Looking over their shoulders at the Blazers
Tim Duncan of the San Antonio Spurs can't play back-to-back games any more. Without a night off between contests, his body just can't take the pounding. And so given that they were in just such a situation against the Sac'to Kings tonight and the Oakland Whatevers tomorrow night, the Spurs decided to rest Duncan and let him play tomorrow. The Spurs survived tonight, just barely, and now they are tied with the Blazers for fourth place in the Western Conference and the important home-court advantage in the first round of the playoffs, which start next weekend.
The San Antonio strategy -- rest TD the first night, let him loose the second -- is a wise one. And it shows how carefully the Spurs are approaching their potential matchup with Portland, who whupped them pretty good just last week.
Both Portland and San Antonio have two games left, one tomorrow night and one Wednesday. The Blazers are at home tomorrow against the humble Oklahoma City Thunder, and at home Wednesday night against the scary Denver Nuggets; the Spurs are on the road in Oakland tomorrow and at home against N'Awlins, a playoff team, on Wednesday.
An alert reader has pointed out a serious quirk in the league's playoff seeding rules that could lead to much grinding of teeth among the Blazer faithful. What if Portland, Houston, and San Antonio, all with identical records at the moment, finish the season in a dead heat in the standings (that is, they each win the same number out of their remaining two games)?
At first glance, you would think that the Blazers would be seeded higher than the Spurs. The first tiebreaker is the head-to-head record. Portland holds the series advantage against San Antonio 3 to 1. That being the case, the Blazers should get the nod over the Spurs if the two of them end up tied. Houston has the head-to-head tiebreaker against the Blazers, and so as between the Rockets and the Blazers, the Rockets should get a higher seed.
But the plot thickens slightly when one realizes that head to head, the Spurs and the Rockets split their series 2-to-2. The next tiebreaker is division record, where at the moment the Spurs have a half-game lead over the Rockets.
So based on the first two tiebreakers, at this writing, Houston is supposed to be ahead of Portland, Portland is supposed to be ahead of San Antonio, and San Antonio is supposed to be ahead of Houston. Those of you still with me can see that those are mutually exclusive possibilities. And right now the official league page says that in case of a tie, if the playoffs were held today, the Blazers would wind up the no. 5 seed. Ick.
But wait! If Houston and San Antonio both win their last two games, they would be in a dead heat all the way through the first three tiebreakers: head-to-head (2-2), division record (10-6), and conference record (36-16). The fourth tiebreaker between the Spurs and the Rockets would be their records against Western Conference playoff teams. Houston has got the better of that one, I believe. I have them at 15-12 if they win out, whereas the Spurs would be 12-13. That would put Houston ahead of San Antonio, and as noted earlier, the Blazers would be ahead of San Antonio, too, based on head-to-head.
Conclusion: If the three teams each win both their remaining games, the Blazers will likely play the Spurs in the first round and definitely have the home-court advantage. Sometimes the home-court business is just a lot of hype, but given the Blazers' dominance at the Rose Garden this year, it's a fairly serious thing this time around. If the Blazers can win both of their remaining games, by my reckoning they've got that advantage sewed up. And the Spurs know they can't afford to lose this week.
Comments (10)
Blazers would mop the floor with the Spurs in a first round match up. 'nuff said. Second round against Denver may be a bit more difficult and entirely engrossing at the same time for the viewer.
I boldly predict that Boston will go out early in the playoffs. I have a feeling that Kevin Garnett's knee injury is on the same level of the one that ended Chris Webber's career as a star in Sacramento.
Posted by YoungOregonMoonbat | April 13, 2009 12:12 AM
The Celtics looked bad yesterday, that's for sure.
Posted by Jack Bog | April 13, 2009 12:14 AM
In other tiebreaker news out west, Utah holds the tiebreakers over both Dallas and New Orleans; New Orleans holds the tiebreaker against Dallas.
Dallas is at home against Minnesota tonight, and at home against Houston on Wednesday. Utah hosts the Clippers, then goes and visits the Lakers.
Posted by Jack Bog | April 13, 2009 4:54 AM
Jack,
what we need is a Blazer win and a Denver loss tonight, then a Denver loss on Wednesday to the Blazers, then we are the 2 seed and none of this matters.
You Gotta Believe!!!
Posted by p | April 13, 2009 6:43 AM
I boldly predict that Houston will emerge from the West, not the Lakers. The Rockets scare the crap out of me....
Posted by TKrueg | April 13, 2009 6:58 AM
I have watched all 4 of Houston's losses against LA this season. They are not scaring my Lakers at all. However, a Houston Portland match-up would definitely favor the Rockets in my opinion.
First, Houston has that baggage called Ron Artest. Ronnie is the type of player who cannot shoot worth a damn, but has the audacity to throw up 15 to 30 shots a game with over half of them being bricks. Watching Ronnie this season, I now know why LAL did not dangle Lamar Odom for him.
Second, 2 of Houston's 4 losses against LA came when LA did not have Andrew Bynum in the middle. If LA could win twice against Houston without Bynum in the middle to guard Yao Ming, then I like LA's chances with Bynum.
Finally, you have to look at recent history. With Tracy McGrady, Houston has not won a playoff series. I believe that this is some sort of bad luck voodoo thing that comes with having FailMac on your team.
I am over-generalizing and showing my bias for the Lakers, yet I just don't see how Houston is scary to the Lakers especially after watching all four of their losses against LA this season.
In a Houston Portland match-up, my money would be on the Trailblazers in 7 games.
Posted by YoungOregonMoonbat | April 13, 2009 11:30 AM
Trailblazers in 7 games over Houston if they have the higher seed.
If Houston has the higher seed, then I see them winning in 6 games.
Portland like Utah currently and the Sacramento Kings of the early 2000s are Godly at home, but shameful on the road.
Posted by YoungOregonMoonbat | April 13, 2009 11:35 AM
Great blog, go Blazers!!
Posted by Adam Rankin | April 13, 2009 12:27 PM
this is some sort of bad luck voodoo thing that comes with having FailMac on your team.
McGrady is out for the rest of the season with an injury. Any jinx is therefore off.
Posted by Jack Bog | April 13, 2009 4:36 PM
Yeah, I was commenting prior to hearing the news that Yao Ming has a foot injury that may limit his minutes come playoff time. This changes my prognostications. The Houston Rockets without Yao Ming are the Cleveland Cavaliers without Lebron James.
Here is how I see it panning out:
First Round
1. LAL v. 8. Utah
2. Denver v. 7. Dallas
3. San Antonio v. 6. New Orleans
4. Portland v. 5. Houston
Second Round
1. LAL v. 6. New Orleans
2. Denver v. 4. Portland
Western Conference Finals
1. LAL v. 4. Portland
Posted by YoungOregonMoonbat | April 13, 2009 6:54 PM