Detail, east Portland photo, courtesy Miles Hochstein / Portland Ground.



For old times' sake
The bojack bumper sticker -- only $1.50!

To order, click here.







Excellent tunes -- free! And on your browser right now. Just click on Radio Bojack!






E-mail us here.

About

This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on September 14, 2008 10:25 PM. The previous post in this blog was Oopsie. The next post in this blog is How not to solve Tri-Met's problems. Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.

Archives

Links

Law and Taxation
How Appealing
TaxProf Blog
Mauled Again
Tax Appellate Blog
A Taxing Matter
TaxVox
Tax.com
Josh Marquis
Native America, Discovered and Conquered
The Yin Blog
Ernie the Attorney
Conglomerate
Above the Law
The Volokh Conspiracy
Going Concern
Bag and Baggage
Wealth Strategies Journal
Jim Hamilton's World of Securities Regulation
myCorporateResource.com
World of Work
The Faculty Lounge
Lowering the Bar
OrCon Law

Hap'nin' Guys
Tony Pierce
Parkway Rest Stop
Utterly Boring.com
Along the Gradyent
Dwight Jaynes
Bob Borden
Dingleberry Gazette
The Red Electric
Iced Borscht
Jeremy Blachman
Dean's Rhetorical Flourish
Straight White Guy
HinesSight
Onfocus
Jalpuna
Beerdrinker.org
As Time Goes By
Dave Wagner
Jeff Selis
Alas, a Blog
Scott Hendison
Sansego
The View Through the Windshield
Appliance Blog
The Bleat

Hap'nin' Gals
My Whim is Law
Lelo in Nopo
Attorney at Large
Linda Kruschke
The Non-Consumer Advocate
10 Steps to Finding Your Happy Place
A Pig of Success
Attorney at Large
Margaret and Helen
Kimberlee Jaynes
Cornelia Seigneur
Mireio
And Sew It Goes
Mile 73
Rainy Day Thoughts
That Black Girl
Posie Gets Cozy
{AE}
Cat Eyes
Rhi in Pink
Althouse
GirlHacker
Ragwaters, Bitters, and Blue Ruin
Frytopia
Rose City Journal
Type Like the Wind

Portland and Oregon
Isaac Laquedem
StumptownBlogger
Rantings of a [Censored] Bus Driver
Jeff Mapes
Vintage Portland
The Portlander
South Waterfront
Amanda Fritz
O City Hall Reporters
Guilty Carnivore
Old Town by Larry Norton
The Alaunt
Bend Blogs
Lost Oregon
Cafe Unknown
Tin Zeroes
David's Oregon Picayune
Mark Nelsen's Weather Blog
Travel Oregon Blog
Portland Daily Photo
Portland Building Ads
Portland Food and Drink.com
Dave Knows Portland
Idaho's Portugal
Alameda Old House History
MLK in Motion
LoveSalem

Retired from Blogging
Various Observations...
The Daily E-Mail
Saving James
Portland Freelancer
Furious Nads (b!X)
Izzle Pfaff
The Grich
Kevin Allman
AboutItAll - Oregon
Lost in the Details
Worldwide Pablo
Tales from the Stump
Whitman Boys
Misterblue
Two Pennies
This Stony Planet
1221 SW 4th
Twisty
I am a Fish
Here Today
What If...?
Superinky Fixations
Pinktalk
Mellow-Drama
The Rural Bus Route
Another Blogger
Mikeyman's Computer Treehouse
Rosenblog
Portland Housing Blog

Wonderfully Wacky
Dave Barry
Borowitz Report
Blort
Stuff White People Like
Worst of the Web

Valuable Time-Wasters
My Gallery of Jacks
Litterbox, On the Prowl
Litterbox, Bag of Bones
Litterbox, Scratch
Maukie
Ride That Donkey
Singin' Horses
Rally Monkey
Simon Swears
Strong Bad's E-mail

Oregon News
KGW-TV
The Oregonian
Portland Tribune
KOIN
Willamette Week
KATU
The Sentinel
Southeast Examiner
Northwest Examiner
Sellwood Bee
Mid-County Memo
Vancouver Voice
Eugene Register-Guard
OPB
Topix.net - Portland
Salem Statesman-Journal
Oregon Capitol News
Portland Business Journal
Daily Journal of Commerce
Oregon Business
KPTV
Portland Info Net
McMinnville News Register
Lake Oswego Review
The Daily Astorian
Bend Bulletin
Corvallis Gazette-Times
Roseburg News-Review
Medford Mail-Tribune
Ashland Daily Tidings
Newport News-Times
Albany Democrat-Herald
The Eugene Weekly
Portland IndyMedia
The Columbian

Music-Related
The Beatles
Bruce Springsteen
Seal
Sting
Joni Mitchell
Ella Fitzgerald
Steve Earle
Joe Ely
Stevie Wonder
Lou Rawls

E-mail, Feeds, 'n' Stuff

Sunday, September 14, 2008

Sunday will never be the same

As predicted here, there were lots of signs of the implosion of the U.S. financial markets today: Lehman Brothers in bankruptcy. Merrill Lynch taken over in a government-brokered deal. And this:

The American International Group is seeking a $40 billion bridge loan from the Federal Reserve, as it faces a potential downgrade from credit ratings agencies that could spell its doom, a person briefed on the matter said Sunday night.
Heck of a job, Bushie. More deregulation! More tax cuts during wartime! Four more years!

