The quote Jack chose is the one that stood out for me. Arrogance isn't even the word for it. "Delusional". Yes, that's it. Delusional. Adams is so clearly a narcissist that it hardly seems necessary to point it out.
Of course, he could just be blindingly stupid. Either way, we lose.
The most un-Portland-like, significantly un-Portland like, renderings of what it would be.
Oh good lord. Near as I can tell, "Portland-like" is code for brand new buildings with Subways as primary tenants. Maybe if the Blazers brought Jared in, they could close the deal.
I was surprised to read in Sam's memo that half a million people visit Memorial Coliseum each year. Yes, they are not all paying customers but that's a significant number. That's more than the Seattle Sounders drew at home last year.
One plan would be to pay the 25 million in repair costs, and let those 500,000 people go right on using MC.
But no, Sam wants to spend 120 to 140 million in a mishmash of ideas that he himself calls, "half-baked."
Could this be a ploy - a poison pill designed to make keeping MC seem too costly?
In other words, is Sam infusing this - not with ideas and vision - but with the always shovel-ready pile of BS?
I don't know, but I've now spent enough time watching these things, so they just seem funny. I love the idea of egomaniacs at the controls, especially when they're way less smart than they think they are. There are few things in life you can count on as much as this group screwing up. It almost seems reassuring.
One prediction: If Sam gets to redo MC, the project will cost way more than 140 million and way fewer than 500,000 people will be using the facility each year from then on. I've seen these people's work before.
{This is called egonomics. When politicians spend other people's money to satisfy their own whims.}
Good one. "Egonomics" accurately describes a phenomenon that we see over and over again in public spending. It should be considered for addition to the next edition of Merriam Webster's Dictionary.
Let's not overlook the vindictive side of Sam's personality. You know - the side he showed with the Oregonian editors talking about Bob Ball.
Remember, Sam really wanted the Rose Quarter baseball park. Otherwise he could look like he got played when he gave PGE Park to the Paulson family for soccer only. (Yes, I know football will still be played there, when the Portland State Vikings get back from Hillsboro where they go every time the city council has a new PGE Park plan.)
Sam loves moving parts of Portland around. He loves creative ideas and grand visions. He even loves the temporary creative "solutions" for the steps along the way, like sending the Vikings to Hillsboro. These are small sacrifices by others while a bigger vision takes shape.
Sam loves a big idea - and it doesn't really matter if it's ridiculous. Who can forget the plan to move the Sauvie Island bridge into downtown?
Anybody seen that lately?
So when his plan to replace Memorial Coliseum with a ballpark was rebuffed, Sam must have been steamed. Remember the days of measuring to see if he could fit both in? It would have worked except the game would have had to be stopped every time an outfielder yelled, "Car!"
So how does a person with Sam's vindictive streak handle that? Just maybe he says to himself, "If they want their little Memorial Coliseum they'll get it, but it's really going to cost them."
There could be an element of revenge at work here. Not to say a combination velodrome/swimming pool isn't a terrific idea.
It's really like he doesn't even understand what money is. I feel like the city budget person should sit down with him and start from the beginning. "Now you see these different sized coins? This one is called a quarter. This is a dime...."
In other words, "Now that the planning doesn't jive with my delusional vision of what should happen, it is time for me to power trip everybody into letting me get my way."
Unfortunately for us, Sam does indeed represent a significant segment of our population here in "Weird City".
The part that he represents the best is the development community and other people who've made out like hogs on the city's dimes. It's not the tattooed, bike-riding, baristas who are making the bucks out of the deals Jack decries here like the tram, SoWhat, and Paulsen Park. Those people are getting economically screwed by bathroom dealing just as much as the rest of the citizenry.
I mean, seriously, just look at the title of the article that Janie Har, aka Mona Lisa, gives her article.
"Compromise"? "Float"?
This is Portlandish for "weasel", and "connive".
