So says the director of one Portland nonprofit that provides aid to those out on the street.
Comments (19)
My impression downtown is that homelessness is definitely up quite a bit over the last few years. Tough to quantify, but there is some agency that does a physical count out on the street every year or two.
Actually I would bet that it is true.
A friend from the OregonFood Bank tells me that the food bank just distributed its one millionth food box earlier this month, an all time record for OFB. Not exactly the sort of goal that makes me think that this "recession" is over.
Where do all the folks who had their homes foreclosed go? Some will rent, some will live in their RVs and some will be even farther down the food chain and be homeless.
The City of Portland has allegedly posted information on help for the homeless at various points around the Occupy camp. Many of the people that have been encamped there have no place to go (despite the constant chatter of 'go home' from people who disapprove).
The City says there are 600-something shelter beds in town but fail to mention that every one of them is full and there are 2000 or more homeless people on the streets every night.
For many of these folks at the Occupy camp, Sunday night will be back in a doorway or under a bridge.
And even those places are full. I drove along SE 2nd the other day under the Burnside Bridge and there are at least 10 folks there with mattresses and shopping carts looking like they have been there for some time. If that isn't camping I don't know what is!
Leaving;
So...with the government subsidizing the big banks and their obscenely over compensated leaders, we have more big banks with more grossly over paid executives.
By golly, you are so right!
I know that at my agency the waiting list for our housing is triple what it was 3 years ago. And, I'm not talking about free housing. Unfortunately the waiting list is also 7 times larger than the total number of rental units we operate.
Oregon Food Bank (or more properly, the Oregon Food Bank Network) distributed food equivalent to OVER a million (1,029,000 to be exact)emergency food boxes LAST fiscal year. Those numbers will be higher in the next fiscal year as there has been unprecedented levels of need. In addition, OFB assures that 94% of every dollar received supports food and education programs. If you are looking for an organization to supoprt for your year-end giving, OFB is a great choice. Every $10 donated can provide the equivalent of 30 meals. http://www.oregonfoodbank.org/Donate
This is not human.
What would "new eyes" on our society think if they saw many vacant buildings, with kitchens and baths and more and more people out on the streets homeless?
We have plenty of money for pet projects for wall street, bank bail outs, and not enough resources for others.
We do not have adequate resources for those with mental problems.
How about some compassion for some who are just out and out helpless, out of work, money and food and no family/friends to help out
or for those who cannot for reasons live "as we think they should fall in line"?
Sure there are troublemakers, slackers, etc. Some may have just given up and unless we are in their shoes,...
A complex subject.
As always I am open to be shown otherwise. But lack of home ownership does not equate to homelessness except in the darkly comedic literal sense.
It's about mental instability. Whatever the cause of the instability, these types are generally on the lower rung of the employment ladder (if they can get work at all) and are the first to go when cuts happen. Then they end up homeless.
Of course this is an oversimplification.
The true measure of a compassionate society is how it treats those who cannot take care of themselves.
More people on the planet simply equates to more of those who are helpless.
Homeownershp for those who could under no conceivable economic senario afford to actually own a home, was just a scam to enrich those who did not need to be further enriched. This scheme is in my mind on a par with privatizing Social Security, 401k pension plans, and Roth IRAs. It is also right up there with the premise that everyone needs and should go to a 4 year university to get ahead in life. And if you do not you are some sort of looser.
Too bad we can't train some of those high earning Wall Street scammers how to fix a toilet, build a house, weld pipes, or learn to install an electrical outlet. But those folks are probably too stupid to learn something useful.
Portland Native: how might you distinguish between those who are helpless and those who are just too damn lazy to play a role in improving their lives?
Are heroin addicts helpless?
Are people who are able bodied, but averse to working helpless?
Are those with personality disorders who refuse treatment helpless?
For less than $50 million, I could build enough quonset huts to house every homeless person in Oregon. I would obligate them to actively participate in every aspect of operating the huts, not unlike the way the Army does it. The truly helpless would get light duty or be obligated to participate in drug/mental health treatment.
If you refuse to live by the rules, you get moved to a less desirable part of the community. I would try to create a progressive standard of living such that those who choose sobriety will enjoy more comfortable living. There would be a place for the outcasts to survive and/or drug themselves to death: it wouldn't be
an option to do so in a downtown park.
Is there any data on how many of Portland's homeless are from here? I've heard that homeless migrate here from around the country because we give away so many freebies. Does anyone attempt to distinguish between the "professional" homeless and those who really need help?
I remember seeing a statistic somewhere - I think it was in a story in the Wall Street Journal some months ago - where it stated that Portland had more homelss per capita than any other city in the US. All I know from traveling is that I certainly see a lot more beggars downtown in Portland than I do in Sacramento, Reno, Las Vegas or Phoenix..
