Detail, east Portland photo, courtesy Miles Hochstein / Portland Ground.

For old times' sake
The bojack bumper sticker -- only $1.50!

To order, click here.

Excellent tunes -- free! And on your browser right now. Just click on Radio Bojack!

E-mail us here.


This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on April 10, 2008 2:46 AM. The previous post in this blog was The other guy. The next post in this blog is Tales of two developers. Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.



Law and Taxation
How Appealing
TaxProf Blog
Mauled Again
Tax Appellate Blog
A Taxing Matter
Josh Marquis
Native America, Discovered and Conquered
The Yin Blog
Ernie the Attorney
Above the Law
The Volokh Conspiracy
Going Concern
Bag and Baggage
Wealth Strategies Journal
Jim Hamilton's World of Securities Regulation
World of Work
The Faculty Lounge
Lowering the Bar
OrCon Law

Hap'nin' Guys
Tony Pierce
Parkway Rest Stop
Along the Gradyent
Dwight Jaynes
Bob Borden
Dingleberry Gazette
The Red Electric
Iced Borscht
Jeremy Blachman
Dean's Rhetorical Flourish
Straight White Guy
As Time Goes By
Dave Wagner
Jeff Selis
Alas, a Blog
Scott Hendison
The View Through the Windshield
Appliance Blog
The Bleat

Hap'nin' Gals
My Whim is Law
Lelo in Nopo
Attorney at Large
Linda Kruschke
The Non-Consumer Advocate
10 Steps to Finding Your Happy Place
A Pig of Success
Attorney at Large
Margaret and Helen
Kimberlee Jaynes
Cornelia Seigneur
And Sew It Goes
Mile 73
Rainy Day Thoughts
That Black Girl
Posie Gets Cozy
Cat Eyes
Rhi in Pink
Ragwaters, Bitters, and Blue Ruin
Rose City Journal
Type Like the Wind

Portland and Oregon
Isaac Laquedem
Rantings of a [Censored] Bus Driver
Jeff Mapes
Vintage Portland
The Portlander
South Waterfront
Amanda Fritz
O City Hall Reporters
Guilty Carnivore
Old Town by Larry Norton
The Alaunt
Bend Blogs
Lost Oregon
Cafe Unknown
Tin Zeroes
David's Oregon Picayune
Mark Nelsen's Weather Blog
Travel Oregon Blog
Portland Daily Photo
Portland Building Ads
Portland Food and
Dave Knows Portland
Idaho's Portugal
Alameda Old House History
MLK in Motion

Retired from Blogging
Various Observations...
The Daily E-Mail
Saving James
Portland Freelancer
Furious Nads (b!X)
Izzle Pfaff
The Grich
Kevin Allman
AboutItAll - Oregon
Lost in the Details
Worldwide Pablo
Tales from the Stump
Whitman Boys
Two Pennies
This Stony Planet
1221 SW 4th
I am a Fish
Here Today
What If...?
Superinky Fixations
The Rural Bus Route
Another Blogger
Mikeyman's Computer Treehouse
Portland Housing Blog

Wonderfully Wacky
Dave Barry
Borowitz Report
Stuff White People Like
Worst of the Web

Valuable Time-Wasters
My Gallery of Jacks
Litterbox, On the Prowl
Litterbox, Bag of Bones
Litterbox, Scratch
Ride That Donkey
Singin' Horses
Rally Monkey
Simon Swears
Strong Bad's E-mail

Oregon News
The Oregonian
Portland Tribune
Willamette Week
The Sentinel
Southeast Examiner
Northwest Examiner
Sellwood Bee
Mid-County Memo
Vancouver Voice
Eugene Register-Guard
OPB - Portland
Salem Statesman-Journal
Oregon Capitol News
Portland Business Journal
Daily Journal of Commerce
Oregon Business
Portland Info Net
McMinnville News Register
Lake Oswego Review
The Daily Astorian
Bend Bulletin
Corvallis Gazette-Times
Roseburg News-Review
Medford Mail-Tribune
Ashland Daily Tidings
Newport News-Times
Albany Democrat-Herald
The Eugene Weekly
Portland IndyMedia
The Columbian

The Beatles
Bruce Springsteen
Joni Mitchell
Ella Fitzgerald
Steve Earle
Joe Ely
Stevie Wonder
Lou Rawls

E-mail, Feeds, 'n' Stuff

Thursday, April 10, 2008

They sign permits, don't they?

