Detail, east Portland photo, courtesy Miles Hochstein / Portland Ground.

For old times' sake
The bojack bumper sticker -- only $1.50!

To order, click here.

Excellent tunes -- free! And on your browser right now. Just click on Radio Bojack!

E-mail us here.


This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on November 12, 2007 5:29 AM. The previous post in this blog was Firefox: Google's Turkey. The next post in this blog is Say hello to Penryn. Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.



Law and Taxation
How Appealing
TaxProf Blog
Mauled Again
Tax Appellate Blog
A Taxing Matter
Josh Marquis
Native America, Discovered and Conquered
The Yin Blog
Ernie the Attorney
Above the Law
The Volokh Conspiracy
Going Concern
Bag and Baggage
Wealth Strategies Journal
Jim Hamilton's World of Securities Regulation
World of Work
The Faculty Lounge
Lowering the Bar
OrCon Law

Hap'nin' Guys
Tony Pierce
Parkway Rest Stop
Along the Gradyent
Dwight Jaynes
Bob Borden
Dingleberry Gazette
The Red Electric
Iced Borscht
Jeremy Blachman
Dean's Rhetorical Flourish
Straight White Guy
As Time Goes By
Dave Wagner
Jeff Selis
Alas, a Blog
Scott Hendison
The View Through the Windshield
Appliance Blog
The Bleat

Hap'nin' Gals
My Whim is Law
Lelo in Nopo
Attorney at Large
Linda Kruschke
The Non-Consumer Advocate
10 Steps to Finding Your Happy Place
A Pig of Success
Attorney at Large
Margaret and Helen
Kimberlee Jaynes
Cornelia Seigneur
And Sew It Goes
Mile 73
Rainy Day Thoughts
That Black Girl
Posie Gets Cozy
Cat Eyes
Rhi in Pink
Ragwaters, Bitters, and Blue Ruin
Rose City Journal
Type Like the Wind

Portland and Oregon
Isaac Laquedem
Rantings of a [Censored] Bus Driver
Jeff Mapes
Vintage Portland
The Portlander
South Waterfront
Amanda Fritz
O City Hall Reporters
Guilty Carnivore
Old Town by Larry Norton
The Alaunt
Bend Blogs
Lost Oregon
Cafe Unknown
Tin Zeroes
David's Oregon Picayune
Mark Nelsen's Weather Blog
Travel Oregon Blog
Portland Daily Photo
Portland Building Ads
Portland Food and
Dave Knows Portland
Idaho's Portugal
Alameda Old House History
MLK in Motion

Retired from Blogging
Various Observations...
The Daily E-Mail
Saving James
Portland Freelancer
Furious Nads (b!X)
Izzle Pfaff
The Grich
Kevin Allman
AboutItAll - Oregon
Lost in the Details
Worldwide Pablo
Tales from the Stump
Whitman Boys
Two Pennies
This Stony Planet
1221 SW 4th
I am a Fish
Here Today
What If...?
Superinky Fixations
The Rural Bus Route
Another Blogger
Mikeyman's Computer Treehouse
Portland Housing Blog

Wonderfully Wacky
Dave Barry
Borowitz Report
Stuff White People Like
Worst of the Web

Valuable Time-Wasters
My Gallery of Jacks
Litterbox, On the Prowl
Litterbox, Bag of Bones
Litterbox, Scratch
Ride That Donkey
Singin' Horses
Rally Monkey
Simon Swears
Strong Bad's E-mail

Oregon News
The Oregonian
Portland Tribune
Willamette Week
The Sentinel
Southeast Examiner
Northwest Examiner
Sellwood Bee
Mid-County Memo
Vancouver Voice
Eugene Register-Guard
OPB - Portland
Salem Statesman-Journal
Oregon Capitol News
Portland Business Journal
Daily Journal of Commerce
Oregon Business
Portland Info Net
McMinnville News Register
Lake Oswego Review
The Daily Astorian
Bend Bulletin
Corvallis Gazette-Times
Roseburg News-Review
Medford Mail-Tribune
Ashland Daily Tidings
Newport News-Times
Albany Democrat-Herald
The Eugene Weekly
Portland IndyMedia
The Columbian

The Beatles
Bruce Springsteen
Joni Mitchell
Ella Fitzgerald
Steve Earle
Joe Ely
Stevie Wonder
Lou Rawls

E-mail, Feeds, 'n' Stuff

Monday, November 12, 2007

Pretenses, Disguises, and Charades

Under the Potter administration, the Portland Development Commission has changed some of its evil ways. For example, its approach to public relations has definitely improved from the days of Don Mazziotti's middle finger. Now the hipsters at the PDC are all, like, kewl -- going so far as to post videos on YouTube. You can see some of their handiwork embedded on the WW website, here.

