About

This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on May 16, 2011 11:49 PM. The previous post in this blog was Reader poll: Who will be pro hoops champs?. The next post in this blog is Eat your nukes, they're good for you. Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.

E-mail, Feeds, 'n' Stuff

Monday, May 16, 2011

Playing right along

If the last two months have shown us anything about the nuclear meltdown at Fukushima in Japan, it's that Tokyo Electric and the national government there don't know what they're doing, are hiding facts, or most likely both. The news that they are releasing about the conditions of the four trashed reactors gets worse by the day, and they have no credible plan to remediate the disaster other than pouring swimming pools full of water onto the reactors, which then escapes as highly radioactive pollution into the sea and groundwater. Meanwhile, serious earthquakes near Fukushima continue unabated, and the blown-out building shells of two of the plants, which hold up the spent nuclear fuel pools, look to be teetering on collapse.

And so what does the U.S. government do? Officially stop paying attention, thus providing further cover for the Japanese. If there was any doubt that the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission was still a house of industry call girls, it's been removed.

Comments (4)

When did I stop feeling sure, feeling safe
And start wondering why, wondering why
Is this a dream, am I here, where are you
What's in back of the sky, why do we cry

Gotta get off, gonna get
Out of this merry-go-round....

From Valley of the Dolls by Andre & Dory Previn, here sung by Dory ~
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xH15InuSVWs

OK, Jack the quote in the article was: "Mr. Borchardt said last week that the condition of the reactors was “static but not stable.”" That is a true statement. The reactors are not going anywhere, and they seem to have everything - meaning the leaks and the migration of radioactive material outside of their controlled area under control. OBVIOUSLY your definition of under control is different than their definition. This sounds like a prudent position for the NRC to take.

they seem to have everything - meaning the leaks and the migration of radioactive material outside of their controlled area under control.

You are totally delusional.




Clicky Web Analytics