Bureaucrat-speak is always a little hard to make out, but no agency blows thicker smoke than the Portland "Bureau of Development Services." When they open their mouths to explain what they do, the jargon that comes out is often impenetrable. I think they used to be called the "Building Permit Office," but nowadays they make it sound like they're some kind of insurance company, or maybe Home Depot.

Yesterday they sent around a breathless press release letting us all know that they have "rebranded" themselves, with a spiffy new logo. I don't even want to think about how much it all cost, but what cracks me up is the goofy description of their mission. It's reach the point of self-parody:

On March 20, 2008, the first day of spring, the City of Portland’s Bureau of Development Services unveiled a new look signaling a new beginning – the creation of a cohesive and easily identifiable image of the bureau for staff and customers. The bureau’s new slogan, "From Concept to Construction", cements the logo which depicts residential and commercial development nestled among Portland’s precious and valued natural resources....

According to Paul Scarlett, BDS Director, "The new logo and slogan embody the bureau’s commitment to promoting safe and attractive developments, balancing the built and natural environment, and reinforcing our focus on assisting customers with their development projects from start to finish."...

The new logo and slogan is part of an overall marketing effort that is designed to build and reinforce the bureau’s identity in the community. "Our top priorities continue to be to provide excellent service, creative solutions, and reliable information to meet our customers’ development needs," said Alisa Cour, Public Information Manager for BDS.

"We want to reach all our customers with the message that if you are planning a development project in Portland, come see us first," said Cour. "We’re here to partner with you on your project from concept to construction."

Whew. Somebody, please open a window.

Comments (33)

"We’re here to partner with you on your project from concept to construction."

This line has all the tenor of some goon laying down the law for how the vig collection is gonna work in a proposed new nightclub or something.

Exhibit numero uno for why I will someday own property in the Northwest, which I love, outside of the reach of the tentacles of that RICO, our own beloved Metro.

There was a time, honest, that a bureau chief would and could speak for the bureau, not anymore now they all have a group such as Alisa Cour, Public Information Manager, to mis-speak, lie, or cover-up. Instead Of one PR I see it is now almost a bureau within a bureau. A manager and how many underlings?
Hey, if we went back to Chiefs addressing the public we might have enough to fix the streets.

The bureau's announcement makes me long for the days when Randy Leonard actually worked for his constituents. Remember when he'd step in and personally solve a constituent's problem? Or the case of the employee who he personally re-instated after bureaucrats laid her off?

Now he's gone native and picked up the mantle of Stenesque grand plans--BIOFUEL! DUCT TAPE!--and bureaucratic mumbo jumbo.

"From Concept to Construction"

Sounds expensive.

"From Concept to Construction"

Sounds intrusive.

Obviously inspired by "from cradle to grave"

"We’re here to partner with you on your project from concept to construction."

Just to let you know the meter's running at BDS. It is a huge profit center for CoP.

"if you are planning a development project in Portland, come see us first"

Uh, do we have a choice? I love how this over-funded agencies has money to "brand" itself. The glaring omission in the press release is no mention of saving builders' cost. "Creative" usually means forcing builders to add costs or impeding a project.

The concept of BDS as more of a one-stop-shop for developers' permitting needs probably arose from the city's belief that condos and infill aren't getting built fast enough.

It's clear from this release who they view as their "customer": those who pay the application fees for the "services" they provide.

This problem started way back in Hale's tenure, and I see they're still confused about things. If BDS would stop structuring itself as a fee-for-service operation serving only developers and applicants, and start acting as an arms-length evaluator of whether an application at face value meets the city's codes in force, everyone would probably be happier.

Jumping in and getting involved in fixing problem applications is often viewed as being meddling and expensive from the developer's standpoint, and a conflict of interest from the standpoint of those who might oppose it. No one is happy outside of BDS.

Why do BDS and the other agencies feel the need to "market" themselves? Businesses market themselves to differentiate from the competition. Who is BDS' competition?

Granted, they do have to let customers know how to access their services. But why the fancy-schmancy PR and branding? Where else are developers and applicants going to go?