I get a kick out of the Burnside Bridgehead one. They keep saying over and over how wonderful it's going to be -- you can have business lunches at the Doug Fir! But in their eyes I see desperation. If this was such a great project, how come nobody's turned a shovel of dirt in the 2½ years since the developer was selected?

The outreach to the cyberworld is a nice touch by the PDC honchos. But turning from style to substance, some things haven't changed -- especially the agency's odd view of public involvement. Like just about all segments of government in the Portland area, the PDC seems ever inclined to decide first and seeks broad public input later.

Case in point: the confab they've got planned for next Monday night (in a holiday week) that's styled as "a community meeting to discuss the future of urban renewal." Sounds at first like an open-ended and free-ranging town hall meeting, but when you get down to the fine print of the invitation, you see that it's far from that. In fact, it's "a briefing and discussion of the Future of Urban Renewal Initiative." Big difference.

"Briefing" means they're going to tell us a few things about what's already been decided. And what's already been decided is that there's going to be an "initiative." The goals and methods of that "initiative" have no doubt already been settled in some secret or obscure forum. And now that the train is on the track, they'll have some meetings at which the public will get to find out about it, and say what they think of it, all in the space of an hour. There'll be some suspiciously well-informed people gushing their praise of it, and most of those folks will be paid in one way or another to do so. Any critics will be thanked for their frankness. But no matter what the meeting attendees say, there are some deals here that are already as good as done.

Reading down a little further confirms that this is the posture we're in:

The PDC is seeking public input and discussion on a variety of issues including:

● What 61 acres should be added to the River District?

Notice, they don't care what you think about whether 61 acres ought to be added -- that's part of the done deal. But you do get to say which 61 acres you'd pick. Whoopdee doo.

Then there's this one:

● As part of the discussion about the 61 acres for the River District, can and should “satellite districts” be created elsewhere in the city that would be financially connected to the River District and thus allow spending some of the available funds elsewhere in the city, and if so, under what circumstances?
Give me a break. Though ever-so-abstractly stated in the PDC notice, we all know in very concrete terms what this one is about. It's "Opie" Sten's latest harebrained scheme, to spend urban renewal taxes from the Pearl District on a new school for the David Douglas School District, 10 miles away. It is one of this fellow's silliest pipe dreams yet -- and that's saying a lot -- and it's probably neither legal nor feasible. But hey, we are going to spend hundreds of thousands, if not millions, screwing around with it, and oh, yes, you might get to comment on some vague conceptual presentation of it for two minutes next Monday night if you want to.

And how about this one?

● Should more bonds be issued for projects in any of the expiring districts to accomplish community goals?
Does anyone in their right mind think that "no" is an answer that anyone at the PDC would consider, even jokingly, for even a second? I work Monday nights, but even if I didn't, I wouldn't waste time at a meeting where folks are going to pretend that that question is really on the table.

The meeting notice comes replete with a reminder of the "urban renewal" mission statement:

Urban renewal is a state-authorized, redevelopment and finance program designed to help communities improve and redevelop areas that are physically deteriorated, suffering economic stagnation, unsafe or poorly planned.
"Poorly planned" -- got that? If the city decides that your neighborhood is "poorly planned" -- even if it thinks it's doing fine -- they can condemn it, bulldoze it, and turn it over to the condo tower weasels, all in the name of "urban renewal."

Now, there's something I'd like to see on a meeting agenda sometime.

Comments (22)

Looks like the Westside Future of Urban Renewal meetings have been going on since September, at the very least.

I know in our neighborhood, they started surveying and seeking public input in July. The neighborhood stakeholder meetings have been going on since August.

So, perhaps you just weren't paying attention? I don't think the work of the people who were paying attention should be tossed aside just because a few late comers want to show up at the last minute and send everyone back to square one.

