Detail, east Portland photo, courtesy Miles Hochstein / Portland Ground.

For old times' sake
The bojack bumper sticker -- only $1.50!

To order, click here.

Excellent tunes -- free! And on your browser right now. Just click on Radio Bojack!

E-mail us here.


This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on September 10, 2009 10:38 AM. The previous post in this blog was So much for the principle of the thing. The next post in this blog is Football query. Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.



Law and Taxation
How Appealing
TaxProf Blog
Mauled Again
Tax Appellate Blog
A Taxing Matter
Josh Marquis
Native America, Discovered and Conquered
The Yin Blog
Ernie the Attorney
Above the Law
The Volokh Conspiracy
Going Concern
Bag and Baggage
Wealth Strategies Journal
Jim Hamilton's World of Securities Regulation
World of Work
The Faculty Lounge
Lowering the Bar
OrCon Law

Hap'nin' Guys
Tony Pierce
Parkway Rest Stop
Along the Gradyent
Dwight Jaynes
Bob Borden
Dingleberry Gazette
The Red Electric
Iced Borscht
Jeremy Blachman
Dean's Rhetorical Flourish
Straight White Guy
As Time Goes By
Dave Wagner
Jeff Selis
Alas, a Blog
Scott Hendison
The View Through the Windshield
Appliance Blog
The Bleat

Hap'nin' Gals
My Whim is Law
Lelo in Nopo
Attorney at Large
Linda Kruschke
The Non-Consumer Advocate
10 Steps to Finding Your Happy Place
A Pig of Success
Attorney at Large
Margaret and Helen
Kimberlee Jaynes
Cornelia Seigneur
And Sew It Goes
Mile 73
Rainy Day Thoughts
That Black Girl
Posie Gets Cozy
Cat Eyes
Rhi in Pink
Ragwaters, Bitters, and Blue Ruin
Rose City Journal
Type Like the Wind

Portland and Oregon
Isaac Laquedem
Rantings of a [Censored] Bus Driver
Jeff Mapes
Vintage Portland
The Portlander
South Waterfront
Amanda Fritz
O City Hall Reporters
Guilty Carnivore
Old Town by Larry Norton
The Alaunt
Bend Blogs
Lost Oregon
Cafe Unknown
Tin Zeroes
David's Oregon Picayune
Mark Nelsen's Weather Blog
Travel Oregon Blog
Portland Daily Photo
Portland Building Ads
Portland Food and
Dave Knows Portland
Idaho's Portugal
Alameda Old House History
MLK in Motion

Retired from Blogging
Various Observations...
The Daily E-Mail
Saving James
Portland Freelancer
Furious Nads (b!X)
Izzle Pfaff
The Grich
Kevin Allman
AboutItAll - Oregon
Lost in the Details
Worldwide Pablo
Tales from the Stump
Whitman Boys
Two Pennies
This Stony Planet
1221 SW 4th
I am a Fish
Here Today
What If...?
Superinky Fixations
The Rural Bus Route
Another Blogger
Mikeyman's Computer Treehouse
Portland Housing Blog

Wonderfully Wacky
Dave Barry
Borowitz Report
Stuff White People Like
Worst of the Web

Valuable Time-Wasters
My Gallery of Jacks
Litterbox, On the Prowl
Litterbox, Bag of Bones
Litterbox, Scratch
Ride That Donkey
Singin' Horses
Rally Monkey
Simon Swears
Strong Bad's E-mail

Oregon News
The Oregonian
Portland Tribune
Willamette Week
The Sentinel
Southeast Examiner
Northwest Examiner
Sellwood Bee
Mid-County Memo
Vancouver Voice
Eugene Register-Guard
OPB - Portland
Salem Statesman-Journal
Oregon Capitol News
Portland Business Journal
Daily Journal of Commerce
Oregon Business
Portland Info Net
McMinnville News Register
Lake Oswego Review
The Daily Astorian
Bend Bulletin
Corvallis Gazette-Times
Roseburg News-Review
Medford Mail-Tribune
Ashland Daily Tidings
Newport News-Times
Albany Democrat-Herald
The Eugene Weekly
Portland IndyMedia
The Columbian

The Beatles
Bruce Springsteen
Joni Mitchell
Ella Fitzgerald
Steve Earle
Joe Ely
Stevie Wonder
Lou Rawls

E-mail, Feeds, 'n' Stuff

Thursday, September 10, 2009

Buying himself out

Fred Stickel has announced he's retiring as publisher of The Oregonian. When asked why, the 87-year-old confided, "I wanted to be sure to get my retirement tributes in the paper before it folds."

