Detail, east Portland photo, courtesy Miles Hochstein / Portland Ground.

For old times' sake
The bojack bumper sticker -- only $1.50!

To order, click here.

Excellent tunes -- free! And on your browser right now. Just click on Radio Bojack!

E-mail us here.


This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on December 1, 2006 7:59 AM. The previous post in this blog was Wave bye-bye. The next post in this blog is 7.2-Up. Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.



Law and Taxation
How Appealing
TaxProf Blog
Mauled Again
Tax Appellate Blog
A Taxing Matter
Josh Marquis
Native America, Discovered and Conquered
The Yin Blog
Ernie the Attorney
Above the Law
The Volokh Conspiracy
Going Concern
Bag and Baggage
Wealth Strategies Journal
Jim Hamilton's World of Securities Regulation
World of Work
The Faculty Lounge
Lowering the Bar
OrCon Law

Hap'nin' Guys
Tony Pierce
Parkway Rest Stop
Along the Gradyent
Dwight Jaynes
Bob Borden
Dingleberry Gazette
The Red Electric
Iced Borscht
Jeremy Blachman
Dean's Rhetorical Flourish
Straight White Guy
As Time Goes By
Dave Wagner
Jeff Selis
Alas, a Blog
Scott Hendison
The View Through the Windshield
Appliance Blog
The Bleat

Hap'nin' Gals
My Whim is Law
Lelo in Nopo
Attorney at Large
Linda Kruschke
The Non-Consumer Advocate
10 Steps to Finding Your Happy Place
A Pig of Success
Attorney at Large
Margaret and Helen
Kimberlee Jaynes
Cornelia Seigneur
And Sew It Goes
Mile 73
Rainy Day Thoughts
That Black Girl
Posie Gets Cozy
Cat Eyes
Rhi in Pink
Ragwaters, Bitters, and Blue Ruin
Rose City Journal
Type Like the Wind

Portland and Oregon
Isaac Laquedem
Rantings of a [Censored] Bus Driver
Jeff Mapes
Vintage Portland
The Portlander
South Waterfront
Amanda Fritz
O City Hall Reporters
Guilty Carnivore
Old Town by Larry Norton
The Alaunt
Bend Blogs
Lost Oregon
Cafe Unknown
Tin Zeroes
David's Oregon Picayune
Mark Nelsen's Weather Blog
Travel Oregon Blog
Portland Daily Photo
Portland Building Ads
Portland Food and
Dave Knows Portland
Idaho's Portugal
Alameda Old House History
MLK in Motion

Retired from Blogging
Various Observations...
The Daily E-Mail
Saving James
Portland Freelancer
Furious Nads (b!X)
Izzle Pfaff
The Grich
Kevin Allman
AboutItAll - Oregon
Lost in the Details
Worldwide Pablo
Tales from the Stump
Whitman Boys
Two Pennies
This Stony Planet
1221 SW 4th
I am a Fish
Here Today
What If...?
Superinky Fixations
The Rural Bus Route
Another Blogger
Mikeyman's Computer Treehouse
Portland Housing Blog

Wonderfully Wacky
Dave Barry
Borowitz Report
Stuff White People Like
Worst of the Web

Valuable Time-Wasters
My Gallery of Jacks
Litterbox, On the Prowl
Litterbox, Bag of Bones
Litterbox, Scratch
Ride That Donkey
Singin' Horses
Rally Monkey
Simon Swears
Strong Bad's E-mail

Oregon News
The Oregonian
Portland Tribune
Willamette Week
The Sentinel
Southeast Examiner
Northwest Examiner
Sellwood Bee
Mid-County Memo
Vancouver Voice
Eugene Register-Guard
OPB - Portland
Salem Statesman-Journal
Oregon Capitol News
Portland Business Journal
Daily Journal of Commerce
Oregon Business
Portland Info Net
McMinnville News Register
Lake Oswego Review
The Daily Astorian
Bend Bulletin
Corvallis Gazette-Times
Roseburg News-Review
Medford Mail-Tribune
Ashland Daily Tidings
Newport News-Times
Albany Democrat-Herald
The Eugene Weekly
Portland IndyMedia
The Columbian

The Beatles
Bruce Springsteen
Joni Mitchell
Ella Fitzgerald
Steve Earle
Joe Ely
Stevie Wonder
Lou Rawls