If a nice big public swimming pool happens in this town, I will take it all back. I will invite the ground to swallow me up if this happens. But only if said swimming pool is actually able to be used by kids, unlike the rest of the swimming pools in Portland. During the school year, the public pools in Portland are open to schoolchildren on weekdays only after 7.30pm, when they are eating dinner, doing homework, and going to bed.
Which means pools are only open to school kids during the school year for 4 hours a day on the weekend days. The lifeguards and their masters don't want to have all that fuss and drowning risk to handle.
Besides, who cares about offering indoor exercise options to kids in this rainy climate during the winters?
Portlanders are very, very, nice. And very, very progressive.
...haven't you noticed this?
No, I haven't noticed it. That's just buying into a stereotype. Is the guy who blows past you on a sidewalk progressive because he rides his bike everywhere? Do the people who put their cans and bottles out on the street for the bums to get them on trash day instead of returning them progressive because they don't just throw them away?
And my point was that if you're going to take the position (as Pat did) that some group of people "deserves" the elected officials they get that the same rule applies to any group of people, whether it's a town, county, country, or dog-catching district. I don't think there's anything special about Portlanders that makes them deserve Sam Adams any more than people in the US deserved George W. Bush or Barack Obama (pick one or both, depending on your political leanings).
Irony, darell, irony...I find Portlanders in general to be much "nicer" on the surface than one generally finds in other cities. And much more "progressive", too. These characterisitics are masks, convenient, holier-than-thou displays; the effect of wearing them is that Portlanders, as a whole, have a larger denial complex than citizens of other burgs. Without this complex, Adams wouldn't have been elected in a virtual landslide in the first place. So in that sense, Portlanders do deserve him in their own, special, characteristic way.
Portlanders, as a whole, have a larger denial complex than citizens of other burgs.
I just don't see that. Especially considering that most Portlanders are originally from other burgs. You've got swaths of "heartland" cities who claim to be more in touch with the "real America" because they're not on the coasts when, paradoxically, most of America lives on the coasts. You've got multi-millionaire politicians running as "common people" and sucking people into believing them. I don't think Portland has any lock on denial.
Speaking of denial, the way I remember it, the two major choices for mayor were Adams and Sho Dozono, and I'd love to hear how the business and development lobby's feet would have been held to the fire under a Dozono administration in a way that Adams hasn't done. How Dozono wouldn't have let Merritt Paulsen walk over the city like Adams has. A different group of developers would have been sucking money from the city and for different projects, but it still would have sucked.
I don't think you can fault Portland's citizens for that.
Why did we come here? Maybe because Oregon is better than where we came from, in ways that were maybe more important in the first flush of our youth.
Like, being politically liberal. Being physically beautiful, to an extent that eclipses most urban areas in the country.
Like the rare exquisitely beautiful human, Oregon is startling in its beauty. Having this streak that defines it as different...the first state to try a public health insurance option..the first state to have vote by mail...the first state to have medical marijuana... the first state to give the dying some autonomy in their waning days...
So of course, the utopians flock here. And then they do things like decide its time to elect the nation's first openly gay mayor.
As a former disabused utopian disciple, I voted for Sam Adams. My liberal political older girlfriend loved him, so I decided to vote for him because I trusted her judgment. On voting day, I was tempted to vote for the underdog. As my pencil flickered sympathetically over Sho Dozono's spot, I had this distinct mental switchback, that went something like this: "Oh, Gaye, quit playing that silly game. It's time to vote for what you stand for. The country needs gay people in politics. Look at all those anti-gay marriagers with their ubiquitous depictions, reminiscent of signs on public lavatories, of one man and one woman. We need to get past all that.."
And thus I voted for Sam Adams, an act which has come full circle, to an outright rejection of identity politics and everything it entails.
