As they mercilessly clear-cut SW Lincoln Street for the pointless Billion-Dollar Mystery Train to Milwaukie (pop. 20,291), the mouthpieces at Portland's insolvent public transit agency (motto: "We're no. 1 5") are painting themselves as the great keepers of the trees. Oh, they may be cutting down some old trees, but they're planting many more! And the old ones will all go for firewood for the poor!
You can almost smell the Goldschmidt, can't you?
Whatever. They've also released their artist's conception of how the street will look once the MAX train shows up. Combining many elements of Portland's progressive government, it's worth a look, here.
Comments (25)
It looks like one of Randy Looman's "Loo" trees...probably planted at great expense.
Jack, perhaps it's time for another contest - the best definition(s) for a "Goldschmidt" - could have both a noun and verb contest!
And, I work in a building adjacent to this street - is TM running the lightrail down the same tracks as the streetcar? Relocating the street car? If both are running on the same tracks, could be very interesting - as is, there are enough streetcars that at certain intersections, one waits for the other to pass.
My bet is they're not only going to relocate the newly laid streetcar tracks (a Portland thing), but also the sewer and water lines, the Keller auditoreum and fountain, the KOIN tower, the Willamette River, the Washington Monument, and one of the Great Pyramids in Giza. Details to follow...
There will be no streetcar relocation on Lincoln because the streetcar runs down Harrison (a few hundred yards to the north). Lincoln is served by the #17 bus, which will be permanently displaced by light rail.
Of course, since the streetcar does serve PSU, it runs parallel to Lincoln, drops down into the South Waterfront district, and will cross the new transit bridge to the east side, it raises the question of why we're going to destroy Lincoln street just to serve those same locations by yet another train. But no one at TM wants to talk about that.
Hi Jack:
This looks like an "off leash" dog park. Is there a behind the scenes link between
Metro and Parks? Somehow PDC has to figure into this too, or maybe Randy with a new doggie porta potty scheme?
I suppose all of the highly paid dog walkers(Parks/PDC/Metro staff) are catching up on local gossip while sipping their lattes at Starbucks?
And the old ones will all go for firewood for the poor!
Actually, no. The larger pieces are to be "re-purposed" as playground equipment; the smaller pieces are destined to become firewood for the poor or turned into mulch.
Given that the poor are unlikely to have an environmentally-approved wood-burning unit, its safe to assume that mulch will be the option selected.
"Great video exploring an alternative to spending $1.5 billion for the Milwaukie line."
Question: Would every source that's funding it be OK with the money being used for another purpose (even if its transit-related) in the Portland region? If not, its not correct to say there are "alternatives" to spend the money on.
Since the life span of the light rail system is about 30 years and the $1.5 billion does not include operating costs and the proposed alternative does. Why not spend 1/5th of the $1.5 billion on the alternative. You'd be set for 30 years INCLUDING staffing.
Let the "sources" of funds keep the extra $1.2 billion. We would still end up with better transit service assuming that is the real goal.
Essentially all of the local match, $750 million, is borrwed against existing revenue streams funding other things.
Because voters were never given the choice of voting to pay for the boondoggle no new tax or levy is being used.
Instead the Light Rail racket is pilferring Lottery proceeds, schools, police fire, parks, libraries, regional transporttation infrastructure Flex Funds, human services and even TriMet's own operations revenue.
To make it clear, the $250 Million of Lottery proceeds were committed to MLR several years ago. That is the "seed money" that is paying for cutting the trees down on SW Lincoln, doing geological surveys in the river bed for the bridge and building the pier foundations, partly helping to move the recently built trolley line in SoWhat 100 ft. to the west while raising it 14 ft., paying all the planners, and buying a few parcels of land along the proposed route.
That is how so many of our boondoggles get along around here. Find some "seed money", do some work, then say "we can't stop now!"
That is why CoP/PDC/Milwaukie/Clackamas Co Commissioners are working so hard to do things under the radar. "Too Late!"
Mode of operation.
Same with our PWB, race to spend more money so that they can say "we can't stop now!"
Under the radar screen works so well for the agenda, and against the citizenry.