E-mail, Feeds, 'n' Stuff

Friday, December 1, 2006

A hideous stench

The dirt in that Portland Development Commission "linchpin" scam involving the Police Headquarters block is getting more interesting. Now it turns out that the PDC let the developer who wanted to acquire the property dictate how the appraiser hired by the PDC was going to appraise it -- all the way down to telling him which appraisal methodology to use. Here's how the O plays it today:

The documents released Wednesday show that Trammell Crow's Tom DiChiara drafted "appraisal instructions" for the public-private deal in May 2005. Those instructions included taking a project-specific "land residual" approach that resulted in the negative appraisal. Development commission officials edited the instructions and sent them to appraiser John Ingle, then of PGP Valuation.
The PDC might as well have forgone the appraisal altogether, and just let Trammell Crow name its price. To let the buyer determine the appraisal technique is preposterous -- if it isn't criminal, it ought to be.
But development commission officials said that working with the developer to reach agreement on the appraisal instructions is routine in public-private deals.
Wow. There's an interesting ethical system. "We do it all the time, so there can't be anything wrong with it."

And any appraiser who would let the client or the client's buyer tell him which appraisal method should be used is a... well, let's put it this way: That appraiser should go stand under a red light.

Just more evidence that the PDC should be converted into a regular city agency, where we can all keep a closer eye on it. Even if they make nicey-nicey for a while as a result of this scandal, it's just a matter of time before they revert to their old ways. It's called human nature. And Portland "urban renewal" is a huge but dangerously obscure pot of public money waiting to be stolen.

Comments (22)

I am pretty sure there are currently three votes on the council to put PDC reform on the ballot. I think council approval of the PDC budget is one of their goals, but I would like to see it go further than that. The PDC's original mission to restore economic vitality to blighted areas was a worthy endeavor... but greed and corruption have turned it into an organization that plunders tax dollars for core city services to line the pockets of the wealthy. Time to slay this beast.

Sam, Randy and Erik... let's get going on this!

Talk about your moral quandaries - we appeal to the Portland City Council as an agent for more responsive and responsible use of our tax dollars!


Interestingly, the most recent SWNI News reported that the West Portland Park Neighborhood Association adopted a resolution regarding city property dispositions that could prevent, at at least cut down on, shennagins like this.

The West Portland Neighborhood Association, in the context of supporting the Mt. Tabor Neighborhood Association, with respect to the sweetheart deal the city was getting ready to give Warner Pacific for the Mt. Tabor Yards property, adopted a resolution that asked the City Council to establsh a policy that in any sale, lease or other dispsition of real property the city require public bidding for all property dispositions, and that in any transaction the city get three separate appraisals, with the disposition price having to meet at least the average of the three apprasals.

A neighbrhood association is small potatoes in the world of the Scone and his friends and clients, but its nice to see that at the grass roots level parts of the usually blind and complacent west side are even beginning to pay attention. Interesting, too, to see a small westside neighborhood joining up with the concerns of an east side neighborhood. Then again, West Portland Park is sort of the Cully of the west side.

The neighborhood association's idea may be a little cumbersome, but an effective way to cut down on PDC shennagins.

Abolishing the PDC, now, is the best solution to the PDC land deals. Though, as the proposed Mt. Tabor deal shows, city government's capacity for cupidity and stupidity is not limited to the PDC.


Ha Ha... you're right... it is a little ironic. But the thing is three votes on the council can put a charter change on the ballot. The only other way to do it is through an initiative referendum. Much, much tougher to make it happen.

The mayor's been asking them to hold off pending the results of the charter review commission... but that turkey is DOA.

Another example of subsidies for high density, which is un-economic without subsidies.

Just one way the PDC shoves desnity down our throats and destroys neighborhoods.


Kudos to WesPoPark folks.

I think the key is that people are seeing unsavory activities occurring with nary a peep and can see that if the trend continues...well, it won't be in the public interest. And they are the public.

I appreciate the acknowledgement that neighborhood associations can be source of valid and useful criticism, verily steeped in concern.

Having the buyer dictate methodolgy may be a violation of appraisal ethics. If you can find the name of the appraiser, you could report them to the Oregon Appraiser Certification and Licensure Board.

Click here for the form:

"...any appraiser who would let the client or the client's buyer tell him which appraisal method should be used is a... well, let's put it this way: That appraiser should go stand under a red light." I couldn't agree more. This has conflict of interest written all over it. Sounds like a basis for a complaint to the appraisers licensing body.