My guess this is the inevitable outcome and downside of our commissioner form of city government. Each commissioner has his own fiefdom, and he and his sub-chiefs vie for public attention and support so they can get a bigger slice of the pie.

Just to let you know the meter's running at BDS. It is a huge profit center for CoP.

I believe BDS is self-funded through permits/fees, and I don't think they contribute to the City's general fund.

Where else are developers and applicants going to go?

Part of the rebranding is probably to reach out to residential homeowners, who may not know that you need a permit to build an addition, a balcony, a dormer, a new garage, etc. Or they may know, but decide to take their chances because they think it's too much hassle.

And it is a hassle, and too expensive as well. But at the same time I want to know that when my kids go play at a friend's house, the addition wall isn't going to cave in on them because some jackass decided to skip the permit/inspection process while he and cousin Vinny threw back a few beers while putting up the south wall.

Sometimes marketing your image is a canny move, even if you have no competition. Agencies like this have a huge interest in being associated with action words like "proactive" and "visionary".

But the new logo kinda misses the mark, in my opinion. The execution is actually kind of clever, with shading making it look like the view through a window, but when you read the press release and it says that it's meant to show Portland's development "nestling" amongst the area's natural charms, and you look at this and see development dominating and about to overwhelm the area's natural charms ... well, maybe I don't know so much but I did have some graphic design training. I'd develop this up a little more. Those huge gray edifices in the design are kind of oppressive.

The colors overall are a bit too much on the cool side too. What's not clear is whether or not that's because a CMYK image was translated into RGB, which always neutralizes it a bit. But the big gray mass in the middle, coupled with a muted color scheme, kind of make for a visually depressing thing.

I often wonder if the choice quotes in press releases were ever actually uttered. I tend to think it's more like, "Just type out something and put my name next to it. I'm busy."

BDS? Sounds more like BS to me.

Oh please,,,,,

They want more customers to come see them because they're too many employees with the construction downturn.

Instead of laying off a few they want busy work.

"We’re here to partner with you"

Partner? OK.

I want to build a snout house because it's the only way to make my lot work.

What say you partner?

I want to move my pizza business across the street. How much are the fees?

$30,000.00 ????!!!!!!

Yikes. I need a new partner.

Jack, you're right most of the time but this piece against BDS is off. Reading the mission statement I find it generally reasonable. It does use current cliches like, "rebranding," and further extends the idea that Portland is becoming more "natural."

Try the Portland Department of Transportation mission statement. It used to be on their website but last I looked it was gone. Maybe someone beside me noticed that logic has left PDOT and they took it off. The last mission statement did not mention cars or motor vehicles. It did mention street gatherings.

In practice, the bureau is not that bad and the process of getting a building permit, in my experience, is less painless than it might seem (my experience being making improvements on my rental property). I can put up with the bureaucratese as long as the people I deal with are reasonable, and for the most part, they are.

"I believe BDS is self-funded through permits/fees, and I don't think they contribute to the City's general fund."

License/permits charges generated $150M
Service charges - $415M

Don;t know where SDCs fit, but when you go to BDS and tell them your project costs $100K and they tell you give us $10K, I believe they are more than self-funding.

The last mission statement did not mention cars or motor vehicles. It did mention street gatherings.

That may be what it takes to change the culture around here.

I thought Bill Sizemore, the infamous anti-tax advocate, was working an initiative which would allow homeowners to sink $35,000 or less in their house without having to get permits. It would require the work still meet code. I would sure appreciate such a law because getting a permit from this city, like most cities, for even the smallest of projects like replacing an existing fence, is an arduous process. I think Bradbury, Secretary (dictator) of Oregon, has the petition held up in his office.

Free the people.

I would sure appreciate such a law because getting a permit from this city, like most cities, for even the smallest of projects like replacing an existing fence, is an arduous process.

I don't think a permit is required for a fence unless it's *over* 6' tall. You buildin' a spite fence?

Steve, the BDS page in the City budget says they pull in about $26 million in licenses/permit revenues and almost $10 million in service charges and fees. I don't think any of that goes to the General Fund.

I would agree that it's too expensive. The permit for my covered front porch cost $300, even though the overall project was only around $4,000. Even so, I totally disagree with Sizemore's idea. How exactly are we going to ensure that renovations meet code if there's no permitting process?

