About

This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on March 3, 2010 1:32 PM. The previous post in this blog was Palin gets into it with actress with Down's. The next post in this blog is Two painful experiences for the price of one. Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.

E-mail, Feeds, 'n' Stuff

Wednesday, March 3, 2010

Look, kids, it's a letter from Mr. Landlord

For an agency run by a lawyer, the Portland public housing bureau sure isn't looking too sharp in these cases.

Comments (6)

"C-I-L-L my landlord" --- Tyrone Green

I am shocked simply shocked......

Since they spent over $165,000 per unit for housing on land they already owned they must need the money. Millions were spent just on design and planning.

Remember when they started the "re-development" in the late 90's they could have bought any number of new houses or apartments for a fraction of the money they spent in New Columbia. The whole thing is a boon-doggle of major proportion.

I am not sure that the one-year time limit is true for current tenants. That OAR applies to action against prior tenants for damages and money owed for rent and fees owed after a tenant left. The landlord needs to make a claim in writing within one year of the move-out to secure their claim. For current tenants, this sounds like a contract issue not covered by landlord tenant laws.

Contact a lawyer EXPERT in LT law.

Check out ORS 12.125. Any action arising under a rental agreement is subject to the 1 year statute of limitations. Rent arises under a rental agreement.

What Erin said.




Clicky Web Analytics