Tee your idea that there are significant numbers of homeless people that could function in such a system is incorrect. They are homeless because they are dysfunctional. The system you describe is not much different than what is already happening.
Order. Consequences for not following along. Not much different than the current system. And they cannot handle it. At least not for long.
The reasons are many. Drug addiction is the major one. Mental health is the other. The 2 are often one in the same.
I do sympathize with the 'get yer shit together' mentality. I often share it. But it is not a viable solution.
2 things Dave.
1. We draw homeless from all over. No doubt. Our support system for them is well known. So they come here.
2. Not every city keeps their homeless problem right in the middle of everything. Our homeless are very visible.
PS: Until 2006 I worked with the homeless on 2nd/burnside. My job was to help them get jobs...a sort of tough love 'git it together' social work job. It was impossible. There were always new people coming in and no one could maintain a job for long.
I'm seeing two issues here. First, it seems like many homeless are able to travel here from all over the country to live off our freebies. I'm skeptical that someone who is able to move here and exploit these resources is incapable of caring for themselves, working, or maintaining a residence. Someone who lives on the streets may very well be abnormal and antisocial, but does that mean they are incapable of self-sufficiency? Certainly there are homeless who can't help themselves, but how do we separate them from the freeloaders?
The other issue: why is it Portland's role to provide support for other states' transients? Even if you believe that all homeless are incapable of self-sufficiency, why should Portland provide freebies to draw them here from other states? Our schools are a laughingstock, the infrastructure is falling apart, and our PERS finances are unsustainable. Where are our priorities?
Charamba, Douro 2008
Horse Heaven Hills, Cabernet 2010
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills Pinot Grigio 2011
Avignonesi, Montepulciano 2004
Lorelle, Willamette Valley Pinot Noir 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2007
Mercedes Eguren, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Lorelle, Columbia Valley Cabernet 2011
Purple Moon, Merlot 2011
Purple Moon, Chardonnnay 2011
Abacela, Vintner's Blend No. 12
Opula Red Blend 2010
Liberte, Pinot Noir 2010
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Indian Wells Red Blend 2010
Woodbridge, Chardonnay 2011
King Estate, Pinot Noir 2011
Famille Perrin, Cotes du Rhone Villages 2010
Columbia Crest, Les Chevaux Red 2010
14 Hands, Hot to Trot White Blend
Familia Bianchi, Malbec 2009
Terrapin Cellars, Pinot Gris 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2009
Campo Viejo, Rioja, Termpranillo 2010
Ravenswood, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2010
Waterbrook, Reserve Merlot 2009
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills, Pinot Grigio 2011
Tarantas, Rose
Chateau Lajarre, Bordeaux 2009
La Vielle Ferme, Rose 2011
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio 2011
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir 2009
Lello, Douro Tinto 2009
Quinson Fils, Cotes de Provence Rose 2011
Anindor, Pinot Gris 2010
Buenas Ondas, Syrah Rose 2010
Les Fiefs d'Anglars, Malbec 2009
14 Hands, Pinot Gris 2011
Conundrum 2012
Condes de Albarei, Albariño 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2007
Penelope Sanchez, Garnacha Syrah 2010
Canoe Ridge, Merlot 2007
Atalaya do Mar, Godello 2010
Vega Montan, Mencia
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir, Marlborough 2009
Portuga, Rose 2011
Revelation, Chardonnay, Pays d'Oc 2010
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 2005
Monte Alto, Tinto Reserva 2005
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Cabernet, Indian Wells 2009
Espiral, Vinho Rose
Vin-Koru, Pinot Gris 2011
14 Hands, Hot to Trot Red 2009
Rodney Strong, Cabernet, Sonoma 2009
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #11
Portuga, White 2010
La Bourgeoisie, Red 2009
Januik, Red 2009
Three Rivers, River's Red 2008
Kirkland, Alexander Valley Merlot 2008
Muga, Rioja Rose 2010
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2009
Mauro Molino, Barbera d'Alba 2009
Garda Chiaretto Rose
Columbia Crest, Two Vines Vineyard 10 White
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Pinot Gris, Columbia Valley 2009
L'Hortus, Rose de Saignee 2010
Maculan, Pino & Toi 2008
McKinley Springs, Bombing Range Red 2008
Trader Joe's Pinot Gris 2009
Montes Alpha, Cabernet 2007
Gran Sasso, Sangiovese, Terre di Chieti 2009
Garda, Classico Chiaretto Rose
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 1999
Picos del Montgo, Tempranillo 2008
Chateau de Montmirail, Vacqueyras 2008
La Granja 360, Syrah 2009
Montgras, Carmenere Reserva 2009
Lange, Pinot Gris 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Cabernet 2008
Kirkland, Pinot Grigio 2010
Trader Joe's Coastal Syrah 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Merlot 2008
Trader Joe's Coastal Chardonnay 2009
Vieux Papes Red
Domaine de l'Aujardiere, Chardonnay 2009
Santa Rita, Cabernet, Medalla Real 2007
Penfold's, Koonunga Hill Shiraz Cabernet 2008
Guild, Red, Lot #02 2008
Dievole, Dievolino Sangiovese 2008
Laforet, Burgogne Chardonnay 2009
Columbia Winery, Merlot 2007
Bonterra, Cabernet 2008
Elk Cove, Pinot Gris 2009
Maquis Lien 2006
Scott Paul, Pinot Noir, Le Paulee 2007
The Occasional Book
Neil Young - Waging Heavy Peace
Mark Bego - Aretha Franklin, the Queen of Soul (2012 ed.)