Don't these bozo's work for us. When are we going to rise up and stop this nonsense?

"I totally disagree with Sizemore's idea. How exactly are we going to ensure that renovations meet code if there's no permitting process?"

I think there needs to be some cap on how much they charge for permitting since you can burn $100K pretty easily remodeling and I don't really think it would cost $10K of city labor to ensure it is meeting code.

In additions, SDCs are almost never used as they are supposed to be - in the neighborhoods they originate from. Heck, they were robbing SDCs from all over town to improve the Pearl District.

Don't these bozo's work for us.

It depends. Have you shown your love lately?

(sort by amount)

Another very good feature of Sizemore's initiative is the county couldn't figure out if you had a renovation so as to raise your property taxes. As it is now, homeowners are doing their own renovations in the "dark of night", and probably not doing it as well as professionals. As a result, old homes may be getting more and more out of code.

Why not do away the disincentives caused by permitting, and spur more home renovations using professionals? Free the People!

P.S I've been hearing the city wants to require permits on all fences, even 6 feet tall and under. & I'm not associated with the home construction business, speaking only as a home owner.

As a former (27 year) Bureau I will make a few comments.

State law prohibits any "building permit" fees from going to the general fund. The builders monitor where the funds go to make sure they are not actually funding something else. But SDC's are NOT "building permit" fees. These supposedly are fees that go to Bureau's other than BDS to help cover i.e expansion of sewer facilities, parks, etc. BDS just collects them.

Generally fees for small projects, like a front porch addition, do not cover the cost of providing plan review and inspections. The large projects, like Homers, pay extra to cover the costs.

The Bureau is rebranding itself because Randy thinks it will help keep him in office. The position Alisa Cour holds as well as the people who report to her didn't exist until Randy took office.

Greg C

Concept to Construction.

In the good old days BDS would refuse to look at your project until you paid your fees and submitted. This often times meant redesigning your project because you weren't designing it according to the latest iterations coming out of the various Bureaus. Ray Kerridge, now City Manager for Sacramento, thought it would make sense for BDS to actually advise builders during the design phase about what the bureaucrats were coming up with now so there would be no surprises later on in the process.

Coming and talking to the people at BDS prior to submitting your project is voluntary and doesn't cost you any money. The Development Services Center is open and staffed M - F from 7:30 am to 3:00 pm and most Thursday nights from 5 pm to 7:30 pm.

Greg C

If the city claimed the power to ban private adult consensual activity . . . then bureau Xx3 could be "self-funded through permits/fees[.]" (The funding method, by itself, justifies nothing.)

If they (any authority) ever lifted a restraint would that be viewed as adding value to the activity (or product)?

Does the need for, or usefulness of, a "partner" mean that the general understanding of "two's company three's a crowd" must be wiped from our collective minds'. So long as we recognize that private contracting (or building per se) is not sinful . . .

Wasn't there a church that went bankrupt (long long ago) and then took their message of absolution, for a fee, to the countryside (to rebuild their own coffers)?

As always, look at the money side first . . . then at the most convenient contemporary rationale. If people will pay extra for bottled tap water they will buy almost anything.

Generally fees for small projects, like a front porch addition, do not cover the cost of providing plan review and inspections.

That's hard to believe. My $300 permit involved the following: a 20-minute meeting with a BDS architect who reviewed the plans and made one minor modification; then an inspection a few weeks later, where the inspector spent 15 minutes making sure the joists were connected properly to the house and the posts were properly cemented. Not exactly $300 worth or work, even at a fully loaded rate.

The fees have become a major part of new construction. A person can have 10s of thousands in fees that are passed onto the buyer who in turns has to finance them as part of the home loan.
I have yet to understand how a few hours of work on the part of the permits process justifies this huge outlay.
Plan review
site plan review
site inspections
Electrical, plumbing, framing etc permits.

"State law prohibits any "building permit" fees from going to the general fund."

OK, I stand corrected. Where exactly do the fees go? THey seem awfully large for the little work BDS does to stamp them.

In addition, meeting early on doesn't cure my main gripe - You can never get a statement like "fix this and we'll give you a permit"."

The response is always, fix this and come back and we'll talk. THis wastes a lot of time. God forbid you should get a diff inspector that disagrees with the previous one since they always find something different.

