Oregon State prof sweeping Fukushima under the rug
It's "really, really minor," says Kathryn Higley. Some other folks would beg to differ, and they question Higley's objectivity. That's the way it is with all things nuclear -- you can't seem to get a straight answer to any question. But anyone who's "partnering" with the nuclear power industry gets zero trust from us.
Comments (4)
Just wait till the folks at The O get ahold of this, they'll likely do an anti nuclear editorial based on fac.... Sorry. Never mind.
Posted by paul | March 4, 2012 7:50 AM
So Jack, I take it that you are a tool of the Anti-Nuclear Industry and cannot be trusted either?
Posted by John D | March 4, 2012 6:49 PM
She tells some absolute whoppers over at NEI that are worse yet. http://safetyfirst.nei.org/public-health/experts-say-health-effects-of-fukushima-accident-should-be-very-minor/?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter
Posted by Lilly | March 5, 2012 1:33 PM
Maybe Ms. Higley should speak to the people connecting over here:
http://www.stltoday.com/lifestyles/health-med-fit/fitness/lawsuit-links-illnesses-to-north-st-louis-county-creek/article_4d9b45ff-3aa2-560d-9ec9-8fa44436acfc.html
Posted by sheila | March 6, 2012 1:27 PM