"If the city decides that your neighborhood is 'poorly planned' -- even if it thinks it's doing fine -- they can condemn it, bulldoze it, and turn it over to the condo tower weasels, all in the name of 'urban renewal.'

Passage of Measure 39 in 2006 would hopefully stop this scenario from occurring. It prohibits government from using eminent domain to take property from one private party and giving it to another private party. Details can be found at:

All of this is being perpetrated to perpetuate the high paid hierarchy at the PDC, their funding, their developer friends, 230 planners and the fiscally NON-sustainable mess they have created all over the city.
Having so extremely abused the municipal credit card of Urban Renewal (TIF financing) to the point of insanity, their only two choices are the loss of their stature and livelihood OR more insanity. Since they have no contraints on spending money to snow job along more insanity the choice is simple.

They proudly and smuggly make it and the newspapers, for the most part, pat them on the back.

I wonder if the PDC has already done some polling it will present to say something like, "a majority of citizens approve of these plans?" Adams used polling data at his dog and pony transportation tax/fee meetings. I still can't believe Portlanders would be willing to lavish this government in even more tax dollars while many of them are just treading water against inflation. But I'm probably wrong.

PDC has done some good things and some not so good things over the years. As with many well intentioned ideas, the implementation has sometimes been less than stellar.
Now the whole thing is too big, represents too much money, too much debt and is way too powerful. The organism is not about to give up anything. It must continue to feed itself in order to survive. Too bad...Perhaps the City Club should investigate again!


I just checked your blog's reading level and this story has moved you up to high school. Way to go. Keep up the good work and maybe you can join me at the genius level. LOL

By the way, great article. Maybe I should link to it to keep my ratings up there.

Best Regards,


they started surveying and seeking public input in July.

Maybe in some neighborhoods, with little or no publicity. There has been a series of meetings with Sten and Charles Wilhoite of the PDC board, but they never got into a wide open discussion of "the future of urban renewal."

And one thing is for darn sure -- no neighborhood ever said, in any way, shape, or form, that it wanted 61 more acres in the River District and a new school in David Douglas built out of urban renewal taxes. That was all decided in back rooms, where Sam the Tram, Sten, and Wilhoite cleared everything with their boss, Homer Williams.

Actually, there was quite a bit of publicity as well as blanket mailings in Lents. PDC staff was also soliciting comments and survey responses at multiple neighborhood events and was the headliner at a neighborhood association meeting.

Anyone who attended the amendment study meetings was aware of what was going on in the River District as it related to the options for expansion or increasing indebtedness in Lents. There's only so much acreage and funds to go around, so what happens in the River District effects the other URAs.

I serve on the Burnside Bridgehead Citizen Advisory Committee, and our November meeting was just cancelled...nothing happening. I DID get a call from the developer's rep after that they'd like to be on our neighborhood association's agenda, to explain, I imagine, why nothing's happening? (Whatever happened to that old notion of "fish or cut bait"?)

I think public involvement has become more important --and required-- but too often that means just being slicker about how to spin foregone conclusions. (Or like the 16 year old that wises up that replacing the purloined gin from the bottle with water is less obvious and less likely to get your ass grounded.)

Sometimes it's hard to decide whether to be angry or flattered when someone tries to spin me. Wouldn't it be nice, though, if we could just be more transparent with each other, and take pleasure from that?

the Westside Future of Urban Renewal meetings have been going on since September

Yes, but notice that suddenly the word "Westside" has mysteriously disappeared from the program. Now the whole city's apparently on the table.

The "Future of Urban Renewal" studies have been city-wide since they started. There are other substantial amendments, other than activities included in the "Westside" URAs that are under consideration, and they are included in the "future of urban renewal" activities. So, it's not "suddenly".

The major difference in the process is the structure of the advisory committees, which is much different for the older Westside URAs than it is for the neighborhood URAs like Lents. Public comment has been occurring for the the potential Lents URA amendment since late summer, and has been on the agendas for the Westside URA advisory committee since Sept 25th.

Anyone who is really concerned with the activities of any given URA should take the time to at least scan the meeting agendas. It's not that hard to get on the PDC listservs for individual URAs. Just sign up at their web site and pick your poison.

