They're sending more brave souls into a melted-down reactor at Fukushima, Japan today. Crews are heading into unit 2 to check radiation levels in the plant. Apparently there are no working remote sensors to do the work, so human beings have to go in. Given the extreme radiation levels found in the building housing reactor no. 1, it's not likely that the workers will be dawdling.
Meanwhile, there's been some interesting nuke news closer to home. U.S. nuclear power plants use the same types of vents and valves that failed in Japan, causing the explosions that sent the airborne radioactivity all over the Northern Hemisphere. It can't happen here? Don't kid yourself.
And here in the Pacific Northwest, the never-ceasing battle over how much nuclear garbage the federal government can import into the Hanford Nuclear Reservation heated up a bit last night. Hanford, on the banks of the Columbia River in south central Washington, is already the site of some of the worst radioactive contamination anywhere on the planet. Given that it's messed up beyond restoration, the temptation is great to bring in and dump more nasties that other folks don't want. The latest proposal is for shallow burial at Hanford of nuclear waste that's charitably known as "greater than Class C," coming mostly from nuclear power plants but also from some medical facilities. It's highly radioactive garbage -- way worse than the "low level" waste that's already shipped into Hanford on a routine basis by commercial outfits from all over.
All the usual huffing and puffing that comes with plans to dump nuclear waste anywhere are being revisited at Hanford, with the same old arguments being heard on both sides that have bounced around town hall meetings on the subject for many decades now. If the feds stick the GTCC waste at Hanford, a lot of it will be cruising on Portland freeways at high speeds as it rolls into the region from points south. If it gets into the groundwater under the dump site, it will soon be found in the Columbia River.
Hanford and its neighbors have already suffered enough from the radiation that place has already produced. To bring in more hazards would be the exact opposite of fairness. But when it comes to the nuclear industry, it's all about convenience, and money of course. Fairness isn't anywhere to be found on the template.
Comments (5)
Hey other states ,
You make waste , You keep it.
Hanford is already a very bad idea , putting all that horrific material in a major watershed is beyond stupid , it is criminal.
Because , you know major rivers never flood ,
[like in the midwest right now]
It’s not only the danger of accidents that opponents of the DOE’s plans are worried about.
According to the Hanford Watchdog group, Heart of America Northwest, Hanford is the most contaminated site in the Western Hemisphere. Nuclear waste has been dumped there for more than 60 years. Plutonium was both produced and stored there. High level radioactive and chemical wastes, including Plutonium, were dumped into 40 miles of unlined trenches.
In July of 2010, the New York Times reported that much more plutonium was produced and stored at Hanford than the government admits, with 11655 kg of plutonium now stored on site, more than 12 tons. One speck of plutonium inhaled is enough to cause cancer. Plutonium is radioactive for 240,000 years, longer than the time humans have been on earth.
Rather than clean up Hanford, it is one of six sites the DOE is considering as a permanent repository for “GTCC LLNW”-- Greater than Class C Low Level Nuclear Waste-- with two loads a day passing through Portland for twenty years. Don’t let the words “low level” confuse you-- Class C “Low Level” Nuclear Waste is waste that is dangerous for UP TO 500 years. “Greater than Class C Low Level Nuclear Waste.” is hot for more than 500 years. The DOE’s own figures for similar shipments of high level waste projected, even if things go smoothly, 800 fatal cancers along the truck route from the shipments.
The DOE proposal also would convert the Hanford Reactor-- now run by an outfit called “Energy Northwest”-- to a plutonium reactor, fueled by a mixture of Uranium and Plutonium. All the Plutonium waste from our nuclear programs, military and commercial, would be shipped to Hanford and burned on-site to produce nuclear power. This would solve the government’s problem of what to do with the tons and tons of plutonium produced during weapons production and commercial nuclear reaction. The spent fuel rods, which would also contain plutonium, which would be stored on site in spent fuel cooling ponds right above the reactor itself, as they are above the mox reactor at Fukushima.
Plutonium fuel operates at a higher temperature than uranium fuel and has a lower melting point, so it produces more radioactive gases. Because it has a higher decay heat, it is at greater risk for catching fire.
Today radioactive and toxic contamination flows into the Columbia River, which flows through Hanford for fifty miles, at levels as high as 1,500 times the federal Drinking Water Standard. Over a million gallons of deadly liquid High-Level Nuclear Waste has leaked from tanks at Hanford, and over 1.7 trillion gallons of these deadly wastes was dumped into the soil. The contamination is spreading towards the River faster than the federal Energy Department (USDOE) claimed was possible.
Rather, than try to do whatever is possible to remediate the damage already done at Hanford, the DOE proposes to almost double the amount of waste stored there.