The publication is conducting a national search for a replacement for Stickel. Already a prime candidate has been identified.

Comments (23)

Well they need to get someone who has a curious mind for a change and maybe an open one, mind that is, also.

I nominate Amy Ruiz.

That 70-year old young upstart Bob Skipper is looking for work.

What kind of person takes glee in the struggles of a business that plays such an important role in the community?

now THAT is funny Jack!

What kind of person takes glee

I am gleeful if it means that the stances taken by the editorial board of that paper start to wise up. I am not gleeful about the demise of the paper, as I have remarked here many times. Also, I am not sure that the overall Newhouse family handled the internet very well -- nor are they doing so now.

a business that plays such an important role in the community

Much less so nowadays than, say, 10 years ago. But still important.

(Stickel and Schonely: twins separated at birth? viewing video, you decide.)

... going ... going ... not a minute too soon enough.

He said Internet competition came much faster than he and others in the industry expected.

Also more powerful.

"Certainly the impact of it was greater than I anticipated," ...

That too.

"... and it's still shaking down," Stickel said. "Everybody's trying to figure out, 'How do you monetize this?'"
'Figuring the angles' for (him) to be making a buck ain't needed to be figured. NO Ripoff City. Funding the internet is a slamdunk. Easy peasy:

Socialize it ! Just like we socialized the Interstate Highway System; (and this time using world socialism, World Wide Well-being 'socializing' it). How much 'figuring' was there to "monetize" Interstate freeways (by rich folks)?

Maybe Stickel meant to say 'figuring how to monopolize the internet.'

Internets = Interstates: all about traffic and travel (which, btw, is the definition of 'communication') and expanding horizons. Travel is broadening. That's the dictum of Education -- it's 'broadening.' (As in: 'broad-minded,' which, btw, is the definition of 'liberal' and 'cultured' and 'sophisticated' and, in a word, 'educated.' As opposed to 'schooled,' which means 'indoctrinated' or 'rote trained.')

The reason rich folks, a.k.a. The Establishment, failed to foresee the internet coming "faster, more powerful, greater" than that which they had obtained, and "shaking down" obliterating their established status, is because their ONLY founding advantage was: Control of current information flow -- that which is 'trafficked.'

It hardly was seen that information currency was the ONLY device or endowment causing the rich persons' riches. Overwhelming all events and circumstances, by exaggerating or suppressing Who What Where When Why facts for understanding, they constantly told themselves and drumbeat into us the false hollow MYTH that their having riches prove they are better people, with Divine Right to be rich, promised to them chosen by Gad Almighty approving, and proved by, them being rich.

This 'information flow' thing materialized in the invention of telegraphy, circa 1830, which telegraphs then appeared in railroad (traffic) depots, and then begat 'newspapers' (as we think of them, and as 'wire services'), and so on. (Of course, telephony then came in on telegraphy wires. The internet is merely fancy telephony on the telephone wires network.) (Now, radiowave broadcasting -- 'the wireless' -- is a whole different thing, coming after about 1910. The internet is NOT broadcasting. And that's an important legal privacy and people-being-secure-in-their-persons distinction to observe and make.)

Also, the 'information flow' thing involves literacy -- being able to read and to write, (and to 'figure' I suppose), and public education, taxpayers-paid and socialized as US law enacted and instituted it, circa 1845, first in the world, (before then literacy was obtained in priesthoods and 'private schools' only by rich persons ... thoroughly proving God chose and made them smarter and better than the masses of everybody-else 'little people'). Literacy ... education ... currency of information flow ... control ... and so on.

The internet 'democratizes' information. Or, in the famous words of President Clinton: Democracy is what comes out the end of the internet ... uh, and cell phones.