C'mon, you're just looking for an issue here. The rebrand isn't bad, and they do indeed provide the services their new slogan infers.

Other commenters say Leonard is just trying to cement his re-election. Maybe so, but last time I checked he had no real competition. Maybe he's being cautious because his own union turned its back on him. Or maybe he's just doing what he's paid to do. Whatever. This isn't even a real issue, but I love it that the sensationalism turned into a comment-fest.

Would the proceeds of a real estate transfer tax (semantically equivalent to a recording fee, with a sliding price and a blanket banker exception for recording of liens such as mortgages and trust deeds, and retransfers of the same) be used principally to offset the cost of staffing the BDS? Can this be divorced from the various permutations of the definition of "affordable housing," which are now inherently tied to new development? (And to SDCs, and arbitrary waiver of the same for some.)

Hum, if the terms of some arbitration determinations, and settlement agreements, can be held in secret can the existence and/or price of a sale of a home also be done secretly, lawfully secretly? (Maybe I could create a private business to maintain the secrecy of such private transfers from prying eyes.)


As a lawyer/blogger, I get
to be a member of:

In Vino Veritas

Kendall-Jackson, Pinot Noir, California 2013
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Napa Valley 2013
Erath, Pinot Noir, Estate Selection 2012
Abbot's Table, Columbia Valley 2014
Intrinsic, Cabernet 2014
Oyster Bay, Pinot Noir 2010
Occhipinti, SP68 Bianco 2014
Layer Cake, Shiraz 2013
Desert Wind, Ruah 2011
WillaKenzie, Pinot Gris 2014
Abacela, Fiesta Tempranillo 2013
Des Amis, Rose 2014
Dunham, Trautina 2012
RoxyAnn, Claret 2012
Del Ri, Claret 2012
Stoppa, Emilia, Red 2004
Primarius, Pinot Noir 2013
Domaines Bunan, Bandol Rose 2015
Albero, Bobal Rose 2015
Deer Creek, Pinot Gris 2015
Beaulieu, Rutherford Cabernet 2013
Archery Summit, Vireton Pinot Gris 2014
King Estate, Pinot Gris, Backbone 2014
Oberon, Napa Cabernet 2013
Apaltagua, Envero Carmenere Gran Reserva 2013
Chateau des Arnauds, Cuvee des Capucins 2012
Nine Hats, Red 2013
Benziger, Cabernet, Sonoma 2012
Roxy Ann, Claret 2012
Januik, Merlot 2012
Conundrum, White 2013
St. Francis, Sonoma Cabernet 2012
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2012
Decoy, Cabernet, Sonoma 2013
Marqués de Murrieta, Reserva Rioja 2010
Kendall-Jackson, Grand Reserve Cabernet 2009
Seven Hills, Merlot 2013
Los Vascos, Grande Reserve Cabernet 2011
Abbot's Table, Columbia Valley 2014
Forlorn Hope, St. Laurent, Ost-Intrigen 2013
Upper Five, Tempranillo 2010 and 2012
The Four Graces, Pinot Gris 2015
Topsail, Syrah 2013
Jim Barry, The Lodge Hill Shiraz 2013
Robert Mondavi, Cabernet, Napa Valley 2012
Adelsheim, Pinot Gris 2014
Boomtown, Cabernet 2013
Boulay, Sauvignon Blanc 2014
Domaine de Durban Muscat 2011
Patricia Green, Estate Pinot Noir 2012
Crios, Cabernet, Mendoza 2011
WillaKenzie, Pinot Gris 2014
Dehesa la Granja, Tempranillo 2008
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #15
Selvapiana, Chianti Ruffina 2012
Joseph Carr, Cabernet 2012
Prendo, Pinot Grigio, Vigneti Delle Dolomiti 2014
Joel Gott, Oregon Pinot Gris 2014
Otazu, Red 2010
Chehalem, Pinot Gris, Three Vineyards 2013
Wente, Merlot, Sandstone 2011
Abacela, Fiesta Tempranillo 2012
Monmousseau, Vouvray 2014
Duriguttti, Malbec 2013
Ruby, Pinot Noir 2012
Castellare, Chianti 2013
Lugana, San Benedetto 2013
Canoe Ridge, Cabernet, Horse Heaven Hills 2011
Arcangelo, Negroamaro Rosato
Vale do Bomfim, Douro 2012
Portuga, Branco 2013
Taylor Fladgate, Late Bottled Vintage Porto 2009
Pete's Mountain, Pinot Noir, Kristina's Reserve 2010
Rodney Strong, Cabernet, Sonoma 2012
Bookwalter, Subplot No. 28, 2012
Coppola, Sofia, Rose 2014
Kirkland, Napa Cabernet 2012
Trader Joe's Grand Reserve, Napa Meritage 2011
Kramer, Chardonnay Estate 2012
Forlorn Hope, Que Saudade 2013
Ramos, Premium Tinto, Alentejano 2012
Trader Joe's Grand Reserve, Rutherford Cabernet 2012
Bottego Vinaia, Pinot Grigio Trentino 2013
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2011
Pete's Mountain, Elijah's Reserve Cabernet, 2007
Beaulieu, George Latour Cabernet 1998
Januik, Merlot 2011
Torricino, Campania Falanghina 2013
Edmunds St. John, Heart of Gold 2012
Chloe, Pinot Grigio, Valdadige 2013
Edmunds St. John, Bone-Jolly Gamay Noir 2013
Kirkland, Pinot Grigio, Friuli 2013
St. Francis, Red Splash 2011
Rodney Strong, Canernet, Alexander Valley 2011
Erath, Pinot Blanc 2013
Taylor Fladgate, Porto 2007
Portuga, Rose 2013
Domaine Digioia-Royer, Chambolle-Musigny, Vielles Vignes Les Premieres 2008
Locations, F Red Blend
El Perro Verde, Rueda 2013
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Indian Wells Red 2010
Chloe, Pinot Grigio, Valdadige 2013
Edmunds St. John, Bone-Jolly Gamay Noir 2013
Kirkland, Pinot Grigio, Friuli 2013
St. Francis, Red Splash 2011
Rodney Strong, Canernet, Alexander Valley 2011
Erath, Pinot Blanc 2013
Taylor Fladgate, Porto 2007
Portuga, Rose 2013