UPDATE, 11:03 p.m.: Asian markets are closed tomorrow -- it's a holiday. We will see whether something hits the fan in Europe, however.

Comments (58)

BofA to buy Lehman for $40-50B. The DJIA was set to open today 340 down. I think I need a bigger mattress to store my money.

By the close, 340 might not look so bad.

340 might not look so bad.

I'll believe it when I see it. The markets, to this point, have had their heads in the sand about what's going on out there. And watching the bobbleheads on CNBC doesn't give me much more confidence. That said, firms are bringing their traders in early tomorrow in anticipation of a busy day, so who knows.

Do you think Merrill Lynch's clients will be in a buying mood?

mp97303,

I think you meant to say that BofA is to buy Merrill Lynch.

Yes, Lehman now belongs to these guys.

Relax, everybody. President Bush is all over this. In fact, before he rode his bicycle today, he put on his thinking cap.
Everybody's chipping in with ideas to save the economy: Sarah Palin suggested trading some caribou skins.

The Palin family are all clearly experts on stimulus packages.

With all this negative activity affecting 2 percent of U.S. bank customers, I just don't know what we're going to do. What we probably need are more Congressional mandates that force firms to make home loans to people who can't afford to repay them.

Yawn -- they just rearranged some deck chairs. Things will get more interesting when wm croaks.

Meanwhile, what've we been hearing from the Democratic congress? Crickets....

Every party shares responsibility in this mess. Bush, congress, banks, people who took out the loans, etc.

What sort of regulation would you guys propose?

I am investing in coffee can futures.
Oh no! they don't make coffee cans any more. Glass jars? Plastic bottles? zip lock bags?

I know that 'its all Bush's fault' is the default theme here, but how exactly is Bush at fault for this? Seriously, maybe he is, but I don't know how. Did he unwind some Clinton era regulation I don't know about?

Actually Butch, it's partly your fault. For supporting republican pick-pockets over the years. Look over there, burning flags, gay marriage, prayer in schools, my guns, illegals. Meanwhile Butch and Brads wallets get ever so thin. http://www.iht.com/articles/2008/01/18/opinion/edsamuelson.php

Ahh, Butch. Such a gentle tone today. No defiant proclamations about how great Republicans are at the economy. No automatic blame for Clinton. It seems the Bush administration has you doubting yourself.

One place you could start is by examining the confidence level Bush has inspired in the world markets. Start with the oil speculators. It's almost as if the world sees us an unstable killing machine that could attack anyone at anytime. Of course Sarah Palin doesn't see it that way, but maybe God will give her the task of removing her head from her ass at some point.

Butch, don't worry about a thing. Look at it this way: We should thank Jesus that the Republicans are so terrific at foreign policy and money issues. Imagine how screwed up things would be if they were really, really lousy at this stuff.

Time to bail on Washington Mutual too. Todays Bloomeberg.com Site reports that WaMu's ARM Loans are dragging the company's marginal earnings down even lower than anticipated.
Sure most people's money is FDIC insured, but do you really want to wait days or even weeks to see your money?

Bill, it was a serious question. Was there regulation(s) repealed by the Bush Admin that allegedly lead to this 'crisis'? Is there a theory espoused by an economist that is not a known lefty as cited above?

Nice try, Butch. Paul Samuelson is only a "leftist" if you think think Arthur Laffer espouses mainstream economic thinking.

Hey Butch, "Paul A. Samuelson was awarded the Nobel Prize in Economics in 1970 for his fundamental contributions to nearly all branches of economic theory." Not because he was a "known lefty." Where were you home schooled Butch?

Butch, I'm no expert, but I think the failure here is that the financial system has evolved beyond the traditional banking and investment banking that were subject to regulation and are still subject to (seriously diminished) regulation. For example, no more separation of banking and brokerage. So we have evolved (if that's not a socially provocative word for you) a system in which borrowers and lenders are intermediated by very complex arrangements involving securitization, swaps and other derivatives. These cloak the risks in complexity involving multiple layers of contract-defined relationships. It may not be oversimplifying too much to say that the degree of leverage risk was not understood, and the potential impact of lower collateral values on the balance sheets of banks and investment banks was not widely appreciated. No doubt there is more to it than that -- for example, do you now understand that negative amortization inflates the earnings of the holder of a mortgage loan? In other words, that the holder's earnings are increased by the amount of interest it does not receive, an amount which also raises the loan-to-value ratio of the collateral and makes it less secure? All this is beyond the scope of traditional regulation, and a political philosophy of allowing the market to take care of these things has led us to this point. An alternative might have been to impose some sensible accounting rules and capital requirements on the institutions involved.

