This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on March 30, 2004 1:20 PM.
The previous post in this blog was Groundhog Day.
The next post in this blog is More on the Coliseum.
Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.
After listening to Lars Larson for the past two days discuss with his predominantly (jump on your leg) faithful the recent officer-involved shooting of an unarmed man in North Portland, I am sick to my stomach! Larson and his faithful want us to believe this was a justified shooting.
Based on what we know at this point, I strongly disagree! First, I think it appropriate I tell you I am the son of a retired Police Officer, and the nephew of a now deceased Portland Police Captain who commanded North Precinct for many years. I am all to familiar with many police procedures, not to mention the fear and apprehension that goes through every officers mind when he puts on that uniform and reports for work, not knowing if today will be his last. My father and uncle always seemed to associate only with other law enforcement types. I eventually learned it was difficult for them to associate with anyone else because when they donned their uniforms and fastened their gun belts, every single one of the rest of us became that potentially dangerous suspect who could bring their lives to an end in that one unsuspecting moment. I grew and learned to understand that it’s a tough, dangerous job, but that’s what they signed up for. They were proud to risk their lives each day for the rest of us.
What I find so disconcerting for the moment is why hasn’t Officer Jason Sery who fired the fatal bullets into James Jahar Perez, issued any kind of formal apology to the victim’s family? We are being led to believe that he was justified in his actions, so why is he being so tight-lipped that he can’t even offer his condolences to the family of the victim? Could it be that this shooting wreaks of controversy, and he’s only interested in how he’s going to save his butt? Who knows, but he definitely needs to accept responsibility for his actions, justified, and especially unjustified.
Let’s review some of the information we’ve received thus far……Perez was pulled over for failing to signal. By beat neighborhood cops? The cops I grew up around usually wouldn’t waste their time dealing with simple traffic infractions. They would save that for the motorcycle cops, State Police or other units specifically designated for traffic, unless……they recognized the suspect, and conveniently used the infraction as an excuse to pull the vehicle over in order to see what a known felon might be up to. In today’s Oregonian, a story entitled “Officers will face a public inquest”, by Maxine Bernstein, states police said there was no indication that either Officer Jason Sery or his partner, Officer Sean Macomber knew Perez’s identity before the shooting.
That’s very hard to believe! You have a felon who is on parole with convictions for drugs, resisting arrest, assault on a police officer, and whose family lives just down the street from North Precinct headquarters, and two five-year veterans of the police department hadn’t recognized him? A guy known for resisting arrest and assaulting police officers. Sorry, but for cops, those are the ones you do remember!
It’s been reported the entire incident didn’t last much longer than one minute from the time Perez’s vehicle was pulled over until he was shot. Why then, in that short amount of time, did these officers allow this situation to escalate as quickly as it did over nothing more than an unlicensed driver with an attitude who failed to signal? Are we to believe these serious infractions were justification for an officer to have his weapon drawn, and another standing by with a taser in hand? Not to mention their attempts to physically remove Perez from the vehicle in order to place him under arrest. All this for a suspect that the police department contends hadn’t even been identified yet? Not only that, it appears the officers allowed Mr. Perez to orchestrate the series of events with his bad attitude. Allowing their emotions to get the best of them, and instead of using their training in an attempt at diffusing the situation, actually contributed to it’s escalation. A bit late for the “what if’s”, but what if the officers had taken a different, possibly more polite and respectful approach to Mr. Perez. I’m sure we would all agree there are more than a few officers that could use some more training in those two subjects these days. If they had taken that approach it’s quite possible the entire incident could’ve ended with Mr. Perez receiving a citation, and walking home. But then the coroner found some dope in Perez’s mouth during the autopsy. Listening to Lars Larson repeatedly make mention of that today, as if that was some sort of justification for the use of deadly force made me want to puke! Let’s not overlook the fact that the dope was found well after the incident was over, by the coroner.
The statute is clear on when an officer can use deadly force, and that is only when the officer feels like his life, or the life of others is in jeopardy. If an officer’s assumes that a suspect is reaching for a weapon, that’s simply not good enough in my opinion to satisfy the conditions of the statute. If we allow an officer’s assumption to be good enough, then we have given every police officer a license to kill.
Michael Schrunk, the District Attorney for Multnomah County, announced Tuesday he will hold a public inquest into the fatal police shooting. Such an inquest would be a first in the city in nearly two decades. Our fearless Mayor/police commissioner, Vera Katz has requested the inquest along with two state lawmakers in a feeble attempt to appease the public. Such an inquest is a waste of time. The ORS statutes, governing the process of public inquests, clearly states the objectives of which there are four (4).
a. Inquire into who the deceased person was-We already know that answer, James Jahar Perez
b. When and where the deceased person came to death-Sunday afternoon (the time escapes me for the moment, but it’s been recorded), and in front of a Laundromat and grocery store (again the names escape me, my apologies)
c. The cause of death-bullet wounds fired by Officer Sery to the victims chest
d. The manner of death-during an altercation with police
So I ask you, what would be the reason for this inquest?
If there is anything to be learned from this incident thus far, regardless of whether or not you’re a convicted felon, you better be careful the next time you reach for your license, registration and proof of insurance
Comments (3)
Good call.
