Gangster teenagers running wild in Portland
Portland, it's time that we admit as a community that we have a serious problem with teenage gangs. Packs of kids robbing stores, beating people on the trains, shooting each other in schoolyards -- it's all happened over just the last several days. And it's not even summer yet.
Politicians making speeches and passing meaningless gun ordinances are not making a difference. The police seem incapable of doing anything -- or perhaps scared or unwilling to take serious action. The heart of the city is being lost to lawlessness and violence while we ban plastic grocery bags.
The saddest part is when you think about the upcoming municipal elections. Few of the candidates are acknowledging the depth of the problem, much less proposing solutions with any real promise. We pay a lot in property taxes. It's high time these people spent the money on something important. Like making a dent in gang violence.
Comments (42)
This post is on target. The MSM around these parts isn't pressing on this story. They don't write much about the debt problem on the sidebar of this blog either. Sad, but true.
Posted by jimbo | April 15, 2012 8:38 AM
I have ridden the Blue Line Max downtown for work for many years. I would be afraid to add up all of the hours I spent on the train because it could probably be stated in months. I normally ride at rush hour, and for the most part have felt safe. I put on my head phones and mind my own business. Over the years, there have been incidents. A couple of near fights; a couple of real fights; some loud and disruptive people, and some crazies that make you feel uncomfortable, but not too threatened.
I happened to be on the train Friday that had the incident where the 57 year old asked the black teens to quiet down and was assaulted. I didn't see what happened but all I know was there was a loud commotion and then a group of black teens (I would estimate 30-40) running around the 60th avenue platform. I thought it was what some now call a "flash mob" and then somebody yelled "he has a gun, get down" Everybody hit the floor. I was thinking how insane this is. Here I am trying to get home from work at rush hour and I'm ducking down on the train floor because somebody might have a gun out on the platform.
When this sort of stuff happens at rush hour, normal working people that pay their fares are going to stop riding the train. They're certainly not going to ride it at off peak hours. I'm seriously reconsidering my transit options after this.
Posted by ron | April 15, 2012 8:40 AM
And from the Albina Ministerial alliance ?
Crickets...
Posted by tankfixer | April 15, 2012 8:46 AM
If many people starting taking the buses instead of Eastside MAX, even if it takes longer, it would send a very strong message.
Posted by Nick theoldurbanist | April 15, 2012 8:59 AM
It is not about race, but race is a huge component.
It is about crime prevention, pure and simple.
Address the crime problem, and by definition you are addressing the race component, since so much crime is done by minorities.
How to address the crime part?
Follow the model set by the previous Mayor of NYC. Start with the "broken windows" and the TriMet assaults, and at the same time obviously crack down hard on the gangs. That alone sends the signal that Portland has had enough.
But has Portland really "had enough" yet? Maybe Bojack and a few others on this blog, yes. But not the uber liberal "Keep Portland Weird" crowd. Portland gets what those people want. Expect no changes, because of what the "saddest part" really is!
Posted by Harry | April 15, 2012 9:07 AM
Based on the people that keep getting elected, including the HUGE list of losers pining for the mayor's office. It's going to get even worse. Sorry, but evidently it's not bad enough for enough people to finally demand and get something done about it. Until then, the march to the bottom continues.
Posted by Native Oregonian | April 15, 2012 9:16 AM
How can the police be effective when most arrests of minorities bring out the race card. Portland has become an entitlement city. I moved years ago, but maybe not far enough.
The broken window model is a good one.
Posted by snowdog | April 15, 2012 9:21 AM
Theres a really worthwhile book that every candidate in pdx should be forced to discuss before the election: called When Brute Force Fails, it is a research based book on how to actually make a dent in this kind of thing, rather than blundering into a Thumper Humphreys kind of response that only makes things worse. It's by Mark Kleiman.
Posted by GA Seldes | April 15, 2012 9:22 AM
On target. The mob of punks at Nordstrom the other day shows how out of hand it's gotten, as does the story from rider Ron. And of course, Jesse and Al are laying low.
The mayor winks at Randy and puts on his mean glasses, and may have somebody send out a strongly-worded tweet.
What are the cops going to do? If they take action, they get heat; if they do nothing, they get heat - though less of it in the latter case. Tri-Met's not going to do anything; they don't even require folks to pay to ride their crime trains.
