Detail, east Portland photo, courtesy Miles Hochstein / Portland Ground.

For old times' sake
The bojack bumper sticker -- only $1.50!

To order, click here.

Excellent tunes -- free! And on your browser right now. Just click on Radio Bojack!

E-mail us here.


This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on September 30, 2009 1:42 AM. The previous post in this blog was Foundation continues to crumble. The next post in this blog is Bad boy, bad boy, whatcha -- look out!. Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.



Law and Taxation
How Appealing
TaxProf Blog
Mauled Again
Tax Appellate Blog
A Taxing Matter
Josh Marquis
Native America, Discovered and Conquered
The Yin Blog
Ernie the Attorney
Above the Law
The Volokh Conspiracy
Going Concern
Bag and Baggage
Wealth Strategies Journal
Jim Hamilton's World of Securities Regulation
World of Work
The Faculty Lounge
Lowering the Bar
OrCon Law

Hap'nin' Guys
Tony Pierce
Parkway Rest Stop
Along the Gradyent
Dwight Jaynes
Bob Borden
Dingleberry Gazette
The Red Electric
Iced Borscht
Jeremy Blachman
Dean's Rhetorical Flourish
Straight White Guy
As Time Goes By
Dave Wagner
Jeff Selis
Alas, a Blog
Scott Hendison
The View Through the Windshield
Appliance Blog
The Bleat

Hap'nin' Gals
My Whim is Law
Lelo in Nopo
Attorney at Large
Linda Kruschke
The Non-Consumer Advocate
10 Steps to Finding Your Happy Place
A Pig of Success
Attorney at Large
Margaret and Helen
Kimberlee Jaynes
Cornelia Seigneur
And Sew It Goes
Mile 73
Rainy Day Thoughts
That Black Girl
Posie Gets Cozy
Cat Eyes
Rhi in Pink
Ragwaters, Bitters, and Blue Ruin
Rose City Journal
Type Like the Wind

Portland and Oregon
Isaac Laquedem
Rantings of a [Censored] Bus Driver
Jeff Mapes
Vintage Portland
The Portlander
South Waterfront
Amanda Fritz
O City Hall Reporters
Guilty Carnivore
Old Town by Larry Norton
The Alaunt
Bend Blogs
Lost Oregon
Cafe Unknown
Tin Zeroes
David's Oregon Picayune
Mark Nelsen's Weather Blog
Travel Oregon Blog
Portland Daily Photo
Portland Building Ads
Portland Food and
Dave Knows Portland
Idaho's Portugal
Alameda Old House History
MLK in Motion

Retired from Blogging
Various Observations...
The Daily E-Mail
Saving James
Portland Freelancer
Furious Nads (b!X)
Izzle Pfaff
The Grich
Kevin Allman
AboutItAll - Oregon
Lost in the Details
Worldwide Pablo
Tales from the Stump
Whitman Boys
Two Pennies
This Stony Planet
1221 SW 4th
I am a Fish
Here Today
What If...?
Superinky Fixations
The Rural Bus Route
Another Blogger
Mikeyman's Computer Treehouse
Portland Housing Blog

Wonderfully Wacky
Dave Barry
Borowitz Report
Stuff White People Like
Worst of the Web

Valuable Time-Wasters
My Gallery of Jacks
Litterbox, On the Prowl
Litterbox, Bag of Bones
Litterbox, Scratch
Ride That Donkey
Singin' Horses
Rally Monkey
Simon Swears
Strong Bad's E-mail

Oregon News
The Oregonian
Portland Tribune
Willamette Week
The Sentinel
Southeast Examiner
Northwest Examiner
Sellwood Bee
Mid-County Memo
Vancouver Voice
Eugene Register-Guard
OPB - Portland
Salem Statesman-Journal
Oregon Capitol News
Portland Business Journal
Daily Journal of Commerce
Oregon Business
Portland Info Net
McMinnville News Register
Lake Oswego Review
The Daily Astorian
Bend Bulletin
Corvallis Gazette-Times
Roseburg News-Review
Medford Mail-Tribune
Ashland Daily Tidings
Newport News-Times
Albany Democrat-Herald
The Eugene Weekly
Portland IndyMedia
The Columbian

The Beatles
Bruce Springsteen
Joni Mitchell
Ella Fitzgerald
Steve Earle
Joe Ely
Stevie Wonder
Lou Rawls

E-mail, Feeds, 'n' Stuff

Wednesday, September 30, 2009

Reader poll: Send Roman Polanski to prison?

