Detail, east Portland photo, courtesy Miles Hochstein / Portland Ground.

For old times' sake
The bojack bumper sticker -- only $1.50!

To order, click here.

Excellent tunes -- free! And on your browser right now. Just click on Radio Bojack!

E-mail us here.


This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on August 29, 2011 8:47 AM. The previous post in this blog was Dickie's dead. The next post in this blog is Time to get serious about football. Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.



Law and Taxation
How Appealing
TaxProf Blog
Mauled Again
Tax Appellate Blog
A Taxing Matter
Josh Marquis
Native America, Discovered and Conquered
The Yin Blog
Ernie the Attorney
Above the Law
The Volokh Conspiracy
Going Concern
Bag and Baggage
Wealth Strategies Journal
Jim Hamilton's World of Securities Regulation
World of Work
The Faculty Lounge
Lowering the Bar
OrCon Law

Hap'nin' Guys
Tony Pierce
Parkway Rest Stop
Along the Gradyent
Dwight Jaynes
Bob Borden
Dingleberry Gazette
The Red Electric
Iced Borscht
Jeremy Blachman
Dean's Rhetorical Flourish
Straight White Guy
As Time Goes By
Dave Wagner
Jeff Selis
Alas, a Blog
Scott Hendison
The View Through the Windshield
Appliance Blog
The Bleat

Hap'nin' Gals
My Whim is Law
Lelo in Nopo
Attorney at Large
Linda Kruschke
The Non-Consumer Advocate
10 Steps to Finding Your Happy Place
A Pig of Success
Attorney at Large
Margaret and Helen
Kimberlee Jaynes
Cornelia Seigneur
And Sew It Goes
Mile 73
Rainy Day Thoughts
That Black Girl
Posie Gets Cozy
Cat Eyes
Rhi in Pink
Ragwaters, Bitters, and Blue Ruin
Rose City Journal
Type Like the Wind

Portland and Oregon
Isaac Laquedem
Rantings of a [Censored] Bus Driver
Jeff Mapes
Vintage Portland
The Portlander
South Waterfront
Amanda Fritz
O City Hall Reporters
Guilty Carnivore
Old Town by Larry Norton
The Alaunt
Bend Blogs
Lost Oregon
Cafe Unknown
Tin Zeroes
David's Oregon Picayune
Mark Nelsen's Weather Blog
Travel Oregon Blog
Portland Daily Photo
Portland Building Ads
Portland Food and
Dave Knows Portland
Idaho's Portugal
Alameda Old House History
MLK in Motion

Retired from Blogging
Various Observations...
The Daily E-Mail
Saving James
Portland Freelancer
Furious Nads (b!X)
Izzle Pfaff
The Grich
Kevin Allman
AboutItAll - Oregon
Lost in the Details
Worldwide Pablo
Tales from the Stump
Whitman Boys
Two Pennies
This Stony Planet
1221 SW 4th
I am a Fish
Here Today
What If...?
Superinky Fixations
The Rural Bus Route
Another Blogger
Mikeyman's Computer Treehouse
Portland Housing Blog

Wonderfully Wacky
Dave Barry
Borowitz Report
Stuff White People Like
Worst of the Web

Valuable Time-Wasters
My Gallery of Jacks
Litterbox, On the Prowl
Litterbox, Bag of Bones
Litterbox, Scratch
Ride That Donkey
Singin' Horses
Rally Monkey
Simon Swears
Strong Bad's E-mail

Oregon News
The Oregonian
Portland Tribune
Willamette Week
The Sentinel
Southeast Examiner
Northwest Examiner
Sellwood Bee
Mid-County Memo
Vancouver Voice
Eugene Register-Guard
OPB - Portland
Salem Statesman-Journal
Oregon Capitol News
Portland Business Journal
Daily Journal of Commerce
Oregon Business
Portland Info Net
McMinnville News Register
Lake Oswego Review
The Daily Astorian
Bend Bulletin
Corvallis Gazette-Times
Roseburg News-Review
Medford Mail-Tribune
Ashland Daily Tidings
Newport News-Times
Albany Democrat-Herald
The Eugene Weekly
Portland IndyMedia
The Columbian

The Beatles
Bruce Springsteen
Joni Mitchell
Ella Fitzgerald
Steve Earle
Joe Ely
Stevie Wonder
Lou Rawls

E-mail, Feeds, 'n' Stuff

Monday, August 29, 2011

Clackistan war: County hires big bucks Portland lawyers

The ugly combat over "urban renewal" in Clackamas County took a wicked turn late last week. The county commissioners, terrified that "urban renewal" scams might become subject to voter approval, revealed that they have hired high-priced Portland lawyers to write a legal opinion and a memo attacking the ballot measure that recently qualified, through a petition drive, for the November ballot. The measure would require a countywide public vote when "urban renewal" districts are created or expanded.