Me, I stay out of downtown Portland, and I drive to get from point A to point B. To do otherwise is just too risky, these days.
What's really weird is that 40 years ago, I used to live on N. Tillamook (off Williams) and felt safe walking in the hood any time of the day or night. Today, I wouldn't feel safe walking to Lloyd center on a sunny day.
The area just cries out for condos.
Posted by Max | April 15, 2012 9:22 AM
Part of Portland, but needs attention. Remember when the Servarla Garnt High School student body offices were doing armed robberies on grocery stores?
Posted by John F Bradach, Sr. | April 15, 2012 9:22 AM
WHY would anybody run for office? So the "progressive" media can attack you and your family for attempting to make a difference?
Weird Aint Work-in folks,
Posted by fancypants | April 15, 2012 9:26 AM
What used to be "my city" and I was so proud of it has become a scary embarrasment- How do we fix this - where do we start?
Posted by K.W. | April 15, 2012 9:50 AM
Jack, this is a serious problem, thanks for hammering on it. Think Out Loud on OPB did a story the other day about the "Broken Windows" efforts made around Killingsworth and Albina. While it does help in many ways, and I sincerely support it, it also pushes bad actors elsewhere, so it isn't a total solution (as seen in east county, and as the Nordstrom story suggests). There needs to be, plain and simple, more hours by police and social workers on this issue. It will cost more money, but there is plenty floating around the city's bureaus. Maybe a WaterGangEnforcementBus?
Posted by Huck | April 15, 2012 9:56 AM
I am in my late 20s, black, pretty decent size, work downtown, and last year reached the decision there is no way in heck I am riding the Max to work anymore. Between the packs of gang members/gutter punks and crazy people, I don't feel safe on that tin box - no matter how tough you think you are, a mob/knife/bullet will have you beat. I'm not very PC, so calling it like it is, most of the "packs" of gang member/gang wannabees I've seen have been black (though the road warrior types with their aggressive pit bulls on the train have skewed white). So, while race is part of this equation, it isn't the whole deal.
That said, the major issue to me is the lack of fare enforcement. I've never felt threatened on the bus, in large part because the get from A to B on the old #10 (now #73), you need to pay or present a pass to ride. With the Max, the only time this is enforced is the random day a fare inspector is on your particular train. Unfortunately, rather than addressing the issue, which I think could be combatted in large part through consistent security/fare enforcement, the city's answer has been gutting the bus system to force ridership on trains. As a consequence, myself and many others who can afford the gas prices (for now) have made the decision to commute by car rather than transit, those who can't, onto the Max. How "progressive" of the powers that be.
Posted by NEPguy | April 15, 2012 9:59 AM
If you think the black community ignores gang and crime problems among teenagers, you are sadly mistaken. For example, Google "sei portland" and take a look at SEI's website, the Oregonian article on SEI, and the Charity Navigator page on it. Another effective program that helps teenagers, SUN, is about to get slashed for lack of money. If you guys have any extra cash, please consider looking for a way you can actually help.
At least you could quit saying no black or liberal people do anything. I'm a Portland liberal who's taught a lot of high-risk teenagers and given them a better alternative for what to do with their time and energy. You would not believe what hard workers and survivors many of these kids are. And yes, I voted for Adams, and yes, I'm disappointed, but honestly I'm not sure I'd vote for Dozono if I could do it all again.
I appreciate this blog's focus on this issue. A lot of us still feel quite safe in our day-to-day lives in Portland, but it's not OK to ignore that a lot of us don't.
Posted by JulieinSE | April 15, 2012 10:16 AM
The cops have been conditioned. If you contact persons of color who (in their mind) seem to be up to some possible trouble-making, you may be guilty of profiling. That kind of complaint may follow you forever, maybe even into a civil courtroom proceeding.
Best course of action; Wait till a crime occurs and then re-act if you can. Reactive rather than proactive is not a good recipe for prevention of criminal behavior.
Profiling because of race is a bad thing, but being able to profile a situation and take action before something bad happens is a disappearing art.
Posted by gibby | April 15, 2012 10:24 AM
We usually only hear from the black community when a cop kills or beats a black kid.
We rarely hear from the black community when a gang of black kids beat up someone.
Speaking out when something bad happens is applying the "broken window" concept of crime prevention.
Staying silent is giving assent to the crime.