There's a fascinating debate about whether it's appropriate to extradite and incarcerate Roman Polanski, the fugitive film director, who ran from the United States 31 years ago rather than face the music from his plea bargain, in which he talked rape charges down to having sex with a minor. The strongest argument I have heard on his behalf so far is that the authorities should have arrested him sooner, much sooner, with which I agree. And the timing of their sudden interest in the guy is suspicious; there are allegations that the prosecutor and judge in his case committed misconduct many years ago. But what's the right remedy for the lackadaisical pursuit and the charges of misconduct -- Polanski walks? Maybe.

The man is a most interesting character. His "Rosemary's Baby" scared the starch out of me in high school. And for my money, "Chinatown" is one of the best American films ever. To have his pregnant wife and her friends murdered in his home by the Manson people must have caused deep scars inside Polanski that can never heal -- on top of the ones he got from his mother dying in a Nazi concentration camp. But what he did in his case was profoundly evil, and his flight to avoid his sentence was juvenile.

I'm looking forward to seeing what readers have to say about this one.

What should be done with Roman Polanski?
Lock him up
Let him go, as long as he stays out of the United States
Let him go, and let him come back to the United States if he wants free polls

Comments (47)

It is hard to believe we are even having this conversation.

The man was convicted of a crime, a pretty horrendous one at that.

He fled the country to avoid a prison sentence. Where in our jurisprudence does it say that if you do this you get to be absolved of your crime and punishment? Where in our laws does it say that if you had personal tragedy in your life you get to drug and rape a 13 year old? I cannot find it.

Is there any justification or rationale at all as to why he should not be made to serve his sentence, or some sentence? I too admire his movies but does that in any way have a bearing on the case? Are there separate rules for the rich and famous and creative?

Jean valJean was not a pedophile

Chinatown is on my top ten list, but es mach nichts.

Drugging and raping a girl is about as bad as it gets. This guy wasn't jaywalking.

Haven't heard that Polanski says let bygones be bygones when Charlie Manson's parole hearings come up. Only when his rear is on the line.

When authorities fail to bring someone before the court for trial in a timely manner, that persons right to a fair trial could certainly be compromised. In this case however RP has already been convicted.

Bring him here now, and put him in jail. If there was any misconduct he certainly has had the time and money to expose it. Who knows, his time behind bars may inspire a great new movie.

If RP drugged an adult female, and raped her, then he should do time.

If RP forced himself on an adult female, thus raping her after she said no, then he should do time.

If RP had sex with a 13 yr old female, thus commiting statutory rape ala Goldschmidt, then he should do time.

Since he did all three in the same crime, plus he made some good movies, I think he should walk a free man. Besides, Goldy also did some good things (okay, great things), and he got a pass too.

I thought the only reason he's been under pursuit for so long was because he was hanging out in a country that refused to extradite him.

Every time he's been up for some award somewhere else, the Department of Justice would file paperwork to nab him and ship him back here, but he never showed up until this time.

When he got nabbed, and they're working on the shipping.

I also have a difficult time on this issue. Goldschmidt did the crime and walked, Bush senior brought drugs into our country in arm swap deals and walked, Bush light altered the constitution and created wars based on lies and walked with death in abundance.So is this another Clinton " moral lesson"? Never a word about Jerry Lee Lewis, so what to think?

I think there is a bit more to the story than often gets reported. Specifically, the prosecutor and the initial judge engaged in misconduct that, allegedly, undermined the plea agreement.