Jenny Lawson - Let's Pretend This Never Happened
J.D. Salinger - Franny and Zooey
Charles Dickens - A Christmas Carol
Timothy Egan - The Big Burn
Deborah Eisenberg - Transactions in a Foreign Currency
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. - Slaughterhouse Five
Kathryn Lance - Pandora's Genes
Cheryl Strayed - Wild
Fyodor Dostoyevsky - The Brothers Karamazov
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt
Road Work
Miles run year to date: 21
At this date last year: 52
Total run in 2012: 129
In 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269
Comments (19)
My impression downtown is that homelessness is definitely up quite a bit over the last few years. Tough to quantify, but there is some agency that does a physical count out on the street every year or two.
Posted by Snards | November 11, 2011 10:13 AM
Actually I would bet that it is true.
A friend from the OregonFood Bank tells me that the food bank just distributed its one millionth food box earlier this month, an all time record for OFB. Not exactly the sort of goal that makes me think that this "recession" is over.
Where do all the folks who had their homes foreclosed go? Some will rent, some will live in their RVs and some will be even farther down the food chain and be homeless.
Posted by Portland Native | November 11, 2011 10:14 AM
The City of Portland has allegedly posted information on help for the homeless at various points around the Occupy camp. Many of the people that have been encamped there have no place to go (despite the constant chatter of 'go home' from people who disapprove).
The City says there are 600-something shelter beds in town but fail to mention that every one of them is full and there are 2000 or more homeless people on the streets every night.
For many of these folks at the Occupy camp, Sunday night will be back in a doorway or under a bridge.
Posted by reader | November 11, 2011 10:55 AM
When you subsidize something - you get more of it.
Posted by Leaving | November 11, 2011 10:59 AM
And even those places are full. I drove along SE 2nd the other day under the Burnside Bridge and there are at least 10 folks there with mattresses and shopping carts looking like they have been there for some time. If that isn't camping I don't know what is!
Posted by Portland Native | November 11, 2011 11:00 AM
Leaving;
So...with the government subsidizing the big banks and their obscenely over compensated leaders, we have more big banks with more grossly over paid executives.
By golly, you are so right!
Posted by Portland Native | November 11, 2011 11:20 AM
I know that at my agency the waiting list for our housing is triple what it was 3 years ago. And, I'm not talking about free housing. Unfortunately the waiting list is also 7 times larger than the total number of rental units we operate.
Posted by PDXPessimist | November 11, 2011 11:44 AM
I think those statistics are pretty accurate. I wonder if it includes the Occupy Portland people?
Posted by Jim Wagoner | November 11, 2011 11:52 AM
Oregon Food Bank (or more properly, the Oregon Food Bank Network) distributed food equivalent to OVER a million (1,029,000 to be exact)emergency food boxes LAST fiscal year. Those numbers will be higher in the next fiscal year as there has been unprecedented levels of need. In addition, OFB assures that 94% of every dollar received supports food and education programs. If you are looking for an organization to supoprt for your year-end giving, OFB is a great choice. Every $10 donated can provide the equivalent of 30 meals. http://www.oregonfoodbank.org/Donate
Posted by Jill-O | November 11, 2011 12:02 PM
This is not human.
What would "new eyes" on our society think if they saw many vacant buildings, with kitchens and baths and more and more people out on the streets homeless?
We have plenty of money for pet projects for wall street, bank bail outs, and not enough resources for others.
We do not have adequate resources for those with mental problems.
How about some compassion for some who are just out and out helpless, out of work, money and food and no family/friends to help out
or for those who cannot for reasons live "as we think they should fall in line"?