Posted by Worldwide Pablo | March 30, 2004 4:33 PM
Do you mean a Portland Police badge?
Posted by Philip | March 31, 2004 8:36 AM
After listening to Lars Larson for the past two days discuss with his predominantly (jump on your leg) faithful the recent officer-involved shooting of an unarmed man in North Portland, I am sick to my stomach! Larson and his faithful want us to believe this was a justified shooting.
Based on what we know at this point, I strongly disagree! First, I think it appropriate I tell you I am the son of a retired Police Officer, and the nephew of a now deceased Portland Police Captain who commanded North Precinct for many years. I am all to familiar with many police procedures, not to mention the fear and apprehension that goes through every officers mind when he puts on that uniform and reports for work, not knowing if today will be his last. My father and uncle always seemed to associate only with other law enforcement types. I eventually learned it was difficult for them to associate with anyone else because when they donned their uniforms and fastened their gun belts, every single one of the rest of us became that potentially dangerous suspect who could bring their lives to an end in that one unsuspecting moment. I grew and learned to understand that it’s a tough, dangerous job, but that’s what they signed up for. They were proud to risk their lives each day for the rest of us.
What I find so disconcerting for the moment is why hasn’t Officer Jason Sery who fired the fatal bullets into James Jahar Perez, issued any kind of formal apology to the victim’s family? We are being led to believe that he was justified in his actions, so why is he being so tight-lipped that he can’t even offer his condolences to the family of the victim? Could it be that this shooting wreaks of controversy, and he’s only interested in how he’s going to save his butt? Who knows, but he definitely needs to accept responsibility for his actions, justified, and especially unjustified.
Let’s review some of the information we’ve received thus far……Perez was pulled over for failing to signal. By beat neighborhood cops? The cops I grew up around usually wouldn’t waste their time dealing with simple traffic infractions. They would save that for the motorcycle cops, State Police or other units specifically designated for traffic, unless……they recognized the suspect, and conveniently used the infraction as an excuse to pull the vehicle over in order to see what a known felon might be up to. In today’s Oregonian, a story entitled “Officers will face a public inquest”, by Maxine Bernstein, states police said there was no indication that either Officer Jason Sery or his partner, Officer Sean Macomber knew Perez’s identity before the shooting.
That’s very hard to believe! You have a felon who is on parole with convictions for drugs, resisting arrest, assault on a police officer, and whose family lives just down the street from North Precinct headquarters, and two five-year veterans of the police department hadn’t recognized him? A guy known for resisting arrest and assaulting police officers. Sorry, but for cops, those are the ones you do remember!
It’s been reported the entire incident didn’t last much longer than one minute from the time Perez’s vehicle was pulled over until he was shot. Why then, in that short amount of time, did these officers allow this situation to escalate as quickly as it did over nothing more than an unlicensed driver with an attitude who failed to signal? Are we to believe these serious infractions were justification for an officer to have his weapon drawn, and another standing by with a taser in hand? Not to mention their attempts to physically remove Perez from the vehicle in order to place him under arrest. All this for a suspect that the police department contends hadn’t even been identified yet? Not only that, it appears the officers allowed Mr. Perez to orchestrate the series of events with his bad attitude. Allowing their emotions to get the best of them, and instead of using their training in an attempt at diffusing the situation, actually contributed to it’s escalation. A bit late for the “what if’s”, but what if the officers had taken a different, possibly more polite and respectful approach to Mr. Perez. I’m sure we would all agree there are more than a few officers that could use some more training in those two subjects these days. If they had taken that approach it’s quite possible the entire incident could’ve ended with Mr. Perez receiving a citation, and walking home. But then the coroner found some dope in Perez’s mouth during the autopsy. Listening to Lars Larson repeatedly make mention of that today, as if that was some sort of justification for the use of deadly force made me want to puke! Let’s not overlook the fact that the dope was found well after the incident was over, by the coroner.
The statute is clear on when an officer can use deadly force, and that is only when the officer feels like his life, or the life of others is in jeopardy. If an officer’s assumes that a suspect is reaching for a weapon, that’s simply not good enough in my opinion to satisfy the conditions of the statute. If we allow an officer’s assumption to be good enough, then we have given every police officer a license to kill.
Michael Schrunk, the District Attorney for Multnomah County, announced Tuesday he will hold a public inquest into the fatal police shooting. Such an inquest would be a first in the city in nearly two decades. Our fearless Mayor/police commissioner, Vera Katz has requested the inquest along with two state lawmakers in a feeble attempt to appease the public. Such an inquest is a waste of time. The ORS statutes, governing the process of public inquests, clearly states the objectives of which there are four (4).
a. Inquire into who the deceased person was-We already know that answer, James Jahar Perez
b. When and where the deceased person came to death-Sunday afternoon (the time escapes me for the moment, but it’s been recorded), and in front of a Laundromat and grocery store (again the names escape me, my apologies)
c. The cause of death-bullet wounds fired by Officer Sery to the victims chest
d. The manner of death-during an altercation with police
So I ask you, what would be the reason for this inquest?
If there is anything to be learned from this incident thus far, regardless of whether or not you’re a convicted felon, you better be careful the next time you reach for your license, registration and proof of insurance
Posted by Rob | March 31, 2004 9:48 PM