The use of the word "linchpin" in the Big O's story this week brought about an audible giggle from me because I can no longer see that word without thinking "underpants." (See many earlier posts/comments on Bojack regarding the use of the word linchpin in reference to SoWhat). Thanks goes out to Bill McDonald I believed thought up the idea of replacing linchpin with underpants.

Now go back and read the title and opening sentence of Bojack's post and see if you don't at least guffaw. "Hideous stench" indeed.

I'm wondering if the term "appraisal methodology" used by the O is really what they're referring to. Seems to me there is a difference between "methodology" and telling the appraiser what requirements will be imposed on the property. Is this purely market value (i.e., what would it sell for on the open market)? Or is it the value if we impose x, y, and z requirements on the developer? Those values should be different.

What stinks about this deal is that the developer was involved in any way, and that PDC was looking for a low appraisal so they could give it away and get around any fair wage rules. If PDC was really operating like a business, they would want the property to be valued as highly as possible -- even with the requirements they are imposing. That's the surest sign that this decades-long PDC experiment is failing. . . and it's a direct result of no public accountability.

One other point that's getting lost amidst the questions of impropriety is the lack of a cost/benefit analysis indicating that PDC's requirements are a good idea. If you have a piece of land valued at $1.9 million, but your development requirements make it worth negative $1.9 million, your requirements have a $3.8 million cost. Where's the PDC analysis showing that the public would get at least $3.8 million in benefits?

In BoJacks yesterdays "linch pin scam" I posted about the PDC stench that filters from block 49 and 33 in North Macadam. The Portland Police block definately has quantifiable stench. But lets relate the money measurements of just Block 49 (Homer's Block).

It was bought by Homer for $1.2M one year before PDC recently purchased it for $5.7M(even the price jump in one year is stench) with all kinds of favorable conditions thrown in to benefit Homer. Like exclusive building rights-no bidding, we will pay whatever you demand; public pays for any toxic clean-up; taxbreaks for the affordable housing units; 50 free parking spaces; free commercial spaces on the ground floors, etc. Now,lets do some comparisions appraisel analysis like Portland Police block.

Also recently the Parks Bureau paid $7.1M for the NM park which is two blocks and one 60 ft street vacation in size: two and a third larger than Homers Block. Wouldn't you think that Homers Block should have cost the taxpayers of Portland (PDC) only $3.5M based on parks property across the street? Can't believe I am using the word "ONLY".

Not to belittle the Portland Police Block, but the stench is even higher for Block 49

The "stench" is getting to be too much, and we are also finding it in so many agencies. If we had "hit and miss" corruption, some sane people would say that is what we have to accept as a society. But it is not "hit and miss".

Major PDC reform must happen and consideration of its dismissal needs to be considered because these incidents have been going on a long time. As a long time active citizen in neighborhood politics, and even serving on the NM URAC, I wouldn't mind eliminating my job with PDC when it is dissolved.

Like Randy Leonard did yesterday in calling for his vote on the Iraq issue, even though City Council does not make national policy, I applaud our West Portland Park for taking a stand on property disposition concerning Mt. Tabor and outside of their "territory". Several times in the past 30 years SWNI has "warned" our "mealy-mouse" nieghborhood associations to "stay on course" with our own particular agendas. (City of Portland ONI even threatens taking funds away) I think the city-wide neigborhood assns. need to take on the PDC and corruptions in other agencies.

Comparing West Portland Park's opinion on East Portland to Randy Leonard's opinion on Iraq is a poor analogy.

Leonard's view on the Iraq War is more akin to West Portland Park's perspective on how maple syrup should be harvested in Maine. West Portlanders don't know anything about maple syrup, and (even if they did have something meaningful to say) it seems unlikely that Maine's maple tree farmers would give a rats-a$$ about West Portland Park's opinion.

Arrest the criminals, pave the streets, put out the fires, and clean the parks.
Leave the FBI and the DoD alone: they don't give a sh!t what Randy Leonard thinks...

Bruce, maybe I am not good as making analogies. I did not make an opinion if I personally thought Leonard's initiative was correct. I only met to say that even when an issue like "stench" that "hit and misses" our city in various forms, time period; we need to collectively say the "stench" is too much.

I would say for neighborhoods to speak up about "stench" collectively is much less a reach that Council's Iraq reach.