The internet wrecking ball smashing the state of The Establishment is literately discussed and explained in 2 parts (Footnotes in the 2nd part) here:

Excerpt (from part 2):

The Myth of the Open Society: Secrecy and the Newspress. In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is king. Upon the newspress falls the responsibility of sustaining the [monetizing] MYTH that the United States’ political economy is fundamentally open, with pockets of secrecy, rather than fundamentally defined by information differentials, with apertures of openness. But in fact the newpress is required by law, directly or indirectly, to respect all of the political eoconomy’s major concealments. These laws enact the least cumbersome form of censorship – prior exclusion – and deny the newpress access to four areas of conflict whose exposure would drastically undermine corporate power vis-a-vis the rest of American society. These four areas, with the paramount interests said to justify the exclusion of the newspress from each, are:

· Labor processes and corporate business practices (proprietary information).

· The system of criminal justice (integrity of police procedures, fair trial and custodial considerations),

· Domestic governmental proceedings (integrity of the deliberative process).

· Foreign affairs (national security)

In addition to its legal exclusion from forbidden areas, because the newspress' profits depend on the profits of its corporate advertisers, it has a financial interest in self-censoring reportage that would lessen its advertisers' profits. Since coverage of forbidden areas would undermine corporate power and wealth, the newspress does not provide such coverage.

Non-coverage of forbidden areas by the newspress is explained then, by three factors: (1) the power of the dominant participants to legally exclude the newspress; (2) the newspress' financial interest in not undermining advertising revenue; and (3) the newspress' acceptance of both the pre-eminence of the paramount interests justifying non-coverage and the incompatibility of those interest with coverage. What coverage of forbidden areas there is requires espionage and betrayal. But it should not be surprising that the newspress is required to resort to these methods to pierce the pervasive and doctrinal secrecy surrounding consequential governmental and corporate activities; in such cases, the ends define the means.

I hope we all have opportunity to read it. The power of the people thinking globally is acted out faster, more powerful, greater than the local 'yokels' figuring to monetize 'it' ... that information flow thing. A magnificent tract.

The internet is going to be both all-powerful and free of corporate and establishment pressure? Do you mind if I kind of doubt that?

Great arguments, but you know, while information may be free, good information is not.

I always find these discussions about the "free" internet amusing. Somehow the Wall Street Journal has no problem charging subscribers for full use of it's online edition. Of course, UNLIKE the OREGONIAN they provide their readers with real news and facts - no the spin of the day from City Hall.

So are they finally going to acknowledge that "telly-vision" thing isn't just a fad that's going away, or is that for after he's left?

For years I have read at least two news papers a day. The Oregonina is not one of them. Quality is not something that is required in their editorial offices.

i hear from people who've met you that in person you're a decent guy. on your blog, well, that's not really the case, is it?

galen barnett
commentary editor
the oregonian

Hey Galen, I'm not saying whether it's good or bad. I happen to think it's a very bad thing. But the O is on life support. You know it and I know it.

It's interesting that the "commentary editor" of the O goes all ad hominem when somebody offers brutally frank, but 100% true, commentary. I would think you of all people would consider that fair game.

As for Mr. Stickel, I'm sure he is a great guy. I started out as a reporter on the same New Jersey newspaper that he used to run, and so I feel some affinity there. The Newhouse organization is pretty crazy, though -- including more than its fair share of nepotism and other forms of professional in-breeding. It's never seemed in worse shape than it does now, at least not during my lifetime. Stickel Sr. may not be to blame, but he's not leaving on any high note.

And the editorial stances that the paper takes on local issues are usually quite troublesome -- highly predictable and often laughable. I can't believe that he didn't have something to do with that.

Have to agree that Newhouse's Internet strategy is lacking, although not many other newspaper chains have managed to crack that atom. I've seen the weird Oregonian/OregonLive model used by other Newhouse papers. I don't see why the online unit needs to be a separate entity (although probably some hopeful theory about maximizing ad revenue). OregonLive's gotten better, but it's still nowhere near as user-friendly as the online sites for the NY Times, Washington Post, or even the frickin' Portland Tribune.

Socialize the internet.

You pay taxes. You get internet.

It's like hiways and schools and fire & police departments. and such

Hiways aren't all good; you may pay toll-road extras and get slightly better -- your choice.

Schools aren't all good; you may pay for 'private' schools and get better(?) -- your choice.

