Detail, east Portland photo, courtesy Miles Hochstein / Portland Ground.

For old times' sake
The bojack bumper sticker -- only $1.50!

To order, click here.

Excellent tunes -- free! And on your browser right now. Just click on Radio Bojack!

E-mail us here.


This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on January 4, 2008 8:05 AM. The previous post in this blog was All muscle and heart. The next post in this blog is Do you see what they see?. Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.



Law and Taxation
How Appealing
TaxProf Blog
Mauled Again
Tax Appellate Blog
A Taxing Matter
Josh Marquis
Native America, Discovered and Conquered
The Yin Blog
Ernie the Attorney
Above the Law
The Volokh Conspiracy
Going Concern
Bag and Baggage
Wealth Strategies Journal
Jim Hamilton's World of Securities Regulation
World of Work
The Faculty Lounge
Lowering the Bar
OrCon Law

Hap'nin' Guys
Tony Pierce
Parkway Rest Stop
Along the Gradyent
Dwight Jaynes
Bob Borden
Dingleberry Gazette
The Red Electric
Iced Borscht
Jeremy Blachman
Dean's Rhetorical Flourish
Straight White Guy
As Time Goes By
Dave Wagner
Jeff Selis
Alas, a Blog
Scott Hendison
The View Through the Windshield
Appliance Blog
The Bleat

Hap'nin' Gals
My Whim is Law
Lelo in Nopo
Attorney at Large
Linda Kruschke
The Non-Consumer Advocate
10 Steps to Finding Your Happy Place
A Pig of Success
Attorney at Large
Margaret and Helen
Kimberlee Jaynes
Cornelia Seigneur
And Sew It Goes
Mile 73
Rainy Day Thoughts
That Black Girl
Posie Gets Cozy
Cat Eyes
Rhi in Pink
Ragwaters, Bitters, and Blue Ruin
Rose City Journal
Type Like the Wind

Portland and Oregon
Isaac Laquedem
Rantings of a [Censored] Bus Driver
Jeff Mapes
Vintage Portland
The Portlander
South Waterfront
Amanda Fritz
O City Hall Reporters
Guilty Carnivore
Old Town by Larry Norton
The Alaunt
Bend Blogs
Lost Oregon
Cafe Unknown
Tin Zeroes
David's Oregon Picayune
Mark Nelsen's Weather Blog
Travel Oregon Blog
Portland Daily Photo
Portland Building Ads
Portland Food and
Dave Knows Portland
Idaho's Portugal
Alameda Old House History
MLK in Motion

Retired from Blogging
Various Observations...
The Daily E-Mail
Saving James
Portland Freelancer
Furious Nads (b!X)
Izzle Pfaff
The Grich
Kevin Allman
AboutItAll - Oregon
Lost in the Details
Worldwide Pablo
Tales from the Stump
Whitman Boys
Two Pennies
This Stony Planet
1221 SW 4th
I am a Fish
Here Today
What If...?
Superinky Fixations
The Rural Bus Route
Another Blogger
Mikeyman's Computer Treehouse
Portland Housing Blog

Wonderfully Wacky
Dave Barry
Borowitz Report
Stuff White People Like
Worst of the Web

Valuable Time-Wasters
My Gallery of Jacks
Litterbox, On the Prowl
Litterbox, Bag of Bones
Litterbox, Scratch
Ride That Donkey
Singin' Horses
Rally Monkey
Simon Swears
Strong Bad's E-mail

Oregon News
The Oregonian
Portland Tribune
Willamette Week
The Sentinel
Southeast Examiner
Northwest Examiner
Sellwood Bee
Mid-County Memo
Vancouver Voice
Eugene Register-Guard
OPB - Portland
Salem Statesman-Journal
Oregon Capitol News
Portland Business Journal
Daily Journal of Commerce
Oregon Business
Portland Info Net
McMinnville News Register
Lake Oswego Review
The Daily Astorian
Bend Bulletin
Corvallis Gazette-Times
Roseburg News-Review
Medford Mail-Tribune
Ashland Daily Tidings
Newport News-Times
Albany Democrat-Herald
The Eugene Weekly
Portland IndyMedia
The Columbian