Do people realize that it isn't until late Friday afternoon that we can know what will be on the city council agenda the following Wednesday? That is another way they get by with so much under the radar screen...
and they very frequently use *emergency ordinance which means:
The * indicates an emergency ordinance, which takes effect immediately if passed. Non-emergency ordinances require two readings and a 30-day waiting period before taking effect. Resolutions, reports, etc., adopted by Council are effective after adjournment.
Leonard used an *emergency ordinance to get $135 million as I recall spring of 2009 for the unnecessary Powell Butte project...he wouldn't ask for a delay as NY did, as he was on a race to spend spend and spend so that he could say to citizens, we have gone so far and too late to stop now and then justify closing down reservoirs.
So *emergency ordinance is just another little clever way to go under the radar screen.
Since then, of course, we are finding out now that since NY Senator Schumer asked, EPA is reconsidering the LT2 rule and may exempt capping a reservoir in NY...so what was the emergency Mr. Leonard?
...other than to do what lw brought up, to say "Too Late!"
Wonder what Leonard thinks now, and will the public put enormous pressure on him to finally stop the spending?
Charamba, Douro 2008
Horse Heaven Hills, Cabernet 2010
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills Pinot Grigio 2011
Avignonesi, Montepulciano 2004
Lorelle, Willamette Valley Pinot Noir 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2007
Mercedes Eguren, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Lorelle, Columbia Valley Cabernet 2011
Purple Moon, Merlot 2011
Purple Moon, Chardonnnay 2011
Abacela, Vintner's Blend No. 12
Opula Red Blend 2010
Liberte, Pinot Noir 2010
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Indian Wells Red Blend 2010
Woodbridge, Chardonnay 2011
King Estate, Pinot Noir 2011
Famille Perrin, Cotes du Rhone Villages 2010
Columbia Crest, Les Chevaux Red 2010
14 Hands, Hot to Trot White Blend
Familia Bianchi, Malbec 2009
Terrapin Cellars, Pinot Gris 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2009
Campo Viejo, Rioja, Termpranillo 2010
Ravenswood, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2010
Waterbrook, Reserve Merlot 2009
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills, Pinot Grigio 2011
Tarantas, Rose
Chateau Lajarre, Bordeaux 2009
La Vielle Ferme, Rose 2011
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio 2011
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir 2009
Lello, Douro Tinto 2009
Quinson Fils, Cotes de Provence Rose 2011
Anindor, Pinot Gris 2010
Buenas Ondas, Syrah Rose 2010
Les Fiefs d'Anglars, Malbec 2009
14 Hands, Pinot Gris 2011
Conundrum 2012
Condes de Albarei, Albariño 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2007
Penelope Sanchez, Garnacha Syrah 2010
Canoe Ridge, Merlot 2007
Atalaya do Mar, Godello 2010
Vega Montan, Mencia
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir, Marlborough 2009
Portuga, Rose 2011
Revelation, Chardonnay, Pays d'Oc 2010
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 2005
Monte Alto, Tinto Reserva 2005
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Cabernet, Indian Wells 2009
Espiral, Vinho Rose
Vin-Koru, Pinot Gris 2011
14 Hands, Hot to Trot Red 2009
Rodney Strong, Cabernet, Sonoma 2009
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #11
Portuga, White 2010
La Bourgeoisie, Red 2009
Januik, Red 2009
Three Rivers, River's Red 2008
Kirkland, Alexander Valley Merlot 2008
Muga, Rioja Rose 2010
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2009
Mauro Molino, Barbera d'Alba 2009
Garda Chiaretto Rose
Columbia Crest, Two Vines Vineyard 10 White
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Pinot Gris, Columbia Valley 2009
L'Hortus, Rose de Saignee 2010
Maculan, Pino & Toi 2008
McKinley Springs, Bombing Range Red 2008
Trader Joe's Pinot Gris 2009
Montes Alpha, Cabernet 2007
Gran Sasso, Sangiovese, Terre di Chieti 2009
Garda, Classico Chiaretto Rose
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 1999
Picos del Montgo, Tempranillo 2008
Chateau de Montmirail, Vacqueyras 2008
La Granja 360, Syrah 2009
Montgras, Carmenere Reserva 2009
Lange, Pinot Gris 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Cabernet 2008
Kirkland, Pinot Grigio 2010
Trader Joe's Coastal Syrah 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Merlot 2008
Trader Joe's Coastal Chardonnay 2009
Vieux Papes Red
Domaine de l'Aujardiere, Chardonnay 2009
Santa Rita, Cabernet, Medalla Real 2007
Penfold's, Koonunga Hill Shiraz Cabernet 2008
Guild, Red, Lot #02 2008
Dievole, Dievolino Sangiovese 2008
Laforet, Burgogne Chardonnay 2009
Columbia Winery, Merlot 2007
Bonterra, Cabernet 2008
Elk Cove, Pinot Gris 2009
Maquis Lien 2006
Scott Paul, Pinot Noir, Le Paulee 2007
The Occasional Book
Neil Young - Waging Heavy Peace
Mark Bego - Aretha Franklin, the Queen of Soul (2012 ed.)
