Here's a glowing tribute to Portland's current crop of high-tech startups, some of which are now getting city handouts. It's a fun story, but the number of jobs these outfits support is minuscule. They are to an actual economy what food carts are to a restaurant scene.
Comments (19)
A stork...delivering the "baby startups" or is that a bag full o' money?
The tech industry remains the darling of the green and sustainable set. The industry is seen as clean, intellectually challenging, creative, needs educated workers, has high wages. We like the people, we like the cachet, we like their money. But without a research university and a critical mass of tech businesses and investors, then the tech industry will always be small, and the bulk of jobs relegated to the parts that need labor, space, and cheap energy. The incubator money should go into funding grad level tech education in a big way and experimental venture projects.
Are there other industries that Oregon should be perusing for stable, family-wage jobs? What would these be?
Current Portland leadership seems so badly to want to emulate the USSR it's ludicrous, even to the point of wanting to brag to the world about it's "successes" while hobbling its population with the necessary subsidies to keep them afloat and even create them in the first place.
I've got no problem with us focusing on this part of the economy. I did a cyber-interview with the Silicon Florist himself, Rick Turoczy, for Neighborhood Notes. He was selected as Armchair Mayor for June. That's a distinguished group including you Jack, Phil Stanford, Scott Fernandez... Some say being Armchair Mayor of Portland is an honor that only comes along once in a lifetime.
I thought Rick's best answer was about the next trend: "In a world where everyone and anyone can create content, we’ll need some way of effectively managing that content. The same way Google came along and helped us search the web. And Wikipedia came along and helped us organize information. That’s the next thing."
I stumbled into high-tech in the mid-eighties. There is definitely a place for those kind of jobs in Portland.
Private Equity and selling off America are the two biggest reasons why the industry has not become larger.
Even if the business is located here, a company often wants to employ an H-1 Visa worker from India - or ship off a whole project to the land of the third eye.
In addition to PIE, PSU has its own Business Accellerator lab with lab and office spaces available to select science and technology start-ups. I assume there is some synergy that occurs when these companies work in the same building, but the office rents aren't special except that they are a bargain in the downtown market. Suburban markets are more affordable. http://www.psba.pdx.edu/about
Since PIE is privately funded, I say more power to them. More enterprises should be mentors for young entrepreneurs - it is a daunting task and so many people with good ideas and talent fail because of their lack of business skills.
Oregon's high state income tax will all but gurantee that if any of these companies goes public or are acquired by a larger buyer/competitor (Jive Software, for example) their HQ will be located to either a more tax favorable state or to a region with deeper access to human capital and investors (Bay area). Doing the same thing and expecting different results is meshugenah.
Nolo, Oregon's perceived high corporate income tax rate is just that. Perceived. Regardless if that truly was the case (high state corporate tax rates scaring off businesses) then why are there so many successful start ups in California which does have very high corporate tax rates? Cost of living is significantly less in Oregon and the quality of life is better as well. Start ups can do just fine here.
Canucken: challenge is high personal income tax (not corp tax). Income tax is not perceived: it is second highest in country besides Hawaii.
1.Hawaii: top rate of 11 percent on taxable income greater than $200,000 per single filer, $400,000 per married couple
2.Oregon: top rate of 11 percent on taxable income greater than $250,000 per single filer, $500,000 per married couple
3.California: top rate of 10.3 percent on taxable income greater than $1 million for all filers
4.Iowa: top rate of 8.98 percent on taxable income greater than $64,755 for all filers
5.New Jersey: top rate of 8.97 percent on taxable income greater than $500,000 for all filers
6.New York: top rate of 8.97 percent on taxable income greater than $500,000 for all filers
7.Vermont: top rate of 8.95 percent on taxable income greater than $379,150 for all filers
8.Maine: top rate of 8.5 percent on taxable income greater than $19,750 per single filer, $39,550 per married couple
9.Washington, D.C.: top rate of 8.5 percent on taxable income greater than $40,000 for all filers
10.Minnesota: top rate of 7.85 percent on taxable income greater than $74,780 per single filer, $132,220 per married couple
The higher cost of living in CA is offset big time by deep pool of talent and billions of VC dollars. PDX's 2,300 employees in start ups is great but does not move the needle on a national basis. Our start up high tech is the tallest midget at the circus locally. I hope and pray that it will continue to grow and will become 10% or more of our employment base. Regrettably,government employees is way to high a portion of our local jobs.
