This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on
October 25, 2009 2:04 AM.
The previous post in this blog was
Blah, blah, Blazers.
The next post in this blog is
First week's 'dog picks are in.
Many more can be found on the
main index page or by looking through
the archives.
Comments (7)
Wow, that's harsh.
If "37 grams of bong water constituted about 2-1/2 tablespoons", how many grams would larger amounts of bong water constitute? Many bongs hold a cup or two of water.
I think the rule on whether this is a drug should depend on whether anyone would actually use it.
In other jurisdictions, the biggest risk of possessing dirty bong water is spilling it on the carpet.
Posted by none | October 25, 2009 8:06 AM
The law of perhaps unintended consequenses is in effect.
Convict this woman, send her kids into foster care for 8 years, both at vast expense to the tax payer, when a rehab program would perhaps be much more effective with possible positive outcomes for her and her children.
Oh dear...there I go again with 'socialist ideas'.
Posted by portland native | October 25, 2009 9:41 AM
The two dissenting judges called the majority ruling absurd, and I agree.
She is a presumed meth user, I suppose, and the treatment should be as "portland native" suggests.
Posted by Lawrence | October 25, 2009 10:01 AM
I say legalize and tax meth. Then all the problems go away.
Posted by Jon | October 25, 2009 10:55 AM
I wonder how the court would look at the practice of some meth users of saving urine (for reprocessing)? Up to 55 gallon drums of the stuff!
http://www.morningsun.net/weird_news/x1931061337/Urine-based-meth-operation-busted-in-Tennessee
Posted by dman | October 25, 2009 11:24 AM
Just make her drink the bong water!
Posted by Doris | October 25, 2009 4:44 PM
I wonder how OHSU is doing on that meth cooking and testing on humans thing they were starting up ? It was in the Oregonian a while back.
Posted by conspiracyzach | October 26, 2009 11:08 AM