The Occasional Book

Ruth Sepetys - Between Shades of Gray
Richard Adams - Watership Down
Claire Vaye Watkins - Gold Fame Citrus
Markus Zusak - I am the Messenger
Anthony Doerr - All the Light We Cannot See
James Joyce - Dubliners
Cheryl Strayed - Torch
William Golding - Lord of the Flies
Saul Bellow - Mister Sammler's Planet
Phil Stanford - White House Call Girl
John Kaplan & Jon R. Waltz - The Trial of Jack Ruby
Kent Haruf - Eventide
David Halberstam - Summer of '49
Norman Mailer - The Naked and the Dead
Maria Dermoȗt - The Ten Thousand Things
William Faulkner - As I Lay Dying
Markus Zusak - The Book Thief
Christopher Buckley - Thank You for Smoking
William Shakespeare - Othello
Joseph Conrad - Heart of Darkness
Bill Bryson - A Short History of Nearly Everything
Cheryl Strayed - Tiny Beautiful Things
Sara Varon - Bake Sale
Stephen King - 11/22/63
Paul Goldstein - Errors and Omissions
Mark Twain - A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court
Steve Martin - Born Standing Up: A Comic's Life
Beverly Cleary - A Girl from Yamhill, a Memoir
Kent Haruf - Plainsong
Hope Larson - A Wrinkle in Time, the Graphic Novel
Rudyard Kipling - Kim
Peter Ames Carlin - Bruce
Fran Cannon Slayton - When the Whistle Blows
Neil Young - Waging Heavy Peace
Mark Bego - Aretha Franklin, the Queen of Soul (2012 ed.)
Jenny Lawson - Let's Pretend This Never Happened
J.D. Salinger - Franny and Zooey
Charles Dickens - A Christmas Carol
Timothy Egan - The Big Burn
Deborah Eisenberg - Transactions in a Foreign Currency
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. - Slaughterhouse Five
Kathryn Lance - Pandora's Genes
Cheryl Strayed - Wild
Fyodor Dostoyevsky - The Brothers Karamazov
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt

Road Work

Miles run year to date: 144
At this date last year: 203
Total run in 2015: 271
In 2014: 401
In 2013: 257
In 2012: 129
In 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269

Clicky Web Analytics