So says this website, which usually gets pretty good tips about such things.
Comments (2)
That website has got it right about the O's stubborn refusal to enter the digital age and get itself a proper site on the internets. Finding anything on the OLive.com site is a true exercise in frustration.
That being said, even newspapers that DO have a decent website are in trouble. I've got some good friends in the newspaper/print media biz, and I feel badly for all of them.
even newspapers that DO have a decent website are in trouble.
True, that, but they are arguably better positioned to survive than the O.
Someday, probably sooner than we know, daily print newspapers will be a rarity.
Smart publishers are hedging their bets with internet media (c.f. the Washington Post).
Newhouse's Web properties all follow the same template as O-Live, which is to say they suck (no reflection of the staff that works at O-Live, by the way).
Comments (2)
That website has got it right about the O's stubborn refusal to enter the digital age and get itself a proper site on the internets. Finding anything on the OLive.com site is a true exercise in frustration.
That being said, even newspapers that DO have a decent website are in trouble. I've got some good friends in the newspaper/print media biz, and I feel badly for all of them.
Posted by Dave J. | July 10, 2008 4:27 PM
even newspapers that DO have a decent website are in trouble.
True, that, but they are arguably better positioned to survive than the O.
Someday, probably sooner than we know, daily print newspapers will be a rarity.
Smart publishers are hedging their bets with internet media (c.f. the Washington Post).
Newhouse's Web properties all follow the same template as O-Live, which is to say they suck (no reflection of the staff that works at O-Live, by the way).
Posted by Steve R. | July 10, 2008 5:01 PM