The Beatles
Bruce Springsteen
Joni Mitchell
Ella Fitzgerald
Steve Earle
Joe Ely
Stevie Wonder
Lou Rawls

E-mail, Feeds, 'n' Stuff

Friday, January 4, 2008

Another Fish course

Lawyer and part-time TV talk show host Nick Fish is running for the Portland City Council again, according to this morning's Trib. Nick dropped the ball toward the end of his last campaign for the council, and that's how we got Sam the Tram running things at City Hall. Now the Fish is gunning for the seat being vacated by Erik Sten, who acted neutral in the Fish-Adams race but then slinked around helping Adams pull the upset.

Does this mean that the Nickster will be quitting his Sunday morning public affairs show on the CW? I can't imagine that the station will let him host while he's running for political office.

Meanwhile, as usual, the city's brilliant "voter-owed elections" system -- part of the legacy of the Sten genius -- is in complete disarray. It looks like no one running in the Sten fill-in election will qualify for taxpayer campaign funds, but hey, the boys at City Hall just make stuff up as they go along in this area, and so maybe we can burn several hundred thousand more in taxpayer "clean money."

If they're going to change the rules on the fly yet again, maybe they should take a suggestion made by a commenter on this blog in the last couple of days. He suggested that since Sten took "clean money" and then quit halfway through his term, he should have to pay it back. Hear, hear. At least half of it. How many rounds of taxpayer subsidies should there be over a single four-year term for a single seat?

Comments (19)

It's pretty outrageous that you quit for no good reason (e.g., illness) and not have to pay anything back to the city. It's clear this system remains half-baked.

Not unlike free municipal wi-fi.

So Jack, which is worse, tax-payer funded elections or corporate ownership of the elected? I agree Sten should be made to reimburse some of his election funds.
As long as the supreme courts rule that money equates to free speech we, the voters, are doomed to the whims and demands of corporate. Homer Williams, and Jack Weston, Snitzners and Zidells already have the politicos in their pockets.
Every election the voters have a sorry lot to choose from. Money and media rule the elections.

This is kind of confusing. Are you suggesting that if people qualified for public financing it is bad, but that if no one qualifies, it means the system is in "disarray?" I think the fact of people not qualifying helps demonstrate that the bar is set high enough (once the Golovan-likes get weeded out). Then again, I suppose one can always resort to: "see, the system isn't perfect, so it should be characterized as terrible."

What's in disarray -- this time -- is the fact that no one thought about vacancies or special elections, and now there's talk of making rules up on the fly at the 11th hour to allow people to qualify.

That's on top of giving Streetcar Smith his Mulligan when he broke the rules a while back.

And on top of all the fun we had last time. I think "disarray" is a fair assessment.

"and now there's talk of making rules up on the fly at the 11th hour to allow people to qualify" ...

I would be concerned about that kind of thing, too. So who is this talk from? Bloggers, commenters, "in the know" people? It always seems unfair when an interviewer asks someone "you know, people have been saying that you bite the heads off chicks ... please respond" In that vein, it would be nice to be able to gauge the credibility of the comments based on who is making them.

In that vein, it would be nice to be able to gauge the credibility of the comments based on who is making them.

It is nice, Jonathan.

"In that vein, it would be nice to be able to gauge the credibility of the comments based on who is making them.

It is nice, Jonathan."



Is there any difference to you between a minor and major violation?

What would you have suggested they do to Chris Smith? Do you think the violation required that he terminate his candidacy? Go to jail? Be executed?

They didn't anticipate special elections: that was an oversight. So now what? What would you suggest? Would you suggest NOT making up rules at the "11th hour"? Or what?

It's awfully easy to take potshots, but sometimes policies have to be adjusted to the realities of a situation, and that seems to be just what is going on here.