Fire departments have arsonists in 'em. Police dept's have murderers and thieves.
You may pay whopping extra and maybe get better (a bodyguard?). Your choice.

Wall Street Journal may charge what it pleases. You may pay it. Your choice.

You pay taxes = you get internet. Bums and Bill Gates and Warren Buffett get internet too, without paying taxes.

The Oregonian can go monetize itself.
If it offers an internet presence, okay ... whatEVer

- -
Some of the way lots of peoples' thinking got made a habit, is that back in the beginning of radio ( ~ 1925) broadcasts were free and funded by public-money (tax revenues) appropriation by Congress. Things worked well, people were happy with it, (generally speaking).

Then 'corporate sponsors' started BUYING TIME to talk in your head. Saying don't pay taxes, pay a little bit extra for our product and we'll direct that extra to fund broadcasting. with advertising. reminding you to buy our product.

But, hey, the products are cheaper if the business does not buy ad time. And the savings can go (as taxes) though open-book self-governance accounts into funding broadcasting -- and going that route the public can follow the money, like Jack reports City of Portland waste fraud and bribery corruption. There's the vigilance -- it's hard work -- it produces liberty. (Instead of the same broadcast-funding money going into secret profits and rich profiteers of 'corporations' and "privately held companies" as The Oregonian calls itself.)

My basic rant is that there isn't much practical difference between socialism and capitalism. It's more or less only attitude -- do you like to fight against everybody all the time ('competition'), or do you like being together, safe, secure, supportive of others and supported yourself in turn ('cooperation'). Or some mix of both? Okay, which parts mixed which way?

When it's everything for one privately, that's capitalism. When it's everything shared openly for everyone, that's communism. When it's a hybrid mix of some of the first and some of the second, that's socialism. Like China has today. Like Russia has today. Like Canada has today. Like Mexico has today.

Whatever. You have to think for yourself what you like. Stop being a dittohead of some 'celebrity.' Think policy and practicality, NOT personality.

The article I linked to (in a previous comment) makes the point that the ONLY device which causes and sustains capitalism is differentiated information, and monstrously rich persons are rich ONLY by depriving others of information. Like, say, stockbrokers. Or bankers.

That's why it's so important for you to think about who pays for TV. Because that's who feeds you or starves you and controls your information. Newspapers, too, but that's a little bit different; there's a cover price to you but it barely matters, (see: Willamette Week, which won a Pulitzer Prize, about Goldschmidt, Stickel's buddy, The Oregonian didn't report on), the ad buyers are who seriously fund the newspaper.

So, you like internet, as it is, more or less free, and as it can grow? Then put some public money from taxes to it. There's lots of public money. 3 or 4 BILLION a WEEK of it going wasted down a rathole through Iraq-Afghan and into the purses of corrupt politicians and private-held businesses. such as The Oregonian ... so-called 'war' brings big profit to The Oregonian, it declines to report how much "big" that is ... and Stickel is rich by it, and supports more 'war.' You betcha.

You betcha your LIFE is whatcha you betcha.

3 or 4 Billion should be enough to make internet for a large bunch of people a long long time. The Post Office was short only 7 billion last year -- ALL YEAR. Put 12 billion there and we can publicly 'own' the place, and so not have to put stamps on letters, or only like 2 cents. We could 'own' PBS for half that -- no pledge drives, no 'commercial supporters' -- and a fair amount of PBS programming is somewhat edu-tainment many people appreciate ... and it isn't like any of us is going to miss that 6 billion bucks, or 12 billion in the Post Office, after we save 400 billion back from Iraq-Afghan. and another 600 billion back from downsizing the Pentagon. per YEAR. Awfully soon it adds up.

So, socialism? capitalism? it's pretty much the same except what do you like doing -- watching out (behind you)? or helping out (around you)? (Jack likes judging pie contests ... no corruption there :-) (Just look at his miles run, year-to-date, double from last year, waaaay better than I do; how many miles does the Big Title 'commentary editor' run? I mean, there's talking the talk and then there's walking the walk -- who loves Portland in real life: Jack, or Mr. The zerO editor?) Oh, (tremble), Jack Sir, please don't edit my commentary Master, let information flow and self-respect be the control. (... lacking in the townhall wackos and that one dung-tongue toad-rage 'Representative,' I use the term loosely.)