Posted by tankfixer | April 15, 2012 10:38 AM
Wait till the white folks get robbed at the Nordstrom stores! instead of these flash robbers just taking merchandise.
Then! perhaps Nordstrom will install guards at the doors as is done in places in Argentina and South Africa or Richmond, CAI can assure everyone that I do not want to live where that is necessary.
Posted by Portland Native | April 15, 2012 10:43 AM
I'm surprised there's no video of the teens released for the Nordstrom's robbery.
Mall video security cameras are quite impressive, and can even zoom in to see your credit card when you're at the checkout stand.
Posted by ws | April 15, 2012 10:52 AM
Lets stop letting kids ride Tri Met for free. Big part of the problem solved.
Posted by steve | April 15, 2012 11:01 AM
As my high school teachers might say: "Compare and contrast the PPB report as written and contrast to the report as edited for the "Oregonian". Extra credit for pointing out differences and possible motives:
PPB press release:
"Officers arrived and learned that a group of 15-20 African American male teens were being loud on the eastbound MAX approaching 60th when the victim, a 57-year-old Danny Adamson, asked them to quiet down."
As edited in the "O":
"A group of 15 to 20 male teenagers were being loud on an eastbound MAX train headed toward the station when Danny Adamson, 57, reportedly asked them to be quiet."
Followed by the "O" request from witnesses:
"Witnesses can provide information by emailing CrimeTips@PortlandOregon.gov. "
-----------
And no doubt the "O" spends countless meetings on determining the cause of their declining credibility and loss of paid readership.
Posted by J. D. Field | April 15, 2012 11:09 AM
Shhh...
If we keep talking about this you're going to scare off the expected hordes of prospective condo buyers in search of clean, happy, sustainable Nirvana and p*ss off the developer/politician money changers.
Hint:
Remember the flim-flam mayor in the film "Jaws" who didn't want news about the shark getting out?
Posted by Mr. Grumpy | April 15, 2012 11:27 AM
"...and I sincerely support it, it also pushes bad actors elsewhere, so it isn't a total solution."
This is a silly and trite argument that I hear way too much (i.e., crime being pushed elsewhere from community crime watches and what not).
I'd say "good" that crime is pushed elsewhere; communities shouldn't have to deal with it in their neighborhood in the first place. And when the bad actors do go elsewhere, let them get pushed somewhere else too by even more crime intervention and neighborhood involvement.
What's the opposite of this argument? Letting crime stay in a neighborhood instead and having community members (ineffectively) deal with it on their turf?
Posted by ws | April 15, 2012 11:44 AM
NEPguy: Correct: on a bus, you pay - which is why Tri-Met's constant gutting of bus services in favor of "free ride" crime-trains is so incredibly irritating.
But there's something else going on, as well, and I confess that I have no clue about it. When I lived over on NE Tillamook in '73, I was one of maybe two white guys in the whole area, and it was great. Afternoons, there'd be folks sitting out on the porches, and you always got a wave and a smile as you walked by.
2 a.m., they'd be indoors, most likely, but folks you saw as you walked back from the clubs were always cool. I could walk from NE Tillamook down Williams and over a bridge, down to Sack's Front Avenue, have a couple of brews and catch some great live music, then walk back home, and it was always safe.
Something's changed in the culture of downtown and NE - and not for the better. Sometime around the '80's, I think it was, things started getting uglier; kids started shooting things up on the inner east side, and then they started taking things downtown. Eastside light rail really kicked things up, and the place has never been the same.
Maybe it's just me, but I don't think so. We just didn't have gang attacks and fools popping caps all around the place back when Seafood Mama was singing about Williams Avenue.
Me, I think "urban renewal" and light rail had a huge negative impact.
Posted by Max | April 15, 2012 12:04 PM
Subway systems are better suited for densely populated cities than Portland's light rail model (especially in Portland's much lesser dense suburbs and much of even Portland). Light rail's capital cost makes it a very uneconomical substitue for rapid bus transit and the individual modes of transport. What may be just as bad about Portland's light rail model is it is way too open to anyone with bad intentions and exacts no cost for those riding it (fare evasion is almost risk free).
Light rail's subversive incubator is made even worse by Metro and other liberal oriented local and federal governments erecting heavily subsidized housing around the system. It's almost a replay of the bombed out ghettos of the failed 1960/70s Chicago public housing projects. Portland and Oregon governance needs a reset where government size is reduced and churches and charities enlisted to bring about positive change in individual behavior, bringing back belief in responsible individual behavior and being responsible for one's lot in life.