Finally, the suggestion that an elected candidate should "pay back" the City if he/she resigns before the end of the term is just silly.

So obviously "cc" and "Jim" have some kind of great inside track of knowledge. Perhaps that's the reason for anonymity?

Finally, the suggestion that an elected candidate should "pay back" the City if he/she resigns before the end of the term is just silly.

You're right. If only we could only pay to HAVE them resign, everything would be in balance.

So obviously "cc" and "Jim" have some kind of great inside track of knowledge.

Never mind that neither of us claimed anything remotely like that, Jonathan's 360 degree blind spot allows such an incisive comeback.

So, why the interest in our "real" names, Jonathon? Does that help you evaluate the content of our character?


My sincerest apology for misspelling your real name.

"which is worse, tax-payer funded elections or corporate ownership of the elected?"

Puh-leeze, you just think with voter-financed elections that Sam or Ted won't take call's from Neil's hey-boy Tom Imeson or if Homer happens to make a large contribution to one of Erik's favorite charities that they'll circumvent this "solution"?

You are naive. I doubt VOE will cahnge one thing as far as influence. If corporate control of elected officials is an issue, then fine, let's cut to the quick and make it so no public official can interced on behalf of a special interest or make the penalties real.

If VOE is so great, how come the only incumbent who used it was Erik Sten?

Sam Adams... no
Dan Saltzman... no
Randy Leonard... no

For a bunch of new candidates running for an open seat it isn't going to matter much. But challenging an incumbent using VOE... no chance. VOE improved the incumbents edge, which was substantial to begin with.

VOE improved the incumbents edge, which was substantial to begin with.

A thoughtful, cynical person might conclude that was the plan, no?

I like Nick Fish and I'm glad to learn he doesn't plan on using tax dollars to fund his campaign.

Why? Because I believe it's unfair that the pretenders (like Ms. Boyles) and the legitimate candidates should receive the same amount of money.

Serious candidates will attract more campaign donations than pretenders: great political talent attracts more money. Why? Because they're good at influencing others. And because a lot of donors will open up their wallets for a candidate they believe in. Not because they expect anything in return, but because they believe that government is in desperate need of better leadership.

Just because you're good at gathering $5.00 donations doesn't mean you'd make a good city commissioner. We're not trying to identify the best signature gatherers, we're looking for the best leadership.

Similarly, I don't believe that public funds should be used to procure a private income for the winning candidate, especially those who are currently (ahem!) underemployed.

Fritz, Fish and Dozono in 2008! The trifecta of change.

We're not trying to identify the best signature gatherers, we're looking for the best leadership.

That distinction is lost on many in Portland. For others, that such a distinction exists is cynically ignored.

What a great coalition.

You've got my vote for "Best Comment" of the day on that one...

...hell, of the year.


If you were grading a bar exam would you be puzzled by the lack of an author's name? Judge the argument.


It was the Auditor and Mr. Sten that thought it would be wise to substitute a private contract for public law. There was an exchange of something of value by both parties to the contract, as it is unlawful just to hand out gifts. You could read this article on the implied duty of good faith and fair dealing. Or see an application of the concept in one recent Oregon case.

The city attorney would be hard pressed to assert that it is not an "objectively reasonable" argument to make . . . at least before the only body that matters.

From Chiles v. Robertson, 94 Or App 604, dealing with a fiduciary duty of majority shareholders to minority shareholders, I like the following phrase:

"The nature of the remedy follows from the nature of the breach."

That case was treated is a dispute merely between private parties. Would a charge here of manipulation of the electoral process warrant less examination by a court? I think not. Precisely to offer some deference to the political branch? This would be silly to the point of being absurd.

Again, from Chiles, I like this characterization:

"The parties' legal arguments are like two ships that pass in the twilight: Each is vaguely aware of the other's presence, but neither actually reacts to the other."

That sounds like modern blogging, with a hint of pretense of professionalism thrown in to keep it sort of civil.

