About

This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on October 22, 2012 11:46 AM. The previous post in this blog was Oregon talking new "alignment" for high-speed heavy rail. The next post in this blog is Nothing grows like shrinkage. Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.

E-mail, Feeds, 'n' Stuff

E-mail me


[What is this?]

GeoURL

Personal blogs







« Oregon talking new "alignment" for high-speed heavy rail | Main | Nothing grows like shrinkage »

Monday, October 22, 2012

UC Nike loses round in big sex discrimination case

The university got the bad news, again, from the Ninth Circuit last week. The suits in Eugene are actually talking about the possibility of appealing to the Supreme Court. The whole thing must be costing quite the pretty penny. The case, brought by a former Ph.D. candidate in the education department, would go to trial next, unless the Supremes dismiss it.

Posted at 11:46 AM | Bookmark and Share

Comments (2)

Wouldn't you say it would (or will) cost a lot more if they lose?

At any rate, that a lot of money must be spent defending legal cases says nothing in itself on their merits.

Posted by sally | October 22, 2012 2:13 PM

Yes. The cost is a reflection of the screwy system, it says nothing about the merits of individual cases.

Posted by Jo | October 22, 2012 4:28 PM




Clicky Web Analytics