Butch is busy preparing a spirited defense of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (which DID occur under the Clinton presidency). This finished off the Glass-Steagall Act of 1933, in part leading to the financial mess of today.

Brad,

Al Gore was awarded a Nobel Prize as well. Paul Krugman is considered to be an 'eonomist'.

Allan, thanks for the thoughtful response. Bill and Brad, you should try that sometime.....

What $100,000 limit?

Watch this video from Promontory Interfinancial Network - home of CDARS.

Does anyone know how I can find and access the "2003 legal opinion" that made this innovation possible? (It is just the same old "brokered-deposit" pass-through insurance game as the old one from the RayGun era. The insurance caused bank failure, or at least the injection of brokered deposits was/is the single most correlated event to bank failure.)

The best regulatory change would be to limit FDIC insurance -- of deposits and NOT BANKERS -- to a per person (per SSN) absolute cap of some arbitrary amount between 100k and 350K regardless of where those deposits are located. Someone tried but failed to enact legislation of this nature in the early 1990's but failed to get enough support in Congress.

Thanks guys for correcting my first post. I broke my rule of blogging after 11pm. Everything gets a little fuzzy

Things will get more interesting when wm croaks.

I don't know. WM has been on a "death watch" since this mortgage fiasco started. I don't think it has ever been a question of if, but of when.

Butch,
Don't give me the thoughtful response routine. Not after what your team has done to this country.

Okay, in the spirit of blog civility I will answer this:

Rent a Ronald Reagan movie - maybe Bedtime for Bonzo. Next read about his position on deregulation. Then look at the Savings and Loan crisis that followed where over a trillion dollars was transferred to a small group of people including John McCain's friend Keating.

Now admit to yourself that although Ronald Reagan was a terrific B-movie actor, his policy of deregulation has led us to the brink.

Oh wait. Uncle Ronnie was a God to you people. Sorry. Then maybe you don't really want an answer to this question in which case you're as genuine as your fake blogging name Butch.

You know things are bad when Butch plays the thoughtful card.

Hey Butch, Fill this report out in triplicate. http://www.eatliver.com/i.php?n=2026

Do you think Merrill Lynch's clients will be in a buying mood?

There seem to be enough buyers out there today. A 250-point drop isn't anything. The Dow and S&P are both only off about 5% since March. Meanwhile the banks continue to implode. This seems a bit more serious than a 5% correction... Like I said, I don't get it.

Bill, that reply didn't help much. I'd like to hear some specifics, in ones own words.

Bill,

How about if I play this one?:

http://www.wsws.org/articles/1999/nov1999/bank-n01.shtml

Of course, you won't like it very much because it doesn't lay the blame solely on dubya. Unless you are going to try to argue that he was the President in 1999....

LEH is at $0.19 per share.......any takers?

Butch,
If you really want to know what happened, go back to the founding of the Federal Reserve. There's been a slow death grip on us ever since.
As far as the 1999 thing, thank God the Republicans saw the problem, corrected it and made us safe. They were looking out for our national security, right? What did they do in the intervening years to make sure the train stayed on the rails?

I'll have one, thanks.

I'll have one, thanks. (A Lehman share, that is.)

Of course Obama and the dems will try to pin the Fannie/Freddie/Lehman debacle on McCain and the Republicans.

Credit where it is due?
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122091796187012529.html?mod=googlenews_wsj

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/09/11/AR2008091102841.html


"... how exactly is ... fault for this?"

Once in a rare while comes the tentative question and wee opening where, taken seriously, an answer might enter consciousness. The teachable moment.

In the Big Economic Picture it's all about oil. Since 1900. And about those whose position and riches is oil-dependent, who go on maneuvering to maintain their status especially by disguising to disregard the depletion and inevitable exhaustion of oil's finite supply.

Petroleum eventually runs out as it is used up. That truism is unarguable and undeniable. But oil 'supply' being finite is a secondary matter of concerned discussion, in the main. What matters most is: Knowing when oil runs out.

Of those whose status in the Big Picture Global Economy of Oil is inherent in the machinations of oil and oil 'supply,' the highest priority is (for them) to go to the ends of the Earth precluding anyone else from knowing the facts and information of oil geology and extent.

So the 'game' is a variation on Watergate interrogator 'whatshisname' Baker's question: What did 'we' know and when did 'we' know it?

In our real politick situation, there is no question in the first part -- we all know What is known: oil runs out. The entire question is in the second part -- When do we know (that what is known is oil runs out)?

Those who never know When oil runs out are those who keep on living a lifestyle dependent on oil, and dependent on believing oil 'supply' goes on without end, and who are those who blindly miss seeing the brickwall STOPPER straight ahead, and so hit the wall at full velocity and die.

Those 'insiders' who foresee the 'When' end of oil coming, endeavor to keep as many people blind to the knowledge as late as it's possible to keep them in the dark, promoting the deluded suckers to full speed into the wall and their demise, and, so then, those who have their private proceeds from a century of selling the public's oil to the public, are intending to take the money and run. The less public that survives alive in the aftermath, the fewer there are to chase down the profiteers and bring them back to face World Justice.

