Third 'dog night
It's time for another week of trying to figure out American pro football. Two weeks into our charity underdog pool, we have 11 players with points -- more than half the participants. And they'll be poring over this list of underdogs (in caps) to see which one can win its game outright, without the benefit of the point spread. The spread is relevant only in that it determines how many points the pool players get if they're right:
14 CAROLINA at New Orleans
10.5 MIAMI at New England
10.5 TAMPA BAY vs. Green Bay
10 DETROIT at Seattle
10 WASHINGTON at Atlanta
9 HOUSTON at Indianapolis
6.5 KANSAS CITY at Jacksonville
5.5 TENNESSEE at San Francisco
3.5 SAN DIEGO at NY Giants
3 ARIZONA at Chicago
3 CINCINNATI vs. Baltimore
3 DALLAS at Philadelphia
3 DENVER vs. Pittsburgh
On the administrative side, the charitable contribution that we'll be making when the playoffs are over now totals $420, which will be divvied up $300 for first, $75 for second, and $45 for third. And bragging rights among our players? Priceless.
Even if you're not formally playing, you may have an opinion about which of the 'dogs is this week's best bet. Don't be shy, now.
Comments (20)
Boy, my crystal ball is very cloudy this week -- keeps saying "Ask Again Later."
But for now I see Denver as the most likely upset up there. So to make sure I don't fail to pick on, I'll pick Denver ...
Posted by George Anonymuncule Seldes | November 3, 2009 9:16 PM
Remember the Titans? I do. Give me Tennessee to beat San Francisco.
Posted by Hank Stern | November 3, 2009 10:40 PM
Not ready to pick yet, but on the Dog theme, thought I would share this gem from the 6th circuit (courtesy of howappealing.law.com) http://www.ca6.uscourts.gov/opinions.pdf/09a0383p-06.pdf.
And ... wow. Denver is the underdog in Denver?
Posted by Kevin | November 4, 2009 9:14 AM
On the safer side I'm liking Arizona over Chicago and Cincinnati over Baltimore. My high-point what-the-heck-take-a-risk game would be Miami at New England.
Posted by Rich | November 4, 2009 10:39 AM
For low percentage big points, I like Miami over New England. For a more realistic risk/return proposition, Kansas City over Jacksonville has potential. If my risk tolerance declines further, I'll be looking hard at Arizona and Denver.
Posted by jmh | November 4, 2009 2:49 PM
I'll take Detroit this week. I'm starting to think that playing the small point games can't work in the long run. Even if you win each week, you lose 7 points to anyone who picks a 10 point winner. If someone wins a 10 point game twice then you need 7 3-point winners to beat their two wins. There are only 9 games left in the season. And when you look at the 3-point games they seem like just as much of a coin-flip as the higher point games.
Posted by Gary K | November 5, 2009 7:55 AM
How about players disclosing the charity that they are playing for - if you want to? It would be kind of interesting to see the mix of organizations that we are going to support. Not binding of course, just for fun. Plus it will introduce other blog reader's to some deserving organizations that they might not otherwise think about.
I'm playing for the Community Cycling Center in Portland. Working to provide bikes to kids.
www.communitycyclingcenter.org
Posted by Gary K | November 5, 2009 11:10 AM
Since jmh, inc. is not a registered 501(c)3, I am playing for Water Watch of Oregon. They protect and restore flows in our rivers to sustain the native fish, wildlife, and the people who depend on healthy rivers.
Posted by jmh | November 5, 2009 1:56 PM
The only 2 with any chance at all are Denver and Dallas (I don't really think Dallas will win in Philly).
Posted by LucsAdvo | November 5, 2009 4:14 PM
I am going to take DETROIT because Lions can obviously beat Seahawks. In fact, what is a Seahawk?
I am playing for the Asheville Area Habitat for Humanity. In case any of your are wondering Asheville is known as the Paris of western North Carolina, although not by anyone who has ever been to Paris France.
Posted by Sidney R. Finkel | November 5, 2009 4:32 PM
I'm playing for the Glory Hole Homeless Shelter here in Juneau. Some of my favorite clients stay there.
Posted by Kevin | November 6, 2009 9:53 AM
PS - looking forward to Indianapolis losing this weekend.
As a Bears fan, who lived in Indiana for 7 years, I enjoy anytime the Colts lose, but especially after Superbowl XLI. That was the year the Bears defense, Devin Hester, and Dennis Green did this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYoApt68uhg&feature=player_embedded
Posted by Kevin | November 6, 2009 10:17 AM
I'll take Detroit. Seattle was bad to begin with, losing several key players hasn't really improved their chances of winning on "any given Sunday."
Posted by Michael Welch | November 6, 2009 10:50 AM
I'll take Miami
Posted by annie | November 6, 2009 1:18 PM
Tennessee is my dog this week and genop's mom has selected Houston from the pound. I might begin to ponder a charity once I achieve a victory. Finding a winning dog in the pack is a tad more difficult than I thought. In the meantime my thoughts are directed toward preserving my dignity as a sports afficianatto.
Posted by genop | November 6, 2009 2:57 PM
I'm going to take Tennessee. Still not sure about my charity of choice...I'm going to give it some more thought.
Posted by Dan F | November 6, 2009 8:06 PM
Nothing is certain but death and Texans rounding up the Colts. Put me down for Houston this week. My charity is the Clackamas Service Center, a great organization that provides emergency food, clothing and other services for the needy.
Posted by Rick | November 6, 2009 10:11 PM
Matt Schaub is a UVA grad. Good enough for me. Houston please.
Posted by Gordon | November 7, 2009 10:05 AM
My charity of choice is Albertina Kerr Centers, a 100 year old social service agency in Portland that supports people with mental health challenges and developmental disabilities. I've been a volunteer for a few years.
Posted by Doug | November 7, 2009 11:09 AM
My theory is that I'd be getting ahead of myself if I were to think about any charities who would benefit from any largess I was able to swing their way. In chess the rule is play the game, don't think about the result or the standings. I do better when I follow the rule.
I've got half a dozen groups listed in my will. Seems likely that one or more of those might wind up with something if I'm given a say in where the pot goes -- but there's a lot of upsets to pick before that could happen.
Posted by George Anonymuncule Seldes | November 8, 2009 1:26 AM