Assuming our Justice Department's resources are not unlimited, I would have thought this case deserves a pretty low priority. There seems to be no risk to the public of this criminal's re-offending, and little deterrent value in his case for other potential offenders, so we're just talking about punishment. The offense is over 30 years old. There must be better ways to spend money fighting crime.

What he did was wrong, wrong, wrong.

But given the amount of time that has passed and the fact that the victim has been very upfront about her wish that this all just go away (yes, she got a big settlement and apparently has moved past it in her life), I'm inclined to give the most weight to what SHE wants. As a victim of a sexual assault myself in which the perpetrator was never tried but put away for an earlier crime (a generation ago at this point in a far away locale and I'm way past it), I think her wishes should be paramount.

Therefore, keep him out of the U.S. and move on. If she has changed her mind, then haul his tush back here and throw away the key.

But as a taxpayer, I can think of many other criminals I'd rather spend my money on to put away at this point.

I was sympathetic to the guy before I knew much about it. Then I skimmed over the recently unsealed grand jury minutes:

Yeeeeah. It's not just a "little" matter of ignoring the age of consent, he drugged and forcibly raped the girl, multiple times. Permanent exile is sorta the least we can do under the circumstances, IMHO.

(FYI, The Smoking Gun also has the transcript of his guilty plea: )

Haven't heard that Polanski says let bygones be bygones when Charlie Manson's parole hearings come up.

There is a big difference between mass murder and statutory rape originally plea bargained down to probation.

Watch Wanted and Desired, a fascinating documentary about Roman Polanski that sheds a great deal of light on the man.

There was an article floating around earlier in the week that quoted his victim as saying that the way the court and authorities have handled the situation over the years has hurt her more than Polanski's criminal act.

I wonder if victims will ever be listened to, in a judicial system that has a bunch of pit bulls working in it.

There seems to be no risk to the public of this criminal's re-offending

Nope. There's always the possibility that child molesters will reoffend, sometimes repeatedly.

Remember Polanski's film, "The Pianist" starring Adrien Brody?
That was the year I attended the Producers Guild Awards banquet and Adrien Brody was sitting at the next table along with....Diane Lane.
I shook hands with both of them.
Roman Polanski did not attend and was not arrested.
On the way out I ran into the lawyer Bob Shapiro from OJ's dream team. It sort of combined the dark side of Hollywood with the rest of it, much as Polanski's life did with Charles Manson and this girl.
Hollywood, where even the crimes are famous.

"statutory rape originally plea bargained down to probation."

None, read the links I included above and you will see that this common perception is at odds with the facts. He plea bargained down to a statutory rape charge, but the grand jury testimony supported much more serious charges. In his plea, he knowingly and willingly agreed to let the judge decide his sentence with the prosecutor giving only a recommendation on appropriate sentencing, not a promise binding on the judge.

(Plus he skipped bail, which is itself a crime for obvious reasons.)

I do have quite a bit of sympathy for the victim's desire to not have this old wound re-opened, really. It may be worth letting this go simply out of respect for her wishes. But even in so doing, we should not be blind to the crime Polanski actually committed: forcible rape.

He should run for office.

For a lot of crimes, I could see letting Polanski go or supporting the wishes of the victim over the necessities of our Justice system.

But not on this one. He's gotta be locked up.

Elizabeth Smart has a remarkably mature outlook on this set of issues and compartmentalizing her responsibility to herself and to society at large:

On the one hand:

LARRY KING: Knowing how strong your faith is, Elizabeth, do you forgive your abductors?

ELIZABETH SMART: Yes. Yes, I do. I mean, you know, one day my mom sat me down and she said "You know, Elizabeth, you can either, you know, forgive them and move on and just forget that it ever happened to you and just, you know, continue on in your life or, you know, you can just -- I mean, yes, what they did to you was horrible and you didn't deserve that and no one should deserve that and, you know, you can just sit there and be mad at them.

