How to stop City of Portland computer purchase bungling
Of course -- form a committee! Each member of the City Council will appoint a member, and the appointees will have some meetings and maybe a few charrettes, and soon the city's computer system disasters will come to an end.
Sam Adams will appoint somebody who will tell him what he wants to hear; Randy Leonard will appoint somebody who will tell him what he wants to hear; Amanda Fritz will appoint somebody who will tell her what she wants to hear, and so on. It's gonna be so much better.
Comments (12)
What is that old saying about how a giraffe is a cow designed by a committee? Or maybe it was an elephant?
Posted by Portland Native | July 12, 2011 8:06 AM
And when the city screws up next time, council can blame the committee!
Posted by Garage Wine | July 12, 2011 8:13 AM
Didn't the O report that there were already paid consultants that advise them on this sort of thing? Did they not also report that at least one of those paid consultants tried to dissuade them from purchasing the new 9-1-1 system from the company that they awarded the no bid contract to? Aren't there also ad hoc committees of experts assembled for individual projects?
I guess they're just not getting the answers they're looking for from the folks they have now so they need to get some people who'll tell them what they want to hear. More often than not it seems like the sole purpose of the many many "advisory committees" that the CoP forms is to provide political cover to city hall.
Posted by Pragmatic Portlander | July 12, 2011 8:19 AM
... and I´ve seen it before
... and I´l see it again
... yes I´ve seen it before
... just little bits of history repeating
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=15QngStkp-E
Respectfully submitted on behalf of the Ridicule Committee's Entertainment Research Subcommittee.
Posted by Mojo | July 12, 2011 8:38 AM
"council can blame the committee"
You mean:
council WILL blame the committee
This is just a liability shield.
Posted by Steve | July 12, 2011 8:59 AM
Re: "Amanda Fritz will appoint somebody who will tell her what she wants to hear"
"I have an immediate opportunity to nominate a volunteer to serve on the City's new Technology Oversight Committee. This group is being established to oversee large or complex technology purchases and upgrades. Details here (pdf)
Please email me if you are interested, using Technology Committee Volunteer as the subject of your message, and stating within the email your experience and expertise with technology systems. Applications will be processed as received, so please contact me soon."
http://www.portlandonline.com/fritz/index.cfm?a=355245&c=49233
More disturbing is this addendum:
"I also expect to nominate two replacement members for the 2011 Charter Commission, due to resignations of previous members who I nominated. The City Attorney has advised the Council to prepare an ordinance to specify when vacancies exist and how vacancies will be filled, since the Charter is silent on those questions. I would like to hear from anyone interested in serving on this Charter Commission, while the ordinance is being prepared under the leadership of Mayor Adams."
The Charter is silent on how vacancies on the Charter Commission are to be filled? And a city attorney reviewed the original Charter that provides for succeeding Charter Commissions but did not notice this omission so that the current City Attorney must strongly suggest that an ordinance is required? And this is called governance?
Posted by Gardiner Menefree | July 12, 2011 9:20 AM
These people couldn't lead the way out of a room with one door.
Posted by Snards | July 12, 2011 9:51 AM
Citizens need to organize and convene their own committees and issue reports.
Posted by Mojo | July 12, 2011 11:00 AM
Snards, "These people couldn't lead the way out of a room with one door".
Uh, they'd form a committee to consider whether it's the correct door.
Posted by lw | July 12, 2011 11:50 AM
Require performance bond.
Posted by pdxnag | July 12, 2011 12:43 PM
Mojo:Citizens need to organize and convene their own committees and issue reports.
This is what needs to happen, more productive to be on our own track and out from under their control. We can conduct our own meetings and will not have to hire any mediators as the city does in case the people need to be "settled down" when they oppose or are upset.
We should stay away from their deceptive paths, just a way to keep us busy and on their track, so they can control and use the "committees" to blame or as Steve mentioned as a liability shield.
Posted by clinamen | July 12, 2011 2:24 PM
The real question is whose cronies are going to be appointed to this and how much pork will be dished out.
Posted by LucsAdvo | July 13, 2011 6:06 AM