The reason Cali has the startups inspite of high taxes and costa-living is because they have massive capital, both intellectual and financial. Ptown has minimal financials and their IP is inside the heads of the SamRand twins.
We frequently hear new home buyers and slick Green builders talking about how having an "earth friendly" or green home is really important to them.
So they tear town a 90 year old structure and build a new one, with two or three times the square footage.
Want to know a even more sustainable way to provide housing for you and your precious snowflakes? Buy an existing home that simply needs a new HVAC and hot water heating system.
Lots of CO2 emissions can be saved on all the concrete you don't consume. Lots of diesel will be saved not hauling your exotic materials from across the globe.
The cork can stay on the cork trees, the granite can stay in the earth, and all the low VOC paint can stay on the shelf and sustainably harvested bullshit can be consumed by some other faux greenie.
Buy an existing home that simply needs a new HVAC and hot water heating system.
Or better yet, forego the A/C. We lived for many years without air conditioning...the eco-goody-shoes should be the first to admit that the mass adoption of modern air conditioning systems have played a large part of dramatically increasing electric consumption, which in turn has meant increases in the consumption of coal, natural gas and nuclear fuel.
Next, comes the plethora of electronic gadgets. Do we need four computers per household, with 300 watt power supplies, four televisions each with CATV boxes, DVD players and stereo receivers? How about the sixteen transformers to charge the cell phones, the handheld game systems, the MP3 players, the tablets...?
The eco-goody-shooes should be the very first people to admit that our own consumerism actions have led us to where we are...and they should be the first to shun it all.
I'm not an electrical engineer Erik, but I've long wondered why there isn't some kind of centralized high-performance AC-DC converter in every house and standardized 12V DC plugs.
Aaron, I've wondered that, too. I'm not sure lights require the same conversion but it seems like everything else does. Eliminating the power bricks would seem like it's safer and requires less energy.
A few years ago there was talk of California requiring transformer bricks to draw no or almost no electricity when not being used. I haven't heard anything further about that. But that seemed like a great idea. It would cost another $1 or whatever to implement when manufacturing but could easily pay for itself over a few years.
Here's the next wave Portland can crest on with opportunistic start-ups, taking advantage of an imported and established local urban natural resource, using currently idle hipster harvesters even! --
Charamba, Douro 2008
Horse Heaven Hills, Cabernet 2010
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills Pinot Grigio 2011
Avignonesi, Montepulciano 2004
Lorelle, Willamette Valley Pinot Noir 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2007
Mercedes Eguren, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Lorelle, Columbia Valley Cabernet 2011
Purple Moon, Merlot 2011
Purple Moon, Chardonnnay 2011
Abacela, Vintner's Blend No. 12
Opula Red Blend 2010
Liberte, Pinot Noir 2010
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Indian Wells Red Blend 2010
Woodbridge, Chardonnay 2011
King Estate, Pinot Noir 2011
Famille Perrin, Cotes du Rhone Villages 2010
Columbia Crest, Les Chevaux Red 2010
14 Hands, Hot to Trot White Blend
Familia Bianchi, Malbec 2009
Terrapin Cellars, Pinot Gris 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2009
