How the Bush tax cuts wreck your lungs
| Posted at 1:10 AM | Permalink |
|
About
This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on June 12, 2006 1:10 AM.
The previous post in this blog was World of discovery.
The next post in this blog is Bill McDonald explains in plain English.
Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.
Comments (8)
Here's the scoop on the soot.
Posted by Jack Bog | June 12, 2006 1:18 AM
I think you have the wrong link to the scoop on the soot.
http://www.oregonlive.com/printer/printer.ssf?/base/news/114835293196500.xml&coll=7
"Portland General Electric's coal-burning power plant near Boardman pollutes more than 10 protected parks and wilderness areas, including Mount Hood, Mount Rainier and Mount Jefferson, a new federal analysis found."
Posted by Steve Schopp | June 12, 2006 8:39 AM
Why click the link? Sean Hannity, Bill O'Reilly, and the oil companies will tell me everything I need to know on the subject. It's the same way I learned the Al Gore film was a lie. It makes my life so much easier.
Posted by Chris Snethen | June 12, 2006 9:20 AM
Seems like step one could also mention a few local players: MacIntire, Sizemore, Eyman...
Posted by Alan DeWitt | June 12, 2006 9:39 AM
Jack: I find it ironic that you've used the Central District of the North Macadam Central URA as your 2. and 6. points of your flow chart. Regarding:
2. But I thought the Portland taxpayers and not China was financing NM.
6. What do you mean "even if Bush cared"-what about our own Vera Katz and now Tom Potter and Council cared?
Posted by Lee | June 12, 2006 9:58 AM
Nothing to see here folks. Place your heads firmly back in the sand. Watch out for the broken glass though...
Posted by TKrueg | June 12, 2006 10:37 AM
One question: are federal income tax revenues higher or lower after the "tax cuts"? It was a rate cut, not a tax cut. Federal income tax revenues are higher than they were prior to the so-called "tax cuts". Increased deficits are caused by significant increases in federal spending. But who cares about facts?
Bob
Posted by BobW | June 13, 2006 9:20 AM
BobW,
Is that after discounting for the increase in the money supply?
Posted by Ron Ledbury | June 13, 2006 3:07 PM