Got health? Your choice: run? or give all your money to insurance company owners getting privately quite rich?

So think about it. Socialize the internet. Don't 'monetize' it. This socialism thing is a good practice, pay it forward, in some special situations (where 'public' is involved) when viewed openly thinking about it.

- -
btw, does anyone know Stickel's birthday? let the info flow. It's 1921, November I get, near the 9th maybe. Very plausibly the true birthdate was lost, forgotten, unknown; some births in those days weren't in hospital, some homes didn't 'use' calendars, some families fought and kept secrets from each other. It's not unusual that a birth is only known within a spread of days or a couple weeks, (J.Edgar Hoover's is a mystery for 6 months), and the person grows up choosing one date for convention to celebrate.

"a business that plays such an important role in the community"

Much less so nowadays than, say, 10 years ago. But still important.

Too bad you weren't here to see it 40 years ago. Back then I'm sure they actually saw themselves as the west coast Gray Lady, all staid, ponderous, and majestic. If you take a longer view the fall has been much further and dramatic.

i hear from people who've met you that in person you're a decent guy. on your blog, well, that's not really the case, is it?

galen barnett
commentary editor
the oregonian

I never met bojack in person, but on this blog the guy seems rather decent to me.

But he speaks his mind; and calls it out when he sees "stuff". And he allows (mostly) commentary on his blog that offer different opinions to his own.

Funny that the Oregonian editor comes here to ad hominem, when on the Oregonian story, commentary was not allowed.

I guess the Oregonian editors knew how their own readers would comment about the retirement of Stickel, so they had to dis-allow any comments. Kinda like Pravda; not compliants there, just alotta love.

Funny that the Oregonian editor comes here to ad hominem, when on the Oregonian story, commentary was not allowed.

Just for the record: When the story was first posted yesterday morning, they were taking comments. As has been previously remarked upon in this forum, the comments were mostly crude, ill-informed, off-topic and wearisomely predictable. On the morning after Joe Wilson's outburst, they frankly reflected the coarseness and incivility of a health care Town Hall.

You have to marvel at a society where it is evidently OK to anonymously chastise an 87-year-old widower stepping down after what was for the most part an enormously successful career and life. What a graceless people we have become.

No, the publisher of a monopoly daily newspaper is fair game for civil criticism, no matter what his or her age and regardless of whether his or her spouse is alive or dead. The fact that Mr. Stickel hung around until he was 87 before leaving the building shouldn't change that.

the comments were mostly crude, ill-informed, off-topic and wearisomely predictable

That is true of the comments on nearly every story on Oregon Live.

I blame the Republicans. There, for Tensky & his ilk - That's out of the way.

Now the real comment - I grew up in a working-class family that took both Oregonian and Journal, back in the 50s & 60s, but the O has become so tendentious & transparently the tool of various parties, I canceled last year. My worst suspicions were confirmed last month, when I got a cheerful letter saying that I was to get a free three-month subscription, 7 days a week, "courtesy of the Beavers." (might have been the timbers, too - I can't remember). I like getting the paper free, but even free is too high a price when the paper is so obviously a mouthpiece for Paulson & Co.
How many others got this generous offer?

Ask ten people why they think print news is dying and you might get five different responses. Mine would be that the papers are too slavishly left-wing. But the real reason is that the internet is "free." Why pay for archaic delivery when everything is an instant click away? I've published three op-eds in the Big O, and never had so much feedback. Notwithstanding the sycophancy,I'll miss it if it goes.

I adore the "tendentious." Word.

"How many others got this generous offer?" Every. One. Every. Time. And it doesn't stop after 3 months. It's like a haunt.

Here's ugly: I bought a paid obit, in The O, since the 'free' fill-out-the-form is excrement beneath human dignity, while writhing in a pain may you never suffer knowing, having to do with having to do an obit. Indecently months and months later comes a funny-looking letter in my residential mailbox from Stickel's SalesStasi, quote: "Dear Display Advertiser, This advance notice shares the excitement to get you onboard with the paper's new crisper column width and sleek style sheet, in time to re-size camera-ready layouts for your quarter-page and half-page buys ... blah blah blah" and I puked. I reported it; I never got an apology.

