastructure, and moving Saturday Market.
Articles like these make me ever so happy for picking the mental health field as my preffered line of work.
Posted by: mike at August 26, 2006 04:59 AMThese projects between developers and the city are an intoxicating drug of their own, and we've got to get the entire council into rehab.
Posted by: Bill McDonald at August 26, 2006 07:33 AMPortland City Council members have an as-many-times-as-you-want refillable prescription on file at the pharmacy, for a drug called "power".
Here's what to expect from withdrawal.
Disbelief. The Tram won't cost that much.
Posted by: Silence Dogood at August 26, 2006 08:34 AMDenial. There is no problem.
Bargaining. Let's spend $90 million on the Tram.
Guilt. We really screwed up.
Anger. See "critics and outsiders"
Depression. I can't believe I only got 50.2%.
Acceptance. Bill's right. We're all going in.
I liked the comment on the article as of this AM - "Visioning is such a f***ing waste of time!"
Posted by: Steve at August 26, 2006 09:21 AMI like the concept, the comment and the psychodelic picture. But I think the woman who said giving to help the addicted is more important than giving to help animals is off-base and promoting a false dichotomy. We should pay attention to both. While there are better places to give humane dollars than the Oregon Humane Society (like Evan Kalik's Cat Adoption Team in Sherwood, for example), how society treats animals is an important indicator of how it treats people. And, people who suffer from addiction can sometimes receive love from animals easier than from people. If the Multnomah County Commissioners would stop listening to this kind of fallacious argument, perhaps we would see the 2000 MCAS task force recommendations enforced, and, eventually, agency spending cut way back.
Posted by: Cynthia at August 26, 2006 02:46 PMPeople are more important than cats.
Period.
Try saying it out loud a few times, Cynthia: your species needs your support.
Posted by: Mister Tee at August 27, 2006 09:37 AMAgreed Mr. Tee. You can believe people are more important without dismissing the other species God gave us to care for. My species has had my support and advocacy for my entire life, but it is self-centered and blind, so I have to wonder why in the heck I have cared. I no longer am inclined to support idiocy. I was watching something on CSPAN yesterday on the case for impeaching GWB. Panelists were talking about how Americans' unwillingness or inability to pay attention to politics and exercise critical thinking skills has led us to the predicament we now face. The citizenry did it to itself.
Period.
Posted by: Cynthia at August 27, 2006 10:04 AMI get more satisfaction from cats.
[Posted as indicated; restored later.]
Posted by Blog restoration | August 14, 2007 12:45 PM