Jenny Lawson - Let's Pretend This Never Happened
J.D. Salinger - Franny and Zooey
Charles Dickens - A Christmas Carol
Timothy Egan - The Big Burn
Deborah Eisenberg - Transactions in a Foreign Currency
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. - Slaughterhouse Five
Kathryn Lance - Pandora's Genes
Cheryl Strayed - Wild
Fyodor Dostoyevsky - The Brothers Karamazov
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt
Road Work
Miles run year to date: 21
At this date last year: 52
Total run in 2012: 129
In 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269
Comments (25)
It looks like one of Randy Looman's "Loo" trees...probably planted at great expense.
Raise a leg....Go on streetcar!!!
Posted by veiledorchid | September 26, 2011 12:01 PM
But, but, but....
TREES HAVE RIGHTS, TOO!
Posted by cc | September 26, 2011 12:07 PM
Jack, perhaps it's time for another contest - the best definition(s) for a "Goldschmidt" - could have both a noun and verb contest!
And, I work in a building adjacent to this street - is TM running the lightrail down the same tracks as the streetcar? Relocating the street car? If both are running on the same tracks, could be very interesting - as is, there are enough streetcars that at certain intersections, one waits for the other to pass.
Posted by umpire | September 26, 2011 12:22 PM
My bet is they're not only going to relocate the newly laid streetcar tracks (a Portland thing), but also the sewer and water lines, the Keller auditoreum and fountain, the KOIN tower, the Willamette River, the Washington Monument, and one of the Great Pyramids in Giza. Details to follow...
Posted by Mr. Grumpy | September 26, 2011 12:37 PM
I'm sorry, but isn't that drawing missing
1. Someone on a bicycle
2. Homeless people
3. A food cart
To be properly Portland?
Posted by T | September 26, 2011 12:50 PM
That can't be the correct artwork, Jack. Those dogs aren't accompanied by hipsters with "GIMME A DOLLAR" signs.
Posted by Texas Triffid Ranch | September 26, 2011 12:59 PM
Some of them dogs need neckerchiefs.
Posted by Mr. Grumpy | September 26, 2011 1:12 PM
There will be no streetcar relocation on Lincoln because the streetcar runs down Harrison (a few hundred yards to the north). Lincoln is served by the #17 bus, which will be permanently displaced by light rail.
Of course, since the streetcar does serve PSU, it runs parallel to Lincoln, drops down into the South Waterfront district, and will cross the new transit bridge to the east side, it raises the question of why we're going to destroy Lincoln street just to serve those same locations by yet another train. But no one at TM wants to talk about that.
Posted by John Charles | September 26, 2011 1:18 PM
Hi Jack:
This looks like an "off leash" dog park. Is there a behind the scenes link between
Metro and Parks? Somehow PDC has to figure into this too, or maybe Randy with a new doggie porta potty scheme?
I suppose all of the highly paid dog walkers(Parks/PDC/Metro staff) are catching up on local gossip while sipping their lattes at Starbucks?
Posted by Michael Whitmore | September 26, 2011 1:19 PM
Someone needs to put a Bird on it...
Posted by PDXileinOmaha | September 26, 2011 1:20 PM
I can definitely smell the goldScHmIdT.
Posted by reader | September 26, 2011 1:24 PM
Put a bird on it.
Posted by Mister Tee | September 26, 2011 1:33 PM
And the candlelight cafe bar will be forced to close Feb 26,2012 all because of trimets emminent domain greed arrogance and selfishness.
Posted by Matt Vantress | September 26, 2011 1:53 PM
And the old ones will all go for firewood for the poor!