No sympathy for Stickel bereaved. I hope he had to compose Mrs. S.'s obit himself.

- -
"I've published three op-eds in the Big O ...." Myself, I feel proud of my hundred (at least) they rejected. And would have even if well written. Unable to handle publishing the truth against their lies. A couple of times my community group needed some promotion of its affairs and I did bland vanilla columns for that and they ran 'em.
Once upon a time I was proud of having my letters appear in the NY Times, but ultimately I wised up they were playing me as filler stopping better true news more fit to print.

Reprising: In my firsthand experience and in the stuff I wrote, the validity of content or interest of the ideas is irrelevant. Instead, paramount over all in determining what gets set to print and what gets cut, is the factor of mind control by news control, of the masses. Propaganda is a heady power, and lust, and perversely corrupted. Absolutely.

... they say that Richard Corey owns one half ot this whole town ....


As a lawyer/blogger, I get
to be a member of:

In Vino Veritas

Lange, Pinot Gris 2015
Kiona, Lemberger 2014
Willamette Valley, Pinot Gris 2015
Aix, Rosé de Provence 2016
Marchigüe, Cabernet 2013
Inazío Irruzola, Getariako Txakolina Rosé 2015
Maso Canali, Pinot Grigio 2015
Campo Viejo, Rioja Reserva 2011
Kirkland, Côtes de Provence Rosé 2016
Cantele, Salice Salentino Reserva 2013
Whispering Angel, Côtes de Provence Rosé 2013
Avissi, Prosecco
Cleto Charli, Lambrusco di Sorbara Secco, Vecchia Modena
Pique Poul, Rosé 2016
Edmunds St. John, Bone-Jolly Rosé 2016
Stoller, Pinot Noir Rosé 2016
Chehalem, Inox Chardonnay 2015
The Four Graces, Pinot Gris 2015
Gascón, Colosal Red 2013
Cardwell Hill, Pinot Gris 2015
L'Ecole No. 41, Merlot 2013
Della Terra, Anonymus
Willamette Valley, Dijon Clone Chardonnay 2013
Wraith, Cabernet, Eidolon Estate 2012
Januik, Red 2015
Tomassi, Valpolicella, Rafaél, 2014
Sharecropper's Pinot Noir 2013
Helix, Pomatia Red Blend 2013
La Espera, Cabernet 2011
Campo Viejo, Rioja Reserva 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2013
Locations, Spanish Red Wine
Locations, Argentinian Red Wine
La Antigua Clásico, Rioja 2011
Shatter, Grenache, Maury 2012
Argyle, Vintage Brut 2011
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #16 Abacela, Fiesta Tempranillo 2014
Benton Hill, Pinot Gris 2015
Primarius, Pinot Gris 2015
Januik, Merlot 2013
Napa Cellars, Cabernet 2013
J. Bookwalter, Protagonist 2012
LAN, Rioja Edicion Limitada 2011
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 2009
Denada Cellars, Cabernet, Maipo Valley 2014
Marchigüe, Cabernet, Colchagua Valley 2013
Oberon, Cabernet 2014
Hedges, Red Mountain 2012
Balboa, Rose of Grenache 2015
Ontañón, Rioja Reserva 2015
Three Horse Ranch, Pinot Gris 2014
Archery Summit, Vireton Pinot Gris 2014
Nelms Road, Merlot 2013
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Pinot Gris 2014
Conn Creek, Cabernet, Napa 2012
Conn Creek, Cabernet, Napa 2013
Villa Maria, Sauvignon Blanc 2015
G3, Cabernet 2013
Chateau Smith, Cabernet, Washington State 2014
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #16
Willamette Valley, Rose of Pinot Noir, Whole Clusters 2015
Albero, Bobal Rose 2015
Ca' del Baio Barbaresco Valgrande 2012
Goodfellow, Reserve Pinot Gris, Clover 2014
Lugana, San Benedetto 2014
Wente, Cabernet, Charles Wetmore 2011
La Espera, Cabernet 2011
King Estate, Pinot Gris 2015
Adelsheim, Pinot Gris 2015
Trader Joe's, Pinot Gris, Willamette Valley 2015
La Vite Lucente, Toscana Red 2013
St. Francis, Cabernet, Sonoma 2013
Kendall-Jackson, Pinot Noir, California 2013
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Napa Valley 2013
Erath, Pinot Noir, Estate Selection 2012
Abbot's Table, Columbia Valley 2014
Intrinsic, Cabernet 2014
Oyster Bay, Pinot Noir 2010
Occhipinti, SP68 Bianco 2014
Layer Cake, Shiraz 2013
Desert Wind, Ruah 2011
WillaKenzie, Pinot Gris 2014
Abacela, Fiesta Tempranillo 2013
Des Amis, Rose 2014
Dunham, Trautina 2012
RoxyAnn, Claret 2012
Del Ri, Claret 2012
Stoppa, Emilia, Red 2004
Primarius, Pinot Noir 2013
Domaines Bunan, Bandol Rose 2015
Albero, Bobal Rose 2015
Deer Creek, Pinot Gris 2015
Beaulieu, Rutherford Cabernet 2013
Archery Summit, Vireton Pinot Gris 2014
King Estate, Pinot Gris, Backbone 2014
Oberon, Napa Cabernet 2013
Apaltagua, Envero Carmenere Gran Reserva 2013
Chateau des Arnauds, Cuvee des Capucins 2012
Nine Hats, Red 2013
Benziger, Cabernet, Sonoma 2012
Roxy Ann, Claret 2012
Januik, Merlot 2012
Conundrum, White 2013
St. Francis, Sonoma Cabernet 2012

