A carbon footprint -- on your face
We had already heard that the OHSU aerial tram cars [rim shot] were unventilated stinkies, but apparently that concept applies to the new land facilities in the SoWhat district as well. A optometry patient writes about that facility:
Both my husband and I are absolutely stunned by the disastrous lack of ventilation in the underground parking garage. One can hardly breathe down there. Even worse, the elevators fill with all that exhaust, and bring it to the floors above. If you walk in front of the elevators on the main floor, you just about choke on the car exhaust.I don't know, ma'am.It's pretty outrageous that an entity dedicated to improving people's health would build a structure which continually fills the lungs of people working or visiting that building with car exhaust.
Where do we apply pressure to get them to address this shoddy mess?
Comments (20)
OSHA-?
There are carbon monoxide level limits in parking garages. It has something to do with the weight of the gases and the toxicity.
Contact Carl Halgren, OSHA-NOT OHSU.
Reese
Posted by alesia reese | May 3, 2007 10:55 AM
Wait a minute... there aren't supposed to be any cars in South Waterfront. How can there be auto exhaust??
Posted by Dave Lister | May 3, 2007 11:07 AM
I'd recommend people just park up on the hill and take the tram down there.
Posted by Alan DeWitt | May 3, 2007 12:04 PM
the bad news is when automobiles are present, you're breathing toxic levels of exhaust. almost always.
for example, a walk downtown is just as bad for you as several minutes in that parking garage.
heck, living near the freeway is even worse.
oh, and [rim shot] for Dave's comment.
Posted by ecohuman.com | May 3, 2007 12:34 PM
Wait a minute now."the bad news is when automobiles are present you're breathing toxic levels of exhaust.almost always...a walk downtown is just as bad for you as several minutes in that parking garage." I don't think that last statement is entirely accurate. If you are walking downtown you are exposed to unhealthy levels of car exhaust but because we are talking fairly open spaces here the ratio of fresh air to pollutants is less then there would be within an enclosed space where it could reach toxic levels faster. I'm not trying to defend automobile use I just think you are making a large assumption when you say one is equivalent to the other.
Posted by tom | May 3, 2007 1:12 PM
Do people turn green when they breath too much in this green building? It cost a lot of green so I wonder why the problem exists in the first place.
Green on-green off, "it's sustainable".
Posted by Howard | May 3, 2007 1:28 PM
tom,
it's true. i wish i was just making an assumption. a moderate-length walk in downtown Portland is just as harmful to your lungs as 2-3 minutes in an unventilated parking garage.
most people (falsely) assume that because they're in an open space, there's "fresh" air to help the situation.
Posted by ecohuman.com | May 3, 2007 2:17 PM
I thought the thing with green buildings was to make them more efficient to seal them drum-tight. You know, you can heat a house with a hair dryer.
Maybe we will have to have some revisionist science soon.
Posted by Steve | May 3, 2007 2:21 PM
a moderate-length walk in downtown Portland is just as harmful to your lungs as 2-3 minutes in an unventilated parking garage.
Interesting. You have data to back this up?
Because you would think the DEQ would be calling "clear air action days" every day.
(And we havent had one of those in a while.)
Posted by Jon | May 3, 2007 3:18 PM
Well, normally, I'd agree with alesia, that you should take it to OSHA and/or DEQ.
However, in speaking to a friend about it, she reminded me that she's a member of the OHSU Safety Team and asked me to forward the post to her and she'd see if she can get anything rectified.
I personally wouldn't be too hopeful, trying to get anything obviously sane accomplished with the bureaucracy up at OHSU is like trying to push a rope uphill.
Posted by godfry | May 3, 2007 3:19 PM
I would think that such circumstances would be enough to eliminate any LEED 'green building' standards, of which OHSU seems to be inordinately proud.
Posted by godfry | May 3, 2007 3:21 PM
Jon, Tom - this 2000 BBC report on a study by the National Health Service in London and backed by their Council, says Londoners are more likely to die from traffic pollution than in a road accident.
Posted by Amanda Fritz | May 3, 2007 4:11 PM
Amander,
So what.
The subject was a parking garage, in Portland, remarkably enough, not "traffic pollution" in London.
Posted by rr | May 3, 2007 9:08 PM
Thanks, Amanda. But I was looking for data for Portland.
Posted by Jon | May 4, 2007 8:45 AM
Jon,
DEQ and EPA have analyses for Portland. if you're doing research (which it sounds like you are), then i'm hoping you'll post what you find (or a reference to it) here.
what's the goal of your research, by the way?
Posted by ecohuman.com | May 4, 2007 8:53 AM
"The subject was a parking garage, in Portland, remarkably enough, not "traffic pollution" in London."
O snap!
Posted by j | May 4, 2007 9:26 AM
what's the goal of your research, by the way?
Im curious about statements made here about air quality in Portland.
Posted by Jon | May 4, 2007 10:07 AM
Im curious about statements made here about air quality in Portland.
excellent, i'm glad you're taking time to learn more about it. here's one place to start:
http://www.deq.state.or.us/aq/toxics/pata.htm
this is a large topic, though, so i wouldn't expect commenters to supply data each time they post a comment. if you're doubting that breathing exhausting is harmful, i think the data is plentiful. if you're doubting the degree of that harm, the data's also plentiful.
good luck and happy reading.
Posted by ecohuman.com | May 4, 2007 10:22 AM
Remember a made for TV remake version of "The Invaders" that featured Richard Thomas (John Boy) as one of the aliens? He used to sneak out into the shed at night and breath auto exhaust to get straightened up.
Posted by Dave Lister | May 4, 2007 11:59 AM
Amanda,
Sorry - that was over the top. No excuses, just rudeness.
Again, sorry.
Posted by rr | May 4, 2007 12:20 PM