Trojan ends
I see that the local media is making a big deal out of the implosion of the cooling tower at the Trojan Nuclear Power Plant tomorrow morning. Much ado about nothing. The shutdown of plant operations was the real milestone, and the removal of a lot of the contaminated equipment for a ride up to Hanford was a clever maneuver. The tower is a snooze. Wake me when they figure out what to do with all the hideously lethal spent fuel rods sitting in the crummy old pool next to the Columbia River. At least Al Qaeda won't have the tower as a visual marker to help guide them in when they're ready to blow the pool to smithereens.
Comments (15)
Perhaps because the demolishment of a building that large is friggin' awesome? I think you miss the "sweet" factor of a lot of things that go on around Portland.
Like the tram. Busses on wires? Going up to OHSU? SIgn me up for the grand opening. Because it's frggin' awesome. I see this all the time with my friends parents and my parents as well.
Many people are prepared to dismiss anything out of hand without considering the personal cool factor. Not how cool other people think it is, but how cool it is to watch things blow up.
Or, you know, slide through the air with the greatest of ease.
Posted by Benkay | May 20, 2006 7:08 PM
This isn't MySpace, child. Wait 'til you grow up and have real responsibilities.
Posted by Jack Bog | May 20, 2006 7:13 PM
I've been watching Portland implode for years. It's not very "cool".
Posted by Hinckley | May 20, 2006 7:42 PM
Thus goes everyone to the world but I
and I am sunburntl
I may sit in a corner and call
'hey-ho' for a husband!
(Or hey-ho for a fabulously decommissioned nuclear power plant...)
Posted by ellie | May 20, 2006 8:00 PM
I must confess I thought about watching the Trojan tower blow up, but not to the point of getting up at 6 a.m. I also am leery of whatever dust cloud it creates. I don't think Oregon appreciates getting this thing shut down enough. To do that you have to follow nuclear reactors in other parts of the country. For example, Vermont Yankee, a reactor scheduled to shut down in 2012 was recently granted a 20-year extension. It has also been allowed to raise its power output to 120%. You think I'm joking but search your news site for Vermont Yankee. That could have been us.
Posted by Bill McDonald | May 20, 2006 8:06 PM
I thought OPB had a great segment on nuclear power in Oregon yesterday. It's definitely worth checking out. Seems there have been some tremendous advances in the last 30 years. I'm all for letting the Europeans be guinea pigs with the new technology, but if it works and they can get more energy out of the fuel (cutting its toxic lifespan from tens of thousands of years down to less than 200 in the process), then I think we've got to take a serious look at it.
Posted by Chris Snethen | May 20, 2006 8:08 PM
Is this the bitter old farts blog? How can every single thing that happens in and around Portland annoy and/or bore you Jack?
Posted by Scott | May 20, 2006 9:52 PM
If you don't like the smell of bitter old farts, why are sniffing around here? Go upwind, for pete's sake.
Posted by Harry | May 20, 2006 10:00 PM
Touche! Sort of...
Posted by Scott | May 21, 2006 12:52 AM
Benkay and Scott are sniffing around here because Bojack's blog is... frggin awesome.
Posted by PDXile in Seattle | May 21, 2006 9:50 AM
Trojan aside, expect to see nuclear (or as it is now pronounced, nookoolar) coming to a grid near you soon. Better multiple Chernobyls than the global warming now headed our way.
Posted by libertas | May 21, 2006 12:47 PM
There's no doubt -- nukes are coming back. But I do doubt that they'll cut the half-life of the waste products.
Posted by Jack Bog | May 21, 2006 5:28 PM
Don't have a myspace, Jack. I'm a neo-luddite, rejecting the commodification of humanity.
Posted by Benkay | May 21, 2006 7:17 PM
Well, hope you enjoyed the Trojan fun. Don't mind the spent fuel rods!
Posted by Jack Bog | May 21, 2006 7:40 PM
I agree with Benkay that the tram would probably be fun to ride. However, I don't think anyone--supporters or opponents of the tram--thinks that "fun to ride" alone is a sufficient reason to build one.
Posted by CLP | May 21, 2006 11:25 PM