The West Portland Park Neighborhood Association's motion was in the context of my report from the Citywide Parks Team monthly meeting of parks volunteers, at which members of the Mt Tabor Neighborhood Association had alerted activists of the issue of the possible sale of part of Mt Tabor Park. WPP Board members and meeting participants agreed that any sale of public property anywhere in the city without proper appraisals and due process would set a bad precedent for all our public parkland. Credit is due to Jim McLaughlin, WPP NA Board member, for moving and crafting the language of the parks property motion.

WPP NA passed a similar motion regarding sale of school district property, but limiting that one to commenting on potential sales our own neighborhood, since that was the request from the SW Neighborhoods Schools Committee.

Hilsy, I too laughed when reading "linchpin" in the original Oregonian article.

I'm wondering if the term "appraisal methodology" used by the O is really what they're referring to. Seems to me there is a difference between "methodology" and telling the appraiser what requirements will be imposed on the property.

Miles, go blow your smoke elsewhere. The O clearly states that the appraiser was instructed to use a "land residual" approach to valuation. That is a valuation methodology by any definition, and this was a clear case of a cooked appraisal.

the appraiser was instructed to use a "land residual" approach to valuation

Reminds me of the "valuation" methodology that leaves the Zidell's with assessed values of $95,000 --and property taxes of less than $2,000-- for their 29 plus acres of property in South Waterfront.

The stink don't stop at PDC's doorstep...

Jerry: no offense intended. I think it's wonderful that westside residents care about what's happening on the eastside vis-a-vis city shennanigans.

If Commissioner Leonard spent more time listening to neighborhood associations (rather than grandstanding with his Big Issues/Deep Thinker reelection strategy), the CoP would be a better place to live.

Land Residual Procedure: Calculates land value by first estimating net income earned by a property and then subtracting income that can be attributed to the improvements, leaving a residual value attributable to the land.


Another souce describes this as a less desirable method. Using comp sales is considered better.


Why fight a good thing?

Accept the "independent" appraisal at face value . . . but then apply the standards the fed would apply to a bank when assessing the bank's financial soundness.

SO -- you say your assets have negative value (at least this one and maybe many more). OK then -- this means that your capital reserve requirements are not met and we must therefore immediately seek to shut you down or facilitate an overnight transfer (just as with the Resolution Trust Corporation dealings with S&L's) to a more sound entity such as Bank of America.

But given that the asset valuation is negative then it is clear that the government would not have to be on the hook to guarantee the "value" of the assets that are transferred as part of the overnight transfer.

Oh happy day.

This reveals as much about the skill and knowledge our present auditor as anything. I'll just pick my preferred methodology for my own audit. Would the appraiser then attack me as unethical? The ENTIRE Public-Private partnership thing is unethical, where the notion that a gift to any private entity so as to assure them profitability is by definition inherently impossible to square with the affirmative duty and loyalty of public officials to the public interest and thus fits the definition of absurd.

Suppose the PDC were to be enjoined from engaging in any activities that are typical of a financial institution, such as lending and investment. Would there be anything left of the PDC, other than as a non-binding advisory board with powers that are little more than that of a neighborhood association or a private citizen land use committee? That is, by way of exclusion of other descriptions of features of what the PDC is, it is in reality more like a bank than anything else.

One of the exceptions to the feds getting in the nose of the (public) PDC when offering banking services (or investment services) is itself premised on the absence of fraud. Karen and the FBI could send in SWAT teams to preserve documents from shedding machines and hard disk self-destruct routines as a precautionary measure as she brings the full power of the federal government down upon the heads of the local mob.

(Like Gilda -- Oh, "never mind.")

Ron Public-Private partnership
JK: If this is truly a partnership, where are the city's ownership papers? Stock certificates?


Phony appraisals are common in the public sector and the primary reason I voted against Metro's $200M bond measure to buy more open space land. Public officials simply can't resist the temptation to help their supporters and friends, and in the case of land purchase (or sale) transactions, they do this by having their bureaucrats tamper with the appraisal process. When buying land, public agencies have the appraisers come up with a higher than market value by dictating the use of unrealistic comps and assumptions, and when selling land, the agencies order the appraisers to use the same tactics to ensure appraisal reports come up with a lower than market value.

This PDC deal is peanuts compared to the potential shenanigans that Metro could perpetrate as it buys $250-300 million worth of land using the open spaces bond measure funds. And there is a history of abuse of appraisals at Metro, according to a report issued by its own auditor in 2000 or 2001. Metro officials never took action on some key recommendations in that audit report that would help prevent appraisal abuses.