The Occasional Book

Marc Maron - Waiting for the Punch
Phil Stanford - Rose City Vice
Kenneth R. Feinberg - What is Life Worth?
Kent Haruf - Our Souls at Night
Peter Carey - True History of the Kelly Gang
Suzanne Collins - The Hunger Games
Amy Stewart - Girl Waits With Gun
Philip Roth - The Plot Against America
Norm Macdonald - Based on a True Story
Christopher Buckley - Boomsday
Ryan Holiday - The Obstacle is the Way
Ruth Sepetys - Between Shades of Gray
Richard Adams - Watership Down
Claire Vaye Watkins - Gold Fame Citrus
Markus Zusak - I am the Messenger
Anthony Doerr - All the Light We Cannot See
James Joyce - Dubliners
Cheryl Strayed - Torch
William Golding - Lord of the Flies
Saul Bellow - Mister Sammler's Planet
Phil Stanford - White House Call Girl
John Kaplan & Jon R. Waltz - The Trial of Jack Ruby
Kent Haruf - Eventide
David Halberstam - Summer of '49
Norman Mailer - The Naked and the Dead
Maria Dermoȗt - The Ten Thousand Things
William Faulkner - As I Lay Dying
Markus Zusak - The Book Thief
Christopher Buckley - Thank You for Smoking
William Shakespeare - Othello
Joseph Conrad - Heart of Darkness
Bill Bryson - A Short History of Nearly Everything
Cheryl Strayed - Tiny Beautiful Things
Sara Varon - Bake Sale
Stephen King - 11/22/63
Paul Goldstein - Errors and Omissions
Mark Twain - A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court
Steve Martin - Born Standing Up: A Comic's Life
Beverly Cleary - A Girl from Yamhill, a Memoir
Kent Haruf - Plainsong
Hope Larson - A Wrinkle in Time, the Graphic Novel
Rudyard Kipling - Kim
Peter Ames Carlin - Bruce
Fran Cannon Slayton - When the Whistle Blows
Neil Young - Waging Heavy Peace
Mark Bego - Aretha Franklin, the Queen of Soul (2012 ed.)
Jenny Lawson - Let's Pretend This Never Happened
J.D. Salinger - Franny and Zooey
Charles Dickens - A Christmas Carol
Timothy Egan - The Big Burn
Deborah Eisenberg - Transactions in a Foreign Currency
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. - Slaughterhouse Five
Kathryn Lance - Pandora's Genes
Cheryl Strayed - Wild
Fyodor Dostoyevsky - The Brothers Karamazov
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt

Road Work

Miles run year to date: 5
At this date last year: 3
Total run in 2017: 113
In 2016: 155
In 2015: 271
In 2014: 401
In 2013: 257
In 2012: 129
In 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269

Clicky Web Analytics