Dear KATU
If you're going to cite "experts" on the Japanese nuclear disaster, you might try identifying at least two. Preferably try to include one who hasn't made a career out of playing with a toy reactor. If you try really hard, you might interview a scientist who actually opposes nuclear power! Or maybe a marginal leftist like the U.S. Surgeon General.
But hey, I understand -- you've got a lot going on with the Charlie Sheen story.
Comments (14)
Preferably try to include one who hasn't made a career out of playing with a toy reactor.
It would be refreshing if you'd find a way to criticize the media without demeaning others who are tangential to the story, Jack.
Posted by Dave J. | March 15, 2011 8:06 PM
Why doesn't KATU quote the article in the NYT which tells the story of "the GE 3". These engineers quit in protest after they determined that these nuke plants were unsafe 30+ years ago.
And ABC broke the story today!
I understand not wanting to panic the general populace, but out and out lies will not serve anyone. Rampant speculation serves no useful purpose either.
Posted by Portland Native | March 15, 2011 8:16 PM
He's the leading spokesperson for misinformation at this point. All over the media with "Don't worry." Ludicrous.
Posted by Jack Bog | March 15, 2011 8:16 PM
Hey, his toy reactor has had leaks of radiation like a dozen times!
Posted by moonmist | March 15, 2011 8:50 PM
He's the leading spokesperson for misinformation at this point. All over the media with "Don't worry." Ludicrous.
Just because someone has a different opinion (one informed by an advanced degree, I'd point out) doesn't make them an agent of misinformation.
Posted by Dave J. | March 15, 2011 9:42 PM
Here's what he said yesterday:
Zero effect on health in Japan from a meltdown? Absolutely ludicrous. I don't care what kind of degree he has.Posted by Jack Bog | March 15, 2011 9:52 PM
Lately Frantz has been busy importing Arizona's nuclear waste to the Reed campus. Quite proud of it -- he's doing a big favor to the U.S. Department of Energy, who is the nation's worst nuclear villain.
His previous gig was at Trojan:
He's listed as staff -- not faculty -- at Reed. He's retiring this year.It would be interesting to hear what the science profs at that institution think.
Posted by Jack Bog | March 15, 2011 10:08 PM
He sure knows a lot about how to safely operate a nuclear reactor!
http://www.nrc.gov/about-nrc/regulatory/enforcement/current/reactor-actions/2008.html
"Reed College (Reed Research Reactor Facility) EA-08-339. On December 19, 2008, a Notice of Violation was issued for a Severity Level III violation. Specifically, the facility was operated at a power level in excess of the licensed full power limit of 250 kW for approximately 70 minutes, which is in violation of their Technical Specifications."
Posted by mm | March 15, 2011 10:14 PM
From the NRC's report on the Reed reactor:
"it also appeared that these problems and events seemed to indicate a negative trend at the facility, and lack of proper emphasis on safety, and failure to instill the proper attitude toward maintaining an appropriate safety culture at the facility."
Posted by mm | March 15, 2011 10:15 PM
Regular readers of this blog should know that when Jack gets his panties in a bunch, facts don't matter. All that matters is the story line, not matter how distorted.
Fact is, in the story above, all the surgeon general days is stocking up on iodide is always a good precaution.
Catch the implication: the Surgeon General is a better "expert" on nuclear power than someone who has spent actual time operating a reactor.
Posted by Pg | March 16, 2011 12:19 AM
Here, let me apply some toilet tissue to that last comment. It was left by "PG" -- Paul Gronke, a political science prof at Reed:
Paul, when it comes to health issues -- which is what we are talking about here -- yes, I do take the advice of the surgeon general over that of some guy whose job at Trojan evaporated, and who took a gig running the toy reactor at Reed. Apparently a guy with a spotty record, as another reader has just noted.
Frantz's public assertion that there is zero probability of health effects, even in Japan, from this nuclear incident -- probably to go down as the worst in history -- is laughable. If he's your safety officer at Reed, I'll let you borrow some iodine.
Posted by Jack Bog | March 16, 2011 12:32 AM
What the heck does CHP mean after Frantz's name?
And I bet that so called course that Reed hosting for $1400, is like the "training" for the old Civil Defence back in the 50s when you got a sheet of paper with pictures of Russian bombers, a bucket you were supposed to fill with sand and a small shovel.
"duck and cover!" everyone!
Posted by Portland Native | March 16, 2011 8:04 AM
CHP likely certified health physicist, the civilian term for Navy ELTs, engineering lab techs. A little extra training in operating radiacs (rad measuring devices) and pass a pretty easy exam.
Posted by George Anonymuncule Seldes | March 16, 2011 9:08 AM
I realize the post headline names KATU, but the same vidiocy is what every TV station feeds us, including the rightwing-suckup 'Public Broadcasting' ditto propaganda keepers. Perhaps a special criticism is in order aimed particularly at KGW TV since they promote and feature (too often) the dictated talking points by that fop from the FOX syndicate hate-talk radio and Glenn Beck buddy wannabe: LIARS Larson.
Here's more (of a view I endorse) from Wayne Madsen Report .COM, March 16; (subscription req'd so link omitted ... you couldn't click to get there).
That totally describes our LIARS. Complicit local TV magnifies his hate-talk more.Posted by Tenskwatawa | March 17, 2011 2:11 AM