The Big Picture of oil-powered global 'hegemony' contains manifold small pieces and vignettes. Mostly arranged in the time interval 1953 (the death of Ibn Saud, founder and King of Saudi Arabia), to 2001 (and as it was the 'Why?' motive for the Bushmen who staged the Nine-Eleven tragedy, a 'final Pearl Harbor event' to provoke Americans' blind cathartic 'power-grab' for the last remnants of oil on the planet). The main actor in the 1953-2001 feature-length Big Picture has been the Herbert character.

Here's he is in his beginnings: The first asset of Zapata Offshore was the SCORPION, a $ 3.5 million deep-sea drilling rig ... the first three-legged self-elevating mobile drilling barge ..., where it is known (see: Thomas Devine) Herbert was fronting the CIA's slushfund of taxpayer money and steering the point of that Agency's actions and operations.

No citation is necessary for everyone's knowledge that Herbert's son was clandestinely and unlawfully installed in The Fright House, in advance, to stonewall investigation into Nine-Eleven while directing 'vengence' catharsis into the pre-planned Middle East incursion.

And here is an array of the facets which have come to light, at one point or another, of the oil-powered 'hegemony' of our planet: http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=theme&themeId=2

Economic collapse now, is the 'fault' to blame on 60 years of a taxpaying public who trusted but failed to verify that 'TV-image celebrities' in national office were not drunk crazed and demented mind-mad morons indulging in powerlust.

Next time, the public should pay closer attention. Which requires schools educating the children of successive generations to attend to and participate in that, and such vigilance of 'leaders.'

"Which requires schools educating the children of successive generations"

Amen - Heck, I'd be happy if they educated kids on how to balance a checkbook and use credit wisely (I work with a local HS and personal finance is not considered a basic skill). That might solve a lot more problems instead of more regulations.

Clinton and Rubin ended Glass-Steagell. Clinton also supported Alan Greenspan at the FDIC. Obama is cut from the same corporatist mold, IMO.

I don't know. WM has been on a "death watch" since this mortgage fiasco started. I don't think it has ever been a question of if, but of when.

Bank runs are the thing that the FED fears the most.

Arggh: FDIC=FED in previous post.

Butch, You really outdid yourself today.
Not just you but your GOP brethren.

I love hearing the national security/family values set deny any of this is their fault. It's terrific theater. They piously bragged that they - and only they - could keep us safe because they understood national security. Well, what's more central to national security than our economic well-being? The Soviet Union didn't end because of terrorism - it imploded economically.
Yet after 8 years of shenanigans, including a President who ignored HUNDREDS of laws with signing statements, Butch drags out his explanation for why the stewardship of our nation was not the problem. There was this law in 1999 we had to follow!!!!! Oh, the drama.
Could it be that Republicans embraced the adjustable mortgage rate crisis because it allowed them to do what they do best: Get rich while things go to hell?

Butch, you better get back to the script: Forget the economy. Concentrate on how terrific it is that Sarah Palin shot a moose.

Is someone here really denying any of this is the GOP's fault? Is anyone denying that any of this is the fault of the Democrats? How about the fault of the banks? The homeowners? I'm curious to know where everyone would place the blame and why.

DJIA down 504.48...OUCH OUCH OUCH. Who's to blame for this........everyone who allows greed to override common sense.

I love the notion that this is one mysterious glitch in an otherwise steller record turned in by Republican leadership.
Do the Dems bear responsibility? Damn right for not putting this group in prison where they belong. The Dems cynical decision to let these people go for another 2 years in the hopes it would pay off in Election 2008, was always a sickening display of politics. Nancy Pelosi is an accomplice in all this.

But this is no aberration. Everything Bush and Cheney have touched has turned to crap. Everything. The economy was their old reliable comeback. Oh, they were screwing that up too but it wasn't obvious yet. It's obvious now.

But why am I wasting my time, especially trying to convince someone like Butch? He's not just drinking the Kool-Aid. He's actually sitting in a vat of it.

It's time to move onto the next GOP talking point. You can almost hear the words. Ready? Here we go:

Look, people are hurting. This is not a time to play the blame game.

Sound familiar?

Oh yeah, I almost forgot: And Sarah Palin can field dress a moose!!!!!!!!!!

Is there someway the GOP can make this the result of 9/11?

Ohhhhhh, no, this is Barack's fault. The market is just reacting to the possibility of a socialist loving money from the rich stealing possible Muslim terrorist being elected president.

Shoot, I could work for Faux News with stuff that good.

Y'know, just saying, everyone in position, or who has been during 1946-2008 somewhere in position, at the 'top' of the nationalism heap either elected or appointed, aims at you and me and everyone we care and share life among, with the full intent against us of destroying us ... 'destroying' as in putting us at room temperature while 'they' stay in shangri'la wherever they find it.

And you and me sit here arguing which 'side' is aiming against us and which 'side' is doing the most harm to literally bury us. Your 'side' or my 'side'?

We argue because you and me have never practiced counting what we have in common, and how we are alike -- We, the People -- we never practiced counting the complete long list of 'general welfares' and 'common wealths' before we start itemizing our differences.