Campo Viejo, Rioja, Termpranillo 2010
Ravenswood, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2010
Waterbrook, Reserve Merlot 2009
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills, Pinot Grigio 2011
Tarantas, Rose
Chateau Lajarre, Bordeaux 2009
La Vielle Ferme, Rose 2011
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio 2011
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir 2009
Lello, Douro Tinto 2009
Quinson Fils, Cotes de Provence Rose 2011
Anindor, Pinot Gris 2010
Buenas Ondas, Syrah Rose 2010
Les Fiefs d'Anglars, Malbec 2009
14 Hands, Pinot Gris 2011
Conundrum 2012
Condes de Albarei, Albariño 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2007
Penelope Sanchez, Garnacha Syrah 2010
Canoe Ridge, Merlot 2007
Atalaya do Mar, Godello 2010
Vega Montan, Mencia
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir, Marlborough 2009
Portuga, Rose 2011
Revelation, Chardonnay, Pays d'Oc 2010
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 2005
Monte Alto, Tinto Reserva 2005
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Cabernet, Indian Wells 2009
Espiral, Vinho Rose
Vin-Koru, Pinot Gris 2011
14 Hands, Hot to Trot Red 2009
Rodney Strong, Cabernet, Sonoma 2009
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #11
Portuga, White 2010
La Bourgeoisie, Red 2009
Januik, Red 2009
Three Rivers, River's Red 2008
Kirkland, Alexander Valley Merlot 2008
Muga, Rioja Rose 2010
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2009
Mauro Molino, Barbera d'Alba 2009
Garda Chiaretto Rose
Columbia Crest, Two Vines Vineyard 10 White
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Pinot Gris, Columbia Valley 2009
L'Hortus, Rose de Saignee 2010
Maculan, Pino & Toi 2008
McKinley Springs, Bombing Range Red 2008
Trader Joe's Pinot Gris 2009
Montes Alpha, Cabernet 2007
Gran Sasso, Sangiovese, Terre di Chieti 2009
Garda, Classico Chiaretto Rose
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 1999
Picos del Montgo, Tempranillo 2008
Chateau de Montmirail, Vacqueyras 2008
La Granja 360, Syrah 2009
Montgras, Carmenere Reserva 2009
Lange, Pinot Gris 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Cabernet 2008
Kirkland, Pinot Grigio 2010
Trader Joe's Coastal Syrah 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Merlot 2008
Trader Joe's Coastal Chardonnay 2009
Vieux Papes Red
Domaine de l'Aujardiere, Chardonnay 2009
Santa Rita, Cabernet, Medalla Real 2007
Penfold's, Koonunga Hill Shiraz Cabernet 2008
Guild, Red, Lot #02 2008
Dievole, Dievolino Sangiovese 2008
Laforet, Burgogne Chardonnay 2009
Columbia Winery, Merlot 2007
Bonterra, Cabernet 2008
Elk Cove, Pinot Gris 2009
Maquis Lien 2006
Scott Paul, Pinot Noir, Le Paulee 2007
The Occasional Book
Neil Young - Waging Heavy Peace
Mark Bego - Aretha Franklin, the Queen of Soul (2012 ed.)
Jenny Lawson - Let's Pretend This Never Happened
J.D. Salinger - Franny and Zooey
Charles Dickens - A Christmas Carol
Timothy Egan - The Big Burn
Deborah Eisenberg - Transactions in a Foreign Currency
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. - Slaughterhouse Five
Kathryn Lance - Pandora's Genes
Cheryl Strayed - Wild
Fyodor Dostoyevsky - The Brothers Karamazov
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt
Road Work
Miles run year to date: 21
At this date last year: 52
Total run in 2012: 129
In 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269
Comments (19)
A stork...delivering the "baby startups" or is that a bag full o' money?
Posted by portland native | July 8, 2012 9:58 AM
I saw that article too. Anything can be a "success" if enough fools will subsidize it. Hurray! We're the greatest! Let's get t-shirts printed.
Yawn....
