W. Hayden Island process "complete sellout of the environment"
The activists who have been opposing the pave-over of bald eagle habitat for a proposed Port of Portland shipping terminal on West Hayden Island are madder than ever now that they've had a little time to digest the hundreds of pages that were dumped on the public last week, with the usual rush-rush timeframe, by the powers that be. Even the most rudimentary cost-benefit analysis shows that the costs of the proposal are high -- both to humans and to wildlife -- and the benefits are dubious. Among the costs:
• Air Pollution Impacts on the Local Community: North Portland currently has the highest levels of diesel emissions in the state -- approximately 20 times the public health standard. A West Hayden Island Marine Industrial facility would add to the existing high-risk conditions by bringing idling ships, trucks, and trains close to at-risk communities. It would potentially add significant particulate matter to our air from grain and other bulk material terminals.• Lack of a Health Impact Assessment: Despite repeated requests and more than four years of public process, the City and the Port have not performed the most basic analysis of the potential health impacts of the development on local communities. With millions of public dollars invested in the process to ensure the Port’s needs are met, the health, environment, and livability concerns of North Portland communities are ignored continually and completely by avoiding a Health Impact Assessment.
• Transportation and Road Infrastructure Impacts: The new facility would add an additional car to the local road network on average every 20 seconds and an additional truck every 2.8 minutes. The City is proposing to convert North Hayden Island Drive into a major truck route. Cost estimates for new road infrastructure range from $30 million to $100 million in public financing----at a time when the city cannot afford to fill potholes. In addition, the transportation analysis assumes that the CRC will be built as planned as of January 2012---A dubious proposition at best.
• Turning West Hayden Island Into a Contaminated Waste Dump: The Port has already begun filling West Hayden Island floodplains with contaminated materials from the Portland Harbor Superfund Site. Approval of industrial development will bring additional millions of cubic yards of contaminated fill to Hayden Island.
• Loss of an Irreplaceable Natural Area: West Hayden Island is a jewel in our local system of natural areas. Bald eagles nest right in the middle of the area that the Port would convert to parking lots. The Port of Portland continues to reject any reasonable mitigation package to compensate for the loss of this treasure.
On the benefits side:
The ECONorthwest Reports confirm that there is adequate land in Vancouver to meet regional port development needs. Rather than building duplicative facilities that will sit half empty and lose public money, political leaders should insist that the Columbia River Ports work together to develop approaches that will avoid destroying important wildlife areas and local communities.
Think the Goldschmidt people are listening? Of course not.
Comments (5)
What's a little irreparable harm when there is money to be made for the well connected?
The rush to get this passed is yet another tragic saga of the irreparable harm this city is likely to never recover from, thanks to the fist inserted where the sun don't shine antics of the Sam-Rand twins.
Posted by Tim | June 19, 2012 1:31 PM
There are so many rings wrong with this project it is sure to be continued....just like the new Columbia River bridge.
Posted by portland native | June 19, 2012 1:39 PM
Joe Zehnder, the city’s chief planner, understands Sallinger’s concerns, but insists the draft simply reflects ongoing issues between the Port and the city:
“This isn’t a backroom deal.”
Right. It's an "in your face, and up yours" deal.
Hey, Portland City Council & Pork of Portland: how 'bout you clean up the industrial sites on Swann Island before you go and obliterate the habitat of West Hayden Island?
The main things that CoP & PoP sustain
are their "green" phoniness, deliberate deceptions, and private looting of public resources.
Put a Jailbird on it!
Posted by Mojo | June 19, 2012 2:12 PM
If the facilities were built in Vancouver, would that not impact North Portland air quality?
Posted by Max | June 19, 2012 4:13 PM
Put a Jailbird on it!
In my opinion –
By the time all is done, dirty deeds and all, I can think of one publicly subsidized building project the citizens might approve of, a jailhouse for those who have been the following: Corrupt elected officials and a few others who have done the private looting of public resources. There is a saying that these types will get theirs on judgment day, . . . however, I sincerely hope during our lifetime that matters will have shaken out that we will see some justice will eventually prevail and some put in jail. Right now I can only envision a new system where these actions against the citizenry and the common's interest will no longer be tolerated and there will be respect and value given for special natural areas. At the rate we are going, national parks and treasures set aside for future generations may be lost/sold off for all kinds of reasons.
We will have future generations lamenting about horrendous decisions.
Posted by clinamen | June 19, 2012 10:28 PM