The DOE is holding hearings tomorrow (May 19) from 5:30 to 9:30 PM at the Doubletree Hotel at 1000 NE Multnomah St. Online registration to testify is closed now, but people can sign a signup sheet on site. The government information site on the hearings and the plan is at http://www.gtcceis.anl.gov/involve/pubschedule/index.cfm
And the Hanford watchdog group Heart of America Northwest has much information on Hanford and on the hearings at http://www.hoanw.org/index.cfm
A "mox" reactor means a reactor fueled by a mixture of Uranium and Plutonium. One of the reactors at Fukushima is a mox reactor, and the DOE proposes to convert the nuclear plant on the Hanford site, the one nuclear plant in Washington State, to mox fuel.
Charamba, Douro 2008
Horse Heaven Hills, Cabernet 2010
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills Pinot Grigio 2011
Avignonesi, Montepulciano 2004
Lorelle, Willamette Valley Pinot Noir 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2007
Mercedes Eguren, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Lorelle, Columbia Valley Cabernet 2011
Purple Moon, Merlot 2011
Purple Moon, Chardonnnay 2011
Abacela, Vintner's Blend No. 12
Opula Red Blend 2010
Liberte, Pinot Noir 2010
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Indian Wells Red Blend 2010
Woodbridge, Chardonnay 2011
King Estate, Pinot Noir 2011
Famille Perrin, Cotes du Rhone Villages 2010
Columbia Crest, Les Chevaux Red 2010
14 Hands, Hot to Trot White Blend
Familia Bianchi, Malbec 2009
Terrapin Cellars, Pinot Gris 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2009
Campo Viejo, Rioja, Termpranillo 2010
Ravenswood, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2010
Waterbrook, Reserve Merlot 2009
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills, Pinot Grigio 2011
Tarantas, Rose
Chateau Lajarre, Bordeaux 2009
La Vielle Ferme, Rose 2011
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio 2011
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir 2009
Lello, Douro Tinto 2009
Quinson Fils, Cotes de Provence Rose 2011
Anindor, Pinot Gris 2010
Buenas Ondas, Syrah Rose 2010
Les Fiefs d'Anglars, Malbec 2009
14 Hands, Pinot Gris 2011
Conundrum 2012
Condes de Albarei, Albariño 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2007
Penelope Sanchez, Garnacha Syrah 2010
Canoe Ridge, Merlot 2007
Atalaya do Mar, Godello 2010
Vega Montan, Mencia
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir, Marlborough 2009
Portuga, Rose 2011
Revelation, Chardonnay, Pays d'Oc 2010
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 2005
Monte Alto, Tinto Reserva 2005
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Cabernet, Indian Wells 2009
Espiral, Vinho Rose
Vin-Koru, Pinot Gris 2011
14 Hands, Hot to Trot Red 2009
Rodney Strong, Cabernet, Sonoma 2009
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #11
Portuga, White 2010
La Bourgeoisie, Red 2009
Januik, Red 2009
Three Rivers, River's Red 2008
Kirkland, Alexander Valley Merlot 2008
Muga, Rioja Rose 2010
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2009
Mauro Molino, Barbera d'Alba 2009
Garda Chiaretto Rose
Columbia Crest, Two Vines Vineyard 10 White
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Pinot Gris, Columbia Valley 2009
L'Hortus, Rose de Saignee 2010
Maculan, Pino & Toi 2008
McKinley Springs, Bombing Range Red 2008
Trader Joe's Pinot Gris 2009
Montes Alpha, Cabernet 2007
Gran Sasso, Sangiovese, Terre di Chieti 2009
Garda, Classico Chiaretto Rose
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 1999
Picos del Montgo, Tempranillo 2008
Chateau de Montmirail, Vacqueyras 2008
La Granja 360, Syrah 2009
Montgras, Carmenere Reserva 2009
Lange, Pinot Gris 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Cabernet 2008
Kirkland, Pinot Grigio 2010
Trader Joe's Coastal Syrah 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Merlot 2008
Trader Joe's Coastal Chardonnay 2009
Vieux Papes Red
Domaine de l'Aujardiere, Chardonnay 2009
Santa Rita, Cabernet, Medalla Real 2007
Penfold's, Koonunga Hill Shiraz Cabernet 2008
Guild, Red, Lot #02 2008
Dievole, Dievolino Sangiovese 2008
Laforet, Burgogne Chardonnay 2009
Columbia Winery, Merlot 2007
Bonterra, Cabernet 2008
Elk Cove, Pinot Gris 2009
Maquis Lien 2006
Scott Paul, Pinot Noir, Le Paulee 2007
The Occasional Book
Neil Young - Waging Heavy Peace
Mark Bego - Aretha Franklin, the Queen of Soul (2012 ed.)