The letters are here and here. Somewhat amusingly, they're both from lawyers who make a lot of money on "urban renewal." One is from Ball Janik, the ultimate Portland City Hall real estate fixer firm; it's signed by the firm, but on senior partner Steve Janik's letterhead. The other letter is from Harvey Rogers, the lawyer at K&L Gates who as bond counsel seems to collect a fee every time the City of Portland borrows big money, including on "urban renewal." Which is often.

The Ball Janik letter -- a formal opinion running 10 pages -- basically says that the ballot measure is "more likely than not" unconstitutional, at least in part. The Rogers letter -- a mere three pages -- dances around a lot more, but it seems to be saying that the measure is misleading, vague, and likely to be expensive for the county.

We can't imagine what the lawyers are going to charge for that many words. The county commissioners must have a pretty big budget for this sort of thing. We shudder to think of how many hungry people in Clackamas could be fed with the money that's going to Messrs. Janik and Rogers, all to make sure that the insane Mystery Train to Milwaukie gets built.

Comments (22)

The Law is what we say it is. So shut up and adjust.

Disgusting waste of taxpayer money for these so called legal opinions. Just goes to show how much money is involved in these urban renewal scams. It is the new mafia.

Remember people, the new battle lines are not Conservative/Liberal or Dem/Rep - They are whether you get or give money to the government.

Kind of makes you wonder who they represent.

As an Italian-American, I have to say it sucks to see the use of the word mafia for the UR and public works scammers. The mafia of yore had a code of conduct and a set of ethics that surpasses these bozos. The mafia of yore did not involve people who did not sign up for the deal. These weasels want to soak everyone not just those who get involved in their business. Just sayin'

$1000.00/ Page?

Great post Jack.

Yes the story here is that the county has solicited two legal opinions from very high priced firms who also have a dog in the fight already.

Did Clack Co. pay for these opinions?

If yes, why did Dan Chandler choose law firms that had an obvious interest in the outcome of the election?

If they were provided for free (or highly reduced price) then why should they be considered anything but lobbying efforts masquerading as legal advice?

The letters are nitpicking. EVERY legislature enacted law could be nitpicked in same way ~ and THEY all have "experts" writing them and are vetted by Legislative Counsel.

I imagine they'll be pulling off the gloves on this one. Clackamas County is not the same as Multnomah County and my guess is has far fewer grazing sheeple. Add to that they don't have a central main stage like CoP City Hall for the sock puppet distraction.

I would suggest a Freedom of Information Act request to Clackamas County to determine their financial relationship with these two firms might be in order, assuming they don't try and hide their $350/hour billings behind "attorney/client privilege."

The Law is what we say it is. So shut up and adjust ? Nah- it's shut up and hand over all your money.

Wow. Sounds like it is time for a recall vote. It is obvious these commissioners don't care what the electorate thinks if they jump to lawyers to shut them up.

Steve Janik is wonderful at parsing words, and his 10 pages proves it.

First, he says Clackamas Co. doesn't have a "charter" so authority is "limited to authority of the Legislature", making any changes by citizens in the county bogus. There are other cities and counties in the state that requires citizen voting on UR creations-this fact is contrary to Janik's premise.

And wouldn't the proposed 2nd Clackamas Co. Commissioners Measure to thwart 3-371, whereby only citizens/businesses in a proposed URA would get to vote, be contrary to Janik's argument? Only the Legislature giving the rights to the "governing body"-the Co. Commission-can determine the URA according to Janik. How can limiting the decision to citizens in a proposed URA be any better legally than citizens of a whole county that is tax-wise affected by an URA?

And since any local URA affects Oregon general school fund, wouldn't Janik's interpretation have some state-wide consequences?