Mr. Sten seems to perceive absolutely no duty what so ever. It seems to apply both to his public contracts and his private contracts. The Auditor and City Attorney here look like enablers by not even seeming to entertain a demand for return of the money . . . or even to delay an initial vote until mid-September and to seek recovery of any public funds spent to fill the balance of his vacant term.

Is Mr. Fish just an opportunist too, or would he like to argue that the vote should be held in mid-September? Such a delay would certainly magnify the potential personal liability faced by Mr. Sten. Which leads to the obvious and allowable conclusion that Mr. Sten benefits very substantially by official council action to exclude the possibility of publicly funded campaigning now or by not delaying the first special election until mid-September.

I asked the city election officer to present to the council an alternative resolution for this coming Wednesday that schedules a special election to fill the Sten vacancy for mid-September. Such an alternative is one that no single proponent of public funding of campaigns should find objectionable.


As a lawyer/blogger, I get
to be a member of:

In Vino Veritas

Chloe, Pinot Grigio, Valdadige 2013
Edmunds St. John, Bone-Jolly Gamay Noir 2013
Kirkland, Pinot Grigio, Friuli 2013
St. Francis, Red Splash 2011
Rodney Strong, Canernet, Alexander Valley 2011
Erath, Pinot Blanc 2013
Taylor Fladgate, Porto 2007
Portuga, Rose 2013
Domaine Digioia-Royer, Chambolle-Musigny, Vielles Vignes Les Premieres 2008
Locations, F Red Blend
El Perro Verde, Rueda 2013
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Indian Wells Red 2
If You See Kay, Red 2011
Turnbull, Old Bull Red 2010
Cherry Tart, Cherry Pie Pinot Noir 2012
Trader Joe's Grand Reserve Cabernet, Oakville 2012
Benton Lane, Pinot Gris 2012
Campo Viejo, Rioja, Reserva 2008
Haden Fig, Pinot Noir 2012
Pendulum Red 2011
Vina Real, Plata, Crianza Rioja 2009
Edmunds St. John, Bone/Jolly, Gamay Noir Rose 2013
Bookwalter, Subplot No. 26
Ayna, Tempranillo 2011
Pete's Mountain, Pinot Noir, Haley's Block 2010
Apaltagua, Reserva Camenere 2012
Lugana, San Benedetto 2012
Argyle Brut 2007
Wildewood Pinot Gris 2012
Anciano, Tempranillo Reserva 2007
Santa Rita, Reserva Cabernet 2009
Casone, Toscana 2008
Fonseca Porto, Bin No. 27
Louis Jadot, Pouilly-Fuissé 2011
Trader Joe's, Grower's Reserve Pinot Noir 2012
Zenato, Lugana San Benedetto 2012
Vintjs, Cabernet 2010
14 Hands, Hot to Trot White 2012
Rainstorm, Oregon Pinot Gris 2012
Silver Palm, North Coast Cabernet 2011
Andrew Rich, Gewurtztraminer 2008
Rodney Strong, Charlotte's Home Sauvignon Blanc 2012
Canoe Ridge, Pinot Gris, Expedition 2012
Edmunds St. John, Bone-Jolly Gamay Noir Rose 2012
Dark Horse, Big Red Blend No. 01A
Elk Cove, Pinot Noir Rose 2012
Fletcher, Shiraz 2010
Picollo, Gavi 2011
Domaine Eugene Carrel, Jongieux 2012
Eyrie, Pinot Blanc 2010
Atticus, Pinot Noir 2010
Walter Scott, Pinot Noir, Holstein 2011
Shingleback, Cabernet, Davey Estate 2010
Coppola, Sofia Rose 2012
Joel Gott, 851 Cabernet 2010
Pol Roget Reserve Sparkling Wine
Mount Eden Chardonnay, Santa Cruz Mountains 2009
Rombauer Chardonnay, Napa Valley 2011
Beringer, Chardonnay, Napa Reserve 2011
Kim Crawford, Sauvignon Blanc 2011
Schloss Vollrads, Spaetlese Rheingau 2010
Belle Glos, Pinot Noir, Clark & Telephone 2010
WillaKenzie, Pinot Noir, Estate Cuvee 2010
Blackbird Vineyards, Arise, Red 2010
Chauteau de Beaucastel, Chateauneuf-du-Pape 2005
Northstar, Merlot 2008
Feather, Cabernet 2007
Silver Oak, Cabernet, Alexander Valley 2002
Silver Oak, Cabernet, Napa Valley 2002
Trader Joe's, Chardonnay, Grower's Reserve 2012
Silver Palm, Cabernet, North Coast 2010
Shingleback, Cabernet, Davey Estate 2010
E. Guigal, Cotes du Rhone 2009
Santa Margherita, Pinot Grigio 2011
Alamos, Cabernet 2011
Cousino Macul, Cabernet, Anitguas Reservas 2009
Dreaming Tree Cabernet 2010
1967, Toscana 2009
Charamba, Douro 2008
Horse Heaven Hills, Cabernet 2010
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills Pinot Grigio 2011
Avignonesi, Montepulciano 2004
Lorelle, Willamette Valley Pinot Noir 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2007
Mercedes Eguren, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Lorelle, Columbia Valley Cabernet 2011
Purple Moon, Merlot 2011
Purple Moon, Chardonnnay 2011
Horse Heaven Hills, Cabernet 2010
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills Pinot Grigio 2011
Avignonesi, Montepulciano 2004
Lorelle, Willamette Valley Pinot Noir 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2007
Mercedes Eguren, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Lorelle, Columbia Valley Cabernet 2011
Purple Moon, Merlot 2011
Purple Moon, Chardonnnay 2011
Abacela, Vintner's Blend No. 12
Opula Red Blend 2010
Liberte, Pinot Noir 2010
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Indian Wells Red Blend 2010
Woodbridge, Chardonnay 2011
King Estate, Pinot Noir 2011
Famille Perrin, Cotes du Rhone Villages 2010
Columbia Crest, Les Chevaux Red 2010
14 Hands, Hot to Trot White Blend