Charamba, Douro 2008
Horse Heaven Hills, Cabernet 2010
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills Pinot Grigio 2011
Avignonesi, Montepulciano 2004
Lorelle, Willamette Valley Pinot Noir 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2007
Mercedes Eguren, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Lorelle, Columbia Valley Cabernet 2011
Purple Moon, Merlot 2011
Purple Moon, Chardonnnay 2011
Abacela, Vintner's Blend No. 12
Opula Red Blend 2010
Liberte, Pinot Noir 2010
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Indian Wells Red Blend 2010
Woodbridge, Chardonnay 2011
King Estate, Pinot Noir 2011
Famille Perrin, Cotes du Rhone Villages 2010
Columbia Crest, Les Chevaux Red 2010
14 Hands, Hot to Trot White Blend
Familia Bianchi, Malbec 2009
Terrapin Cellars, Pinot Gris 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2009
Campo Viejo, Rioja, Termpranillo 2010
Ravenswood, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2010
Waterbrook, Reserve Merlot 2009
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills, Pinot Grigio 2011
Tarantas, Rose
Chateau Lajarre, Bordeaux 2009
La Vielle Ferme, Rose 2011
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio 2011
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir 2009
Lello, Douro Tinto 2009
Quinson Fils, Cotes de Provence Rose 2011
Anindor, Pinot Gris 2010
Buenas Ondas, Syrah Rose 2010
Les Fiefs d'Anglars, Malbec 2009
14 Hands, Pinot Gris 2011
Conundrum 2012
Condes de Albarei, Albariño 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2007
Penelope Sanchez, Garnacha Syrah 2010
Canoe Ridge, Merlot 2007
Atalaya do Mar, Godello 2010
Vega Montan, Mencia
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir, Marlborough 2009
Portuga, Rose 2011
Revelation, Chardonnay, Pays d'Oc 2010
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 2005
Monte Alto, Tinto Reserva 2005
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Cabernet, Indian Wells 2009
Espiral, Vinho Rose
Vin-Koru, Pinot Gris 2011
14 Hands, Hot to Trot Red 2009
Rodney Strong, Cabernet, Sonoma 2009
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #11
Portuga, White 2010
La Bourgeoisie, Red 2009
Januik, Red 2009
Three Rivers, River's Red 2008
Kirkland, Alexander Valley Merlot 2008
Muga, Rioja Rose 2010
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2009
Mauro Molino, Barbera d'Alba 2009
Garda Chiaretto Rose
Columbia Crest, Two Vines Vineyard 10 White
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Pinot Gris, Columbia Valley 2009
L'Hortus, Rose de Saignee 2010
Maculan, Pino & Toi 2008
McKinley Springs, Bombing Range Red 2008
Trader Joe's Pinot Gris 2009
Montes Alpha, Cabernet 2007
Gran Sasso, Sangiovese, Terre di Chieti 2009
Garda, Classico Chiaretto Rose
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 1999
Picos del Montgo, Tempranillo 2008
Chateau de Montmirail, Vacqueyras 2008
La Granja 360, Syrah 2009
Montgras, Carmenere Reserva 2009
Lange, Pinot Gris 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Cabernet 2008
Kirkland, Pinot Grigio 2010
Trader Joe's Coastal Syrah 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Merlot 2008
Trader Joe's Coastal Chardonnay 2009
Vieux Papes Red
Domaine de l'Aujardiere, Chardonnay 2009
Santa Rita, Cabernet, Medalla Real 2007
Penfold's, Koonunga Hill Shiraz Cabernet 2008
Guild, Red, Lot #02 2008
Dievole, Dievolino Sangiovese 2008
Laforet, Burgogne Chardonnay 2009
Columbia Winery, Merlot 2007
Bonterra, Cabernet 2008
Elk Cove, Pinot Gris 2009
Maquis Lien 2006
Scott Paul, Pinot Noir, Le Paulee 2007
The Occasional Book
Neil Young - Waging Heavy Peace
Mark Bego - Aretha Franklin, the Queen of Soul (2012 ed.)