But really then you're just -- your whole life is going to be wrapped up in it and you won't be able to move on and you'll just always be like my life would be -- you just always think to yourself, oh well my life would be so much better if these two people never had happened, I mean you know if they had never and just blame everything on them."

On the other hand:

A Utah judge has cleared the way for Elizabeth Smart, now 21, to testify against the man who kidnapped her as a teenager seven years ago. Smart will testify against Brian David Mitchell Thurday morning in a Utah courtroom.

According to sources, Smart will testify that Mitchell was motivated primarily by sex and not religion in kidnapping her, and that his behavior was inconsistent with that of a 'prophet,' which he proclaimed himself to be.

U.S. District Judge Dale Kimball made the ruling Monday, allowing Smart to take the stand. Smart, now a music major at Brigham Young University, is testifying ahead of the rest of the trial scheduled for November 30th, as she has been called to serve as a missionary for The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints in Paris, France, and will be departing November 10th for preparatory language training.

Thursday's hearing will determine whether Mitchell, who has been a patient at the Utah State Hospital since 2005, is competent to stand trial. Elizabeth's father, Ed Smart, said that the judge's ruling was expected, and that his daughter has been preparing to testify against Mitchell.

It will be the first time Elizabeth Smart has faced her abductor since the kidnapping.


If it is true that the victim received a financial settlement along the way, I have to wonder what her motivation is for not wanting to repeat her already oft repeated statements in this case. What society needs from the unfortunate woman is not her vengence, but cooperation in a process that would help to deter others.

The only way I could even vote is to thoroughly know the extent of the accusation and it's legal standing as of today. Since this knowledge is lengthy and includes such things as statutory limits, also of which I am not aware, I think it should be allowed to unravel on it's own.

This smacks of entertainment, not justice.

What's most startling about this incident is how bizarre and out-of-touch the French and Polish politico-artistes apparently are. Particularly (largely) Catholic Poland. All those "free Polanski" stickers.

Then again, have you seen Rohmer's "Pauline at the Beach"?

I may be mistaken about his, but didn't the girl's mother basically pimp her out to Polanski?

Okay, I just read the awful transcript (the only way to make up my mind on this). It's horrible. He committed a serious and rather disgusting crime, a total abuse of power over a vulnerable child, and he should have to answer for it. I can't speak to the question of whether there was misconduct by the prosecutor and judge, but fleeing was just plain wrong (as was the underlying crime). The extended passage of time complicates this (justice delayed being justice denied and all that) and I thouroughly dislike all the media hoopla that glamorizes it, but he needs to be held accountable, and to atone, according to the same rules that apply to the rest of us.

Sorry. I didn't have any sympathy for Ira Einhorn or for Ronnie Biggs, either, when they were finally picked up. All three knew what they were doing, and figured that running was better than taking responsibility. (Okay, so Einhorn was a murderer instead of a rapist, but it's still that insane "the man was an ARTIST, and besides, it's been thirty years" rationalization from their defenders that drives me insane. If the law is to be respected, it has to be applied justly and fairly to all, and not with special dispensations because of perceived talent that has NOTHING to do with the case at hand.)

The merits of the original case are basically irrelevant at this point. He knowingly and intentionally fled the country to avoid sentencing.

Golschmidt only got a "pass" because the statute of limitations had expired. Polanski's guilty plea tolled the statute of limitations, so the two situations cannot be compared. The orginal judge did engage in misconduct after the guilty plea by having ex parte contacts, but that does not change the fact that Polanski was, in fact, guilty of this crime and admitted so. The misconduct you may ask? The judge reneged on an agreement not to send Polanski back to jail and was going to make him do a whopping 48 more days.

There is a big difference between mass murder and statutory rape originally plea bargained down to probation.

So basically you're saying that rape victims should just be happy they were not killed?

It wasn't statutory rape pleaded down to probation, it was rape pleaded down to statutory rape.

I can see where my stand on this can be seen as rationalizing.