Given the juveniles (Sam Adams and Jefferson Smith, e.g) popular for running Portland city hall it probably makes more sense for grown ups to plan exiting the city of Portland than staging a frustratingly long, long generational campaign to bring about more grown up governance.
Posted by Bob Clark | April 15, 2012 12:53 PM
What I see is a total lack of interest in the hard work of running a city by Sam Adams and his team. They only care about "green" stuff, and "cool" shiny toys. They don't care about boring things like crime, potholes, property values, jobs, etc.
Sam is so brain washed that he would rather spend his time worrying about plastic bags and food slop buckets than real issues.
Most of the cult members running for mayor suffer from the same fault. They don't really want to run a city, they just want to play God on a couple of special issues that they care about.
Posted by Andy | April 15, 2012 1:45 PM
Dealing with the street violence is going to take a whole lot more than action solely by the City of Portland(CoP).
Certainly it starts there, with the CoP, with "no-nonsense,arrest-everybody police activity.
But the Mult. DA's office, funded by the County and the State, and headed by a separately elected official, soon to be the unopposed Rod Underhill replacing Mike Schrunk, has to buy in, and aggressively prosecute, without plea bargains.
Judges need to sentence.
And the Department of Corrections and the Jeuvenile Authority need to keep folks in.
All that in the face of a Kitzhaber led attempt to dismantle mandatory sentencing as it is now. The Commission / Committee Governor retread put together on Measure 11 revision, without a single prosecutor or police agency head on it, tells you which way the wind is blowing among the usual suspects.
Maybe its time to move to Montana.
Posted by Nonny Mouse | April 15, 2012 2:00 PM
K.W.:...How do we fix this - where do we start?
Start by being an independent voter, do not assume that the top three "deemed" only viable candidates are going to do much fixing. In my view, mostly more of the same agenda, and that is why the power brokers, insiders are promoting them and not allowing others to even participate in debates.
Some democracy!
Look carefully at the voter's pamphlet and the other candidates that are not being promoted by the media, you may find those who are very concerned about our city and ready to work for the public interest. There are some who want to stop the city going on this downward spiral.
Posted by clinamen | April 15, 2012 3:41 PM
This has absolutely nothing to do with race, per se, but everything to do with a culture and a targeted demographic to which this culture is marketed.
In other words, as long as there is MONEY to be made this culture of criminality WILL continue.
"There is a class of colored people who make a business of keeping the troubles, the wrongs, and the hardships of the Negro Race before the public. Having learned they can make a living out of their troubles, they have grown into the settled habit of advertising their wrongs, partly because they want sympathy, and partly because it pays. Some of these people do not want the Negro to lose his grievances because they do not want to lose their jobs...There is a certain class of race-problem solvers that don't want the patient to get well because as long as the disease holds out they have not only an easy means to make a living, but an easy medium through which to make themselves prominent before the public."
Booker T. Washington
1856-1915
Educator, Author, and Civil Rights Leader
Until this is addressed - nothing will change.
Posted by msmith | April 15, 2012 4:54 PM
The bottom line is that there is no REACTIVE fix for this. Community building from pre-school up through a broad web of wholesome participatory programs is the only answer. There is absolutely no other fix. NONE!
SEI does a great job, but can only do so much. Summer parks and youth sports programs have been cut by 2/3 or more since the '70s -- more victims of TIF rake-offs. Gang activity fills a void left by wholesome community activities that have been scrapped in favor of all these sexier boondoggles.
The solution is obvious! What we need to do is pay the "development community" to build more condos on the public dime! (Oh, sure!) That ideology is pushing Portland straight into Chapter 9, under which banks and bond holders will get paid before current and former public workers. The scramble to commit lots of $$ to more PDC condo projects before the current council turns over says it all. Building a broad web of wholesome community activities in all neighborhoods is the last thing on the pols' minds. It is all about giving the real estate sharpies the last three pieces of pie before the kitchen is shut down for four generations.
But, don't worry, they'll be leaving the Portland "brand" in great shape, and we all know that is more important than anything, right?
