Should Kate Brown get involved in the Sam Adams scandal?
Blogger Isaac Laquedem thinks she might have to.
| Posted at 11:57 AM | Permalink |
|
About
This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on January 23, 2009 11:57 AM.
The previous post in this blog was Did Adams pay Wiener with city funds?.
The next post in this blog is Saltzman: We need Sam's "smarts".
Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.
Comments (5)
This is the real issue. Amazing it has taken all week for someone to get to it.
Posted by cbb | January 23, 2009 12:16 PM
It's been a busy week.
(Thanks for the link, Jack!)
Posted by Isaac Laquedem | January 23, 2009 12:54 PM
Kate Brown? Enforce laws against Sam Adams? HA-HA-HA-HA
Posted by Steve | January 23, 2009 1:55 PM
From Section 2-206 of the City Charter
"(a) A vacancy in office shall exist when the Mayor . . . is convicted of a felony . . . "
So, would being convicted of an election-related crime disqualify Adams from holding office?
Posted by Audaciously Hopeful | January 23, 2009 11:22 PM
Not necessarily under the City Charter; many election-related crimes are misdemeanors. It might, however, under state law.
Posted by Isaac Laquedem | January 24, 2009 7:11 AM