There are other substantial amendments, other than activities included in the "Westside" URAs that are under consideration, and they are included in the "future of urban renewal" activities.

I rest my case. Is the average person in Portland supposed to follow all that? The PDC wants our input like I want a hole in the head.

I consider myself pretty average, and I manage to keep up and give my input when the timing is appropriate.

What do you want a fruit basket and hand written invitation?

That's funny. You obviously work for the PDC or one of the developer weasels who run Portland. Or maybe the streetcar company.

I live in a dense slurry of Urban Renewal and urban decay. My spare time is spent trying to implement smart growth in a neighborhood that isn't known for being smart or growing. But, they're wrong about us. Just ask the folks down at the bus stop that are waiting for the 72. Life is exciting here in the URA, and I'm vying for a starring role in the night time drama, and the weekend drama...


Isnoful, "Disguises" as Jack states happens at PDC. Assuming I'm concerned, somehow find a meeting agenda, get off work, and find a parking space in torn-up NW Portland along the transit mall, here is what is likely to happen as the last URAC meeting demonstrated.

After a long agenda of reports from all kinds of bureaus, etc. representing several regional governmental agencies with no public input requested, the Parks Bureau gave a report to the URAC on how raising Service Development Charges (SDCs)for parks are warranted because Portland is 12th in charges for the metro area. They proposed adding $5,000 to the existing $3600 residential charged by parks. Plus they want to prorate SDCs even higher with percentage formulas for commercial/industrial projects. This will affect the price of affordable housing that was promised in SoWhat. Of course, we're all for parks. But then after several concerned comments were made by URAC members as to implications of the additional taxes, the committee almost moved to other business, except it was asked of PDC staff if they could express those concerns to the City Council. Staff thought maybe it could be done. Luckily there was a motion made and passed. There was almost not even an "advisory" input, even though URAC stands for Urban Renewal Advisory Committee. But, also noteworthy, there was not any citizen input requested.

Most URAC meetings are usually just reports with a heavy dose of "public relations" as exhibited by the Parks report, not "citizen involvement".

"What do you want a fruit basket and hand written invitation?"

At least a basket and letter would be real.

Unlike the PDC's interest in learning and considering public opinion.

If they had any interest in public opinion they would be providing basic information requested by Urban Renewal Citizen Advisory Committee members to provide feedback. Instead the PDC essentially, provides redacted pieces of information and partial budgets with no consistency or clarity for review.

Anyone who looks at budgets for a couple years of meetings will see how line items titles and numbers continually change making it impossible to know what is being spent for what reason.
When PDC staff is asked, they either obviscate or don't know what is going on.

If it wasn't so blatantly deliberate and self serving it would be hillarious.

Hoo-Rah !!! for Chuck. He just nailed it!

"to spend urban renewal taxes from the Pearl District on a new school for the David Douglas School District"

I really don't get why they have to do this thing so complexly unless they are trying for ledgerdemain on the public. Of course, politicians get confused to all heck also.

If CoP wants a new school in David Douglas, why not just take that $30M surplus this year, don't buy Homer's parking spaces and build something for $36M?

Tom Hayden was on Book TV this weekend talking about Iraq. He made the point that elected officials view everything as noise unless their offices are put at risk. I think that's the key to all of this. These shenanigans, which would bring indictments in some parts of the country, are unlikey to change until the players change.

If Erik Sten somehow advances his plan to use TIF money to build a new school in Davis Douglas, what is he going to say to all the other schools and worthy projects that are just as far removed from the URA as David Douglas? That's an insurmountable political problem.

As long as Erik pushes the plan all the way to the edge, without actually using TIF money for the school, he looks good almost everyone. Teachers and parents think he's the Robin Hood of Urban Renewal, taking money from the rich Pearl district to use for the poor school, and the people outside the URAs think he wants to spread the wealth around.

It all falls apart, though, if the plan actually goes into effect, because the same people will start asking for their own slice of the TIF pie for their own projects, and invariably, Erik will have to say no to almost everyone else. It would also drive a wedge between the Council and the PDC, because PDC won't have as much TIF money to sprinkle over its favored developers.

Using that logic, if anyone wants to see Erik Sten politically self-destruct, support his David Douglas idea.