Posted by Mr. Grumpy | July 8, 2012 10:55 AM
The tech industry remains the darling of the green and sustainable set. The industry is seen as clean, intellectually challenging, creative, needs educated workers, has high wages. We like the people, we like the cachet, we like their money. But without a research university and a critical mass of tech businesses and investors, then the tech industry will always be small, and the bulk of jobs relegated to the parts that need labor, space, and cheap energy. The incubator money should go into funding grad level tech education in a big way and experimental venture projects.
Are there other industries that Oregon should be perusing for stable, family-wage jobs? What would these be?
Posted by Nolo | July 8, 2012 11:22 AM
Playing with percentages...
Would be nice to see some actual numbers. Salaries, jobs created, etc.
Are any evil VC part of the picture?
Posted by Mike (one of the many) | July 8, 2012 11:23 AM
That should be pursuing, not perusing. Darn auto spelling!
Posted by Nolo | July 8, 2012 11:23 AM
Current Portland leadership seems so badly to want to emulate the USSR it's ludicrous, even to the point of wanting to brag to the world about it's "successes" while hobbling its population with the necessary subsidies to keep them afloat and even create them in the first place.
I could go on, but I needn't digress.
Posted by Mr. Grumpy | July 8, 2012 11:34 AM
I've got no problem with us focusing on this part of the economy. I did a cyber-interview with the Silicon Florist himself, Rick Turoczy, for Neighborhood Notes. He was selected as Armchair Mayor for June. That's a distinguished group including you Jack, Phil Stanford, Scott Fernandez... Some say being Armchair Mayor of Portland is an honor that only comes along once in a lifetime.
I thought Rick's best answer was about the next trend: "In a world where everyone and anyone can create content, we’ll need some way of effectively managing that content. The same way Google came along and helped us search the web. And Wikipedia came along and helped us organize information. That’s the next thing."
Posted by Bill McDonald | July 8, 2012 11:49 AM
I stumbled into high-tech in the mid-eighties. There is definitely a place for those kind of jobs in Portland.
Private Equity and selling off America are the two biggest reasons why the industry has not become larger.
Even if the business is located here, a company often wants to employ an H-1 Visa worker from India - or ship off a whole project to the land of the third eye.
Posted by tim | July 8, 2012 11:56 AM
In addition to PIE, PSU has its own Business Accellerator lab with lab and office spaces available to select science and technology start-ups. I assume there is some synergy that occurs when these companies work in the same building, but the office rents aren't special except that they are a bargain in the downtown market. Suburban markets are more affordable. http://www.psba.pdx.edu/about
Since PIE is privately funded, I say more power to them. More enterprises should be mentors for young entrepreneurs - it is a daunting task and so many people with good ideas and talent fail because of their lack of business skills.
Posted by Nolo | July 8, 2012 12:00 PM
Oregon's high state income tax will all but gurantee that if any of these companies goes public or are acquired by a larger buyer/competitor (Jive Software, for example) their HQ will be located to either a more tax favorable state or to a region with deeper access to human capital and investors (Bay area). Doing the same thing and expecting different results is meshugenah.
Posted by Brian | July 8, 2012 12:00 PM
Nolo, Oregon's perceived high corporate income tax rate is just that. Perceived. Regardless if that truly was the case (high state corporate tax rates scaring off businesses) then why are there so many successful start ups in California which does have very high corporate tax rates? Cost of living is significantly less in Oregon and the quality of life is better as well. Start ups can do just fine here.
Posted by canucken | July 8, 2012 12:22 PM
Canucken: challenge is high personal income tax (not corp tax). Income tax is not perceived: it is second highest in country besides Hawaii.