Jenny Lawson - Let's Pretend This Never Happened
J.D. Salinger - Franny and Zooey
Charles Dickens - A Christmas Carol
Timothy Egan - The Big Burn
Deborah Eisenberg - Transactions in a Foreign Currency
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. - Slaughterhouse Five
Kathryn Lance - Pandora's Genes
Cheryl Strayed - Wild
Fyodor Dostoyevsky - The Brothers Karamazov
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt
Road Work
Miles run year to date: 21
At this date last year: 52
Total run in 2012: 129
In 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269
Comments (36)
I am shocked, simply shocked that there are allegations of favoritism right here in the City of Thorns.
Posted by LucsAdvo | August 8, 2010 8:51 PM
Nice 'shop. Is that an actual Adams quote? If so, God help us get through to the end of his term.
Posted by Eric | August 8, 2010 8:59 PM
Click on the photo -- it's an actual quote.
Posted by Jack Bog | August 8, 2010 9:00 PM
The quote Jack chose is the one that stood out for me. Arrogance isn't even the word for it. "Delusional". Yes, that's it. Delusional. Adams is so clearly a narcissist that it hardly seems necessary to point it out.
Of course, he could just be blindingly stupid. Either way, we lose.
Posted by the other white meat | August 8, 2010 9:02 PM
The most un-Portland-like, significantly un-Portland like, renderings of what it would be.
Oh good lord. Near as I can tell, "Portland-like" is code for brand new buildings with Subways as primary tenants. Maybe if the Blazers brought Jared in, they could close the deal.
Posted by Bean | August 8, 2010 9:10 PM
Chef Sam has a vision! Its a bubblin!
Posted by JS | August 8, 2010 9:49 PM
Best.Comment.EVER, for the win!
"If it's on track, it's a very strange track"
Posted by George Anonymuncule Seldes | August 8, 2010 9:53 PM
A new motto for the City of Portland.
Posted by Jack Bog | August 8, 2010 10:25 PM
I was surprised to read in Sam's memo that half a million people visit Memorial Coliseum each year. Yes, they are not all paying customers but that's a significant number. That's more than the Seattle Sounders drew at home last year.
One plan would be to pay the 25 million in repair costs, and let those 500,000 people go right on using MC.
But no, Sam wants to spend 120 to 140 million in a mishmash of ideas that he himself calls, "half-baked."
Could this be a ploy - a poison pill designed to make keeping MC seem too costly?
In other words, is Sam infusing this - not with ideas and vision - but with the always shovel-ready pile of BS?
I don't know, but I've now spent enough time watching these things, so they just seem funny. I love the idea of egomaniacs at the controls, especially when they're way less smart than they think they are. There are few things in life you can count on as much as this group screwing up. It almost seems reassuring.
One prediction: If Sam gets to redo MC, the project will cost way more than 140 million and way fewer than 500,000 people will be using the facility each year from then on. I've seen these people's work before.
Posted by Bill McDonald | August 8, 2010 10:42 PM
This is called egonomics. When politicians spend other people's money to satisfy their own whims.
Posted by Bluecollar Libertarian | August 8, 2010 11:21 PM
Bill McDonald's comment about Sam's spending addictions seems truer and truer every day.
Posted by Garage Wine | August 9, 2010 6:19 AM
A year later, Adams said he's staying nimble.
Nimble (adjective:)
cleverly contrived
Posted by phil | August 9, 2010 6:37 AM
Is Sam an only child? What a dweeb.
Posted by SKA | August 9, 2010 8:38 AM
{This is called egonomics. When politicians spend other people's money to satisfy their own whims.}
Good one. "Egonomics" accurately describes a phenomenon that we see over and over again in public spending. It should be considered for addition to the next edition of Merriam Webster's Dictionary.
Posted by Usual Kevin | August 9, 2010 8:46 AM
Let's not overlook the vindictive side of Sam's personality. You know - the side he showed with the Oregonian editors talking about Bob Ball.
Remember, Sam really wanted the Rose Quarter baseball park. Otherwise he could look like he got played when he gave PGE Park to the Paulson family for soccer only. (Yes, I know football will still be played there, when the Portland State Vikings get back from Hillsboro where they go every time the city council has a new PGE Park plan.)
