Blazer trade in the works?
Word on the street for some time now has been that the Blazers are trying to ship out high-priced modest-achieving center Jamaal Magloire. Perhaps they are getting close to doing so -- if this story is accurate. And if you scroll down in this story, you'll see a report that the Blazers may be working on a three-way trade involving the Lakers and Jason Kidd. The trade deadline is Thursday.
| Posted at 1:19 PM | Permalink |
|
Comments (9)
More speculation on the three-way trade scenario can be found here.
Posted by Jack Bog | February 19, 2007 4:02 PM
Whatever they do I hope it doesn't involve any of the young talent. We don't need to trade off a guy like Travis Outlaw and have him turn into the next Jermaine O'Neal.
Posted by UsualKevin | February 19, 2007 4:46 PM
BTW...Jason Kidd? He's (or was) a great player, but we don't need a point guard and he costs too much.
Posted by UsualKevin | February 19, 2007 4:54 PM
We wouldn't get Kidd. We'd get rid of some of the bigger, more useless contracts that we're carrying. The Lakers would get Kidd.
Posted by Jack Bog | February 19, 2007 5:13 PM
Trade zach; waive miles. start fresh.
Posted by mike joerres | February 19, 2007 7:36 PM
Why is it I have terrible memories of every multi-team trade we've been involved in over the last 10 years?
Posted by Sebastian | February 19, 2007 8:26 PM
It's a joke that Kidd makes 18 million and Billups, a much better point guard, makes nearly 12 million less at 6.5 million. I hope to God that the Blazers stay very far away from Kidd. He's too old, slow, and has a weak jumper.
Let's hope the Blazers make some good moves here.
Posted by TJ | February 19, 2007 8:57 PM
Yeah, but what about the Blazer tradition of getting all-stars way past their prime?!
I'm still worried we're going to get Rod Strickland *AGAIN* someday. That can't happen can it?
Posted by Sebastian | February 19, 2007 11:32 PM
No, but we could get Sebastian Telfair back at any moment.
If they trade Jarrett Jack, I may have to dump a Coke on Patterson. No, make that a $3 bottle of water.
Posted by Jack Bog | February 20, 2007 1:31 AM