Then Janik argues that "citizens" are not a "governing body". That's a good one. What happens to "taxation without representation" or the many other nomenclatures we can apply to this slippery slope of Janik's? Who governs us-not ourselves? Let's just not vote on anything anymore because we have attorneys like Janik that can find word tricks. He summaries with "Board of Commissioners is, therefore, the 'governing body' for purposes of activating the urban renewal agency."

But maybe we can play a trick too. Note he wrote "activating the urban renewal agency". That is just an "agency". Voters want to be able to vote on whether to enact an "urban renewal area", not an "agency".

One of Steve Janik's most famous "arguments" is when he represented a developer who wanted to build an 11 story office building right on the edge of the Willamette River in Johns Landing several years ago. It is in the Willamette Greenway Zone requiring buildings "to be similar in scale to nearby neighbors" and to have a stepped down of height to the river. Janik argued before Council, with a straight face, that the proposed building was similar in scale to the nearest taller building 4 miles away in downtown Portland. The stepdown argument, even though building in the near vicinity was shown to average between 1 and 2 stories, was that the building proposed had 8 foot projections of the building that were decreasing in height on the river side. Clever. The neighborhood association prevailed through LUBA on getting 5 stories.

Things look like they will be lawyering up for M3-371. And it should if citizens of Oregon are being denied voting rights.

It sounds like the classic case of big players with big money paying for big lawyers to squash the little player with little or no money and no lawyer.

Get ready for 19th century transportation infrastructure, 19th century sewer, waste, and public health, 19th century police and public safety, 19th century diseases, and 19th century robber barons.

"Shut up and give us all your money"

Based on the initials at the end, Ball Janik's letter was written by Mr. Janik's partner, Dana L. Krawczuk.

Isaac, from my proper letter writing understanding the initials at the end of the letter STJ:DLK stands for Steve Janik with DLK meanng the typist.

If Krawczuk wrote it, why does the stationary letterhead at top have Janik's name-why not writer's own stationary?

"so the county is limited to the scope of authority granted to it"

So the county has enough power to approve a URA, but not enough to have the voters to say NO to a URA?

This whole paper Ball-Janik wrote is so much dance around, my head spins and ears bleed.

To me it says, if you write enough weasel words into any law, you can exclude voter input.

Lee, the practice I've most often seen is that the author's initial's are capitalized and the transcriber's initials are in lower case. I'd agree with you if the tag was "STJ:dlk." If a letter is written by one attorney for another to sign, and then typed by an assistant, the initials at the end would look like "STJ:DLK:cf". My guess is that the letter was long and complex enough that, rather than try to dictate it, Ms. Krawczuk wrote it on her keyboard.

Let's just consider this experiment with American Democracy a failure and go back to plain old fashioned Oligarchy.

Or mob rule. Either one would be better.

Time for some voter-approved amendments to the State Constitution.

Surely most of Oregon can see the crap coming out of Portland and would be happy to vote "no!" even though much of it might not be of direct consequence.

One could ban urban renewal districts.

Another could ban subsidies to developers using transportation funding.

Another could ban transit projects without an explicit vote of the people who would pay for it.

Let's could shut down the OLCC. Another could separate out the Port of Portland's maritime and aviation businesses, and PDX could be privatized and turned into a tax-paying entity.

Erik H.
Some good ideas.
It is time to put efforts into stopping the agenda around here. Simply going to meetings or council doesn't work. Voting for the insiders doesn't work.

Clackamas County is the battle front stopping the agenda and the rebellion has an impressive alliance.

On the black hat side Metro is ganging up with the County Commisssioners and staff to defeat the rebellion. Metro fears this could mean the end of UR and that they are next so the little farce of reaching out to conservatives to "opt-in" has to put put on hold.

I guess they figure they can pick up the pretense after that stamp out the uprising?

In reality their resitance is futile, the white hats will win and they are next.

From Lake Oswego to Wilsonville to Damascus/Boring, Clackamas County to Clark County the TriMet/Metro goose is cooked.

Their attempt to reassemble Humpty Dumpty is laughable and enjoyable.

So anyone wanting to help do what ever you can think of to pile on and do damage.

Including urging a no vote for Beaverton's Urban Renewal scam.

That would close the loop & noose on the Portland Agenda.

Clackamas citizen's win would show the Portland citizens it can be done, which is why the insiders want this to stop. Portland citizens have been bombarded so some feel it is futile, yet others are not willing to just lay down despite the abuse we have had here.