But I still say the victim's wishes should be a paramount consideration in a case that is 31 (or is it 32?) years old. Not to say it wasn't a horrible crime -- it was and there is NO doubt about that -- and had the US pursued him right after he fled, I woulda said throw away the damn key.

But 30 odd years later, I say that if the victim wants it to be over, then let it be over. Rape is the most personal crime there is (after all, murder victims are dead and can't keep reliving the experience in every dream and every moment in their day). Therefore, the victim in a rape should be given some power over the outcome. And in today's judicial system, as pointed out by an earlier poster, the victim is usually roadkill along the way.

Give the victim the power here -- the power she didn't have when she was 13. If she wants him in the hoosegow, then put him there - in the toughest prison the US has to offer (Marion, ILL, right?). Otherwise, don't let the offender come back to the same country the victim lives in. Ever.

I personally have never seen a Polanski movie after Chinatown. Only saw that once right after it came out (I was 20) and refused to see it again, once I realized who he was and what he had been accused and convicted of.

I never saw The Pianist. I'm pretty sure I would have liked it, based on summaries of the story and on reviews I've seen; I certainly think the world of Holly Hunter and Anna Pacquin. But I'll never, ever, watch the movie.

Talea: Wrong movie. Hunter and Paquin were in The Piano, not Polanski's more recent The Pianist.

Talea, I understand your point. However, do you think taking that position would be fair to the defendants serving hard time who were not fortunate enough to have a forgiving victim? If he was not an award winning filmmaker, he would not getting any support whatsoever.

I highly recommend the Pianist. One of the finest historical movies ever made, along with Empire of the Sun.

It is sad that, as a species, we have not thought of and implemented better punishments than prison.

How about a five year regimen of no sex, enforced by an ultra high-tech donut-shaped electric-shock sensor, or something.

It is a criminal matter not a civil matter.
Therefore, the "plaintiff" is society/the state and not the victim.
While, I agree that victims should have some input, they aren't the deciders.
Unless you'd like to move to a system of "blood debt", where the defendant can escape prosecution by paying off the victim or their family.

This case just really shows the lack of basic human morality of RP's defenders.

I've only skimmed the most recent comments, so apologies if someone has made this point already.

As Jack and the rest of us attorneys learned in law school, crimes such as the one RP committed are crimes not just against an individual, but against society as a whole. That is why the prosecutor represents "the people of the State of California," not the victim in particular. In other words, the strength of the (financially-compensated) victim's position is mitigated by the need for RP to pay his debt "to society," not just the girl he drugged and raped.

I've read a whole lot of rationalization on this board and elsewhere. Not worth the pixels. But this post is in response to the reasonable position of those who have heard the victim speak out and are swayed by her desire to close this chapter of her life.

Let RP do his time. To do otherwise would be to make a mockery of the criminal justice system we do our best to make work...despite its evident flaws.

When authorities fail to bring someone before the court for trial in a timely manner, that persons right to a fair trial could certainly be compromised.

That doesn't really apply when the reason they can't be tried in a timely matter is because they fled the country.

What trial? He's already pleaded guilty.

I once was friendly with the young owner of a small start-up restaurant in the Midwest. His wife was 8 months pregnant when he was sentenced to 7 years in jail, mandatory minimum, for growing pot. I will never forget the expression on his face at a buffet breakfast on his last day of freedom before they were going to cart him off to jail the next morning. Or witnessing the continuous struggle of the young mom to visit him, baby in tow, at the facility two hours away.

And we can ever forget Chasse, and Louima, and Diallo, and countless others who have perished at the hands of our nation's rogue police force.

It does seem many of the officers (attorneys,judges, and police)of our system of justice, are turning a blind eye to the evident crimes against society being committed by the justice system itself.

Gaye, the solution isn't to ignore justice for this criminal, but to catch him, deal with him, get him out of the way, then go after those "rogues" and other jerks. I'll gladly pay more taxes for the prosecutor staff and prison space.