1.Hawaii: top rate of 11 percent on taxable income greater than $200,000 per single filer, $400,000 per married couple
2.Oregon: top rate of 11 percent on taxable income greater than $250,000 per single filer, $500,000 per married couple
3.California: top rate of 10.3 percent on taxable income greater than $1 million for all filers
4.Iowa: top rate of 8.98 percent on taxable income greater than $64,755 for all filers
5.New Jersey: top rate of 8.97 percent on taxable income greater than $500,000 for all filers
6.New York: top rate of 8.97 percent on taxable income greater than $500,000 for all filers
7.Vermont: top rate of 8.95 percent on taxable income greater than $379,150 for all filers
8.Maine: top rate of 8.5 percent on taxable income greater than $19,750 per single filer, $39,550 per married couple
9.Washington, D.C.: top rate of 8.5 percent on taxable income greater than $40,000 for all filers
10.Minnesota: top rate of 7.85 percent on taxable income greater than $74,780 per single filer, $132,220 per married couple
The higher cost of living in CA is offset big time by deep pool of talent and billions of VC dollars. PDX's 2,300 employees in start ups is great but does not move the needle on a national basis. Our start up high tech is the tallest midget at the circus locally. I hope and pray that it will continue to grow and will become 10% or more of our employment base. Regrettably,government employees is way to high a portion of our local jobs.
Posted by Brian | July 8, 2012 12:32 PM
The reason Cali has the startups inspite of high taxes and costa-living is because they have massive capital, both intellectual and financial. Ptown has minimal financials and their IP is inside the heads of the SamRand twins.
Posted by Harry | July 8, 2012 12:38 PM
We frequently hear new home buyers and slick Green builders talking about how having an "earth friendly" or green home is really important to them.
So they tear town a 90 year old structure and build a new one, with two or three times the square footage.
Want to know a even more sustainable way to provide housing for you and your precious snowflakes? Buy an existing home that simply needs a new HVAC and hot water heating system.
Lots of CO2 emissions can be saved on all the concrete you don't consume. Lots of diesel will be saved not hauling your exotic materials from across the globe.
The cork can stay on the cork trees, the granite can stay in the earth, and all the low VOC paint can stay on the shelf and sustainably harvested bullshit can be consumed by some other faux greenie.
Posted by Mister Tee | July 8, 2012 1:55 PM
Buy an existing home that simply needs a new HVAC and hot water heating system.
Or better yet, forego the A/C. We lived for many years without air conditioning...the eco-goody-shoes should be the first to admit that the mass adoption of modern air conditioning systems have played a large part of dramatically increasing electric consumption, which in turn has meant increases in the consumption of coal, natural gas and nuclear fuel.
Next, comes the plethora of electronic gadgets. Do we need four computers per household, with 300 watt power supplies, four televisions each with CATV boxes, DVD players and stereo receivers? How about the sixteen transformers to charge the cell phones, the handheld game systems, the MP3 players, the tablets...?
The eco-goody-shooes should be the very first people to admit that our own consumerism actions have led us to where we are...and they should be the first to shun it all.
Posted by Erik H. | July 8, 2012 8:19 PM
I'm not an electrical engineer Erik, but I've long wondered why there isn't some kind of centralized high-performance AC-DC converter in every house and standardized 12V DC plugs.
Posted by Aaron | July 8, 2012 10:49 PM
Aaron, I've wondered that, too. I'm not sure lights require the same conversion but it seems like everything else does. Eliminating the power bricks would seem like it's safer and requires less energy.
A few years ago there was talk of California requiring transformer bricks to draw no or almost no electricity when not being used. I haven't heard anything further about that. But that seemed like a great idea. It would cost another $1 or whatever to implement when manufacturing but could easily pay for itself over a few years.
Posted by Jim | July 9, 2012 12:11 AM
They are to an actual economy what food carts are to a restaurant scene.
Meaning providing new ideas, inspiring new entrepreneurs, and creating a huge buzz around Portland?
Or something else?
Posted by Eater | July 9, 2012 4:36 AM
Here's the next wave Portland can crest on with opportunistic start-ups, taking advantage of an imported and established local urban natural resource, using currently idle hipster harvesters even! --
Opossum protein neutralizes nearly all poisons, could have benefits for humans
http://boingboing.net/2012/07/09/you-cannot-poison-an-opossum.html
Posted by Mojo | July 9, 2012 1:29 PM