It is hypocrisy how Blue Oregon and media combs the contributor lists to the petition to place urban renewal for voter approval. But they fail to highlight the contributors to the recent pro vehicle tax for the Sellwood Bridge, and now the contributors to anti urban renewal vote.

The bureaucrat/pols contributor list is mostly resplendent with those financially benefiting from all the tenacles of urban renewal: attorneys, developers, lightrail/trolley builders, architects-engineers, consultants and property owners directly benefiting.

But those on the opposite side who mostly aren't directly or even indirectly benefited are smeared. And there are unions, other concerned governmental agencies losing operation funds who are even speaking up, and they are smeared.

I hope to be fair the anti-vote side is highlighted. Since much of present funding for the anti-vote position is coming from government itself (ourselves), that is an atrocity. And the Secretary of State needs to review the propriety of government (Clackamas Co. Commission, Planning Bureaus, Metro, TriMet, etc.) spending taxpayer money to try to stop a vote. The recent Secretary of State's application of law for PPS applies to governmental no-vote efforts, it is criminal.


As a lawyer/blogger, I get
to be a member of:

In Vino Veritas

Lange, Pinot Gris 2015
Kiona, Lemberger 2014
Willamette Valley, Pinot Gris 2015
Aix, Rosé de Provence 2016
Marchigüe, Cabernet 2013
Inazío Irruzola, Getariako Txakolina Rosé 2015
Maso Canali, Pinot Grigio 2015
Campo Viejo, Rioja Reserva 2011
Kirkland, Côtes de Provence Rosé 2016
Cantele, Salice Salentino Reserva 2013
Whispering Angel, Côtes de Provence Rosé 2013
Avissi, Prosecco
Cleto Charli, Lambrusco di Sorbara Secco, Vecchia Modena
Pique Poul, Rosé 2016
Edmunds St. John, Bone-Jolly Rosé 2016
Stoller, Pinot Noir Rosé 2016
Chehalem, Inox Chardonnay 2015
The Four Graces, Pinot Gris 2015
Gascón, Colosal Red 2013
Cardwell Hill, Pinot Gris 2015
L'Ecole No. 41, Merlot 2013
Della Terra, Anonymus
Willamette Valley, Dijon Clone Chardonnay 2013
Wraith, Cabernet, Eidolon Estate 2012
Januik, Red 2015
Tomassi, Valpolicella, Rafaél, 2014
Sharecropper's Pinot Noir 2013
Helix, Pomatia Red Blend 2013
La Espera, Cabernet 2011
Campo Viejo, Rioja Reserva 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2013
Locations, Spanish Red Wine
Locations, Argentinian Red Wine
La Antigua Clásico, Rioja 2011
Shatter, Grenache, Maury 2012
Argyle, Vintage Brut 2011
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #16 Abacela, Fiesta Tempranillo 2014
Benton Hill, Pinot Gris 2015
Primarius, Pinot Gris 2015
Januik, Merlot 2013
Napa Cellars, Cabernet 2013
J. Bookwalter, Protagonist 2012
LAN, Rioja Edicion Limitada 2011
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 2009
Denada Cellars, Cabernet, Maipo Valley 2014
Marchigüe, Cabernet, Colchagua Valley 2013
Oberon, Cabernet 2014
Hedges, Red Mountain 2012
Balboa, Rose of Grenache 2015
Ontañón, Rioja Reserva 2015
Three Horse Ranch, Pinot Gris 2014
Archery Summit, Vireton Pinot Gris 2014
Nelms Road, Merlot 2013
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Pinot Gris 2014
Conn Creek, Cabernet, Napa 2012
Conn Creek, Cabernet, Napa 2013
Villa Maria, Sauvignon Blanc 2015
G3, Cabernet 2013
Chateau Smith, Cabernet, Washington State 2014
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #16
Willamette Valley, Rose of Pinot Noir, Whole Clusters 2015
Albero, Bobal Rose 2015
Ca' del Baio Barbaresco Valgrande 2012
Goodfellow, Reserve Pinot Gris, Clover 2014
Lugana, San Benedetto 2014
Wente, Cabernet, Charles Wetmore 2011
La Espera, Cabernet 2011
King Estate, Pinot Gris 2015
Adelsheim, Pinot Gris 2015
Trader Joe's, Pinot Gris, Willamette Valley 2015
La Vite Lucente, Toscana Red 2013
St. Francis, Cabernet, Sonoma 2013
Kendall-Jackson, Pinot Noir, California 2013
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Napa Valley 2013
Erath, Pinot Noir, Estate Selection 2012
Abbot's Table, Columbia Valley 2014
Intrinsic, Cabernet 2014
Oyster Bay, Pinot Noir 2010
Occhipinti, SP68 Bianco 2014
Layer Cake, Shiraz 2013
Desert Wind, Ruah 2011
WillaKenzie, Pinot Gris 2014
Abacela, Fiesta Tempranillo 2013
Des Amis, Rose 2014
Dunham, Trautina 2012
RoxyAnn, Claret 2012
Del Ri, Claret 2012
Stoppa, Emilia, Red 2004
Primarius, Pinot Noir 2013
Domaines Bunan, Bandol Rose 2015
Albero, Bobal Rose 2015
Deer Creek, Pinot Gris 2015
Beaulieu, Rutherford Cabernet 2013
Archery Summit, Vireton Pinot Gris 2014
King Estate, Pinot Gris, Backbone 2014
Oberon, Napa Cabernet 2013
Apaltagua, Envero Carmenere Gran Reserva 2013
Chateau des Arnauds, Cuvee des Capucins 2012
Nine Hats, Red 2013
Benziger, Cabernet, Sonoma 2012
Roxy Ann, Claret 2012
Januik, Merlot 2012
Conundrum, White 2013
St. Francis, Sonoma Cabernet 2012