I agree with Lawrence. You can't presume the state's victim is the real victim-or the only victim. The justice system-and accurate analysis of its'shortcomings -is complex

This is a very hard question for me, not least because I was repeatedly sexually molested as a teenager (though not forcibly raped). I agree with others here that this incident did constitute forcible rape, not merely the statutory kind. I also don't think Polanski should be entitled to any special treatment because of his accomplishments. I empathize strongly with the person who says it's "crazy" not to go all-out to put this guy in prison forever and the one who "can't believe" we're even having this debate. Your pain is real, I know that.

However, after obsessively deliberating this question for the past two days and changing my mind several times, I have reluctantly concluded that justice in this case should take the form of permanent exile from the United States. My reasoning goes as follows:

The chance that Polanski will actually do hard time in prison, before his death by natural causes, is frankly very slim. Inevitably, he will assemble an OJ-style dream team of lawyers who will exploit every irregularity in the original case (as others have noted, there are lots of them) and keep the courts tied up in knots for years if not decades -- consuming thousands of person-hours and millions of dollars in public resources that could otherwise go toward putting away people who _currently_ pose much more of a threat to society. In other words, how many active rapists, murderers, etc. will be left out on the streets in order to go after an old man who is not known to have reoffended in three decades? Under a perfect criminal justice system with unlimited time and resources this would not matter; however, in the real world priorities must be established. My personal feeling is that first-degree murder suspects should be pursued relentlessly to the end of their lives (this includes the Holocaust perpetrators), but all other crimes, no matter how serious, must have implied expiration dates (even if a conviction was made) because otherwise the system would become entirely consumed with righting long-past wrongs and no suspect or victim would ever again get timely resolution of their case in the courts.

There is also the matter of the victim. I know and agree that in theory, criminal acts are committed against society, not against individuals, and the preferences of victims should ordinarily be given little if any weight in deciding the fate of a criminal. But pursuing this particular case, with its very public nature and high likelihood of an extended time frame, has the potential to do grievous harm to an innocent woman who has publicly and repeatedly stated her wish to move on. By being forced to confront old wounds on a daily basis for years, her own suffering would likely be far worse than Polanski's no matter how the case is resolved. So again, I think it's much better to instead focus our limited resources on giving comfort and closure to those victims whose wounds are still festering.

I know it's hard to acknowledge that someone who did something so awful has "beaten the rap" but unfortunately it does sometimes happen. On balance, in this case, my judgment is that it will be less detrimental to admit that reality than to try mightily -- and most likely fail -- to change it.

MarciaFS, thanks for making my point better than I did.

ShameWow, I'm positive you were not inferring I have a lack of morality. And I fully understand the difference between criminal and civil law. Having a number of lawyers in the extended family assured that.

Chris, you are right that this isn't fair to those perps who are caught and sent to jail as they should be. I fully recognize that and said my position is not totally rational.

RP doesn't deserve special treatment and I have no use for the Hollywood types saying he does. But the reality is that a rape victim in such a high profile case gets re-victimized every time it comes up. And I'm not speaking just as a victim; I saw it over and over again as a journalist for more than 20 years. See MarciaFS' post above -- she says it better than I did.

Alan, thanks for setting me straight. I'm off to rent The Piano.

If fleeing the consequences of the law and waiting for things to "cool down" is an effective option - why wouldn't everyone?

Just because we may appreciate a person's art, charisma, politics, money or whatever does not exempt them from the same law that should justly apply to all of us.

Where is Jack Nicholson in all of this?
Maybe he and Neil Goldschmidt should Polanski in a cell.

Where is Jack Nicholson in all of this?
Maybe he and Neil Goldschmidt should join Polanski in a cell.

Tom wants to know: "If fleeing the consequences of the law and waiting for things to "cool down" is an effective option - why wouldn't everyone?"

Seems to me that most perps _do_ attempt exactly that, no? But it's just about impossible for a known felon to evade the law for years on end, especially without living one's whole life underground like a former Weatherman. (Hey, don't take my word for it, try it sometime!) This is why Polanski's case is so unusual and raises such difficult questions.