The West Portland Park Neighbohood Association seems to be right on top of the local government land games if "Amanda's" report is correct.

The PPS Board, on November 30, 2006, cablecast a long board meeting. One item on that cablecast was a "resolution" growing out of a "conversation" with the Lincoln cluster folks about overcroding at Lincoln and boundaries for elementary and middle schools within the Lincoln cluster.

One of the PPS board members (guy with goatee ???), while discussing he "tesolution" opined that Lincoln was a suburban campus beng operated within a downtown city. He suggested that it was time to look at selling off or otherwise developing part of the Lincoiln site for commercial uses, and building more classrooms at Lincoln.

Here come the PDC style deals for developers with school property.

Markham, Stephenson and Jackson on the west side are also ripe for some idiots carving out and selling off chunks. So, too is Rieke.

Then again, at Rieke, a too small building with a too small population, in a system with room for 60,000+ students and a populaion of less than 45,000, the PPS board has committed to build more classrooms (portables) at Rieke.

Yeah, too much capacity, not enough funds,and not enough kids to fill the seats they already have yet PPS wants to add classrooms in multiple schools. Sounds like the finance genuises at General Motors.


As a lawyer/blogger, I get
to be a member of:

In Vino Veritas

Lange, Pinot Gris 2015
Kiona, Lemberger 2014
Willamette Valley, Pinot Gris 2015
Aix, Rosé de Provence 2016
Marchigüe, Cabernet 2013
Inazío Irruzola, Getariako Txakolina Rosé 2015
Maso Canali, Pinot Grigio 2015
Campo Viejo, Rioja Reserva 2011
Kirkland, Côtes de Provence Rosé 2016
Cantele, Salice Salentino Reserva 2013
Whispering Angel, Côtes de Provence Rosé 2013
Avissi, Prosecco
Cleto Charli, Lambrusco di Sorbara Secco, Vecchia Modena
Pique Poul, Rosé 2016
Edmunds St. John, Bone-Jolly Rosé 2016
Stoller, Pinot Noir Rosé 2016
Chehalem, Inox Chardonnay 2015
The Four Graces, Pinot Gris 2015
Gascón, Colosal Red 2013
Cardwell Hill, Pinot Gris 2015
L'Ecole No. 41, Merlot 2013
Della Terra, Anonymus
Willamette Valley, Dijon Clone Chardonnay 2013
Wraith, Cabernet, Eidolon Estate 2012
Januik, Red 2015
Tomassi, Valpolicella, Rafaél, 2014
Sharecropper's Pinot Noir 2013
Helix, Pomatia Red Blend 2013
La Espera, Cabernet 2011
Campo Viejo, Rioja Reserva 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2013
Locations, Spanish Red Wine
Locations, Argentinian Red Wine
La Antigua Clásico, Rioja 2011
Shatter, Grenache, Maury 2012
Argyle, Vintage Brut 2011
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #16 Abacela, Fiesta Tempranillo 2014
Benton Hill, Pinot Gris 2015
Primarius, Pinot Gris 2015
Januik, Merlot 2013
Napa Cellars, Cabernet 2013
J. Bookwalter, Protagonist 2012
LAN, Rioja Edicion Limitada 2011
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 2009
Denada Cellars, Cabernet, Maipo Valley 2014
Marchigüe, Cabernet, Colchagua Valley 2013
Oberon, Cabernet 2014
Hedges, Red Mountain 2012
Balboa, Rose of Grenache 2015
Ontañón, Rioja Reserva 2015
Three Horse Ranch, Pinot Gris 2014
Archery Summit, Vireton Pinot Gris 2014
Nelms Road, Merlot 2013
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Pinot Gris 2014
Conn Creek, Cabernet, Napa 2012
Conn Creek, Cabernet, Napa 2013
Villa Maria, Sauvignon Blanc 2015
G3, Cabernet 2013
Chateau Smith, Cabernet, Washington State 2014
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #16
Willamette Valley, Rose of Pinot Noir, Whole Clusters 2015
Albero, Bobal Rose 2015
Ca' del Baio Barbaresco Valgrande 2012
Goodfellow, Reserve Pinot Gris, Clover 2014
Lugana, San Benedetto 2014
Wente, Cabernet, Charles Wetmore 2011
La Espera, Cabernet 2011
King Estate, Pinot Gris 2015
Adelsheim, Pinot Gris 2015
Trader Joe's, Pinot Gris, Willamette Valley 2015
La Vite Lucente, Toscana Red 2013
St. Francis, Cabernet, Sonoma 2013
Kendall-Jackson, Pinot Noir, California 2013
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Napa Valley 2013
Erath, Pinot Noir, Estate Selection 2012
Abbot's Table, Columbia Valley 2014
Intrinsic, Cabernet 2014
Oyster Bay, Pinot Noir 2010
Occhipinti, SP68 Bianco 2014
Layer Cake, Shiraz 2013
Desert Wind, Ruah 2011
WillaKenzie, Pinot Gris 2014
Abacela, Fiesta Tempranillo 2013
Des Amis, Rose 2014
Dunham, Trautina 2012
RoxyAnn, Claret 2012
Del Ri, Claret 2012
Stoppa, Emilia, Red 2004
Primarius, Pinot Noir 2013
Domaines Bunan, Bandol Rose 2015
Albero, Bobal Rose 2015
Deer Creek, Pinot Gris 2015
Beaulieu, Rutherford Cabernet 2013
Archery Summit, Vireton Pinot Gris 2014
King Estate, Pinot Gris, Backbone 2014
Oberon, Napa Cabernet 2013
Apaltagua, Envero Carmenere Gran Reserva 2013
Chateau des Arnauds, Cuvee des Capucins 2012
Nine Hats, Red 2013
Benziger, Cabernet, Sonoma 2012
Roxy Ann, Claret 2012
Januik, Merlot 2012
Conundrum, White 2013
St. Francis, Sonoma Cabernet 2012