We do it this way Why? (I think we do it) because we were taught, (read: programmed, 'brainwashed'), that accounting our differences is 'capitalism' and accounting our things in common (life, liberty, the pursuit of happiness, for examples) is 'socialism' and discussing socialism is criminal and discussing capitalism is dictated forcibly.

So, hey, right away, the obvious and 'natural' first reflex is to tell me the what-all and how-all ways anyone else sees life differently from what I just said.

What I just said, "just saying," IS: you and me are both interested in and improved by life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Go ahead, anyone jump in to tell me how that's wrong and it can be, and should be, seen differently from my description of the scene. Meanwhile, privileged powercrazies at the top of the heap are still aiming at us and intent on stopping our breath here with each other.

Bill,

I've sat on the sidelines of this one for most of the day because A) I'm not an economist; B) I've had a ton of work to do; and C) The comedy you have provided pretending to know anything about this topic is far better than any joke you've ever written for late night TV (well, most of them anyway).

"Do the Dems bear responsibility? Damn right for not putting this group in prison where they belong."

That one was rich. You 100% exonerate them for ANYTHING - even though it was a Democrat President that signed the Deregulation legislation into law, it was a Democrat Fed Chair that oversaw the markets for almost the entire period, it was the ex-Clintonite controlled Fannie and Freddie that were instrumental in causing this crisis, and it is a Democrat controlled House and Senate that is sitting on their hands during the collapse.

And the only other thing you have to comment on is a quip about Palin and Moose-dressing. I have to start rooting for Obama, Bill. I consider you one of my 'internet friends' and I fear what you might do to yourself if he loses.....

Would either Obama or McCain find the following company's business model fundamentally flawed, and do something about it?

Wintrust Financial Corporation Offers Customers 15 Times Typical FDIC Insurance Coverage. Wintrust Unveils MaxSafe Product and Spreads Deposits and FDIC Insurance Across Its 15 Subsidiary Banks.

Last update: 1:04 p.m. EDT Sept. 15, 2008

PRNewswire-FirstCall via COMTEX/ -- Wintrust Financial Corporation (WTFC) today announced the creation of its MaxSafe Money Market Account that, along with its MaxSafe Certificates of Deposit, can provide customers with 15 times the typical amount of FDIC insurance coverage.

The customer only needs to visit one Wintrust bank to open the account. Wintrust then spreads the account across its 15 well-capitalized Chicago and Milwaukee area subsidiary banks, resulting in the increase in FDIC coverage. The customer receives a single statement and a single 1099 for the entire balance.

By utilizing MaxSafe, a joint account can be insured for up to $3 million, while a qualified retirement account can be insured for up to $3.75 million. By using all of the available FDIC ownership categories of single, joint, revocable trust, and retirement accounts, a married couple can achieve up to $16.5 million in FDIC insurance coverage using MaxSafe.

Why have a $100,000 cap at all? (Is it only for those folks that are not sophisticated enough to just spread out their deposits? Assuming that they have more than $100,000.)

The depositors are freed from any individual duty to ask any question of their bank about the soundness of their lending practices. The banker would simply rebut: don't worry, your accounts are FDIC insured.

I remain as aghast now as during the S&L bailout about the collection of federal income taxes (quite apart from FDIC insurance premiums from depositors) to cover any person's investment/savings loss above the first $100,000 guaranteed deposit from people who have less than $100,000 in savings and wages that are too low to even dream of amassing savings of $100,000.

The feds focus on the costs associated with bailing out FDIC-covered institutions even when they contemplate action pertaining the Lehman Brothers. They look at the FDIC-related impact of helping or not helping Lehman Brothers. The coverage of individual savings in excess of $100,000 is directly related to the likelihood that the feds can say that it is "cheaper" to intervene.

If _____ is perceived as evil and arbitrary, then by all means cut off one of their means of rewarding their political supports, and cap the federal taxpayer obligation to cover savings losses at $100,000 per natural person.

I fully expect to be as disappointed with an Obama administration as I was with the Clinton administration.

butch,

Do you favor smaller government? If so, what would you say about my diagnosis and proposed remedy above?

I am really getting tired of the big gov't/small gov't debate. How about we work to make gov't efficient for once in its pathetic life and then worry about what size it should be.

Unlike some here I am no apologist for Clinton's disastrous corporatist economic legacy. Clinton killed the social safety net and ended critical checks and balances on the financial system.
When it comes to economics and finance there is little difference between the two parties. Maybe Nader was right.

Anyone sleeping any better tonight????

I am picturing Chevy Chase doing his SNL news skit bit: The Federal Reserve announced today that it has lent itself 85 billion dollars.

Many, many folks understand the situation. Here's a tenured professor, very informed, who is saying the same things many, many others seem to be saying.

The U.S. Financial System in Serious Trouble, by Prof. Rodrigue Tremblay, Global Research, September 16, 2008.