Sam loves moving parts of Portland around. He loves creative ideas and grand visions. He even loves the temporary creative "solutions" for the steps along the way, like sending the Vikings to Hillsboro. These are small sacrifices by others while a bigger vision takes shape.
Sam loves a big idea - and it doesn't really matter if it's ridiculous. Who can forget the plan to move the Sauvie Island bridge into downtown?
Anybody seen that lately?
So when his plan to replace Memorial Coliseum with a ballpark was rebuffed, Sam must have been steamed. Remember the days of measuring to see if he could fit both in? It would have worked except the game would have had to be stopped every time an outfielder yelled, "Car!"
So how does a person with Sam's vindictive streak handle that? Just maybe he says to himself, "If they want their little Memorial Coliseum they'll get it, but it's really going to cost them."
There could be an element of revenge at work here. Not to say a combination velodrome/swimming pool isn't a terrific idea.
Posted by Bill McDonald | August 9, 2010 8:47 AM
Sam's initial egonomics:
Install more men's rooms on all concourse levels.
Posted by godfry | August 9, 2010 9:30 AM
Egonomics.... that's funny and for once I actually agree with something bluecollar says
Posted by LucsAdvo | August 9, 2010 9:33 AM
"Sam wants to spend 120 to 140 million"
It's really like he doesn't even understand what money is. I feel like the city budget person should sit down with him and start from the beginning. "Now you see these different sized coins? This one is called a quarter. This is a dime...."
Posted by Snards | August 9, 2010 9:35 AM
You Portlanders have had to grab your ankles so many times for this bugger that I wonder if you can still sit down.
Is that chair comfortable?
Posted by The Other Jimbo | August 9, 2010 10:07 AM
godfry: +3.
What we really need is a vigilante with a D-9 Caterpillar to raze this old barn.
Posted by RJBob | August 9, 2010 10:16 AM
Unfortunately for us, Sam does indeed represent a significant segment of our population here in "Weird City".
Posted by al m | August 9, 2010 10:35 AM
In other words, "Now that the planning doesn't jive with my delusional vision of what should happen, it is time for me to power trip everybody into letting me get my way."
Seem reasonable to me, Sam the Sham.
Posted by Ralph Woods | August 9, 2010 10:36 AM
To the other Jimbo with a tip of the hat to Monty Python.... NO, not the comfy chair
Posted by LucsAdvo | August 9, 2010 12:42 PM
The part that he represents the best is the development community and other people who've made out like hogs on the city's dimes. It's not the tattooed, bike-riding, baristas who are making the bucks out of the deals Jack decries here like the tram, SoWhat, and Paulsen Park. Those people are getting economically screwed by bathroom dealing just as much as the rest of the citizenry.
Posted by darrelplant | August 9, 2010 3:47 PM
Do we really expect much more from a City Council and mayor that celebrate the opening of a f*cking toilet as big news and progress?
Posted by Mike (the other one) | August 9, 2010 6:27 PM
Well he did win fair and square...
Posted by Rball | August 9, 2010 7:17 PM
If Sam wants to bubble, can we put him in an actual cauldron? Heat to boiling and just let him bubble...away! as in evaporate!
Posted by portland native | August 9, 2010 8:23 PM
The citizens of Portland have the mayor they deserve. Not the mayor they should have, the mayor they deserve.
The people of Portland wouldn't recall their mayor even if he was found guilty of kidnapping Kyron Horman.
Posted by Pat | August 9, 2010 9:49 PM
I sure hope Sam bought some carbon credits for the "bubble" that he emitted. Or maybe it is a "sustainable" bubble.
Posted by Macky Wacky | August 9, 2010 11:20 PM
How are Portlanders different from any group of citizens and the elected officials who serve them?
Posted by darrelplant | August 10, 2010 12:17 AM
darrell-
Portlanders are very, very, nice. And very, very progressive.
...haven't you noticed this?
Posted by gaye harris | August 10, 2010 5:57 AM
I mean, seriously, just look at the title of the article that Janie Har, aka Mona Lisa, gives her article.