The Occasional Book

Marc Maron - Waiting for the Punch
Phil Stanford - Rose City Vice
Kenneth R. Feinberg - What is Life Worth?
Kent Haruf - Our Souls at Night
Peter Carey - True History of the Kelly Gang
Suzanne Collins - The Hunger Games
Amy Stewart - Girl Waits With Gun
Philip Roth - The Plot Against America
Norm Macdonald - Based on a True Story
Christopher Buckley - Boomsday
Ryan Holiday - The Obstacle is the Way
Ruth Sepetys - Between Shades of Gray
Richard Adams - Watership Down
Claire Vaye Watkins - Gold Fame Citrus
Markus Zusak - I am the Messenger
Anthony Doerr - All the Light We Cannot See
James Joyce - Dubliners
Cheryl Strayed - Torch
William Golding - Lord of the Flies
Saul Bellow - Mister Sammler's Planet
Phil Stanford - White House Call Girl
John Kaplan & Jon R. Waltz - The Trial of Jack Ruby
Kent Haruf - Eventide
David Halberstam - Summer of '49
Norman Mailer - The Naked and the Dead
Maria Dermoȗt - The Ten Thousand Things
William Faulkner - As I Lay Dying
Markus Zusak - The Book Thief
Christopher Buckley - Thank You for Smoking
William Shakespeare - Othello
Joseph Conrad - Heart of Darkness
Bill Bryson - A Short History of Nearly Everything
Cheryl Strayed - Tiny Beautiful Things
Sara Varon - Bake Sale
Stephen King - 11/22/63
Paul Goldstein - Errors and Omissions
Mark Twain - A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court
Steve Martin - Born Standing Up: A Comic's Life
Beverly Cleary - A Girl from Yamhill, a Memoir
Kent Haruf - Plainsong
Hope Larson - A Wrinkle in Time, the Graphic Novel
Rudyard Kipling - Kim
Peter Ames Carlin - Bruce
Fran Cannon Slayton - When the Whistle Blows
Neil Young - Waging Heavy Peace
Mark Bego - Aretha Franklin, the Queen of Soul (2012 ed.)
Jenny Lawson - Let's Pretend This Never Happened
J.D. Salinger - Franny and Zooey
Charles Dickens - A Christmas Carol
Timothy Egan - The Big Burn
Deborah Eisenberg - Transactions in a Foreign Currency
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. - Slaughterhouse Five
Kathryn Lance - Pandora's Genes
Cheryl Strayed - Wild
Fyodor Dostoyevsky - The Brothers Karamazov
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt

Road Work

Miles run year to date: 5
At this date last year: 3
Total run in 2017: 113
In 2016: 155
In 2015: 271
In 2014: 401
In 2013: 257
In 2012: 129
In 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269

Clicky Web Analytics