The guy that alleged impropriety on the part of the judge said he lied in yesterday's NYTs.

The O's Mr Levy, seeking to avoid diving into "a Jacuzzi full of eels," identifies his "favorite film" and links to behind-the-scenes tales of its making:

In Vino Veritas

Lange, Pinot Gris 2015
Kiona, Lemberger 2014
Willamette Valley, Pinot Gris 2015
Aix, Rosé de Provence 2016
Marchigüe, Cabernet 2013
Inazío Irruzola, Getariako Txakolina Rosé 2015
Maso Canali, Pinot Grigio 2015
Campo Viejo, Rioja Reserva 2011
Kirkland, Côtes de Provence Rosé 2016
Cantele, Salice Salentino Reserva 2013
Whispering Angel, Côtes de Provence Rosé 2013
Avissi, Prosecco
Cleto Charli, Lambrusco di Sorbara Secco, Vecchia Modena
Pique Poul, Rosé 2016
Edmunds St. John, Bone-Jolly Rosé 2016
Stoller, Pinot Noir Rosé 2016
Chehalem, Inox Chardonnay 2015
The Four Graces, Pinot Gris 2015
Gascón, Colosal Red 2013
Cardwell Hill, Pinot Gris 2015
L'Ecole No. 41, Merlot 2013
Della Terra, Anonymus
Willamette Valley, Dijon Clone Chardonnay 2013
Wraith, Cabernet, Eidolon Estate 2012
Januik, Red 2015
Tomassi, Valpolicella, Rafaél, 2014
Sharecropper's Pinot Noir 2013
Helix, Pomatia Red Blend 2013
La Espera, Cabernet 2011
Campo Viejo, Rioja Reserva 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2013
Locations, Spanish Red Wine
Locations, Argentinian Red Wine
La Antigua Clásico, Rioja 2011
Shatter, Grenache, Maury 2012
Argyle, Vintage Brut 2011
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #16 Abacela, Fiesta Tempranillo 2014
Benton Hill, Pinot Gris 2015
Primarius, Pinot Gris 2015
Januik, Merlot 2013
Napa Cellars, Cabernet 2013
J. Bookwalter, Protagonist 2012
LAN, Rioja Edicion Limitada 2011
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 2009
Denada Cellars, Cabernet, Maipo Valley 2014
Marchigüe, Cabernet, Colchagua Valley 2013
Oberon, Cabernet 2014
Hedges, Red Mountain 2012
Balboa, Rose of Grenache 2015
Ontañón, Rioja Reserva 2015
Three Horse Ranch, Pinot Gris 2014
Archery Summit, Vireton Pinot Gris 2014
Nelms Road, Merlot 2013
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Pinot Gris 2014
Conn Creek, Cabernet, Napa 2012
Conn Creek, Cabernet, Napa 2013
Villa Maria, Sauvignon Blanc 2015
G3, Cabernet 2013
Chateau Smith, Cabernet, Washington State 2014
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #16
Willamette Valley, Rose of Pinot Noir, Whole Clusters 2015
Albero, Bobal Rose 2015
Ca' del Baio Barbaresco Valgrande 2012
Goodfellow, Reserve Pinot Gris, Clover 2014
Lugana, San Benedetto 2014
Wente, Cabernet, Charles Wetmore 2011
La Espera, Cabernet 2011
King Estate, Pinot Gris 2015
Adelsheim, Pinot Gris 2015
Trader Joe's, Pinot Gris, Willamette Valley 2015
La Vite Lucente, Toscana Red 2013
St. Francis, Cabernet, Sonoma 2013
Kendall-Jackson, Pinot Noir, California 2013
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Napa Valley 2013
Erath, Pinot Noir, Estate Selection 2012
Abbot's Table, Columbia Valley 2014
Intrinsic, Cabernet 2014
Oyster Bay, Pinot Noir 2010
Occhipinti, SP68 Bianco 2014
Layer Cake, Shiraz 2013
Desert Wind, Ruah 2011
WillaKenzie, Pinot Gris 2014
Abacela, Fiesta Tempranillo 2013
Des Amis, Rose 2014
Dunham, Trautina 2012
RoxyAnn, Claret 2012
Del Ri, Claret 2012
Stoppa, Emilia, Red 2004
Primarius, Pinot Noir 2013
Domaines Bunan, Bandol Rose 2015
Albero, Bobal Rose 2015
Deer Creek, Pinot Gris 2015
Beaulieu, Rutherford Cabernet 2013
Archery Summit, Vireton Pinot Gris 2014
King Estate, Pinot Gris, Backbone 2014
Oberon, Napa Cabernet 2013
Apaltagua, Envero Carmenere Gran Reserva 2013
Chateau des Arnauds, Cuvee des Capucins 2012
Nine Hats, Red 2013
Benziger, Cabernet, Sonoma 2012
Roxy Ann, Claret 2012
Januik, Merlot 2012
Conundrum, White 2013
St. Francis, Sonoma Cabernet 2012