Today I say that this major crisis has to be placed at the very feet of the Washington establishment. This is a politico-financial establishment that has pushed to the limits its ideology of deregulation of financial markets and stretched the working of unregulated corporate market capitalism to the breaking point. Now, the system is imploding under our very eyes and financial institutions are falling like dominos. As I wrote last August, and repeated in April of this year, the U.S. financial problem is ....

---
His survey of the dollar destruction presents some descriptive details, and then he gets around to the exact crux of the whole enchilada:

But the Bush-Cheney administration, while providing public money to keep the two lenders in operation, stopped short of nationalizing them.

---
We must stop stopping ourselves short, stop stopping our power of The People from seizing public utilities, resources and assets.

Some things belong to all of us. We must go ahead and 'nationalize' them. NOT be 'backed off' by the greedhead rich who scare us away to 'own' Big Things themselves ... and then 'sell' the public's 'Things' to the public.

Socialism is a good thing, appropriate and full Justice in some certain things. For example, the Post Office -- mail delivery, so everyone has a mailbox, and an address; public schools -- so everyone has an education, and can read and write and figure. Socialism is a good thing.

The main problem with socialism is that it requires time and effort of everyone, self-managing, to be aware, to be literate, to stay informed in current affairs and participate in oversights of public operations, keeping an eye on the bookkeeping and disclosing shysters.

For example, all the work Jack does on this blog, keeping oversight of public Bonding operations. We ALL must do some of that. ... oh, sorry if requisite community participation cuts into your couch-potato 'conservatism' ....

"Socialism is a good thing"

When it comes to socializing the profits and privatising the profits the current crop of "democrats" are *worse* than republicans. Case in point: Schumer and Frank have never met a bailout for the ultra-rich investment class they did not like. Its also interesting that investment banks have donated far more to Obama than McCain. I will vote for Obama but he is as much a tool of the elite who run our banana republic as any republican.

Agreed: Republicans perhaps win the race to the bottom, but second place Democrats are close to the same. So to vote without voting against our (country's) self-interest, in the 1st or 2nd place, and to vote for actual change in a paragon of democracy, vote for Nader. Rightists and leftists both countenance Nader's political position, and we could elect him in a near-unanimous landslide, except that we carry on the 'political' baggage, and labels, invested to us by our parents' exhortations at Parties.

Yet, seeing the stock ticker is flatline, we know those bygone investments are bankrupt.

Cutting our losses means all of us together abandoning, as one, R's and D's alike. I will if you will. Or, rather, I won't if you won't vote R NOR D.

And let's spell out our agreement between ourselves, by cutting out the middleman massmedia. Massmedia: The arbitrator with an axe to grind.

In terms of, and the condition on, 'keeping (us) informed,' obtains in socializing the massmedia properties. 'Nationalize broadcasting,' if you prefer to read it that way.

Broadcasting of radiowaves (TV is radiowaves, too) through the atmosphere IS a utility, a public resource, and must be 'owned' and overseen by public interest, i.e., socialism. Which is the situation in which radio began, 1923-33, in social ownership, before and until 'capitalists' preyed to 'privatize' broadcasting (with 'sponsoring' capital). 'Media property' prey, or anything as 'prey,' can be easily and straightforwardly determined by bribing legislators to enact 'legal' language defining and declaring what 'prey' is. For example, alcoholic beverage commerce was 'legal,' before it was 'illegal,' before it was 'legal' again -- but alcohol never changed in its essence by any term or word being enacted for it ... 'words and talk is cheap,' as cheap as the price of buying a legislator.

In our situation today, frail of enforcing democracy, we must NOT stop short of socializing massmedia. Acquiring massmedia properties is not violent and not unfair -- simply appropriate public money and 'buy them out.' Call it a 'national' bail out funding of, by, and for us people, the public, the stake-holding taxpayers, (instead of bailing out select rich persons, such as 'invested' bankers).

Socialized massmedia might look like this: Free cable TV. Free internet. And for each such free-and-right 'privilege' there is some 'responsibility', which, in the matter of media, means that every taxpayer is a 'sponsor' and has 'access' to broadcast facilities to air individual productions; free massmedia puts each of us under an onus of civic duty, a responsibility to participate, to speak forth one's creativity in the matter. Every channel a 'public access' channel. Every program one person's 'issue', opinion, production. Kind of like blogs. For every 3 hours of LIARS Larson, another 3 hours of anti-LIARS Parson, and the truth is somewhere in the balance between them -- truth arrived at by weighing both, for their integrity, gravitas, coherence, veracity, common convention, and in a word, sensibility. Just like debate, and argument; reason and rationality. It's the communication medium, stupid.

'News' could be trafficked in commerce for the same price as a copy of Willamette Week, the free newspaper. That example is not applicable to my point here -- we can socialize broadcasting -- but I cite a newspaper to sort of startle awareness to realize (of 'massmedia') we already have and are familiar with 'semi-socialistic' concepts in practice, beyond which 'free cable TV' and 'free internet' is not a far stretch.

A group (out there somewhere) has been arguing that political campaigns should be 'legally' given free broadcast time to air their positions and issues and reasonings. Well, that argument basically says 'socialize a portion of broadcasting' -- the political campaigning portion.