Jenny Lawson - Let's Pretend This Never Happened
J.D. Salinger - Franny and Zooey
Charles Dickens - A Christmas Carol
Timothy Egan - The Big Burn
Deborah Eisenberg - Transactions in a Foreign Currency
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. - Slaughterhouse Five
Kathryn Lance - Pandora's Genes
Cheryl Strayed - Wild
Fyodor Dostoyevsky - The Brothers Karamazov
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt
Road Work
Miles run year to date: 21
At this date last year: 52
Total run in 2012: 129
In 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269
Comments (5)
Hey other states ,
You make waste , You keep it.
Hanford is already a very bad idea , putting all that horrific material in a major watershed is beyond stupid , it is criminal.
Because , you know major rivers never flood ,
[like in the midwest right now]
Posted by billb | May 18, 2011 2:42 PM
from the Oregonian, "One of six vote-counting machines had not been properly connected into the network."
http://www.oregonlive.com/portland/index.ssf/2011/05/portland_schools_bond_results.html
And they think those of us who doubt their integrity have no basis for our skepticism.
Posted by Mister Tee | May 18, 2011 4:46 PM
It’s not only the danger of accidents that opponents of the DOE’s plans are worried about.
According to the Hanford Watchdog group, Heart of America Northwest, Hanford is the most contaminated site in the Western Hemisphere. Nuclear waste has been dumped there for more than 60 years. Plutonium was both produced and stored there. High level radioactive and chemical wastes, including Plutonium, were dumped into 40 miles of unlined trenches.
In July of 2010, the New York Times reported that much more plutonium was produced and stored at Hanford than the government admits, with 11655 kg of plutonium now stored on site, more than 12 tons. One speck of plutonium inhaled is enough to cause cancer. Plutonium is radioactive for 240,000 years, longer than the time humans have been on earth.
Rather than clean up Hanford, it is one of six sites the DOE is considering as a permanent repository for “GTCC LLNW”-- Greater than Class C Low Level Nuclear Waste-- with two loads a day passing through Portland for twenty years. Don’t let the words “low level” confuse you-- Class C “Low Level” Nuclear Waste is waste that is dangerous for UP TO 500 years. “Greater than Class C Low Level Nuclear Waste.” is hot for more than 500 years. The DOE’s own figures for similar shipments of high level waste projected, even if things go smoothly, 800 fatal cancers along the truck route from the shipments.
The DOE proposal also would convert the Hanford Reactor-- now run by an outfit called “Energy Northwest”-- to a plutonium reactor, fueled by a mixture of Uranium and Plutonium. All the Plutonium waste from our nuclear programs, military and commercial, would be shipped to Hanford and burned on-site to produce nuclear power. This would solve the government’s problem of what to do with the tons and tons of plutonium produced during weapons production and commercial nuclear reaction. The spent fuel rods, which would also contain plutonium, which would be stored on site in spent fuel cooling ponds right above the reactor itself, as they are above the mox reactor at Fukushima.
Plutonium fuel operates at a higher temperature than uranium fuel and has a lower melting point, so it produces more radioactive gases. Because it has a higher decay heat, it is at greater risk for catching fire.
Today radioactive and toxic contamination flows into the Columbia River, which flows through Hanford for fifty miles, at levels as high as 1,500 times the federal Drinking Water Standard. Over a million gallons of deadly liquid High-Level Nuclear Waste has leaked from tanks at Hanford, and over 1.7 trillion gallons of these deadly wastes was dumped into the soil. The contamination is spreading towards the River faster than the federal Energy Department (USDOE) claimed was possible.
Rather, than try to do whatever is possible to remediate the damage already done at Hanford, the DOE proposes to almost double the amount of waste stored there.
The DOE is holding hearings tomorrow (May 19) from 5:30 to 9:30 PM at the Doubletree Hotel at 1000 NE Multnomah St. Online registration to testify is closed now, but people can sign a signup sheet on site. The government information site on the hearings and the plan is at
http://www.gtcceis.anl.gov/involve/pubschedule/index.cfm
And the Hanford watchdog group Heart of America Northwest has much information on Hanford and on the hearings at http://www.hoanw.org/index.cfm
Posted by Barbara LaMorticella | May 18, 2011 8:36 PM
A "mox" reactor means a reactor fueled by a mixture of Uranium and Plutonium. One of the reactors at Fukushima is a mox reactor, and the DOE proposes to convert the nuclear plant on the Hanford site, the one nuclear plant in Washington State, to mox fuel.
Posted by Garbara LaMorticella | May 18, 2011 8:42 PM
You can check beta radiation levels via your android phone. Portland monitoring station is online as I post this.
https://market.android.com/details?id=com.hbisystems.GeigerCounter
Posted by Robert | May 19, 2011 10:21 PM