The Occasional Book

Saul Bellow - Mister Sammler's Planet
Phil Stanford - White House Call Girl
John Kaplan & Jon R. Waltz - The Trial of Jack Ruby
Kent Haruf - Eventide
David Halberstam - Summer of '49
Norman Mailer - The Naked and the Dead
Maria Dermoȗt - The Ten Thousand Things
William Faulkner - As I Lay Dying
Markus Zusak - The Book Thief
Christopher Buckley - Thank You for Smoking
William Shakespeare - Othello
Joseph Conrad - Heart of Darkness
Bill Bryson - A Short History of Nearly Everything
Cheryl Strayed - Tiny Beautiful Things
Sara Varon - Bake Sale
Stephen King - 11/22/63
Paul Goldstein - Errors and Omissions
Mark Twain - A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court
Steve Martin - Born Standing Up: A Comic's Life
Beverly Cleary - A Girl from Yamhill, a Memoir
Kent Haruf - Plainsong
Hope Larson - A Wrinkle in Time, the Graphic Novel
Rudyard Kipling - Kim
Peter Ames Carlin - Bruce
Fran Cannon Slayton - When the Whistle Blows
Neil Young - Waging Heavy Peace
Mark Bego - Aretha Franklin, the Queen of Soul (2012 ed.)
Jenny Lawson - Let's Pretend This Never Happened
J.D. Salinger - Franny and Zooey
Charles Dickens - A Christmas Carol
Timothy Egan - The Big Burn
Deborah Eisenberg - Transactions in a Foreign Currency
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. - Slaughterhouse Five
Kathryn Lance - Pandora's Genes
Cheryl Strayed - Wild
Fyodor Dostoyevsky - The Brothers Karamazov
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt

Road Work

Miles run year to date: 377
At this date last year: 237
Total run in 2013: 257
In 2012: 129
In 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269

Clicky Web Analytics