Posted by dyspeptic | April 15, 2012 5:06 PM
The first home I owned was up in Northeast, somewhere between Woodlawn and Vernon. We moved in just after the last drug house burned out, and were fortunate to enjoy relative peace for five or six years.
It really was lovely up there most of the time. I felt safe, and at home. Then things started to turn sour, even as the economy was going full steam ahead. Fights on the bus. Shootings ramped up More car break-ins (including mine).
Finally, two shot dead within view of my window, and then we sold. It's still pretty up there, but it wasn't home to me anymore. All the quirkly little shoppes in the world don't change the fact that the underlying community is rotten...
Posted by Downtown Denizen | April 15, 2012 5:58 PM
Prophetic words by Mr Washington.
Remarkable the insight he had over a hundred years ago.
Posted by tankfixer | April 15, 2012 6:41 PM
I dunno, think anything like this might be part of the problem?
http://tinyurl.com/74otj43
Posted by ConcordBridge | April 16, 2012 12:15 AM
I think this issue can't be laid solely at the feet of politicians or the police. Rather, you have to back up and look at the parents as well.
I could go on about the roles of parents, or the impact of society on the family, etc., etc. I'm not going to, because we all know the arguments.
It just bothered me that everybody is calling this a political/government issue and ignoring the role of the family as well.
Posted by Michelle | April 16, 2012 7:17 AM
What Michelle said. But just a couple of the arguments: Babies having babies; single parents with no parenting skills; and the parent on drugs and/or just out of jail.
Posted by rickN | April 16, 2012 7:48 AM
Michelle,
I agree that the family role is critical. I also think that the society we live in,
it has become more difficult for the family role importance.
Government, Vera Katz and others brought the education reform legislation (CIM/CAM) that many do not like.
The political scene here with the URA's has hurt the money needed for schools and public safety needs. The political scene here with the UGB and density has made living conditions within the UGB worse, especially in some neighborhoods.
The corruption and lack of stellar leadership in our country/community has in my opinion brought a pallor of negativity that I believe does impact all the way down to the family and the young adults and children. That does not excuse awful behavior, but I believe much of this is an extension of a system not working. How can young people have any respect, when they are mired in a rotten system?
Posted by clinamen | April 16, 2012 9:22 AM
Why are people surprised at the breakdown in the family when Uncle Sugar replaced being a responsible parent that takes care of their family ?
Posted by tankfixer | April 16, 2012 9:52 AM
Casey Foundation grant money has directed the philosophy of our juvenile justice system for many years.
http://www.crimevictimsunited.org/issues/juvenilejustice/multcoreport.pdf
Posted by StJohnsFlasher | April 16, 2012 10:43 AM
Bad enough we have financial mismanagement by elected officials, but government intrusion of social behaviors parallel is perhaps more than a community can withstand.
Posted by clinamen | April 16, 2012 10:55 AM
I used to ride the Maxx, shop and visit downtown. Now I go down once a year, if that. I drive from Hillsboro to Gresham everyday and would if gas was 10 a gallon and if I could I would drive around Portland, not through it. The roads suck, the thugs suck, the bums suck and no seems to be in charge and if they are they do not seem to care about fixing items 1,2 or 3.
Posted by George | April 16, 2012 2:40 PM
As I have said on other online comment pages, racial descriptions mena nearly nothing because people described as "African-American" can range in shading from a shade darker than Jack to coal black. Additionally, multi-racial, East Indian, Polynesian, Hispanics are often mistakenly identified as black, Like I say, if you're Tiger Woods or Halle Berry you are biracial, if you just held up the liquor store you're black.
Racial identification is pretty much useless, except in terms of racial stereotyping.
We can't have it both ways. On one hand folks talk about not wanting to see color, and how were all the same however the same folks are quick to refer these kids as needing help from their "own communities" when bad things happen.
Most of the pathologization of the black community goes unchallenged in Portland. Here are some national facts though: http://colorlines.com/archives/2012/04/crime_myths.htm
Posted by Rebecca of Sunnybrook Farm | April 16, 2012 8:06 PM
Doesn't take action? That's the worst what can they do. If people see that teenagers can roam the town freely the situation will just get worse! I mean no punishment or anything. Imagine their situation they do bad things but nobody cares or acts.
I think this article may be a good extra for this one.
http://journalue.blogspot.com/2012/04/goodbye-childhood.html
Posted by Csaba Holcz | April 17, 2012 9:22 AM