The Occasional Book

Marc Maron - Waiting for the Punch
Phil Stanford - Rose City Vice
Kenneth R. Feinberg - What is Life Worth?
Kent Haruf - Our Souls at Night
Peter Carey - True History of the Kelly Gang
Suzanne Collins - The Hunger Games
Amy Stewart - Girl Waits With Gun
Philip Roth - The Plot Against America
Norm Macdonald - Based on a True Story
Christopher Buckley - Boomsday
Ryan Holiday - The Obstacle is the Way
Ruth Sepetys - Between Shades of Gray
Richard Adams - Watership Down
Claire Vaye Watkins - Gold Fame Citrus
Markus Zusak - I am the Messenger
Anthony Doerr - All the Light We Cannot See
James Joyce - Dubliners
Cheryl Strayed - Torch
William Golding - Lord of the Flies
Saul Bellow - Mister Sammler's Planet
Phil Stanford - White House Call Girl
John Kaplan & Jon R. Waltz - The Trial of Jack Ruby
Kent Haruf - Eventide
David Halberstam - Summer of '49
Norman Mailer - The Naked and the Dead
Maria Dermoȗt - The Ten Thousand Things
William Faulkner - As I Lay Dying
Markus Zusak - The Book Thief
Christopher Buckley - Thank You for Smoking
William Shakespeare - Othello
Joseph Conrad - Heart of Darkness
Bill Bryson - A Short History of Nearly Everything
Cheryl Strayed - Tiny Beautiful Things
Sara Varon - Bake Sale
Stephen King - 11/22/63
Paul Goldstein - Errors and Omissions
Mark Twain - A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court
Steve Martin - Born Standing Up: A Comic's Life
Beverly Cleary - A Girl from Yamhill, a Memoir
Kent Haruf - Plainsong
Hope Larson - A Wrinkle in Time, the Graphic Novel
Rudyard Kipling - Kim
Peter Ames Carlin - Bruce
Fran Cannon Slayton - When the Whistle Blows
Neil Young - Waging Heavy Peace
Mark Bego - Aretha Franklin, the Queen of Soul (2012 ed.)
Jenny Lawson - Let's Pretend This Never Happened
J.D. Salinger - Franny and Zooey
Charles Dickens - A Christmas Carol
Timothy Egan - The Big Burn
Deborah Eisenberg - Transactions in a Foreign Currency
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. - Slaughterhouse Five
Kathryn Lance - Pandora's Genes
Cheryl Strayed - Wild
Fyodor Dostoyevsky - The Brothers Karamazov
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt

Road Work

Miles run year to date: 8
At this date last year: 0
Total run in 2018: 10
In 2017: 113
In 2016: 155
In 2015: 271
In 2014: 401
In 2013: 257
In 2012: 129
In 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269

Clicky Web Analytics