It's true we make a better day, just you and Grampy and me
When Portland Mayor Tom Potter announced that he was embarking on a survey of all the city's residents to develop a long-range "vision" for the city, it sort of made sense. Many chief executives embark on such quests early in their tenures. If nothing else, they send off signals that the new chief will adopt an agenda responsive to the wishes of his or her constituents.
As time went on, however, "Vision PDX" started to stray into some pretty goofy territory. Suddenly it became a place for the city to get all PC about multi-culturalism -- so much so that the questionnaire was translated into all manner of languages. Laotian, traditional Chinese, simplified Chinese, the list went on and on. I was in favor of gathering input from these communities, but producing complete translations of the questionnaire seemed a little over-the-top.
Then came the ceremonial tossing of the survey results, substituting what the planning bureaucrats wished people had said. When the survey came back with lots of criticism of the city's current direction, the results were quickly swept under the rug, and a new vision announced. As best I can tell, it is as follows:
Portland's Vision for 2030:George Orwell would be so proud.Shaped by the Willamette and Columbia rivers, Portland connects people and nature to create an international model of equity and sustainability. We are a city of communities. Our distinct neighborhoods and vibrant downtown are safe, energizing civic and cultural spaces. Our diverse population, innovative businesses and forward-thinking leaders work together to ensure livability for all.
Well, the "vision quest" goes on, and now we're back to multi-culturalism. Today the city invites people to a series of "world cafés" that it's going to be putting on. And of course, the invitations have to be printed in all sorts of languages: English, Spanish, Arabic, Russian, Somali, French, Vietnamese...
The stated goal of the cafés is to discuss creation of a permanent "multicultural Community Gathering Center,... a space for cross cultural collaboration, community organizing and leadership development.... The Center would be a place for Portland's diverse communities to gather, interact and communicate."
Now, I'm as open to multi-culturalism as the next guy, and I'm even willing to watch the city spend some money on this. I don't want to be there the day the Arabs and the Israelis have a frank discussion, but hey, it's all good. Your poor, your tired, your hungry, etc.
However, to link this somehow to the "vision" that the average Portlander said he or she wanted on that survey seems like quite a stretch. To my uninformed eye, this is just another example of how public opinion in Portland counts only when the public tells the politicians and bureaucrats what they already wanted to hear. And if it doesn't, they just do what they want, and act as though that's what the public told them, anyway.
Comments (7)
"forward-thinking leaders"?
They used to be called nitwits.
Posted by Ben | May 27, 2008 6:14 PM
Now, now. That's the vision for 2030, not a description of the present.
Posted by Jack Bog | May 27, 2008 6:19 PM
Portland is super, super, super white. Hopefully all this talk about multiculturalism isn't just an effort to make all us white people feel better about the privileges we own and utilize but is in fact an opportunity for "cross-cultural pollination" and a possible locus for dialog to avoid the next fumbled street renaming fiasco.
For all of Potter's failings, I think that his efforts to bring all of Portland's voices to the table, as exemplified by moving city hall to JHS a few months ago, will be seen as his greatest accomplishment, and one that hopefully will stick around as Mr. Adams grabs the reigns.
Posted by Aaron | May 27, 2008 9:09 PM
PLease, please, you all are going to miss Potter after about one month of Sam Adams.
Posted by Steve | May 27, 2008 10:09 PM
Portland is super, super, super white
(1) majority? yes. but dropping yearly.
(2)imagine someone saying "Atlanta is super, super, super black."
For all of Potter's failings, I think that his efforts to bring all of Portland's voices to the table
no, there were several thousand questionnaires filled out at parks, concerts, etc. containing such questions as "what's your vision for Portland in the next 20 years?" imagine for a moment the stunned look on a person being stopped in a park and asked to describe a "vision" for a city of a million people for two decades.
the result? obvious. people want safety, prosperity and beauty.
which everybody already knew.
the other 558,000 Portlanders who were not asked such inane questions are not "at the table."
i like Tom Potter. i believe he means well and tried damn hard. but this pretense of a community produced "vision" is, to paraphrase Leonard Cohen, arrogant pretense wearing an old suit.
and Sam Adams will be less effective than Potter has been.
Posted by ecohuman.com | May 28, 2008 12:04 PM
Which Cohen song was that?
Posted by MJ | May 28, 2008 11:55 PM
Which Cohen song was that?
not a song, but a quote from him in a documentary.
Posted by ecohuman.com | May 29, 2008 11:34 AM