"Compromise"? "Float"?
This is Portlandish for "weasel", and "connive".
If a nice big public swimming pool happens in this town, I will take it all back. I will invite the ground to swallow me up if this happens. But only if said swimming pool is actually able to be used by kids, unlike the rest of the swimming pools in Portland. During the school year, the public pools in Portland are open to schoolchildren on weekdays only after 7.30pm, when they are eating dinner, doing homework, and going to bed.
Which means pools are only open to school kids during the school year for 4 hours a day on the weekend days. The lifeguards and their masters don't want to have all that fuss and drowning risk to handle.
Besides, who cares about offering indoor exercise options to kids in this rainy climate during the winters?
Posted by gaye harris | August 10, 2010 6:14 AM
No, I haven't noticed it. That's just buying into a stereotype. Is the guy who blows past you on a sidewalk progressive because he rides his bike everywhere? Do the people who put their cans and bottles out on the street for the bums to get them on trash day instead of returning them progressive because they don't just throw them away?
And my point was that if you're going to take the position (as Pat did) that some group of people "deserves" the elected officials they get that the same rule applies to any group of people, whether it's a town, county, country, or dog-catching district. I don't think there's anything special about Portlanders that makes them deserve Sam Adams any more than people in the US deserved George W. Bush or Barack Obama (pick one or both, depending on your political leanings).
Posted by darrelplant | August 10, 2010 9:53 AM
Irony, darell, irony...I find Portlanders in general to be much "nicer" on the surface than one generally finds in other cities. And much more "progressive", too. These characterisitics are masks, convenient, holier-than-thou displays; the effect of wearing them is that Portlanders, as a whole, have a larger denial complex than citizens of other burgs. Without this complex, Adams wouldn't have been elected in a virtual landslide in the first place. So in that sense, Portlanders do deserve him in their own, special, characteristic way.
Posted by gaye harris | August 10, 2010 10:35 AM
I just don't see that. Especially considering that most Portlanders are originally from other burgs. You've got swaths of "heartland" cities who claim to be more in touch with the "real America" because they're not on the coasts when, paradoxically, most of America lives on the coasts. You've got multi-millionaire politicians running as "common people" and sucking people into believing them. I don't think Portland has any lock on denial.
Speaking of denial, the way I remember it, the two major choices for mayor were Adams and Sho Dozono, and I'd love to hear how the business and development lobby's feet would have been held to the fire under a Dozono administration in a way that Adams hasn't done. How Dozono wouldn't have let Merritt Paulsen walk over the city like Adams has. A different group of developers would have been sucking money from the city and for different projects, but it still would have sucked.
I don't think you can fault Portland's citizens for that.
Posted by darrelplant | August 10, 2010 11:40 AM
Why did we come here? Maybe because Oregon is better than where we came from, in ways that were maybe more important in the first flush of our youth.
Like, being politically liberal. Being physically beautiful, to an extent that eclipses most urban areas in the country.
Like the rare exquisitely beautiful human, Oregon is startling in its beauty. Having this streak that defines it as different...the first state to try a public health insurance option..the first state to have vote by mail...the first state to have medical marijuana... the first state to give the dying some autonomy in their waning days...
So of course, the utopians flock here. And then they do things like decide its time to elect the nation's first openly gay mayor.
As a former disabused utopian disciple, I voted for Sam Adams. My liberal political older girlfriend loved him, so I decided to vote for him because I trusted her judgment. On voting day, I was tempted to vote for the underdog. As my pencil flickered sympathetically over Sho Dozono's spot, I had this distinct mental switchback, that went something like this: "Oh, Gaye, quit playing that silly game. It's time to vote for what you stand for. The country needs gay people in politics. Look at all those anti-gay marriagers with their ubiquitous depictions, reminiscent of signs on public lavatories, of one man and one woman. We need to get past all that.."
And thus I voted for Sam Adams, an act which has come full circle, to an outright rejection of identity politics and everything it entails.
Posted by gaye harris | August 10, 2010 9:18 PM