Sure there are troublemakers, slackers, etc. Some may have just given up and unless we are in their shoes,...
A complex subject.
Posted by clinamen | November 11, 2011 12:14 PM
As always I am open to be shown otherwise. But lack of home ownership does not equate to homelessness except in the darkly comedic literal sense.
It's about mental instability. Whatever the cause of the instability, these types are generally on the lower rung of the employment ladder (if they can get work at all) and are the first to go when cuts happen. Then they end up homeless.
Of course this is an oversimplification.
Posted by Jo | November 11, 2011 12:28 PM
The true measure of a compassionate society is how it treats those who cannot take care of themselves.
More people on the planet simply equates to more of those who are helpless.
Homeownershp for those who could under no conceivable economic senario afford to actually own a home, was just a scam to enrich those who did not need to be further enriched. This scheme is in my mind on a par with privatizing Social Security, 401k pension plans, and Roth IRAs. It is also right up there with the premise that everyone needs and should go to a 4 year university to get ahead in life. And if you do not you are some sort of looser.
Too bad we can't train some of those high earning Wall Street scammers how to fix a toilet, build a house, weld pipes, or learn to install an electrical outlet. But those folks are probably too stupid to learn something useful.
Posted by Portland Native | November 11, 2011 1:06 PM
Portland Native: how might you distinguish between those who are helpless and those who are just too damn lazy to play a role in improving their lives?
Are heroin addicts helpless?
Are people who are able bodied, but averse to working helpless?
Are those with personality disorders who refuse treatment helpless?
For less than $50 million, I could build enough quonset huts to house every homeless person in Oregon. I would obligate them to actively participate in every aspect of operating the huts, not unlike the way the Army does it. The truly helpless would get light duty or be obligated to participate in drug/mental health treatment.
If you refuse to live by the rules, you get moved to a less desirable part of the community. I would try to create a progressive standard of living such that those who choose sobriety will enjoy more comfortable living. There would be a place for the outcasts to survive and/or drug themselves to death: it wouldn't be
an option to do so in a downtown park.
Posted by Mister Tee | November 11, 2011 3:10 PM
What a good idea Mr Tee. I think your suggestions deserve some serious attention and consideration. Seriously...I really mean it.
Posted by Portland Native | November 11, 2011 4:30 PM
Is there any data on how many of Portland's homeless are from here? I've heard that homeless migrate here from around the country because we give away so many freebies. Does anyone attempt to distinguish between the "professional" homeless and those who really need help?
Posted by adp | November 11, 2011 9:20 PM
I remember seeing a statistic somewhere - I think it was in a story in the Wall Street Journal some months ago - where it stated that Portland had more homelss per capita than any other city in the US. All I know from traveling is that I certainly see a lot more beggars downtown in Portland than I do in Sacramento, Reno, Las Vegas or Phoenix..
Posted by Dave A. | November 12, 2011 7:20 AM
Tee your idea that there are significant numbers of homeless people that could function in such a system is incorrect. They are homeless because they are dysfunctional. The system you describe is not much different than what is already happening.
Order. Consequences for not following along. Not much different than the current system. And they cannot handle it. At least not for long.
The reasons are many. Drug addiction is the major one. Mental health is the other. The 2 are often one in the same.
I do sympathize with the 'get yer shit together' mentality. I often share it. But it is not a viable solution.
Posted by Jo | November 12, 2011 2:53 PM
2 things Dave.
1. We draw homeless from all over. No doubt. Our support system for them is well known. So they come here.
2. Not every city keeps their homeless problem right in the middle of everything. Our homeless are very visible.
PS: Until 2006 I worked with the homeless on 2nd/burnside. My job was to help them get jobs...a sort of tough love 'git it together' social work job. It was impossible. There were always new people coming in and no one could maintain a job for long.
Posted by Jo | November 12, 2011 3:01 PM
I'm seeing two issues here. First, it seems like many homeless are able to travel here from all over the country to live off our freebies. I'm skeptical that someone who is able to move here and exploit these resources is incapable of caring for themselves, working, or maintaining a residence. Someone who lives on the streets may very well be abnormal and antisocial, but does that mean they are incapable of self-sufficiency? Certainly there are homeless who can't help themselves, but how do we separate them from the freeloaders?
The other issue: why is it Portland's role to provide support for other states' transients? Even if you believe that all homeless are incapable of self-sufficiency, why should Portland provide freebies to draw them here from other states? Our schools are a laughingstock, the infrastructure is falling apart, and our PERS finances are unsustainable. Where are our priorities?
Posted by adp | November 13, 2011 10:47 AM