Fuku by moonlight
Those of us watching the meltdown disaster at Fukushima have literally been watching two video feeds for weeks now. One is from an on-site camera (albeit at a pretty unhelpful angle) supplied by the plant operator, Tokyo Electric (a.k.a. Tepco). It is here. The other is a telephoto stream from miles away, supplied by a Japanese television network. It is here.
One thing we've noticed over recent weeks is that there are an awful lot of big steam or smoke events happening at night. Sometimes it's hard to differentiate the emissions coming out of the trashed reactors from fog rolling in off the ocean. Given how scandalously secretive and misleading Tepco has been throughout the disaster, we suspect that they conduct some of their desperate, experimental operations at night, in the hope that the darkness will add a little deniability if needed.
Anyway, early this morning, Japan time (late yesterday morning, our time), a big mess of smoke or steam seemed to come pouring out of reactor 4, the furthest to the right and the furthest away from the Tepco cam. (It's in front of the middle of the three vent towers.) A viewer who recorded the video stream at the time has apparently enhanced the images with colorization, and doctored up that way, the clip shows that something serious was going on at that reactor. Skeptics, feel free to laugh, but for those with open minds, the clip is here.
That green plume seems to be headed south, straight for Tokyo.
Comments (10)
My guess is that the reactor core(s) and/or spent fuel pool(s) are constantly emitting (super)heated water vapor, and that is more visible at night because the ambient air temperature is cooler (the vapor condenses). We understand that TEPCO is almost continually dumping mass quantities of water onto the messes, so that toxic vapor is constantly being carried off by the prevailing winds. Eh?
Posted by Mojo | June 21, 2011 5:51 AM
I am glad I am old.
Posted by portland native | June 21, 2011 7:17 AM
TEPCO have admitted to a significant loss of water in the spent fuel pool located in the R4 building, which as you probably know was in shutdown for maintenance at the time of the disaster. The fuel from R4, which is relatively 'fresh' or 'hot' was removed from the RPV and placed in the SFP alongside the used fuel already stored there for long term cooling.
Like many other aspects of the crisis, this situation seems to have been largely 'off the radar' in terms of risk and crisis management. With both the fresh 'hot' and depleted 'dirty' fuel assemblies exposed to air in an uncontained environment, in a pool which appears to be leaking, they have some serious problems facing them.
Add the fact that the building itself looks in danger of collapsing, with radiation levels so high the workers cannot approach close enough even to assess the damage, and you get a sobering focal point for just one aspect of the problems at this wrecked nuclear plant.
Those interested in the latest news, and discussion of same, might care to visit ENENEWS at http://enenews.com/
Posted by Steven | June 21, 2011 7:38 AM
"...they have some serious problems facing them."
Given the breadth of impacts from oceanic to atmospheric contamination we should substitute "we" for "they" & "us"for "them". Unfortunately radioactivity knows no boundaries.
Posted by genop | June 21, 2011 8:26 AM
Re: "Unfortunately radioactivity knows no boundaries."
genop,
actually, time is a boundary in that half-life decay at least reduces emissions from many isotopes; otherwise, I couldn't agree more with you.
While attention has been focused on Fukushima, NE's own Ft Calhoun nuke has shown that it, too, should be subject to greater scrutiny, even a video feed. But why stop in NE when NRC records show that tritium has leaked from at least 48 of 65 sites, including one in NJ, where it has made its way to an aquifer:
"Radioactive tritium has leaked from three-quarters of U.S. commercial nuclear power sites, often into groundwater from corroded, buried piping, an Associated Press investigation shows."
And,
"At three sites — two in Illinois and one in Minnesota — leaks have contaminated drinking wells of nearby homes, the records show, but not at levels violating the drinking water standard. At a fourth site, in New Jersey, tritium has leaked into an aquifer and a discharge canal feeding picturesque Barnegat Bay off the Atlantic Ocean."
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/us_aging_nukes_part2
Tritium, btw, has a half-life of approximately 12.32yrs:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tritium
"Tritium is potentially dangerous if inhaled or ingested. It can combine with oxygen to form tritiated water molecules, and those can be absorbed through pores in the skin."
Posted by Gardiner Menefree | June 21, 2011 9:24 AM
Your post's title, "Fuku in Moonlight", gave me an idea. The only way to describe the pain and magnitude of this thing is with poetry, specifically the ancient Japanese form called haiku:
Fukushima vents
the People breathe its poison
will it ever end
Posted by Bill McDonald | June 21, 2011 10:50 AM
Bill's invented faiku!
Posted by Mojo | June 21, 2011 12:11 PM
The Nebraska reactor had me concerned when the FAA imposed a no-fly zone in the area. According to the IEAE, it's at level 4.
As somebody has mentioned, an interesting AP report notes that the NRC is merrily reducing standards and extending licenses on aging nukes. Doesn't seem especially responsible.
Fortunately, Obama's certain to be all over it.
Posted by Max | June 21, 2011 3:27 PM
You might go to bed one of these moonlit nights, clouded by vapors and steam steathly passing by and wake up to one of these in your neighborhood:
http://www.nuscalepower.com/ot-Scalable-Nuclear-Power-Technology.php
Brought to you by these smiling faces:
http://www.nuscalepower.com/an-Management-Leadership.php
We had a small stay from imminent irresponsibility when their felon financial backer was arrested:
http://www.oregonlive.com/business/index.ssf/2011/03/nuscale_power_still_seeking_re.html
I don't think TVA will be so lucky.
Posted by sheila | June 21, 2011 4:03 PM
The no-fly zone over the Nebraska nukes (which are still surrounded on all sides by floodwaters) was apparently more out of a concern that swarming news helicopters would collide than out of any concern for radioactive releases.
Posted by Jack Bog | June 21, 2011 4:32 PM