The Occasional Book

Marc Maron - Waiting for the Punch
Phil Stanford - Rose City Vice
Kenneth R. Feinberg - What is Life Worth?
Kent Haruf - Our Souls at Night
Peter Carey - True History of the Kelly Gang
Suzanne Collins - The Hunger Games
Amy Stewart - Girl Waits With Gun
Philip Roth - The Plot Against America
Norm Macdonald - Based on a True Story
Christopher Buckley - Boomsday
Ryan Holiday - The Obstacle is the Way
Ruth Sepetys - Between Shades of Gray
Richard Adams - Watership Down
Claire Vaye Watkins - Gold Fame Citrus
Markus Zusak - I am the Messenger
Anthony Doerr - All the Light We Cannot See
James Joyce - Dubliners
Cheryl Strayed - Torch
William Golding - Lord of the Flies
Saul Bellow - Mister Sammler's Planet
Phil Stanford - White House Call Girl
John Kaplan & Jon R. Waltz - The Trial of Jack Ruby
Kent Haruf - Eventide
David Halberstam - Summer of '49
Norman Mailer - The Naked and the Dead
Maria Dermoȗt - The Ten Thousand Things
William Faulkner - As I Lay Dying
Markus Zusak - The Book Thief
Christopher Buckley - Thank You for Smoking
William Shakespeare - Othello
Joseph Conrad - Heart of Darkness
Bill Bryson - A Short History of Nearly Everything
Cheryl Strayed - Tiny Beautiful Things
Sara Varon - Bake Sale
Stephen King - 11/22/63
Paul Goldstein - Errors and Omissions
Mark Twain - A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court
Steve Martin - Born Standing Up: A Comic's Life
Beverly Cleary - A Girl from Yamhill, a Memoir
Kent Haruf - Plainsong
Hope Larson - A Wrinkle in Time, the Graphic Novel
Rudyard Kipling - Kim
Peter Ames Carlin - Bruce
Fran Cannon Slayton - When the Whistle Blows
Neil Young - Waging Heavy Peace
Mark Bego - Aretha Franklin, the Queen of Soul (2012 ed.)
Jenny Lawson - Let's Pretend This Never Happened
J.D. Salinger - Franny and Zooey
Charles Dickens - A Christmas Carol
Timothy Egan - The Big Burn
Deborah Eisenberg - Transactions in a Foreign Currency
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. - Slaughterhouse Five
Kathryn Lance - Pandora's Genes
Cheryl Strayed - Wild
Fyodor Dostoyevsky - The Brothers Karamazov
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt

Road Work

Miles run year to date: 5
At this date last year: 3
Total run in 2017: 113
In 2016: 155
In 2015: 271
In 2014: 401
In 2013: 257
In 2012: 129
In 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269

Clicky Web Analytics