Urban Renewal and TIF is in as good shape as OHSU. The PDC has been lying for years. More so now than ever.

It won't be long before the PDC comes out with their version of OHSU's "by the way we're broke and can't continue playing our games."

Of course the city is upside down, big time, yet Erik Sten and the rest of the council all the think the city has a surplus.

They can't even grasp and manage the most basic fiduciary responsibilities.

There isn't any pool of TIF money to tap. TIF is used soley to repay borrowed Urban Renewal money. Erik is simply proposing the City borrow more. Wow, genius!

But what about the previous UR comedy act?

Didn't the council vote, in knee jerk fasion, to divert 30% of all Urban Renewal spending to affordable houising?

Exactly how thin can they spread a declining revenue source and how hgih can they stack up debt which requires basic services general fund budgets to pay back?

Don't ask Tommy, Erik or the rest.

They wouldn't even know what you are talking about.


As a lawyer/blogger, I get
to be a member of:

In Vino Veritas

Lange, Pinot Gris 2015
Kiona, Lemberger 2014
Willamette Valley, Pinot Gris 2015
Aix, Rosé de Provence 2016
Marchigüe, Cabernet 2013
Inazío Irruzola, Getariako Txakolina Rosé 2015
Maso Canali, Pinot Grigio 2015
Campo Viejo, Rioja Reserva 2011
Kirkland, Côtes de Provence Rosé 2016
Cantele, Salice Salentino Reserva 2013
Whispering Angel, Côtes de Provence Rosé 2013
Avissi, Prosecco
Cleto Charli, Lambrusco di Sorbara Secco, Vecchia Modena
Pique Poul, Rosé 2016
Edmunds St. John, Bone-Jolly Rosé 2016
Stoller, Pinot Noir Rosé 2016
Chehalem, Inox Chardonnay 2015
The Four Graces, Pinot Gris 2015
Gascón, Colosal Red 2013
Cardwell Hill, Pinot Gris 2015
L'Ecole No. 41, Merlot 2013
Della Terra, Anonymus
Willamette Valley, Dijon Clone Chardonnay 2013
Wraith, Cabernet, Eidolon Estate 2012
Januik, Red 2015
Tomassi, Valpolicella, Rafaél, 2014
Sharecropper's Pinot Noir 2013
Helix, Pomatia Red Blend 2013
La Espera, Cabernet 2011
Campo Viejo, Rioja Reserva 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2013
Locations, Spanish Red Wine
Locations, Argentinian Red Wine
La Antigua Clásico, Rioja 2011
Shatter, Grenache, Maury 2012
Argyle, Vintage Brut 2011
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #16 Abacela, Fiesta Tempranillo 2014
Benton Hill, Pinot Gris 2015
Primarius, Pinot Gris 2015
Januik, Merlot 2013
Napa Cellars, Cabernet 2013
J. Bookwalter, Protagonist 2012
LAN, Rioja Edicion Limitada 2011
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 2009
Denada Cellars, Cabernet, Maipo Valley 2014
Marchigüe, Cabernet, Colchagua Valley 2013
Oberon, Cabernet 2014
Hedges, Red Mountain 2012
Balboa, Rose of Grenache 2015
Ontañón, Rioja Reserva 2015
Three Horse Ranch, Pinot Gris 2014
Archery Summit, Vireton Pinot Gris 2014
Nelms Road, Merlot 2013
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Pinot Gris 2014
Conn Creek, Cabernet, Napa 2012
Conn Creek, Cabernet, Napa 2013
Villa Maria, Sauvignon Blanc 2015
G3, Cabernet 2013
Chateau Smith, Cabernet, Washington State 2014
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #16
Willamette Valley, Rose of Pinot Noir, Whole Clusters 2015
Albero, Bobal Rose 2015
Ca' del Baio Barbaresco Valgrande 2012
Goodfellow, Reserve Pinot Gris, Clover 2014
Lugana, San Benedetto 2014
Wente, Cabernet, Charles Wetmore 2011
La Espera, Cabernet 2011
King Estate, Pinot Gris 2015
Adelsheim, Pinot Gris 2015
Trader Joe's, Pinot Gris, Willamette Valley 2015
La Vite Lucente, Toscana Red 2013
St. Francis, Cabernet, Sonoma 2013
Kendall-Jackson, Pinot Noir, California 2013
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Napa Valley 2013
Erath, Pinot Noir, Estate Selection 2012
Abbot's Table, Columbia Valley 2014
Intrinsic, Cabernet 2014
Oyster Bay, Pinot Noir 2010
Occhipinti, SP68 Bianco 2014
Layer Cake, Shiraz 2013
Desert Wind, Ruah 2011
WillaKenzie, Pinot Gris 2014
Abacela, Fiesta Tempranillo 2013
Des Amis, Rose 2014
Dunham, Trautina 2012
RoxyAnn, Claret 2012
Del Ri, Claret 2012
Stoppa, Emilia, Red 2004
Primarius, Pinot Noir 2013
Domaines Bunan, Bandol Rose 2015
Albero, Bobal Rose 2015
Deer Creek, Pinot Gris 2015
Beaulieu, Rutherford Cabernet 2013
Archery Summit, Vireton Pinot Gris 2014
King Estate, Pinot Gris, Backbone 2014
Oberon, Napa Cabernet 2013
Apaltagua, Envero Carmenere Gran Reserva 2013
Chateau des Arnauds, Cuvee des Capucins 2012
Nine Hats, Red 2013
Benziger, Cabernet, Sonoma 2012
Roxy Ann, Claret 2012
Januik, Merlot 2012
Conundrum, White 2013
St. Francis, Sonoma Cabernet 2012

