Hillary the Crook dirty money tally grows
We're up to $900,000 and counting.
I know -- the voters don't care about this sort of thing.
Just keep telling yourself that.
| Posted at 3:34 AM | Permalink |
|
About
This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on September 12, 2007 3:34 AM.
The previous post in this blog was Transit-oriented crime wave draws attention.
The next post in this blog is Why you so desperately want to pay more gas tax.
Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.
E-mail, Feeds, 'n' Stuff
« Transit-oriented crime wave draws attention |
Main
| Why you so desperately want to pay more gas tax »
Comments (5)
It's true that at $125K attributable to his notorious bundler Ed Feiger, ex-Senator John Edwards lags Sen. Hillary Clinton in dirty dollar give-backs. However, if Edwards gets the coveted Big Labor endorsement he'll surely surpass her.
Posted by Silence Dogood | September 12, 2007 6:11 AM
In the crook department, Edwards will never be able to hold a candle to Hillary.
Posted by Jack Bog | September 12, 2007 6:49 AM
Oh come on compared to the Cheney/Haliburton thing this is petty crime at worst.
(Sheesh next thing you guys will be championing government funded elections in order to get the corruption of private funding out of the political system.)
Greg C
Posted by Greg C | September 12, 2007 11:12 AM
Oh come on compared to the Cheney/Haliburton thing this is petty crime at worst.
Not that you won't get a warm reception with that dreck here, but do you trot that out in an effort to justify something?
Oh, and it's Halliburton.
Posted by rr | September 13, 2007 1:10 PM
If Edwards is elected President, can we refer to anything he does to benefit trial lawyers as a conspiracy?
Cheney was the CEO of Halliburton...does that mean that every gummint contract they were awarded from that day forward was part of the vast right wing conspiracy?
It's like the Clinton-haters using the phrase "Whitewater" as a catch-all euphemism for the Clinton's corruption (despite none ever being proven). But if you just say "Whitewater" with the right sneer, those who already dislike Hillary are willing to believe it actually means something.
Question: can you offer more than innuendo to suggest that Cheney did anything to benefit Halliburton since he became Vice President? Beside the equally vacuous "War for Oil" bumper sticker?
Posted by Mister Tee | September 15, 2007 2:33 PM