Actually, no. The larger pieces are to be "re-purposed" as playground equipment; the smaller pieces are destined to become firewood for the poor or turned into mulch.
Given that the poor are unlikely to have an environmentally-approved wood-burning unit, its safe to assume that mulch will be the option selected.
Posted by Max | September 26, 2011 2:26 PM
I'm only surprised they didn't tell us that polls show that trees prefer to be repurposed rather than stand in the way of light rail progress.
Posted by Mister Tee | September 26, 2011 3:09 PM
Great video exploring an alternative to spending $1.5 billion for the Milwaukie line. I'm sure there are other ideas as well.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=usyUzlhHfe4&feature=mfu_in_order&list=UL
Posted by john | September 26, 2011 3:21 PM
john has a very good video link!
Posted by dman | September 26, 2011 3:32 PM
"Great video exploring an alternative to spending $1.5 billion for the Milwaukie line."
Question: Would every source that's funding it be OK with the money being used for another purpose (even if its transit-related) in the Portland region? If not, its not correct to say there are "alternatives" to spend the money on.
Posted by some body | September 27, 2011 1:11 AM
Ah, the "colors of money." The politicians set up the colors; they can change them if they want.
Posted by Jack Bog | September 27, 2011 1:15 AM
some body,
Since the life span of the light rail system is about 30 years and the $1.5 billion does not include operating costs and the proposed alternative does. Why not spend 1/5th of the $1.5 billion on the alternative. You'd be set for 30 years INCLUDING staffing.
Let the "sources" of funds keep the extra $1.2 billion. We would still end up with better transit service assuming that is the real goal.
Posted by John | September 27, 2011 6:29 AM
Somebody,
Essentially all of the local match, $750 million, is borrwed against existing revenue streams funding other things.
Because voters were never given the choice of voting to pay for the boondoggle no new tax or levy is being used.
Instead the Light Rail racket is pilferring Lottery proceeds, schools, police fire, parks, libraries, regional transporttation infrastructure Flex Funds, human services and even TriMet's own operations revenue.
It's the worst funding scheme in Oregon history.
Posted by Ben | September 27, 2011 7:14 AM
To make it clear, the $250 Million of Lottery proceeds were committed to MLR several years ago. That is the "seed money" that is paying for cutting the trees down on SW Lincoln, doing geological surveys in the river bed for the bridge and building the pier foundations, partly helping to move the recently built trolley line in SoWhat 100 ft. to the west while raising it 14 ft., paying all the planners, and buying a few parcels of land along the proposed route.
That is how so many of our boondoggles get along around here. Find some "seed money", do some work, then say "we can't stop now!"
That is why CoP/PDC/Milwaukie/Clackamas Co Commissioners are working so hard to do things under the radar. "Too Late!"
Posted by lw | September 27, 2011 10:33 AM
Streetcar and Chainsaw Charlie will fit right in.
Posted by clinamen | September 27, 2011 12:06 PM
Mode of operation.
Same with our PWB, race to spend more money so that they can say "we can't stop now!"
Under the radar screen works so well for the agenda, and against the citizenry.
Do people realize that it isn't until late Friday afternoon that we can know what will be on the city council agenda the following Wednesday? That is another way they get by with so much under the radar screen...
and they very frequently use *emergency ordinance which means:
The * indicates an emergency ordinance, which takes effect immediately if passed. Non-emergency ordinances require two readings and a 30-day waiting period before taking effect. Resolutions, reports, etc., adopted by Council are effective after adjournment.
Leonard used an *emergency ordinance to get $135 million as I recall spring of 2009 for the unnecessary Powell Butte project...he wouldn't ask for a delay as NY did, as he was on a race to spend spend and spend so that he could say to citizens, we have gone so far and too late to stop now and then justify closing down reservoirs.
So *emergency ordinance is just another little clever way to go under the radar screen.
Since then, of course, we are finding out now that since NY Senator Schumer asked, EPA is reconsidering the LT2 rule and may exempt capping a reservoir in NY...so what was the emergency Mr. Leonard?
...other than to do what lw brought up, to say "Too Late!"
Wonder what Leonard thinks now, and will the public put enormous pressure on him to finally stop the spending?
Posted by clinamen | September 27, 2011 1:00 PM
Since the life span of the light rail system is about 30 years
Why only 30 years?
Posted by Aaron | September 28, 2011 6:23 PM