The Occasional Book

Marc Maron - Waiting for the Punch
Phil Stanford - Rose City Vice
Kenneth R. Feinberg - What is Life Worth?
Kent Haruf - Our Souls at Night
Peter Carey - True History of the Kelly Gang
Suzanne Collins - The Hunger Games
Amy Stewart - Girl Waits With Gun
Philip Roth - The Plot Against America
Norm Macdonald - Based on a True Story
Christopher Buckley - Boomsday
Ryan Holiday - The Obstacle is the Way
Ruth Sepetys - Between Shades of Gray
Richard Adams - Watership Down
Claire Vaye Watkins - Gold Fame Citrus
Markus Zusak - I am the Messenger
Anthony Doerr - All the Light We Cannot See
James Joyce - Dubliners
Cheryl Strayed - Torch
William Golding - Lord of the Flies
Saul Bellow - Mister Sammler's Planet
Phil Stanford - White House Call Girl
John Kaplan & Jon R. Waltz - The Trial of Jack Ruby
Kent Haruf - Eventide
David Halberstam - Summer of '49
Norman Mailer - The Naked and the Dead
Maria Dermoȗt - The Ten Thousand Things
William Faulkner - As I Lay Dying
Markus Zusak - The Book Thief
Christopher Buckley - Thank You for Smoking
William Shakespeare - Othello
Joseph Conrad - Heart of Darkness
Bill Bryson - A Short History of Nearly Everything
Cheryl Strayed - Tiny Beautiful Things
Sara Varon - Bake Sale
Stephen King - 11/22/63
Paul Goldstein - Errors and Omissions
Mark Twain - A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court
Steve Martin - Born Standing Up: A Comic's Life
Beverly Cleary - A Girl from Yamhill, a Memoir
Kent Haruf - Plainsong
Hope Larson - A Wrinkle in Time, the Graphic Novel
Rudyard Kipling - Kim
Peter Ames Carlin - Bruce
Fran Cannon Slayton - When the Whistle Blows
Neil Young - Waging Heavy Peace
Mark Bego - Aretha Franklin, the Queen of Soul (2012 ed.)
Jenny Lawson - Let's Pretend This Never Happened
J.D. Salinger - Franny and Zooey
Charles Dickens - A Christmas Carol
Timothy Egan - The Big Burn
Deborah Eisenberg - Transactions in a Foreign Currency
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. - Slaughterhouse Five
Kathryn Lance - Pandora's Genes
Cheryl Strayed - Wild
Fyodor Dostoyevsky - The Brothers Karamazov
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt

Road Work

Miles run year to date: 5
At this date last year: 3
Total run in 2017: 113
In 2016: 155
In 2015: 271
In 2014: 401
In 2013: 257
In 2012: 129
In 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269

Clicky Web Analytics