But information -- news weather and sports -- is too vital in life, to be ceded to political postures, partisans, and capitalists. Information is social goods, and should traffick in commerce and social intercourse free of tariffs, fees, and trade restrictions.

We get the weather satellite information (photos) for free, almost taken for granted since we paid for that satellite. (Saying it that way sort of gives fresh sensibility to Reagan's infamous impiety, "I paid for this microphone.") Yet we also paid for the other satellites, and the information (photos) those provide can and should also be free, circulating as currency. In that way we could have known by seeing that there were no WMDs in Iraq. Satellite image resolution can 'read' an automobile license plate; call it a '1-inch-square resolution' to give yourself an idea of it -- and there is no way in hell any 'country' can amass WMDs out of sight of public observation with 1-inch-sq resolution. (This was the sole fact upon which I spoke in-person contradiction face-to-face against Senators Smith and Wyden, Feb.25, 2003, when they stated "we know Saddam has nerve gas stockpiles," and I said, "there are NO WMDs in Iraq." Broadcasters' TV cameras taped this; I spoke the truth, the Senators lied, to the people. I used to, once upon a time did, program the computers which digitize satellite imagery. That's how I knew the known facts.)

Satellite information could show us the last car (vehicle) in the proximity where any forest fire starts. Could show us the car traffic ahead of us on the road to work, either before we leave home or while we're in transit. Could show us where 'the spousal unit' is parked while 'working late at the office.' And ... we paid for those satellites.

Socialize massmedia.

If we HAD NOT stopped ourselves short of it, and so if we HAD socialized massmedia earlier, the banking system and 'financial sector' and 'global economy' would NOT be collapsing today, recession would NOT be happening. It takes a bit of explanation to make aware understanding of the connection (between 'the massmedia' and 'the economy'), yet the connection is as direct as cause-and-effect ... but that explanation is postponed from here. Except two citations: 1- Information is money -- somebody must have said that, somewhere. And longtime noteworthy Washington, DC, lawyer/lobbyist Clark Clifford said, (unless it was Chuck Colson), 2- There are no secrets in this town, the most you can hope for is a two-hour head start. (Colson got a two-year head start, but when he was inevitably caught up with, he got twenty years.)

BTW, today's issue of Willamette Week publishes in print, on-the-record, eye-witness statements saying that Sen.Smith's peapacking 'business' employs (present tense) undocumented workers; said in direct rebuttal of Smith's false broadcast through LIARS (last week) branding the accusations as 'baseless,' 'slurs,' 'innuendo' ... by the way in speaking of economic failure shortcomings of capitalists, uh, politicians.

Charlie Rose interviews Hank Greenberg. (Video)

Note this major shareholder's reference to fed motivation to serve foreign interests.


Sponsors


As a lawyer/blogger, I get
to be a member of:

In Vino Veritas

Lange, Pinot Gris 2015
Kiona, Lemberger 2014
Willamette Valley, Pinot Gris 2015
Aix, Rosé de Provence 2016
Marchigüe, Cabernet 2013
Inazío Irruzola, Getariako Txakolina Rosé 2015
Maso Canali, Pinot Grigio 2015
Campo Viejo, Rioja Reserva 2011
Kirkland, Côtes de Provence Rosé 2016
Cantele, Salice Salentino Reserva 2013
Whispering Angel, Côtes de Provence Rosé 2013
Avissi, Prosecco
Cleto Charli, Lambrusco di Sorbara Secco, Vecchia Modena
Pique Poul, Rosé 2016
Edmunds St. John, Bone-Jolly Rosé 2016
Stoller, Pinot Noir Rosé 2016
Chehalem, Inox Chardonnay 2015
The Four Graces, Pinot Gris 2015
Gascón, Colosal Red 2013
Cardwell Hill, Pinot Gris 2015
L'Ecole No. 41, Merlot 2013
Della Terra, Anonymus
Willamette Valley, Dijon Clone Chardonnay 2013
Wraith, Cabernet, Eidolon Estate 2012
Januik, Red 2015
Tomassi, Valpolicella, Rafaél, 2014
Sharecropper's Pinot Noir 2013
Helix, Pomatia Red Blend 2013
La Espera, Cabernet 2011
Campo Viejo, Rioja Reserva 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2013
Locations, Spanish Red Wine
Locations, Argentinian Red Wine
La Antigua Clásico, Rioja 2011
Shatter, Grenache, Maury 2012
Argyle, Vintage Brut 2011
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #16 Abacela, Fiesta Tempranillo 2014
Benton Hill, Pinot Gris 2015
Primarius, Pinot Gris 2015
Januik, Merlot 2013
Napa Cellars, Cabernet 2013
J. Bookwalter, Protagonist 2012
LAN, Rioja Edicion Limitada 2011
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 2009
Denada Cellars, Cabernet, Maipo Valley 2014
Marchigüe, Cabernet, Colchagua Valley 2013
Oberon, Cabernet 2014
Hedges, Red Mountain 2012
Balboa, Rose of Grenache 2015
Ontañón, Rioja Reserva 2015
Three Horse Ranch, Pinot Gris 2014
Archery Summit, Vireton Pinot Gris 2014
Nelms Road, Merlot 2013
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Pinot Gris 2014
Conn Creek, Cabernet, Napa 2012
Conn Creek, Cabernet, Napa 2013
Villa Maria, Sauvignon Blanc 2015
G3, Cabernet 2013
Chateau Smith, Cabernet, Washington State 2014
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #16
Willamette Valley, Rose of Pinot Noir, Whole Clusters 2015
Albero, Bobal Rose 2015
Ca' del Baio Barbaresco Valgrande 2012
Goodfellow, Reserve Pinot Gris, Clover 2014
Lugana, San Benedetto 2014
Wente, Cabernet, Charles Wetmore 2011
La Espera, Cabernet 2011
King Estate, Pinot Gris 2015
Adelsheim, Pinot Gris 2015
Trader Joe's, Pinot Gris, Willamette Valley 2015
La Vite Lucente, Toscana Red 2013
St. Francis, Cabernet, Sonoma 2013
Kendall-Jackson, Pinot Noir, California 2013
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Napa Valley 2013
Erath, Pinot Noir, Estate Selection 2012
Abbot's Table, Columbia Valley 2014
Intrinsic, Cabernet 2014
Oyster Bay, Pinot Noir 2010
Occhipinti, SP68 Bianco 2014
Layer Cake, Shiraz 2013
Desert Wind, Ruah 2011
WillaKenzie, Pinot Gris 2014
Abacela, Fiesta Tempranillo 2013
Des Amis, Rose 2014
Dunham, Trautina 2012
RoxyAnn, Claret 2012
Del Ri, Claret 2012
Stoppa, Emilia, Red 2004
Primarius, Pinot Noir 2013
Domaines Bunan, Bandol Rose 2015
Albero, Bobal Rose 2015
Deer Creek, Pinot Gris 2015
Beaulieu, Rutherford Cabernet 2013
Archery Summit, Vireton Pinot Gris 2014
King Estate, Pinot Gris, Backbone 2014
Oberon, Napa Cabernet 2013
Apaltagua, Envero Carmenere Gran Reserva 2013
Chateau des Arnauds, Cuvee des Capucins 2012
Nine Hats, Red 2013
Benziger, Cabernet, Sonoma 2012
Roxy Ann, Claret 2012
Januik, Merlot 2012
Conundrum, White 2013
St. Francis, Sonoma Cabernet 2012

The Occasional Book

Kent Haruf - Our Souls at Night
Peter Carey - True History of the Kelly Gang
Suzanne Collins - The Hunger Games
Amy Stewart - Girl Waits With Gun
Philip Roth - The Plot Against America
Norm Macdonald - Based on a True Story
Christopher Buckley - Boomsday
Ryan Holiday - The Obstacle is the Way
Ruth Sepetys - Between Shades of Gray
Richard Adams - Watership Down
Claire Vaye Watkins - Gold Fame Citrus
Markus Zusak - I am the Messenger
Anthony Doerr - All the Light We Cannot See
James Joyce - Dubliners
Cheryl Strayed - Torch
William Golding - Lord of the Flies
Saul Bellow - Mister Sammler's Planet
Phil Stanford - White House Call Girl
John Kaplan & Jon R. Waltz - The Trial of Jack Ruby
Kent Haruf - Eventide
David Halberstam - Summer of '49
Norman Mailer - The Naked and the Dead
Maria Dermoȗt - The Ten Thousand Things
William Faulkner - As I Lay Dying
Markus Zusak - The Book Thief
Christopher Buckley - Thank You for Smoking
William Shakespeare - Othello
Joseph Conrad - Heart of Darkness
Bill Bryson - A Short History of Nearly Everything
Cheryl Strayed - Tiny Beautiful Things
Sara Varon - Bake Sale
Stephen King - 11/22/63
Paul Goldstein - Errors and Omissions
Mark Twain - A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court
Steve Martin - Born Standing Up: A Comic's Life
Beverly Cleary - A Girl from Yamhill, a Memoir
Kent Haruf - Plainsong
Hope Larson - A Wrinkle in Time, the Graphic Novel
Rudyard Kipling - Kim
Peter Ames Carlin - Bruce
Fran Cannon Slayton - When the Whistle Blows
Neil Young - Waging Heavy Peace
Mark Bego - Aretha Franklin, the Queen of Soul (2012 ed.)
Jenny Lawson - Let's Pretend This Never Happened
J.D. Salinger - Franny and Zooey
Charles Dickens - A Christmas Carol
Timothy Egan - The Big Burn
Deborah Eisenberg - Transactions in a Foreign Currency
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. - Slaughterhouse Five
Kathryn Lance - Pandora's Genes
Cheryl Strayed - Wild
Fyodor Dostoyevsky - The Brothers Karamazov
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt

Road Work

Miles run year to date: 113
At this date last year: 155
Total run in 2016: 155
In 2015: 271
In 2014: 401
In 2013: 257
In 2012: 129
In 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269


Clicky Web Analytics